Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

The Authors’ Reply

Ames, Erik; Murphy, William J.

doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000345

Departments of Dermatology and Internal Medicine University of California Davis Medical Center Sacramento, CA

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Address correspondence to: William J. Murphy, Ph.D., Department of Dermatology, UC Davis School of Medicine, 2921 Stockton Blvd, Suite 1630, Sacramento, CA 95817.


Received 3 June 2014.

Accepted 5 June 2014.

We thank Masuda et al. for their discussion of a possible role of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in the engraftment or rejection of allogeneic stem cell transplants. The main conclusion of our article, “Natural Killer Cell Subsets Differentially Reject Embryonic Stem Cells Based on Licensing,” was that allogeneic embryonic stem (ES) cells are sensitive to cytotoxicity from natural killer (NK) cells in vitro and rejection in vivo. Natural killer cells which expressed Ly49 molecules capable of binding self major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, termed “licensed”, showed higher cytotoxicity and were the dominant NK subset mediating the rejection of ES cells. Anti-asialo GM-1 and anti-Ly49 antibodies were used to deplete all NK cells or NK subsets, respectively, to show in vivo proof-in-concept that NK cells could reject ES cells. However, it was correctly pointed out that these markers are also expressed on targets outside of NK cells, including ILC1 and ILC3 cells which have been reported to express low levels of Ly49 receptors (1). Thus, differential engraftment of ES cells after anti-Ly49 administration may have been partially caused by depletion of ILCs. However, a direct role of ILCs is unlikely in this scenario given the lack of cytotoxic function in these cells except for ILC1 which have been reported to exhibit low cytotoxic potential (2). Additionally, these cells are largely localized in mucosal areas and therefore unlikely to mediate rejection of a subcutaneous ES graft. ILCs may play a larger role in the setting of ES engraftment through their production of cytokines and modulation of T-cell responses. However, to isolate NK cell responses, we chose to use severe combined immunodeficient mice which lack T and B cells. Thus, experimental models isolating ILC contributions to T-cell–mediated rejection of allogeneic grafts of undifferentiated cells as well as potentially direct effects would be informative.

As Masuda et al. point out, current therapeutic strategies employing ES-derived or induced pluripotent stem–derived products aim to ensure that undifferentiated cells are excluded which may limit the applicability of our results to current clinical practice. However, the objective of our manuscript was to define the immunogenicity of ES cells in the context of NK cell biology. Natural killer cells have been reported to show increased sensitivity to undifferentiated cell types, with increasing tolerance because these cells differentiate (3). Therefore, NK cells may play an important role in rejecting residual pluripotent cells in the graft and preventing potential teratoma formation. A distinct role for ILCs and the extent of the effects on overall engraftment in this process remain to be determined as this nascent field progresses.

Erik Ames

William J. Murphy

Departments of Dermatology

and Internal Medicine

University of California Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, CA

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Klose CS, Flach M, Mohle L, et al. Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell 2014; 157: 340.
2. Walker JA, Barlow JL, McKenzie AN. Innate lymphoid cells—how did we miss them? Nat Rev Immunol 2013; 13: 75.
3. Tseng HC, Arasteh A, Paranjpe A, et al. Increased lysis of stem cells but not their differentiated cells by natural killer cells: de-differentiation or reprogramming activates NK cells. PloS One 2010; 5: e11590.
© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins