De novo renal carcinoma rarely occurs in kidney grafts, with an incidence rate ranging from 9 to 11 cases per 100 000 patient-years, and accounts for 0.3% of the tumors in transplanted patients.1,2 Treatment usually includes nephron-sparing surgery or radical graft nephrectomy. Among patients with a metastatic disease, a 50% fatal outcome is generally observed despite immunosuppression withdrawal, graft nephrectomy, cytotoxic therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy.1-3 The management of de novo donor-derived metastatic tumors remains poorly defined, with only a few case reports in the literature.4,5 In the spectrum of renal carcinoma, collecting duct carcinoma or Bellini duct carcinoma represents a rare subset, different from the classic renal cell carcinoma, and accounting for 0.4% to 2% of cases.6,7 It is an aggressive tumor with 30% of patients having distant metastases at the time of diagnosis.6 Overall, metastatic collecting duct carcinoma is characterized by poor prognosis and a resistance to systemic chemotherapy with median survival ranging from 5 to 11 months.8,9 Over the past few years, it has been hypothesized that renal cell and collecting duct carcinomas could be linked to BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) in transplanted patients.5,10-14 BKPyV-associated nephropathy (PyVAN-B) complicates 8% (range, 1% to 15%) of kidney transplant recipients causing premature graft loss in 10% to 50% of cases.15
We report the successful management of a kidney-pancreas recipient who developed de novo multimetastatic donor-derived collecting duct carcinoma. We found the presence of large tumor antigen (LTag) in the primary tumor and metastases and multiple BKPyV integrations into the genome of tumor cells. The patient developed a strong and sustained host-versus-graft, -tumor, and -BKPyV cellular response, which was enhanced by immunosuppression withdrawal and interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy. We detected a peripheral expansion of donor-specific CD8+ T cells and activated NKp30+ NKp46+ natural killer (NK) cells and a specific anti-BKPyV T cell response.
A 41-year-old nonsmoking woman with type I diabetes since the age of 10 received a combined kidney-pancreas allograft from a 20-year-old male donor who died of cerebral trauma (neurologically determined death). The posttransplant period was uneventful; euglycemia was rapidly achieved, insulin treatment was discontinued, and the patient was discharged with creatinine levels of 1.37 mg/dL (Figure 1A). Induction therapy consisted in antithymocyte globulin (d 0 to d 3) and methylprednisolone (steroids were tapered down then withdrawn over a period of 6 wk), and maintenance in a tacrolimus-sirolimus combination. Drug levels were monitored daily in the immediate postoperative period (until discharge), once a week in the month following discharge, and once a month thereafter. Tacrolimus goals were 8–12 ng/mL for the first 6 months and then 7–10 ng/mL (trough levels are shown in Figure 1A). She received an initial 6-month course of valganciclovir because of donor+/recipient– cytomegalovirus (CMV) serologies. One-year posttransplantation, she developed asymptomatic CMV primoinfection, successfully treated with intravenous ganciclovir and anti-CMV antibodies. Two years’ posttransplant, creatinine levels increased from 1.20 to 1.82 mg/dL. A renal biopsy demonstrated a PyVAN-B. A positive BKPyV-DNAemia up to 1.4 × 107 copies/mL was also detected (Figure 1A). BKPyV-DNAemia returned to undetectable values 1 year after switching to tacrolimus monotherapy. At that time, sirolimus reintroduction was attempted but led to recurrence of BKPyV-DNAemia. The 2-year control biopsy showed chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis with undetectable LTag staining.
Nine-year posttransplant, a routine ultrasound (performed yearly at our institution) revealed the presence of a cortical cyst within the transplanted kidney. Two successive MRIs confirmed the presence of a Bosniak IIF cyst extending into of the hilum that enlarged from 2 to 9 cm within 6 months. A positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) scan showed a renal mass (maximum standardized uptake value of 13.0) and multiple hypermetabolic lesions in the peritoneal cavity, mesentery, iliac lymph nodes, and lungs suggesting a metastatic kidney malignancy (Figure 1B). Graft nephrectomy was performed and biopsies of small bowel/lymph nodes/greater omentum metastases were taken. Histopathology revealed a metastatic, donor-derived, collecting duct carcinoma, stage pT3a pN1 pM1 (Figure 1C). The donor being male, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was performed, showing a XY karyotype, thus confirming donor’s origin of the tumor (Figure 1D). Three weeks after surgery, a new PET/CT scan showed a rapid progression of the disease with an increase in size of iliac, peritoneal and mesenteric lesions, and appearance of new hepatic and thoracic lesions (Figure 1B).
