Secondary Logo

Selective Recruitment of Large Lower Lobe Atelectasis on Donor Back Table in Rejected Donor Lungs

Okamoto, Toshihiro, MD, PhD1,2; Niikawa, Hiromichi, MD, PhD1,2; Wheeler, David, MEd, RRT-NPS3; Ayyat, Kamal S., MD1,2; Basem, Soliman, MD, PhD4; Itoda, Yoshifumi, MD, PhD1,2; Sunagawa, Gengo, MD5; Farver, Carol F., MD6; McCurry, Kenneth R., MD1,2

doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000889
Lung Transplantation
Open

Background. Large atelectatic areas in donor lungs are frequently resistant to standard recruitment maneuvers, producing a tenaciously low PO2/FiO2 ratio. The aim of this study is to investigate the optimal protocol for the recruitment of large atelectatic areas in the context of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP).

Methods. Seventeen rejected lungs with large lower lobe atelectasis (≥40%) were divided into 2 groups: manual resuscitation (n = 5) and selective recruitment (n = 12). Transplant suitability was then evaluated in cellular EVLP. In the manual resuscitation group, following bronchoscopy, if the conventional recruitment maneuver was not successful, a bagging technique was utilized to resolve atelectasis in EVLP. In the selective recruitment group, a pediatric endotracheal tube was introduced to the lower lobe bronchus on the back table of the donor hospital. Selective recruitment of the lower lobe was accomplished while keeping peak inspiratory pressure <30 cm H2O for 30 seconds.

Results. The average atelectasis size and lung weight in 17 donor lungs was 75.4 ± 20.6% and 960 ± 221 g, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in all donor variables, except cold ischemic time (P = 0.001, 5.2 ± 0.5 versus 6.4 ± 0.7 hours). The selective recruitment group was associated with better transplant suitability (P = 0.035, 75% versus 20%), better PO2/FiO2 ratio (P = 0.186, 324 ± 89 versus 258 ± 87 mm Hg), lower lung weight (P = 0.057, 997.9 ± 229.2 versus 1377.2 ± 452.9 g), and better pathological score (P < 0.05, 1.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.8 ± 0.8) than the manual resuscitation group.

Conclusion. A selective recruitment procedure is a safe and effective method of eliminating large atelectasis before EVLP.

1 Department of Pathobiology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

2 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

3 Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

4 Department of Surgery General, Transplant Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

5 Department of Bioengineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

6 Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Published online 25 April, 2019.

Received 1 February 2019. Revision received 20 February 2019.

Accepted 25 February 2019.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This research was supported by the donation of Rosy and Ray Park.

T.O. participated in research design, performed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. H.N., K.A., B.S., Y.I., and G.S. participated in the study design and performed the study. D.W., C.F., and K.M. designed the study, interpreted all data, and wrote the manuscript.

Correspondence: Kenneth R. McCurry, MD, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195. (mccurrk@ccf.org).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Atelectasis occurs in approximately 90% of anesthetized patients.1 Atelectasis may contribute to hypoxemia, especially when there are risk factors of atelectasis, such as mechanical ventilation, supine position, and obesity.2,3 The effects of atelectasis include decreased pulmonary compliance, increased shunt, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and lung injury.4 Similarly, atelectasis may be the main contributor to low oxygenation in the donor lung necessitating the use of strategic ventilation, using recruitment maneuvers, in the management of the donor lung.5,6 Routine use of bronchoscopy and regular airway suction might be beneficial.7 Hanna and colleagues8 reported that airway pressure release ventilation improved PO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio and increased the donor lung utilization rate (84% versus 18%) when compared with assist/control ventilation. The graft survival of both groups was better than the national average. It is suspected that the resolution of atelectasis might contribute to better oxygenation in the airway pressure release ventilation group.8

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is utilized in the management of marginal donor lungs. One mechanism of improving lung function is to eliminate atelectasis with a recruitment maneuver. We sometimes, however, encounter a case where a standard recruitment maneuver utilizing either high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or high tidal volume does not eliminate large lower lobe atelectasis. During the mechanical breath, the majority of inspiratory flow is delivered to the upper and middle lobes, whose pulmonary compliance is significantly higher than that of atelectatic lower lobes,9-11 as shown in Figure 1. Relatively higher pressure is required at the airway opening in the atelectatic area with the additional concern of decreased cardiac output and endangering the entire lung field to excessive pressure/volume and would selectively risk the areas of highest compliance. We hypothesized that a selective recruitment procedure in donor back table might protect pulmonary lung function of rejected donor lungs with large lower lobe atelectasis. The aim of this study is to investigate the optimal protocol for the recruitment of large atelectatic areas in the rejected donor lungs in the context of EVLP.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

Seventeen rejected donor lungs with large lower lobe atelectasis were obtained for research EVLP from a local organ procurement organization and divided into 2 groups: the manual resuscitation group (n = 5) and the selective recruitment group (n = 12). We first tested 5 lungs in each group and noted profound damage in the manual resuscitation group. Thereafter, we tested 7 more in the selective recruitment group to be sure to have no positive donor selection bias. In the manual resuscitation group, following bronchoscopy, if the conventional recruitment maneuver was not successful, a bagging technique was utilized to resolve atelectasis in EVLP (Figure 2). In the selective recruitment group, selective lower lobe recruitment was performed on the back table in the donor hospital as described below, followed by cold preservation and EVLP. This study was approved by the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board (No. 11–737). The humans involved in this study were treated in a manner in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Declaration of Istanbul.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Donor Selection Criteria

Research donor lungs were obtained from local organ procurement organization (Lifebanc) as follows: (1) donor lungs were declined by a clinical team; (2) the average atelectasis size at the inspection of the chest was ≥40%; and (3) lung weight on donor back table was <1300 g. Donation after circulatory death lungs were included. Donors had no premorbid history of lung disease. Severe pulmonary infection, bilateral lung contusion, severe bullous emphysema, and severe bilateral aspiration were excluded in the study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Lung Procurement

The procurement procedure was basically performed according to our clinical protocol. The 1 difference was that the lung recruitment maneuver with high peak inspiratory pressure (25–30 cm H2O for 30 s) in the chest was not performed, as detailed in the limitations that follow. Briefly, 4 L of Perfadex was flushed through the pulmonary artery. Following explanting lung blocks, a selective recruitment was performed on the back table in the selective recruitment group. Retrograde flush was done with 2 L of Perfadex, and cold preservation was initiated.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Atelectatic Area in Donor Lungs

Atelectatic size during procurement was recorded by our research lung procurement team. Atelectatic size was defined as the percentage of atelectatic area on the diaphragmatic surface of the lower lobe. The atelectatic size was expressed as an average of atelectatic area in both lower lobes.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Donor Hospital Back Table Selective Recruitment Procedure

A pediatric endotracheal tube (5.5 mm ID) was introduced to the lower lobe bronchus and the balloon cuff inflated. The tracheal tube was connected to a manual resuscitator bag with a manometer. Selective recruitment of the lower lobe was accomplished while keeping peak inspiratory pressure of 25–30 cm H2O for 30 seconds (Figure 3). The procedure was performed at both sides. Following the recruitment maneuver, the trachea was clamped, and then cold preservation was initiated following retrograde flush.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cellular EVLP

Vivoline LS1 (Vivoline Medical AB, Lund, Sweden) was utilized with cellular perfusate, 100% of estimated cardiac output, and an open left atrium, as previously reported.12 Briefly, the lungs were gradually warmed to a target of 37°C. At 37°C, tidal volume was increased to 6 mL/ideal body weight. The following 2 standard lung recruitment procedures were performed in both groups: (1) peak inspiratory pressure of 25–30 cm H2O for 30 seconds and (2) tidal volume 10 mL/kg, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 10/min, and 10 minutes. Using physiological parameters at 2 hours, transplant suitability was evaluated, according to the Lund protocol.13,14

Back to Top | Article Outline

Manual Resuscitation Procedure

During EVLP, manual resuscitation procedure was initiated when large lower lobe atelectasis was not resolved by 2 standard lung recruitment procedures. The airway was connected to a resuscitation bag, and manual bagging procedure (5–10 ventilations/15 s) was performed until atelectasis was eliminated.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Lung Tissue Analyses

