Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies encountered in boys. The reported incidence of hypospadias is 1 in 150–300 live births. It is diagnosed by the classic triad of the hooded prepuce, ventral advancement of the urethral meatus, and ventral penile curvature signifying the arrest in the penile development. The goal of primary hypospadias repair includes correction of penile curvature, advancement of urethral meatus to ensure satisfactory passage of urine and semen through the glans, and creation of a cosmetically pleasing penis. The repair techniques can be broadly categorized as procedures utilizing local skin flaps, preputial and extragenital tissue grafts/flaps, and urethral tubularization. More than 200 variations of hypospadias repair have been described in English literature, among which the tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty, introduced by Warren Snodgrass in 1994, has revolutionized the surgical management of hypospadias.[1,2] This technique aims to correct distal hypospadias with minimal chordee by tubularizing the incised urethral plate. The fundamental step of this procedure is a deep longitudinal incision of the native urethral plate, which allows tubularization without the need for additional flaps or grafts. The Snodgrass repair has gained worldwide acceptance for primary distal and even for selected cases of primary proximal hypospadias. A survey among pediatric urologists identified that the TIP technique was preferred in more than 90% of cases of distal and 80% of midshaft hypospadias repair. There is consensus on using absorbable sutures for neourethra creation during hypospadias repair; however, no specific guidelines for the suturing technique in hypospadias repair are available.
Despite the apparent surgical success of TIP, few complications still exist. Although these complications are few, they can be evaluated and eliminated if they relate to the suturing technique. Neourethra is created with absorbable sutures using either continuous suturing (CS) or interrupted (intermittent) suturing (IS). Although Snodgrass et al. reported no difference in outcomes regardless of the suturing technique, results from other authors such as Samir et al. and Gafar et al. have incited us to look into the significance of suturing technique. Ulman et al. first reported that the subcuticular continuous suture technique was associated with a lower incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) in Mathieu repair. Gupta et al. reported that suturing technique had no significant effect on complications following Snodgrass repair. Variations in the surgical techniques can affect the functional outcome of hypospadias repair. As both CS and IS techniques are variably used, this study systematically compares the reported outcomes of both techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A preliminary literature search was done in PubMed Central to confirm the absence of similar published meta-analyses. A systematic, detailed search was carried out in the electronic database including MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Scopus, and Google Scholar by two authors (CT and AD) independently till May 2022. The Clinical Trial Registry (clinicaltrials.gov) and the major conference proceedings were searched till May 2022, with no language restrictions. Searches were rerun before the final analysis. The search terms used were (continuous suturing OR interrupted suturing OR intermittent suturing) AND (tubularized incised plate urethroplasty OR Snodgrass urethroplasty). Hand searches were also conducted along with related references listed in the studies.
Randomized control trials and comparative studies were included in our meta-analysis. Participants/population was defined as patients who have undergone Snodgrass urethroplasty. The intervention was CS and the comparator was IS. The inclusion criteria were the patients who had undergone Snodgrass urethroplasty. The patients undergoing hypospadias repair by techniques other than the Snodgrass technique, Snodgrass repair performed for secondary hypospadias, and stentless urethroplasty were excluded. The primary outcome measures were the development of complications like UCF and meatal stenosis. The secondary outcome measures were wound infection, urethral stricture, and operative time.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors (S.S. and N.B.) independently reviewed for abstract and title of the identified article. All potentially relevant articles were reviewed as full text. Whenever there were differences in opinion, it was resolved by a third author (D.M.).
The critical appraisal of methodological quality was performed by two authors (C.T. and D.M.) using the Modified Downs and Black scale. We also measured the Kappa coefficient to estimate the inter-rater reliability for included studies for the Downs and Black scale.
After the selection of the relevant studies, data extraction was performed by two authors (S.S. and A.D.) independently. The baseline information of each study (information of the author, year of publication), number of patients in each study, number of patients in each group, mean/median age, and age range of the included patients along with the abovementioned outcomes were extracted in a data extraction table using MS Excel (version 16.16.27). The inter-observer discrepancies were resolved through consensus and consultation with the senior author (N.B.).
Risk of bias assessment
This assessment was done by two authors (N.B. and C.T.) independently using the Cochrane collaboration’s tool for randomized studies.