In the absence of efficient chemotherapy options, a host-versus-graft/tumor response strategy was pursued. To that end, immunosuppression was withdrawn and IL-2 was administered at 6 million IU subcutaneously qd (5d/7) for 3 months. IL-2 side effects included fever, shivering, redness at the sites of injection, transient bilateral pleural effusion, and a 20 kg weight loss. During the treatment course, the patient was taken off IL-2 during 3 weeks due to the severity of the side effects. She returned to dialysis and insulin therapy was reintroduced 2 months after nephrectomy (Figure 1A). Six months after the cessation of immunosuppression, she presented with a spontaneous rupture of pseudoaneurysm of the pancreas arterial anastomosis, requiring emergency surgical exploration for hemostasis. Of note, only an atrophic pancreatic graft remnant could be identified during the surgery, this speaking in favor of a complete immune rejection. The 3- and 6-month PET/CT scans showed regression of peritoneal, liver, and lung metastatic lesions and all hypermetabolic lesions disappeared at the 14-month PET/CT control and remained so at 60 months follow-up (Figure 1B). After 6-year follow-up, the patient is alive, on hemodialysis and insulin therapy, without evidence of cancer. Of note, none of the 3 other recipients from the same donor (heart, right kidney, and liver) developed malignancies.
A 4.5-fold increase in tumor size was observed within 6 months. Histopathology of the explanted kidney confirmed the diagnosis of a collecting duct carcinoma with areas of tumor necrosis, multiple lymphovascular invasions, and invasion of surrounding structures (ovary, muscle). Tumor cells stained positive for total keratin, cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20, paired box gene 8, and integrase interactor 1; and negative for carbonic anhydrase 9 (renal cell carcinoma), p63, Wilms' tumor 1, cytokeratin (CK)5.6, CK14, CK903, octamer-binding transcription factor 4, and HLA-DR (Figure S1, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/B888). No B or T lymphocyte infiltration or C4d deposition was seen in the tumor (Figure S2, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/B888). A mild macrophage (CD68+ cells) infiltrate was observed.
Immunohistochemistry was positive for simian virus 40 (SV40)-LTag and the diagnosis of PyVAN-B was made. In addition, LTag-expression was demonstrated in the primary tumor and metastases (Figure 2A–C). Staining for the BKPyV major capsid protein Vp1 was negative in the tumor tissues. A whole genome sequencing of the tumor found multiples BKPyV integration sites in chromosome 2, 4, 6, 9, and X (Figure 2D). On chromosome 9, 11 multiple viral reads were clustered in <800 bp length. We incidentally found sequences of the human papillomavirus 18 and Staphylococcus phage G1 integrations on chromosome 8 and 18, respectively. High BKPyV-specific IgG titers were detected as well as transiently elevated IgM during BKPyV nephropathy (Figure 2E). Five years after diagnosis, the patient showed BKPyV-specific CD8+ T cell responses after direct stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using 97 immunodominant 9mer peptide pool derived from the early viral gene region (60 interferon [IFN]–γ spot-forming units/106 PBMCs) (Figure 2F). The response was also detected following in vitro expansion and stimulation with 97 immunodominant 9mer peptide pool (253 spot-forming units/106 PBMCs). These data suggest that BKPyV incorporated its genome in donor-derived renal cells despite humoral immunity. The omnipresence of BKPyV in the tumor is in line with the notion that viral DNA integration in the tumor cells led to persistent upregulation of early gene proteins in the absence of chronic active replication.
Cellular-mediated Antitumor Response
We characterized the immune infiltrate of the pancreatic remnant specimen taken at the time of pseudoaneurysm rupture, that is, 6 months after immunosuppression withdrawal (Figure 3A). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed some rare positive XY cells (donor) within the granulation tissue suggesting that it may represent the rejected pancreatic graft remnant (Figure 3B). Histology and immunohistochemistry analysis showed a cellular infiltration of CD8+, CD4+ T cells, and CD68+ macrophages (Figure 3C–F). C4d deposition, IgG, and IgM deposition were negative with only a few CD20+ B cells present speaking against an active humoral response (Figure 3H and I). Class-I donor-specific antibodies were mostly negative except for 2 positive testing in 2010 of 2012 (before tumor diagnosis) and remained negative. Class-II donor-specific antibodies were always negative. Mixed lymphocyte reaction demonstrated donor-specific proliferation of PBMCs as well as activation of CD8+ T cells 1 and 2 weeks after IL-2 treatment initiation compared to third party donors (Figure 3J–L). At the 14-month follow-up testing, the activation of CD8+ T cells was not detectable (Figure 3K), while the alloreactive proliferation is still detectable, although to a lesser extent (Figure 3L).