Lung tissue was taken from the middle lobe and the left lower lobe at the end of EVLP. Formalin-fixed lung tissue was sectioned at 5 µm, and hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides were reviewed. Pathological scoring was performed by a pulmonary pathologist (C.F.) in a blind fashion: 0, absent; 1, focal; 2, diffuse; in acute lung injury, acute inflammation, and hemosiderin deposition.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as a mean ± standard deviation. Parametric data were compared by Student’s t-test. The categorical parameters in donor demographics, pathological score, and transplant suitability were analyzed by Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney test, and Pearson Chi-square test, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Version13.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc, NC). This study considered probability values of P < 0.050 as significant.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Donor Demographics of Perfused Lungs

Average donor age was 45.0 years, including 8 women and 9 men. Twelve donors were smokers, with an average of 16.7 pack-years. Body mass index (BMI) was 35.0 ± 11.4 kg/m2. The average final P/F ratio was 216.5 mm Hg. Atelectatic area was 75.4%. The mean cold ischemic time was 5.5 hours (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the selective recruitment and the manual resuscitation groups in all variables, except cold ischemic time (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

EVLP of 2 Groups

In all cases of the manual resuscitation group (n = 5), the conventional recruitment maneuver was not successful, and then the bagging technique was utilized to re-expand atelectasis in EVLP. In 80% (4/5) of cases, lungs were not suitable for transplant (Table 1). In the selective recruitment group (n = 12), selective re-expansion of lower lobe atelectasis was performed on the back table of the donor hospital, and the atelectatic area was successfully eliminated in all cases. In EVLP, lower lobes were fully re-expanded. Seventy-five percent (9/12) of perfused lungs were judged as suitable for transplant. There was a statistically significant difference in transplant suitability between the 2 groups (P < 0.050). The selective recruitment group had a higher P/F ratio, lower lung weight, and lower cases of positive airway fluid than the manual resuscitation group without significant differences (Table 1).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pathological Evaluation of Lung Tissue

Pathological score was significantly lower in the selective recruitment group than in the manual resuscitation group (P = 0.033, 1.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.8 ± 0.8, Figure 4A). The representative pathological findings of the 2 groups are demonstrated in Figure 4B and C. The finding of the selective recruitment group was predominantly unremarkable alveolated lung parenchymal with focal mild congestion (right upper). The pathological finding of the manual resuscitation group was diffusely congested alveolated lung parenchyma with reactive pneumocytes and early acute lung injury.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Sanchez and colleagues15 have reported that the elimination of atelectasis is 1 mechanism of organ repair in EVLP. Obviously, it is not difficult to eliminate small atelectatic areas by using recruitment maneuvers. Yet, it has been unknown if larger atelectatic areas could be eliminated in EVLP. Rothen et al16 reported that lobar atelectasis was eliminated by a recruitment maneuver using a maximum airway pressure of 40 cm H2O during general anesthesia. Tusman and colleagues17 emphasized the importance of high initial pressure of 40 cm H2O to overcome the alveolar collapse. In the Toronto lung transplant program, a maximum of 15–20 cm H2O is applied to recruit donor lung atelectatic areas.18 However, the success rate of lung recruitment of large atelectatic areas with 15–20 cm H2O of PEEP remains unknown.

The initial significant finding of this study was that all of the large atelectatic area lungs (5/5) in the manual resuscitation group were unresolved by the standard recruitment maneuver using high PEEP (30 cm H2O) and high tidal volume (10 mL/ideal body weight) in EVLP. This result might be ascribed to the fact that there is no “chest wall” in EVLP to stabilize and constrain upper/middle lungs. Using the clamp/balloon occlusion technique of upper/middle lobe bronchus and insufflation might be considered to selectively ventilate atelectatic lower lobe.9,10 However, clamping the upper/middle lobe bronchus results in bronchial injury and ballooning through bronchoscopy might be challenging due to this intricacy. Manual resuscitating (bagging) was originally documented by Clement et al,19 who proposed that bagging is effective to clear secretions and reinflate atelectatic areas. Barotrauma was, however, suspected with peak airway pressures as high as 91–56 cm H2O during bagging.20 Björklund et al21 reported that bagging with a few large breaths at birth compromises the effect of surfactant replacement in lambs.

In the manual resuscitation group, atelectasis was eliminated by the bagging procedure in EVLP. The manual resuscitation group demonstrated significantly lower transplant suitability, poorer lung function, and a poorer pathological score than the selective recruitment group. The results might be explained by several mechanisms. First, increased airway pressure/volume during the bagging procedure might cause barotrauma/volutrauma.20,21 Second, the collapse of alveolar space during cold preservation might be related. Previous studies have described that oxygen is necessary during cold storage to maintain aerobic metabolism.22,23 Fukuse et al24 demonstrated that a deflated lung status during cold storage is associated with poorer pulmonary function than other groups in an ex vivo rat lung model. Moreover, it was reported that atelectasis led to a significant maldistribution of lung preservation solution with an increased water content.25 Therefore, it might suggest that the cold storage of a largely collapsed lobe had a negative impact, although Bansal et al26 reported 1 successful lung transplantation of a donor lung with persistent lobar atelectasis. Third, re-expansion pulmonary edema might be related. Re-expansion pulmonary edema has been reported when collapsed lung is re-expanded in a short period of time. Evidence has demonstrated that the major etiology of re-expansion edema is increased pulmonary vascular permeability, which might be caused by hypoxic injury, increased pulmonary vascular pressure and blood flow, decreased surfactant, and mechanical damage.27 The study of porcine warm ischemia lung model by Lindstedt et al28 might be related. They demonstrated that the ventilation using increased PEEP of 10 cm H2O for 10 minutes without perfusion during EVLP was associated with better oxygenation, lower airway pressure and lower lung weight in cellular EVLP system. It is suggested that the ventilation with no flow may contribute to improved pulmonary function because of reduced mechanical stress in endothelial cells.

DeCampos and colleagues29 reported that inflation to total lung capacity for 10-minute ventilation before reperfusion reduced mechanical stress-induced injury in an ex vivo rat lung model. However, it was impossible to expand large atelectatic areas in a nonselective fashion during EVLP as shown in the manual resuscitation group. Moreover, any procedure of ventilation following cold storage might induce mechanical stress, based on the relatively low compliance of lungs at low temperature.30 Along with the previous data supporting the inflated lung during cold storage,22-24 we tried the re-expansion of large atelectatic areas before cold preservation. Hansen et al11 reported that selective recruitment maneuvers effectively eliminated lobar atelectasis without affecting other lobes in a porcine model. Insufflation to the pressure of 40 cm H2O for 30 seconds was performed using the inner lumen of the bronchial blocker. In the present study, a selective recruitment was applied to large lower lobe atelectatic area on the back table of the donor hospital (Figure 2), and this maneuver successfully recruited collapsed lungs. Moreover, the selective recruitment group was associated with significantly better transplant suitability, higher oxygenation, lower lung weight, and a better pathological score than the manual resuscitation group. These data indicate that selective expansion of large atelectatic areas before cold storage might be a safe and effective method to rescue rejected donor lungs with atelectasis and a poor P/F ratio.

In the previous study of 84 cases of nontransplanted donor lungs, which demonstrated the correlation between chest x-ray scoring and lung weight, the radiographic findings of atelectasis were positive in 45% of cases in the right side and in 64% in the left side.31 It is suggested that atelectasis might be present in a significant portion of rejected donor lungs, resulting in poor oxygenation and lower lung utilization. In the analysis of direct inspection in both standard and rejected donor lungs during procurement, our group recently demonstrated that rejected lungs have a larger total atelectatic area than that of standard lungs.32 Moreover, we find that the final P/F ratio in lung donors was significantly associated with either atelectatic area or BMI. In other words, donors with elevated BMI might have greater atelectatic areas, resulting in lower P/F ratio, compared with donors of normal BMI. This finding is consistent with the previous reports that morbid obesity was correlated to a higher frequency and larger atelectatic area in the dependent area during general anesthesia.3 In the analysis of morbid obese patients (n = 20, mean BMI 46.5) and nonobese patients (n = 10), atelectasis was positive in 9.7% in morbid obese patients and 1.9% in control 24 hours after extubation. Obese patients have altered respiratory mechanics, including decreased chest wall and lung compliance and decreased functional residual capacity, in addition to higher intra-abdominal pressure.4 All of these factors result in decreased oxygenation during anesthesia, and it is easily expected that obesity causes poor oxygenation through the mechanism of atelectasis during organ donor management. The association between P/F ratio and either atelectasis or BMI might be useful in identifying the specific population of currently rejected lung donors with large areas of atelectasis. This donor population is important from the viewpoint of increasing the donor lung pool, because donor lungs with atelectasis might be re-expanded by lung recruitment and utilized in clinical lung transplant.