Dichotomous outcome effects were expressed as risks ratio (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous outcome variable effects were expressed as a mean difference with 95% CI. The individual was the preferred unit of analysis. The heterogeneity of the studies was identified by visual assessment of the CI of the studies in the forest plot (eyeball test). Heterogeneity was examined explicitly with I2 statistics. A rough guide to the interpretation of I2 in the context of meta-analyses of randomized trials is as follows: 0%–40%: might not be significant; 30%–60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity, 50%–90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity, and 75%–100%: considerable heterogeneity.
The literature search yielded a total of 211 studies. The PRISMA flow diagram demonstrates our search and selection process [Figure 1]. After removing the duplicate studies, 182 records were screened for title and abstract. A total of 11 articles were retrieved for full-text screening, following which only five randomized studies were included for the evaluation.
Study characteristics – the characteristics of the included study is summarized in Table 1.
Five studies[6,7,9,15,16] met our inclusion criteria, including 521 children (258 in the CS group and 263 in the IS group).
Risk of bias within the studies
A trial by Samir et al. has shown a low risk of bias across random sequence generation, blinding of outcome assessment, and selective reporting. Gupta et al. has shown low risk across all domains except blinding of the participants. The allocation concealment was mentioned only by Gafar et al. and Gupta et al., which is unclear for the other three studies. All included studies generated a random sequence for allocation of the participants.
Results of individual studies
Postoperative complications reported in each study are summarized in Table 2.
Methodological quality assessment
Modified Down and Black scores assigned to each study by two authors are depicted in Table 3. The score ranges from 15 to 25. The study by Samir et al. has the maximum score, and the study by Shibli MMR et al. has the least score. There is a very high inter-rater agreement between rater 1 and rater 2 with a Kappa of 0.99.
The development of postoperative UCF has been reported in all the included studies. All studies have provided split data among the CS and IS groups for Snodgrass repair, except for Sarhan et al. who reported eight UCF among the 80 participants without division among the groups. In the other four studies, there were 28 UCF in 218 patients (12.84%) in the CS group and 17 UCF in 223 patients (7.6%) in the IS group. The UCF division between IS and CS groups has not been reported by Sarhan et al., leading to the noninclusion of this study in the pooled analysis. Pooled analysis of the rest four studies[6,7,9,16] showed no significant difference in the incidence of UCF among IS and CS groups (RR 1.68, 95% CI: 0.95–3.38). There was no significant heterogeneity observed between the studies (I2 = 21%) [Figure 2.1]. Among all four studies included for the pooled analysis, three studies[6,9,16] have used polyglactin as the suture of choice for neourethra construction. In contrast, Gafar et al. used polydioxanone for neourethra construction. We have excluded this study of Gafar et al. from the subgroup analysis of polyglactin suture in Snodgrass urethroplasty. Among the three studies,[6,9,16] there were 27 UCF in 178 patients (15.16%) in the CS group and 14 UCF in 183 patients (7.6%) in the IS group. Pooled analysis of these studies in which polyglactin was used for neourethra construction suggests that there is less incidence of UCF in the IS group (RR 1.97, 95% CI: 1.97–3.61, P = 0.03). There was no heterogeneity observed between the studies (I2 = 0%) [Figure 2.2].
Gafar et al. reported an increased incidence of UCF in the IS group compared to the CS group with polydioxanone sutures, but the difference was statistically insignificant.
Meatal stenosis has been reported in all five studies. Sarhan et al. reported three patients developing MS among the 80 participants in their study. They have not specified their patients’ group-wise (CS and IS) incidence of MS. Hence, this study was not considered for pooled analysis. In the rest four studies, the incidence of MS was eight (3.6%) in the CS group (n = 218) and six (2.6%) in the IS group (n = 223). Pooled analysis of these four studies[6,7,9,16] showed no significant difference in the incidence of MS among IS and CS groups (RR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.49–3.61). There was no heterogeneity observed between the studies (I2 = 0%). Three of the four studies included pooled analysis and used polyglactin for neourethra construction. The study by Gafar et al. was excluded from the subgroup analysis of MS due to the use of polydioxanone sutures. In the other three studies,[6,9,16] the incidence of MS was eight (4.4%) in the CS group (n = 178) and four (2.2%) in the IS group (n = 183). Pooled analysis of the studies in which polyglactin was used for neourethra construction showed no significant difference in the incidence of MS among IS and CS groups (RR 2.04, 95% CI: 0.63–6.60). There was no observed heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 0%). Gafar et al. reported the incidence of MS only in the IS group but with no statistically significant difference in the two groups using polydioxanone sutures in TIP.
Fifty-three (20.5%) complications among the 258 patients in the CS group and 41 (15.8%) complications among the 263 patients in the IS group were observed. Pooled analysis of all five studies showed no significant difference in total complication rates among both the groups (RR 1.32, 95% CI: 0.91–1.91); however, there is substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 55%) [Figure 2.3]. We performed a subgroup analysis of four studies that have used polyglactin for neourethra construction. We have excluded the study of Gafar et al. due to the use of polydioxanone. We calculated a total of 52/218 (23.8%) complications in the CS group and 34/223 (15.2%) complications in the IS group. Pooled analysis showed that total complications are less in the IS group (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.06–2.30) with insignificant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 21%) [Figure 2.4].
Only two studies have reported this complication. Gupta et al. reported one patient with stricture in each group, whereas Samir et al. reported strictures in two patients in the CS group and one in the IS group. Pooled analysis of these two studies shows no significant difference regarding stricture formation among the groups (RR 1.54, 95% CI: 0.26–9.05).
Partial superficial wound infection (PSWI): this complication was reported in three studies. Samir et al. reported three patients with PSWI in each group. Gupta et al. reported one PSWI in each group, whereas Gafar et al. reported two PSWI in the IS group. Pooled analysis of these two studies shows no significant difference regarding PSWI among the groups (RR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.22–2.32).
Gafar et al. and Gupta et al. have reported mean operative time. We observed a vast difference between the reported mean time of both. Both studies have reported that the difference between mean operative time in the IS and the CS group was statistically insignificant.
Although the studies had reported glans dehiscence, we have not included it in the pooled analysis, as a recent review identified various other factors responsible for glans dehiscence apart from the suture technique.
Snodgrass urethroplasty is one of the most versatile techniques among the described techniques for hypospadias. It is an easily reproducible technique with good cosmetic results. There is no consensus on the suturing technique in Snodgrass urethroplasty. Various suturing techniques have also been studied in bowel anastomosis, brachiocephalic anastomosis, hepaticojejunostomy, and oral and nasal mucosal repair.[18-21] The results of these studies are pretty variable, not favoring any one technique. Theoretically, CS takes less time for suturing than IS but can have a higher complication rate due to tissue strangulation and ischemia due to tissue entrapment between the running sutures.
This meta-analysis is the first comprehensive evidence of the currently available comparison between the IS and CS techniques for creating neourethra in Snodgrass urethroplasty. Only five studies met the inclusion criteria set for our meta-analysis, involving a total of 521 children. When we consider the included studies for pooled analysis of total complications, the result suggests that the total complications are more in the CS group; however, the difference between the groups (IS and CS) is not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis for total complications in the four studies using polyglactin for neourethra creation suggests that total complications are less in the IS group with insignificant heterogeneity.
The incidence of UCF in the CS group is 12.84% and 7.6% in the IS group. The incidence of UCF between the IS and the CS group was not separately reported by Sarhan et al., leading to noninclusion in the pooled analysis. Pooled analysis of the four studies showed no significant difference in the incidence of UCF among the IS and the CS group, even though the incidence of UCF is higher in the CS group with no significant heterogeneity. Gafar et al. used polydioxanone, whereas the other three studies used polyglactin for neourethra creation. The subgroup analysis of the three studies suggests a reduced incidence of UCF among the IS group, with no heterogeneity observed between the studies.
Pooled analysis of four studies excluding Sarhan et al. and subgroup analysis of three studies excluding Gafar et al. for MS does not show any statistically significant difference between the (IS and CS) groups. Pooled analysis of the studies for other complications like stricture and PSWI shows no statistically significant difference.
Limitation and strength of the study
Out of the five studies recruited for this metanalysis, three are from Egypt (Africa), and the rest two are from Asia (India and Bangladesh). We were unable to find similar studies from other continents.
