Secondary Logo

Depression and Kidney Transplantation

Chilcot, Joseph1,4; Spencer, Benjamin Walter Jack2; Maple, Hannah3; Mamode, Nizam3

doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438212.72960.ae
Overview
Free

While kidney transplantation offers several advantages in terms of improved clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to dialysis modalities, depressive symptoms are still present in approximately 25% of patients, rates comparable to that of the hemodialysis population. Correlates of depressive symptoms include marital status, income, kidney function, history of affective illness, malnutrition, and inflammation. Depressive symptoms are also associated with poor outcomes following kidney transplantation including nonadherence to immunosuppressant medication, graft failure, and all-cause mortality. Efforts to detect and treat depression should be a priority if one is to improve treatment adherence, quality of life, and outcomes in transplant recipients.

1 Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK.

2 Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK.

3 Department of Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK.

4 Address correspondence to: Joseph Chilcot, Ph.D., Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, 5th floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

E-mail: joseph.chilcot@kcl.ac.uk

All authors contributed to the reviewing of references, and the writing and editing of this article.

Received 30 August 2013. Revision requested 3 October 2013.

Accepted 21 October 2013.

Accepted December 16, 2013

It is well documented that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience high levels of depression with approximately 20% to 30% suffering from depressive symptoms (1–3). When compared with dialysis modalities, kidney transplantation is associated with improved clinical outcomes (4), better quality of life (5), and lower rates of psychiatric morbidity (6, 7). Despite this, transplantation requires psychological adjustment and comes with its own treatment challenges. This can produce problematic feelings such as fear, guilt, and global distress. Depression is likely to be the most common psychological complaint in kidney transplant recipients and is the focus of this review. Specifically, this article describes the estimated prevalence, correlates, and consequences of depression in this setting, and evaluates treatment options.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Prevalence Rates of Depression in Kidney Transplant Patients

Prevalence rates for depression in renal patients vary as a product of the assessment undertaken (1, 8). As discussed elsewhere, the assessment of depression is complicated in kidney disease patients, partly as a result of overlapping physical symptoms between renal insufficiency and the features of depression, such as lethargy (2, 9, 10). Screening approaches that utilize standardized questionnaires with predetermined cutoff scores often inflate estimated prevalence rates, with diagnostic approaches (i.e., clinical interviews) often attenuating these estimates (8). Several screening and severity measures have been used to evaluate depression symptoms in kidney transplant patients, and these include the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (11), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (12, 13), the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) (14), and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (15). It is important to recognize that screening tools are not diagnostic measures; rather they are helpful indicators of those who have significant symptoms that might require further enquiry. It should therefore be noted that throughout this article when studies have adopted such measures, the term depression used does not refer to a diagnosed condition, rather high levels of depressive symptoms. Within the context of renal transplantation, the relative accuracy of screening and severity measures in relation to a clinical diagnosis of depression requires attention in suitably large studies.

In one of the earliest studies looking at distress in kidney transplant patients, 46% were found to be distressed as defined by a General Health Questionnaire-30 score greater than 5 (16). More recently, Novak et al. (17) reported a 22% point prevalence of depression (CES-D score ≥18) among 840 kidney transplant patients and Zelle et al. (18) reported a 31% prevalence using the SCL-90 (>25). Use of the BDI has led to estimates between 13% and 39% (19–24) with variability partly being attributable to methodological differences, such as differences in BDI cutoff scores used. Few studies have examined the incidence of depression over time among kidney transplant recipients. An analysis of Medicare claims in 47,899 kidney recipients revealed a cumulative yearly depression incidence of 5.05%, 7.29%, and 9.1% 3 years posttransplantation (25). Comparing the prevalence of depression symptoms between dialysis and transplant populations has led to mixed findings, which are often hard to interpret because of methodological limits and the potential for confounding. While it is generally recognized that transplantation confers a quality-of-life benefit, there is still significant variation within transplant patients (26, 27). One of the first studies to compare dialysis and transplant modalities revealed similar levels of distress (16), while others suggested that psychiatric morbidity or emotional distress is lower in transplanted patients (6, 7, 21, 28). For example, Szeifert et al. (29) found that the prevalence of depression is lower in transplant patients compared to dialysis patients (22% vs. 33%, respectively), and in multivariate analysis dialysis modality predicted higher depression scores. In a recent meta-analysis, Palmer et al. (8) found that the prevalence of depression, according to self-report or clinician rated tools, was lower in kidney transplant patients (26.6%, 95% CI, 20.9–33.1) compared to ESRD patients (39.3%, 95% CI 36.8–42.0).