This study has several limitations. The case number was small, and thus there might represent a type II statistical error. Second, we had no high PEEP lung recruitment in the procurement. This was because the clinical procurement team did not allow us to perform this procedure because of the concern of unstable cardiovascular status. When the clinical use of lungs with a large atelectatic area is considered, a lung recruitment procedure will be applied, and the lung may be successfully re-expanded. Even if lung recruitment is not successful in the chest, selective recruitment procedure in the back table, and subsequent EVLP will salvage initially declined donor lungs at high rate. Third, the 2 study groups are not comparable, because the first illumination of atelectasis was performed before cold storage in the selective recruitment group and after cold storage in the manual resuscitation group. As discussed as the second reason why the manual resuscitation group was associated with poorer pulmonary function, the deteriorated lung function might be caused by delay in recruitment, not by bagging technique itself. Fourth, there was a statistically significant difference in cold ischemic time between the 2 groups (5.2 versus 6.4 h). However, the cold ischemic time of both groups was within the acceptable cold ischemic time of lungs (<8 h), and the impact of the difference on the result of EVLP might be limited. Fifth, selective recruitment method was not performed during EVLP. This is because we expected that the procedure of selective recruitment method on EVLP might result in poor pulmonary function when lungs with large atelectasis were not recruited before EVLP. As already discussed,22-24 a deflated lung status during cold storage is associated with poorer pulmonary function. Especially, significant large size (average: 75.4 ± 20.6%) of atelectasis in this study might have a severely negative impact on lung function on EVLP. However, this selective recruitment method is applicable on EVLP, when small size of atelectasis is resistant to the current standard recruitment method (high peak inspiratory pressure and manual compression of the upper lobe and the contralateral lobes) on EVLP.