Peripheral Activation of T Cells and Natural Killer Cells
During IL-2 therapy, we observed an increase in absolute numbers of CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells up to 1.7-, 2.3-, and 11.4-fold, respectively (Figure 1A). HLA-DR expression on T cells increased from 6% to 44% as early as 1 week after IL-2 treatment. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the percentage of cytokine-producing bright NK cells increased up to 56% during IL-2 therapy (Figure 1A). NK cells upregulated the natural cytotoxic receptors NKp30 and NKp46, both associated with antitumor response (Figure 3M and N).
We describe the treatment and remission of a metastatic donor-derived BKPyV-associated collecting duct carcinoma with IL-2-based immunotherapy and immunosuppression withdrawal.
The treatment of metastatic collecting duct carcinoma is heterogeneous and various and largely unsuccessful options have been described, including gemcitabine, cisplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, IFN-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2.16 Immune checkpoint inhibitors were recently added to this list.17 Among these, IL-2 was 1 of the first anticancer immunotherapy and was approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic melanoma in the 90’s by the Food and Drug Administration.18 Historically, salvage therapies included IL-217,19 and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation20 which allowed a complete response in <10% of the cases. However, IL-2 lost favor due to its toxic side effect profile. Currently, the role of IL-2 is reemerging as first-line immunotherapy18 in combination with cell-based immunotherapy, peptide vaccines, and other chemotherapeutic agents. Studies using IL-2 in combination with anti-programmed cell death 1, entinostat, or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are currently underway, recruiting, and treating patients (eg, NCT02926053, NCT01884961, NCT03260504, NCT02306954, NCT03474497, and NCT03991130). The clinical decision, to administer IL-2, in the context of a particularly aggressive tumor type, was taken, because immunosuppression withdrawal alone cannot prevent tumor recurrence in a significant proportion of de novo1,11 and transmitted21 donor-derived tumors. The 3 potential mechanisms by which the patient cleared the tumor include (1) alloimmune rejection,22 (2) antitumor response, and (3) antiviral response. Given the pleiotropic effects of IL-2 on the immune system, it may have promoted all 3 types of responses. It was not possible to determine the exact importance of each of these factors individually, and we cannot exclude that immunosuppression alone could have led to the same favorable outcome. One can speculate that a multiple target strategy against the neoplasm gave our patient the best chance to achieve complete remission. Another aspect potentially involved in the immunologic clearance of the tumor is the long-lasting adjuvant role of the remaining pancreas allograft. The polyclonal response against multiple donor epitopes present in the pancreatic graft left in place may have helped tumor rejection. Such strategy has also recently been employed in a metastatic donor-derived renal cancer patient in whom transplantectomy was intentionally delayed to elicit a broad alloimmune antitumor response.4
An important observation made in the present study is the compelling evidence that the development of the tumor was linked to BKPyV, namely, BKPyV genome integration and viral protein expression into/by the tumor. Polyomaviruses, including BKPyV, human JC polyomavirus, and SV40, encode 2 viral oncogenes, the large and small T antigen.23 These viral oncoproteins can inactivate tumor suppressor genes p53 and pRb and induce human cell transformation into cancer.23 It was suggested that the integration of the BKPyV results in alterations in viral gene expression, including a disruption of viral protein 1 protein expression and sustained expression of large T-antigen, accompanied with a shutdown of viral replication and deletions in the noncoding control region.24 Of note, the breakpoint sequences where the BK virus integrates into the genome and the nature of genes affected seems not to play a predominant role in oncogenesis.25 Overall, our observations are consistent with a role of BKPyV in the development of urologic tract malignancies in transplanted patients and further supports growing evidence.5,10-13,25 In our view, the lesson from this case is the importance of BKPyV screening and we would advocate a higher index of suspicion for urinary tract malignancies in patients with a former BKPyV infection.26 While our data and those of others highly suggest an oncogenic role of the BKPyV, we think that, paradoxically, BKPyV may also participate to tumor clearance be it due to lytic replication or due to the HLA-class I presentation of viral antigens,23 as is the case for human endogenous retrovirus.27 This mechanism, along with host-versus-graft and host-versus-tumor responses, can be stimulated by the administration of IL-2.
In conclusion, this case showed evidence for the potential oncogenic role of BKPyV in collecting duct carcinoma and demonstrated that immunosuppression withdrawal and IL-2 therapy lead to an efficient antitumor cellular mediated rejection with complete remission of a widely metastatic solid tumor.
We would like to thank the patient for allowing us to report her case to the medical community. As per our institutional guidelines for single-case report, this study was exempt from approval from our ethics board. We thank Florence Bettens for her help with the mixed lymphocyte reaction protocol. We thank Klaudia Nägele for advice on the interpretation of viral sequences detected by next generation sequencing data. We would like also to thank Solange Moll for her guidance and interpretation of the kidney histology. We thank Jörg Seebach for sharing reagents. Finally, we would like to thank all the medical doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and laboratory technicians who were involved in the management of the patient, particularly Nicolas De Picciotto. Detailed methods and supplementary figures are provided in the Supplemental Appendix.