Only one of the included studies has reported polydioxanone for neourethra creation, leading to its exclusion from the subgroup analysis. Our study has a moderate risk of bias with selective reporting of few secondary outcomes.
Another limitation is the smaller number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the meta-analysis. Only five RCTs were available for the pooled outcome analysis and four for other subgroup analyses. Hence, the results based on pooled analysis should be used with caution due to the smaller number of available RCTs.
The strength of our meta-analysis is the inclusion of only RCTs, considered the best available form of evidence in the literature.
This meta-analysis shows no significant difference in the total complication rates, including UCF in the CS and the IS groups with absorbable suture use in Snodgrass urethroplasty. Our meta-analysis shows a reduction in the incidence of total complications and UCF in the IS group when polyglactin suture is used for urethroplasty.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Long CJ, Zaontz MR, Canning DA Hypospadias Partin AW, Dmochowski RR, Kavoussi LR, Peters CA Campbell-Walsh Urology 12th ed Philadelphia Elsevier 2020 4041–197.
2. Snodgrass W Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994; 151:464–5.
3. Pfistermuller KL, McArdle AJ, Cuckow PM Meta-analysis
of complication rates of the tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair. J Pediatr Urol 2015; 11:54–9.
4. Cook A, Khoury AE, Neville C, Bagli DJ, Farhat WA, Pippi Salle JL A multicenter evaluation of technical preferences for primary hypospadias repair. J Urol 2005; 174:2354–7.
5. Snodgrass WT, Bush N, Cost N Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair for distal hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol 2010; 6:408–13.
6. Samir M, Mahmoud MA, Azazy S, Tawfick A Does the suturing technique
(continuous versus interrupted) have an impact on the outcome of tubularized incised plate in hypospadias repair with adequate urethral plate?A prospective randomized study. J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:519 e1-7.
7. Gafar AM Two different suturing techniques in distal hypospadias repair using tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. Ann Pediatr Surg 2013; 9:117–21.
8. Ulman I, Erikçi V, Avanoğlu A, Gökdemir A The effect of suturing technique
and material on complication rate following hypospadias repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7:156–7.
9. Gupta A, Gupta R, Srivastav P, Gupta A Comparison of interrupted-and continuous-suture urethroplasty in tubularised incised-plate hypospadias repair:A prospective study. Arab J Urol 2017; 15:312–8.
10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement:An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372:n71.
11. Hooper P, Jutai JW, Strong G, Russell-Minda E Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation:a systematic review. Can J Ophthalmol 2008; 43:180–7 doi:10.3129/i08-001.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159–74.
13. Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JA Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Ver. 6.3 Chichester (UK) Cochrane 2022 Available from:http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
[Last updated on 2022 Feb].
14. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analyses Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Ver. 6.3 Chichester (UK) Cochrane 2022 Available from:http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
[Last updated on 2022 Feb].
15. Sarhan O, Saad M, Helmy T, Hafez A Effect of suturing technique
and urethral plate characteristics on complication rate following hypospadias repair:A prospective randomized study. J Urol 2009; 182:682–5.
16. Shibli M, Hoque S, Shahinoor A, Akan M, Zabeen S Short term outcome of urethroplasty for distal hypospadias with interrupted suture compared to continuous suture. J Paediatr Surg Bangladesh 2013; 2:26–30.
17. Karabulut R, Turkyilmaz Z, Atan A, Kaya C, Sonmez K What are the factors affecting glanular dehiscence after hypospadias surgery?. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 2022; 46:4–15.
18. Brunner M, Stockheim J, Krautz C, Raptis D, Kersting S, Weber GF, et al. Continuous or interrupted suture technique for hepaticojejunostomy?A national survey. BMC Surg 2018; 18:84.
19. Ahmed O, Afzal Y, Beg MS, Siddiqui AS, Iqbal FM Comparison of the interrupted and continuous suture techniques for the closure of oral and nasal mucosal layers in cleft palate surgery. Cureus 2021; 13:e20779.
20. Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 2013; 148:190–201.
21. Aitken E, Jeans E, Aitken M, Kingsmore D A randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous suturing techniques for radiocephalic fistulas. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62:1575–82.