In conclusion, all large lower lobe atelectatic areas were not re-expanded by a standard recruit maneuver in EVLP. Subsequent bagging procedure eliminated atelectasis but resulted in poor pulmonary function in EVLP, indicating that it might be difficult to properly eliminate large lower lobe atelectasis in EVLP. Conversely, selective recruitment technique in the donor hospital eliminated large lower lobe atelectasis, and the perfused lungs demonstrated better physiological parameters and transplant suitability in EVLP than the manual resuscitation group. This result indicates that the selective recruitment of the lower lobe is safe and applicable for the case of a large lower lobe atelectasis in the donor hospital before EVLP.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors express deepest gratitude to organ donors and the families. The authors thank Lifebanc team and transplant teams in the Cleveland Clinic. The authors acknowledge Amanda Mendelsohn for illustration. The authors are grateful to XVIVO Perfusion Inc and Maquet for support of perfusion machine and ventilator, respectively.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, Gustavsson H, et al. Influence of age on atelectasis formation and gas exchange impairment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1991;66:423–432.
2. Brooks-Brunn JA. Postoperative atelectasis and pneumonia: risk factors. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:340–349.
3. Eichenberger A, Proietti S, Wicky S, et al. Morbid obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1788–1792.
4. Duggan M, Kavanagh BP. Pulmonary atelectasis: a pathogenic perioperative entity. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:838–854.
5. Parry A, Higgins R, Wheeldon D, et al. The contribution of donor management and modified cold blood lung perfusate to post-transplant lung function. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18:121–126.
6. Angel LF, Levine DJ, Restrepo MI, et al. Impact of a lung transplantation donor-management protocol on lung donation and recipient outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:710–716.
7. Van Raemdonck D, Neyrinck A, Verleden GM, et al. Lung donor selection and management. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6:28–38.
8. Hanna K, Seder CW, Weinberger JB, et al. Airway pressure release ventilation and successful lung donation. Arch Surg. 2011;146:325–328.
9. Susini G, Sisillo E, Bortone F, et al. Postoperative atelectasis reexpansion by selective insufflation through a balloon-tipped catheter. Chest. 1992;102:1693–1696.
10. Kreider ME, Lipson DA. Bronchoscopy for atelectasis in the ICU: a case report and review of the literature. Chest. 2003;124:344–350.
11. Hansen LK, Sloth E, Nielsen J, et al. Selective recruitment maneuvers for lobar atelectasis: effects on lung function and central hemodynamics: an experimental study in pigs. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1504–1510.
12. Okamoto T, Wheeler D, Liu Q, et al. Correlation between PaO2/FiO2 and airway and vascular parameters in the assessment of cellular ex vivo lung perfusion system. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:1330–1336.
13. Ingemansson R, Eyjolfsson A, Mared L, et al. Clinical transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after reconditioning ex vivo. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:255–260.
14. Wallinder A, Ricksten SE, Hansson C, et al. Transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1222–1228.
15. Sanchez PG, Bittle GJ, Burdorf L, et al. State of art: clinical ex vivo lung perfusion: rationale, current status, and future directions. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:339–348.
16. Rothen HU, Neumann P, Berglund JE, et al. Dynamics of re-expansion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:551–556.
17. Tusman G, Böhm SH, Tempra A, et al. Effects of recruitment maneuver on atelectasis in anesthetized children. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:14–22.
18. de Perrot M, Liu M, Waddell TK, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:490–511.
19. Clement AJ, Hubsch SK. Chest physiotherapy by the ‘bag squeezing’ method: a guide to technique. Physiotherapy. 1968;54:355–359.
20. Turki M, Young MP, Wagers SS, et al. Peak pressures during manual ventilation. Respir Care. 2005;50:340–344.
21. Björklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, et al. Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatr Res. 1997;42:348–355.
22. Weder W, Harper B, Shimokawa S, et al. Influence of intraalveolar oxygen concentration on lung preservation in a rabbit model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:1037–1043.
23. Date H, Matsumura A, Manchester JK, et al. Changes in alveolar oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration and oxygen consumption during lung preservation. The maintenance of aerobic metabolism during lung preservation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:492–501.
24. Fukuse T, Hirata T, Nakamura T, et al. Influence of deflated and anaerobic conditions during cold storage on rat lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:621–627.
25. Baretti R, Bitu-Moreno J, Beyersdorf F, et al. Distribution of lung preservation solutions in parenchyma and airways: influence of atelectasis and route of delivery. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;141 Pt 180–91.
26. Bansal A, Shigemura N, Toyoda Y, et al. Successful lung transplantation from a donor with persistent lobar atelectasis. Ochsner J. 2014;14:266–269.
27. Mahfood S, Hix WR, Aaron BL, et al. Reexpansion pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45:340–345.
28. Lindstedt S, Pierre L, Ingemansson R. A Short period of ventilation without perfusion seems to reduce atelectasis without harming the lungs during ex vivo lung perfusion. J Transplant. 2013;2013:729286.
29. DeCampos KN, Keshavjee S, Slutsky AS, et al. Alveolar recruitment prevents rapid-reperfusion-induced injury of lung transplants. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18:1096–1102.
30. Inoue H, Inoue C, Hildebrandt J. Temperature effects on lung mechanics in air- and liquid-filled rabbit lungs. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982;53:567–575.
31. Ware LB, Janz DR, Nguyen J, et al. Radiographic atelectasis contributes to donor hypoxemia and decreased lung utilization: Findings from 418 donors in the Bold study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:S278–S279.
32. Okamoto T, Niikawa H, Wheeler D, et al. How to resolve large atelectasis in ex vivo lung perfusion? J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:S313.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.