Although variation is evident in the literature with confidence intervals for point prevalence estimates large, it appears that approximately one in four patients screen positive for depression across the spectrum of advanced kidney disease, making it one of the more common comorbidities encountered in renal transplant candidates and recipients. Nevertheless, it is also clear that studies are needed to establish the trajectory of depression symptoms over time (30), following up a suitably large sample of patients from dialysis to transplantation and beyond. This will allow researchers and clinicians to observe the natural history of symptomatology, identify correlates, and possibly highlight optimal points for intervention.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Factors Associated With Depression Following Kidney Transplantation

Multiple studies have examined possible clinical, social, and psychological factors associated with depression in kidney transplant patients (Table 1). Demographic correlates of depression include age (25, 31), female gender (17, 25, 32, 33), race (25), employment status and financial situation (18, 29, 31, 32), education (17, 32), and marital status (17, 29). With regards to clinical factors, studies have shown a negative association between renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and depression in transplant patients (17, 29, 32). Zelle et al. (18) report significantly lower creatinine clearance and a higher proportion of proteinuria in depressed transplant patients compared with non-depressed patients. Lower hemoglobin (18, 32) and serum albumin levels (17, 20) have also been associated with depression in kidney transplant patients. Dobbels et al. reported a positive association between Medicare claim–identified depression and having six HLA mismatches, rapamycin use, antithymocyte and antilymphocyte globulin for antibody induction therapy, and having diabetic nephropathy as a primary cause of kidney disease (25). Most of these clinical factors are related to graft function; therefore, these findings may reflect depression symptoms resulting from impending graft loss and the associated physical symptoms resulting from low eGFR. However, prospective evaluations are needed to better understand the casual pathways between depression and clinical factors in kidney transplant recipients. Others report that higher C-reactive protein (20), interleukin-6, and longer dialysis vintage (18, 25) are associated with heightened depression symptoms (32), although again there are conflicting data with respect to these findings (17, 29). There is little evidence that the duration of transplant graft survival is associated with depression in kidney recipients (18, 29, 31). More consistent findings suggest an association between the severity of comorbidity (including obesity) (17, 25, 29, 32) and heightened depression symptoms in kidney recipients.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Regarding psychological factors, having a history of depression predicts concurrent mood following kidney transplantation (6, 20), which is also the case for hemodialysis patients (34). While psychological predictors of depression have been examined in some detail among dialysis patients (1, 35) with particular emphasis on patients’ illness beliefs (30, 36, 37), fewer data exists in kidney transplant patients. Poor psychological adjustment and coping are likely perpetuating contributors. A small study found that age, general life stress, and transplant-related stress were all related to levels of adjustment in transplant patients, although interestingly, moderate to high feelings of indebtedness towards to donor was unrelated to adjustment (38). A strong correlation has been observed between depression symptoms (BDI) with perceptions of illness and social support in renal transplant patients, although a small sample size and failure to control for potential confounding factors are limitations (39). Others have shown that posttransplantation emotional well-being is moderated by the coping preferences of the patient (40). Specifically, patients with a more active coping style (i.e., seeking health-related information) have a reduction in depression symptoms following transplantation compared to those who have a low preference for health-related information seeking, who tend to show increases in depression over time (40). This work has some relevance regarding extended criteria for donation because more patients are receiving less than ideal grafts therefore increasing the potential for clinical complications and events. Managing the expectations of such recipients is likely to be an important factor related to adjustment in the months proceeding transplantation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Depression Predicts Poor Clinical Outcomes

Not only does depression impact severely on quality of life in ESRD patients (41), it is associated with poor clinical outcomes, particularly mortality (42–45). Among kidney transplant patients, depression also appears to play an important prognostic role in terms of kidney graft survival and patient mortality (17, 18, 24, 25, 46). In a large analysis of US Medicare claims, Dobbels et al. (25) found that depression was associated with a twofold increase in risk of graft failure, return to dialysis, and death with a functioning graft, after controlling for several demographic and clinical factors. Novak et al. (17) studied 840 kidney transplant patients and found that those defined as depressed (based upon a CES-D score ≥18) were at greater risk of death over the study follow-up compared to non-depressed patients (HR=1.66, 95% CI 1.12–2.47). Furthermore, baseline depression scores were also associated with death-censored graft survival (HR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05), albeit failing to utilize competing risk survival models in their analysis. A recent study reported that depression, as assessed by the depression subscales of the SCL-90, predicted both all-cause and cardiovascular disease–related mortality (18). These findings support the work of others who have also found that depression predicts survival following heart (47) and liver transplantation (48), although taken together the evidence that depression is associated with clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients is mixed (49).

The association between depression and poor clinical outcomes in kidney transplant patients might be explained by several factors, with nonadherence to treatment regimens a strong explanatory factor. Nonadherence to immunosuppressant medicines is estimated to be approximately 22% to 28%, with around 16% to 36% of failed grafts thought to be the result of nonadherence behavior (50, 51). Depression has been found to increase the risk of treatment nonadherence threefold among patient populations (52). Both retrospective (53) and prospective studies (54, 55) of kidney graft recipients report an association between nonadherence and depression [see (56)]. In a recent study of kidney transplant patients, intentional nonadherence (i.e., choosing not to take them, or skip/adjusting a dose) to immunosuppressant medications was associated with depression symptoms (19). Furthermore, depression in kidney transplant patients is associated with unhealthy behaviors including lower activity levels and higher alcohol use, which may in turn impact upon transplant-related outcomes (18).

Other suggested mechanisms that might explain poor outcomes in depressed patients include the well-established association between depression and cardiovascular disease (CVD) (57, 58) where malnutrition, inflammation, and immune function are all implicating factors (17, 32, 59–62). In dialysis patients, depression has been found to correlate positively with pro-inflammatory cytokines (60, 62), which are also an important factor in the pathogenesis of CVD (63). As described previously, depression symptoms have be shown to have a small yet significant association with IL-6 among kidney transplant recipients (32). Nevertheless, the apparent relationship between depression and inflammation is complex and causal assumptions are difficult to infer because pro-inflammatory cytokines can cause symptoms similar to those observed in depression (64, 65). Taken together, the potential mechanisms linking depression with transplant-related outcomes are unduly complex, involving direct and indirect factors, which likely interact to increase the propensity for a poor outcome.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Interventional Approaches for Treating Depression

Given that depression is a prevalent and costly comorbidity in kidney transplant patients, efforts to detect symptoms and intervene with appropriate treatments are critical. Unfortunately, across the spectrum of advanced kidney disease, little research has been conducted evaluating treatments for depression in robust clinical trials. Group cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to be effective at reducing depression symptoms among hemodialysis patients (66). Among renal transplant recipients, 12 weeks of psychotherapy (individual and group) has been shown to reduce depression symptoms over 12 months, although it should be noted that the control arm of this trial had significantly fewer depression symptoms at baseline, and the analysis failed to adequately consider the interaction between group and time (67). A small study of an intervention designed to improve quality of life and reduce distress in ESRD patients awaiting transplantation also demonstrated benefit to well-being (68), suggesting that targeting symptoms before transplantation might be one effective treatment model. Taken together, there is a need to further develop specific psychological-based interventions that target maladjustment and distress in renal transplant patients, which are tested in trials using robust methodologies.

Renal transplant recipients are a heterogeneous population, with a range of baseline renal function, comorbidities, and immunosuppressive regimens, which are factors that need to be considered when treating depression with antidepressants. When considering treatment with an antidepressant, similar issues are raised as with treating depression in patients with CKD. The authors found no published trials of pharmacological treatments for depression purely in the renal graft recipient population. Further, the evidence for the pharmacological treatment of depression in CKD is very limited, with no robust randomized controlled trials published. As a result, most guidance imports evidence from the treatment of otherwise healthy individuals (69–75), which may not be appropriate given the potential effects of impaired renal function, multiple medications, and comorbidities on existing agents. There is a clear need for high-quality trials, and the authors await the first data (76).