1. Tillou X, Doerfler A, Collon S, et al.; “Comité de Transplantation de l’Association Française d’Urologie (CTAFU)”. De novo kidney graft tumors: results from a multicentric retrospective national study. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12:3308–3315
2. Penn I. Primary kidney tumors before and after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1995; 59:480–485
3. Ploussard G, Chambade D, Meria P, et al. Biopsy-confirmed de novo renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in renal grafts: a single-centre management experience in a 2396 recipient cohort. BJU Int. 2012; 109:195–199
4. Champion L, Culine S, Desgranchamps F, et al. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a renal allograft: a sustained complete remission after stimulated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17:1125–1128
5. Neirynck V, Claes K, Naesens M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the allograft: what is the role of polyomavirus? Case Rep Nephrol Urol. 2012; 2:125–134
6. Tokuda N, Naito S, Matsuzaki O, et al.; Japanese Society of Renal Cancer. Collecting duct (Bellini duct) renal cell carcinoma: a nationwide survey in Japan. J Urol. 2006; 176:40–43. discussion 43
7. Karakiewicz PI, Trinh QD, Rioux-Leclercq N, et al. Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: a matched analysis of 41 cases. Eur Urol. 2007; 52:1140–1145
8. Dason S, Allard C, Sheridan-Jonah A, et al. Management of renal collecting duct carcinoma: a systematic review and the McMaster experience. Curr Oncol. 2013; 20:e223–e232
9. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Mariani T, et al. Treatment outcome and survival associated with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of non-clear-cell histology. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:2376–2381
10. Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Latulippe E, et al. BK polyomavirus genomic integration and large T antigen expression: evolving paradigms in human oncogenesis. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17:1674–1680
11. Sirohi D, Vaske C, Sanborn Z, et al. Polyoma virus-associated carcinomas of the urologic tract: a clinicopathologic and molecular study. Mod Pathol. 2018; 31:1429–1441
12. Papadimitriou JC, Randhawa P, Rinaldo CH, et al. BK polyomavirus infection and renourinary tumorigenesis. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16:398–406
13. Dao M, Pécriaux A, Bessede T, et al. BK virus-associated collecting duct carcinoma of the renal allograft in a kidney-pancreas allograft recipient. Oncotarget. 2018; 9:15157–15163
14. Emerson LL, Carney HM, Layfield LJ, et al. Collecting duct carcinoma arising in association with BK nephropathy post-transplantation in a pediatric patient. A case report with immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization study. Pediatr Transplant. 2008; 12:600–605
15. Hirsch HH, Randhawa PS; AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019; 33:e13528
16. Oudard S, Banu E, Vieillefond A, et al.; GETUG (Groupe d’Etudes des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales). Prospective multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine plus platinum salt for metastatic collecting duct carcinoma: results of a GETUG (Groupe d’Etudes des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales) study. J Urol. 2007; 177:1698–1702
17. Atkins MB, Tannir NM. Current and emerging therapies for first-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018; 70:127–137
18. Jiang T, Zhou C, Ren S. Role of IL-2 in cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2016; 5:e1163462
19. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, White DE, et al. Durability of complete responses in patients with metastatic cancer treated with high-dose interleukin-2: identification of the antigens mediating response. Ann Surg. 1998; 228:307–319
20. Childs R, Chernoff A, Contentin N, et al. Regression of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma after nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:750–758
21. Lipshutz GS, Mihara N, Wong R, et al. Death from metastatic donor-derived ovarian cancer in a male kidney transplant recipient. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9:428–432
22. Wilson RE, Hager EB, Hampers CL, et al. Immunologic rejection of human cancer transplanted with a renal allograft. N Engl J Med. 1968; 278:479–483
23. Dalianis T, Hirsch HH. Human polyomaviruses in disease and cancer. Virology. 2013; 437:63–72
24. Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Burger-Calderon R, et al. The oncogenic potential of BK-polyomavirus is linked to viral integration into the human genome. J Pathol. 2015; 237:379–389
25. Müller DC, Rämö M, Naegele K, et al. Donor-derived, metastatic urothelial cancer after kidney transplantation associated with a potentially oncogenic BK polyomavirus. J Pathol. 2018; 244:265–270
26. Leboeuf C, Wilk S, Achermann R, et al.; Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. BK polyomavirus-specific 9mer CD8 T cell responses correlate with clearance of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients: first report from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17:2591–2600
27. Takahashi Y, Harashima N, Kajigaya S, et al. Regression of human kidney cancer following allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with recognition of an HERV-E antigen by T cells. J Clin Invest. 2008; 118:1099–1109