There are reasons to be cautious when prescribing an antidepressant. The most widely used antidepressants, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), all have an antiplatelet effect (77, 78). Renal graft recipients already have a theoretically associated increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding through use of antiplatelet agents (79, 80) and immunosuppressants, such as steroids, as well as impaired platelet function in renal impairment. However, caution needs to be given to the use of gastroprotective agents if an SSRI is to be prescribed because some combinations interact to produce QTc prolongation. Detailed reviews of the pharmacological treatment options and pharmacokinetic considerations have been reported elsewhere (69–72, 74, 75, 81).

The authors recommend the careful consideration of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for depression to ensure the most appropriate treatment be offered, particularly because untreated depression is a significant risk to well-being and outcome. Given concerns regarding harm in the form of gastrointestinal bleeding, the decision to treat depression pharmacologically is one best made following a discussion between the renal transplant team, specialist psychiatric liaison services, and renal pharmacists to ensure the safest and most effective agent is selected.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in renal transplantation, depression is still a prevalent and problematic comorbidity that remains mostly overlooked. Depression in this setting predicts poor outcomes, including inferior graft survival. While the mechanisms underlying this relationship require further empirical attention, nonadherence is a significant explanatory factor. Efforts to support the adjustment process are critical and when mood symptoms require specific attention, psychological therapies show promise but do require further research into their acceptability and efficacy in this setting. Evidence regarding pharmacological interventions for clinically diagnosed depression in renal transplant patients also requires further investigation, specifically the concerns around safety.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Chilcot J, Wellsted D, Farrington K. Depression in end-stage renal disease: current advances and research. Semin Dial 2010; 23: 74.
2. Chilcot J, Wellsted D, Da Silva-Gane M, et al. Depression on dialysis. Nephron Clin Pract 2008; 108: c256.
3. Cukor D, Peterson RA, Cohen SD, et al. Depression in end-stage renal disease hemodialysis patients. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2006; 2: 678.
4. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1725.
5. Reimer J, Franke GH, Lutkes P, et al. [Quality of life in patients before and after kidney transplantation]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2002; 52: 16.
6. Sensky T. Psychiatric morbidity in renal transplantation. Psychother Psychosom 1989; 52: 41.
7. House A. Psychosocial problems of patients on the renal unit and their relation to treatment outcome. J Psychosom Res 1987; 31: 441.
8. Palmer S, Vecchio M, Craig JC, et al. Prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Kidney Int 2013; 84: 179.
9. Chilcot J, Norton S, Wellsted D, et al. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in end-stage renal disease patients. J Psychosom Res 2011; 71: 148.
10. Afshar M, Rebollo-Mesa I, Murphy E, et al. Symptom burden and associated factors in renal transplant patients in the U.K. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012; 44: 229.
11. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361.
12. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory—2nd Edition Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1996.
13. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 8: 77.
14. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale—preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 1973; 9: 13.
15. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385.
16. Kalman TP, Wilson PG, Kalman CM. Psychiatric morbidity in long-term renal transplant recipients and patients undergoing hemodialysis. A comparative study. JAMA 1983; 250: 55.
17. Novak M, Molnar MZ, Szeifert L, et al. Depressive symptoms and mortality in patients after kidney transplantation: a prospective prevalent cohort study. Psychosom Med 2010; 72: 527.
18. Zelle DM, Dorland HF, Rosmalen JG, et al. Impact of depression on long-term outcome after renal transplantation: a prospective cohort study. Transplantation 2012; 94: 1033.
19. Griva K, Davenport A, Harrison M, et al. Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplantation: intent vs. forgetfulness and clinical markers of medication intake. Ann Behav Med 2012; 44: 85.
20. Spencer BW, Chilcot J, Farrington K. Still sad after successful renal transplantation: are we failing to recognise depression? An audit of depression screening in renal graft recipients. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 117: c106.
21. Akman B, Ozdemir FN, Sezer S, et al. Depression levels before and after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 111.
22. Fierz K, Steiger J, Denhaerynck K, et al. Prevalence, severity and correlates of alcohol use in adult renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2006; 20: 171.
23. Moons P, Vanrenterghem Y, Van Hooff JP, et al. Health-related quality of life and symptom experience in tacrolimus-based regimens after renal transplantation: a multicentre study. Transpl Int 2003; 16: 653.
24. Rocha G, Poli de Figueiredo CE, d’Avila D, et al. Depressive symptoms and kidney transplant outcome. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 3424.
25. Dobbels F, Skeans MA, Snyder JJ, et al. Depressive disorder in renal transplantation: an analysis of Medicare claims. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 819.
26. Dew MA, Switzer GE, Goycoolea JM, et al. Does transplantation produce quality of life benefits? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1261.
27. Fiebiger W, Mitterbauer C, Oberbauer R. Health-related quality of life outcomes after kidney transplantation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 2.
28. Cameron JI, Whiteside C, Katz J, et al. Differences in quality of life across renal replacement therapies: a meta-analytic comparison. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35: 629.
29. Szeifert L, Molnar MZ, Ambrus C, et al. Symptoms of depression in kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 55: 132.
30. Chilcot J, Norton S, Wellsted D, et al. Distinct depression symptom trajectories over the first year of dialysis: associations with illness perceptions. Ann Behav Med 2013; 45: 78.
31. Tsunoda T, Yamashita R, Kojima Y, et al. Risk factors for depression after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 1679.
32. Czira ME, Lindner AV, Szeifert L, et al. Association between the Malnutrition-Inflammation Score and depressive symptoms in kidney transplanted patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2011; 33: 157.
33. Gentile S, Beauger D, Speyer E, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in renal transplant recipients: results of a national survey in France. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 88.
34. Cukor D, Coplan J, Brown C, et al. Course of depression and anxiety diagnosis in patients treated with hemodialysis: a 16-month follow-up. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 1752.
35. Cukor D, Cohen SD, Peterson RA, et al. Psychosocial aspects of chronic disease: ESRD as a paradigmatic illness. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 3042.
36. Griva K, Davenport A, Harrison M, et al. An evaluation of illness, treatment perceptions, and depression in hospital- vs. home-based dialysis modalities. J Psychosom Res 2010; 69: 363.
37. Sacks CR, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL. Perception of illness and depression in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 15: 31.
38. Achille M, Ouellette A, Fournier S, et al. Impact of transplant-related stressors and feelings of indebtedness on psychosocial adjustment following kidney transplantation. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2004; 11: 63.
39. Shah VS, Ananth A, Sohal GK, et al. Quality of life and psychosocial factors in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 1283.
40. Christensen AJ, Ehlers SL, Raichle KA, et al. Predicting change in depression following renal transplantation: effect of patient coping preferences. Health Psychol 2000; 19: 348.
41. Valderrabano F, Jofre R, Lopez-Gomez JM. Quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 443.
42. Chilcot J, Davenport A, Wellsted D, et al. An association between depressive symptoms and survival in incident dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1628.
43. Lopes AA, Bragg J, Young E, et al. Depression as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in the United States and Europe. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 199.
44. Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, et al. Multiple measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 2093.
45. Kimmel PL, Weihs K, Peterson RA. Survival in hemodialysis patients: the role of depression. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 4: 12.
46. Noohi S, Khaghani-Zadeh M, Javadipour M, et al. Anxiety and depression are correlated with higher morbidity after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 1074.
47. Zipfel S, Schneider A, Wild B, et al. Effect of depressive symptoms on survival after heart transplantation. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 740.
48. Corruble E, Barry C, Varescon I, et al. Depressive symptoms predict long-term mortality after liver transplantation. J Psychosom Res 2011; 71: 32.
49. Rosenberger EM, Dew MA, Crone C, et al. Psychiatric disorders as risk factors for adverse medical outcomes after solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2012; 17: 188.
50. Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, et al. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation 2004; 77: 769.
51. Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Cleemput I, et al. Prevalence, consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients: a literature review. Transpl Int 2005; 18: 1121.
52. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2101.
53. Jindal RM, Neff RT, Abbott KC, et al. Association between depression and nonadherence in recipients of kidney transplants: analysis of the United States renal data system. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 3662.
54. Cukor D, Newville H, Jindal R. Depression and immunosuppressive medication adherence in kidney transplant patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008; 30: 386.
55. Gorevski E, Succop P, Sachdeva J, et al. Is there an association between immunosuppressant therapy medication adherence and depression, quality of life, and personality traits in the kidney and liver transplant population? Patient Prefer Adherence 2013; 7: 301.
56. Jindal RM, Joseph JT, Morris MC, et al. Noncompliance after kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 2868.
57. Musselman DL, Evans DL, Nemeroff CB. The relationship of depression to cardiovascular disease: epidemiology, biology, and treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55: 580.
58. Glassman A. Depression and cardiovascular disease. Pharmacopsychiatry 2008; 41: 221.
59. Kalender B, Ozdemir AC, Koroglu G. Association of depression with markers of nutrition and inflammation in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Nephron Clin Pract 2006; 102: c115.
60. Wang LJ, Wu MS, Hsu HJ, et al. The relationship between psychological factors, inflammation, and nutrition in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. Int J Psychiatry Med 2012; 44: 105.
61. Simic Ogrizovic S, Jovanovic D, Dopsaj V, et al. Could depression be a new branch of MIA syndrome? Clin Nephrol 2009; 71: 164.
62. Ko GJ, Kim MG, Yu YM, et al. Association between depression symptoms with inflammation and cardiovascular risk factors in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 116: c29.
63. Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1387.
64. Dantzer R. Cytokine-induced sickness behaviour: a neuroimmune response to activation of innate immunity. Eur J Pharmacol 2004; 500: 399.
65. van den Biggelaar AH, Gussekloo J, de Craen AJ, et al. Inflammation and interleukin-1 signaling network contribute to depressive symptoms but not cognitive decline in old age. Exp Gerontol 2007; 42: 693.
66. Duarte PS, Miyazaki MC, Blay SL, et al. Cognitive-behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment for major depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney International 2009; 76: 414.
67. Baines LS, Joseph JT, Jindal RM. Prospective randomized study of individual and group psychotherapy versus controls in recipients of renal transplants. Kidney Int 2004; 65: 1937.
68. Rodrigue JR, Mandelbrot DA, Pavlakis M. A psychological intervention to improve quality of life and reduce psychological distress in adults awaiting kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 709.
69. Zalai D, Szeifert L, Novak M. Psychological distress and depression in patients with chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial 2012; 25: 428.
70. Hedayati SS, Yalamanchili V, Finkelstein FO. A practical approach to the treatment of depression in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2012; 81: 247.
71. Hedayati SS, Finkelstein FO. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of depression in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 54: 741.
72. Cohen SD, Norris L, Acquaviva K, et al. Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depression in patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 1332.
73. Rabindranath KS, Butler J, Roderick PJ, et al. Physical methods for treating depression in dialysis patients. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews 2009.
74. Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH, Finkelstein FO. The identification and treatment of depression in patients maintained on dialysis. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 142.
75. Tossani E, Cassano P, Fava M. Depression and renal disease. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 73.
76. Jain N, Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, et al. Rationale and design of the chronic kidney disease antidepressant sertraline trial (CAST). Contemp Clin Trials 2013; 34: 136.
77. Dalton SO, Sorensen HT, Johansen C. SSRIs and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: what is known and how should it influence prescribing? CNS Drugs 2006; 20: 143.
78. Paton C, Ferrier IN. SSRIs and gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ 2005; 331: 529.
79. Gansevoort RT, Correa-Rotter R, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet 2013; 382: 339.
80. Palmer SC, Di Micco L, Razavian M, et al. Effects of antiplatelet therapy on mortality and cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in persons with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 445.
81. Nagler EV, Webster AC, Vanholder R, et al. Antidepressants for depression in stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety with recommendations by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 3736.
82. Achille MA, Ouellette A, Fournier S, et al. Impact of stress, distress and feelings of indebtedness on adherence to immunosuppressants following kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2006; 20: 301.
Keywords:

Depression; Kidney transplantation; Renal transplantation; Kidney transplant; Transplant; Outcomes

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins