Secondary Logo

Non-HLA Genetic Factors and Their Influence on Heart Transplant Outcomes

A Systematic Review

van Setten, Jessica, PhD1; Warmerdam, Evangeline G., MD1; Groot, Olivier Q., BSc1; de Jonge, Nicolaas, MD1; Keating, Brendan, PhD2; Asselbergs, Folkert W., MD, PhD1,3,4,5

doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000859
Review
Open
SDC

Background Improvement of immunosuppressive therapies and surgical techniques has increased the survival rate after heart transplantation. Nevertheless, a large number of patients still experience complications, such as allograft rejection, vasculopathy, kidney dysfunction, and diabetes in response to immunosuppressive therapy. Variants in HLA genes have been extensively studied for their role in clinical outcomes after transplantation, whereas the knowledge about non-HLA genetic variants in this setting is still limited. Non-HLA polymorphisms are involved in the metabolism of major immunosuppressive therapeutics and may play a role in clinical outcomes after cardiac transplantation. This systematic review summarizes the existing knowledge of associations between non-HLA genetic variation and heart transplant outcomes.

Methods The current evidence available on genetic polymorphisms associated with outcomes after heart transplantation was identified by a systematic search in PubMed and Embase. Studies reporting on polymorphisms significantly associated with clinical outcomes after cardiac transplantation were included.

Results A total of 56 studies were included, all were candidate gene studies. These studies identified 58 polymorphisms in 36 genes that were associated with outcomes after cardiac transplantation. Variants in TGFB1, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 are consistently replicated across multiple studies for various transplant outcomes.

Conclusions The research currently available supports the hypothesis that non-HLA polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcomes after heart transplantation. However, many genetic variants were only identified in a single study, questioning their true effect on the clinical outcomes tested. Further research in larger cohorts with well-defined phenotypes is warranted.

1 Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

2 Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

3 Durrer Center for Cardiovascular Research, Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

4 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

5 Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research and Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Published online 21 January, 2019.

Received 21 November 2018.

Accepted 25 November 2018.

This work is supported by Dutch Heart Foundation grant 2017T003. Folkert W. Asselbergs is supported by UCL Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

J.vS. and F.W.A. have designed the study. J.vS., E.G.W., and O.Q.G. performed the literature search. J.vS. and E.G.W. drafted the article. N.dJ., B.K., and F.W.A. critically revised the article.

Correspondence: Jessica van Setten, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. (J.vanSetten@umcutrecht.nl); Folkert W. Asselbergs, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. (F.W.Asselbergs@umcutrecht.nl).

Supplemental digital content (SDC) is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.transplantationdirect.com).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Compendium date: February, 2019

Heart transplantation is still considered to be the therapy of choice for patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to optimal medical and surgical therapy.1 Every year, over 4000 heart transplantations are performed worldwide, the majority being in the United States and Europe.2 The survival rate after heart transplantation has increased greatly in the last decades, mainly due to evolving immunosuppressant therapies and improvement in surgical techniques. The current 1-year survival is being reported at greater than 85%.3 However, ~15% of recipients suffers at least 1 episode of acute cellular rejection in the first year after transplantation.3 High doses of immunosuppressive drugs are not only needed to prevent rejection, but are also associated with an increased risk of infections, malignancies, and renal failure.4

HLA (mis)matching and major histocompatibility antigen have been studied extensively for their role in the occurrence of acute and chronic rejection in solid organ transplantation.5 In contrast, the effect of minor histocompatibility antigens (mHA) on transplant outcomes is largely unknown. These mHA polymorphisms could potentially lead to genetic differences between donors and recipients, activating the immune system of the recipient and consequently cause acute allograft rejection. This is supported by allograft rejection being observed in kidney transplants and stem cell transplantations between HLA identical siblings.6 Recent findings suggest that mHA polymorphisms are not only involved in the development of acute rejection, but also determine the renal function posttransplantation and play a role in the development of chronic rejection.7-9 Another group of non-HLA polymorphisms that may be involved in transplant outcomes are those genetic variants involved in drug metabolism. Pharmacogenomics studies have identified dozens of polymorphisms influencing plasma levels of a wide variety of drugs and other substances, some of which may influence metabolism of drugs commonly prescribed to transplanted patients.

This systematic review provides an overview of the published research on non-HLA genetics in heart transplantation. We included all studies that identified 1 or more significant associations between genetic variants and any heart transplant outcome, regardless of study design.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An overview of the literature search and study selection is shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Search

MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases were searched for all relevant literature published on non-HLA polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome after heart transplantation. The search strategy included the terms “heart,” “transplantation,” “gene,” and their synonyms and related terms. Searches were restricted to human studies:

MEDLINE: human[MeSH Terms] AND (heart[Title/Abstract] OR cardiac[Title/Abstract]) AND (transplant[Title/Abstract] OR transplantation[Title/Abstract]) AND (gene[Title/Abstract] OR SNP[Title/Abstract] OR polymorphism[Title/Abstract])

Embase: human AND (heart:ab,ti OR cardiac:ab,ti) AND (transplant:ab,ti OR transplantation:ab,ti) AND (gene:ab,ti OR SNP:ab,ti OR polymorphism:ab,ti). Reference lists of included articles, and previous reviews were manually searched for additional relevant studies. Databases were searched from their inception to July 10, 2018.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Inclusion Criteria

We included original research article published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, reporting on the association of genetic polymorphisms with clinical outcomes after heart transplantation in pediatric and adult patients. Only articles written in English were included.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Study Selection

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify potentially relevant articles. Two reviewers obtained and independently screened full text versions of potentially eligible studies to determine their suitability for inclusion. Studies were included on the basis of consensus agreement.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data Extraction

Two investigators independently retrieved data from each included study. The data collected for each study included study name; first author; publication year; number of recipients, donors and controls in the study; the number of pediatric patients included; mean duration of follow-up; polymorphism/single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) investigated; gene; reference SNP cluster ID (rsID) or primers for SNP; location of SNP; investigated phenotype(s); use of immunosuppressive drugs; statistical test; and P value. In those studies that reported primers instead of rsIDs, we queried the University of California, Santa Cruz Genome Browser and Basic Local Alignment Search Tool of the National Center for Biotechnology Information to try identifying the rsIDs.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data Analysis

The studies were searched for polymorphisms that were significantly associated (P < .05) with 1 or more clinical outcomes after heart transplantation. Associations were categorized based on their phenotype: immunosuppressive therapy, rejection and survival, cardiac function, kidney function, lipids, and other phenotypes (Tables S1–S6, SDC,http://links.lww.com/TXD/A172). Studies were excluded if they did not report a significant association related to heart transplantation outcomes, or if analyses were conducted in a mixed set of solid organ transplants with only a small percentage of cardiac transplants. We assessed quality of the individual studies by the following criteria: (1) selection bias, (2) phenotype definition, (3) population structure taken into account, (4) accuracy of genotyping measurement, (5) Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium assessed, (6) multiple testing correction, and (7) results consistent with other studies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

The literature search included 2755 published results until July 10, 2018, after removal of duplicates. A total of 86 articles were screened full text. After screening, 56 articles with statistically significant associations between SNPs and clinical outcomes after heart transplantation were eligible. Together, these 56 studies contained 107 significant SNP-phenotype associations, and included a total of 7030 recipients, 3059 donors, and 1308 controls. Some studies cohorts published multiple studies using the same samples, so the number of unique samples is lower. Forty-five studies included adult patients only, 9 studies included only pediatric patients and 2 studies included patients of all ages. All included studies were candidate gene studies. A total of 58 polymorphisms in 36 genes were identified to be associated with clinical outcomes after heart transplantation. Results per phenotype group can be found in Tables S1–S6, SDC (http://links.lww.com/TXD/A172). None of the studies fulfilled all of our quality criteria. Especially selection bias, population structure, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, accuracy of genotyping measurement, and multiple testing correction were hardly ever taken into account. Phenotype definition quality varies across clinical outcomes. For example, immunosuppressive drug level measures were explained in detail in all studies, whereas rejection type or grade was not specified in approximately 25% of studies. Therefore, we decided to only use consistency of findings across the 56 studies to identify 3 genes, ABCB1, CYP3A5, and TGFB1, associated with heart transplant outcomes (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

This literature review gives a comprehensive overview of all non-HLA polymorphisms that have been implicated to affect outcomes after heart transplantation. A total of 56 studies were included, all were candidate gene studies. Fifty-eight polymorphisms in 36 different genes were identified. Even though the field of genetics in heart transplantation remains largely unexplored, the identification of multiple polymorphisms supports the theory that non-HLA polymorphisms are involved in clinical outcomes after heart transplantation.

Although many variants and genes were only significantly associated to heart transplant outcomes in a single study, some were identified in multiple studies. Especially SNPs in ABCB1, CYP3A5, and TGFB1, summarized in Table 1, were consistently replicated for a subset of traits.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B Member 1

The ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) gene on chromosome 7 encodes for a transporter protein, P-glycoprotein, which is expressed in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and intestines. This protein is involved in multidrug resistance and is often linked to the development of resistance to anticancer drugs.30,31 Together with CYP3A, it is involved in the transportation and biotransformation of cyclosporine and tacrolimus. It is suspected to be associated with inflammatory bowel disease32 and colchicine resistance.33 Several polymorphisms, rs1045642 within exon 26, rs1128503 within exon 12, rs2032582 within exon 21, rs2235013, and rs2235033, both within an intron, were associated with cyclosporine levels in heart transplant recipients.10 Two reviews on several CYP3A and ABCB1 SNPs show conflicting results on the influence of rs1045642, rs2032582, and rs1128503 on both cyclosporine and tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and drug response solid organ transplant recipients.34-36 It is hypothesized that these SNPs could induce a lower P-glycoprotein activity, which could lead to less cyclosporine to be removed from the cells, thus increasing the bioavailability.37 Two studies found associations between ABCB1 SNPs and acute rejection after heart transplantation, which may be attributed to altered cellular levels of immunosuppressants.14,15

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cytochrome P450 Family 3, Subfamily A, Member 5

The cytochrome P450 family 3, subfamily A, member 5 (CYP3A5) gene on chromosome 7 encodes an enzyme of the cytochrome P450 family, mostly expressed in the liver, which is involved in the metabolism of a large variety of drugs and the synthesis of cholesterol and other lipids.38CYP3A5 is known to be involved in the development of essential hypertension in humans39 and to influence the required dose of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin and tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation recipients. The rs776746 G allele is a loss-of-function allele, which disrupts a splice site. This leads to expression of a nonfunctional enzyme, resulting in reduced metabolization of tacrolimus and thus higher concentrations.40,41 Multiple studies demonstrate an association between the SNP rs776746 and the tacrolimus level or dose for heart transplant recipients.13,16-18 Renal dysfunction after cardiac transplantation is an adverse outcome frequently observed, mainly due to the prescription of calcineurin inhibitors; they are known to be nephrotoxic and involved in the development of hypertension, which can also result in renal dysfunction.42 Two genomewide association studies (GWAS) in African American and European kidney transplant recipients, respectively, identified several CYP3A5 SNPs to be associated with tacrolimus through concentrations, including rs776746.43,44 One study found this SNP to be associated with renal function postheart transplantation.20

Back to Top | Article Outline

Transforming Growth Factor Beta-1

The transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFB1) gene on chromosome 19 encodes a cytokine that has a wide range of functions and is involved in many biological processes, such as embryogenesis, carcinogenesis and immune response.45 TGF-ß1 plays an especially large role in the regulation of T-lymphocytes46 and is known to be of importance in a large variety of disorders in humans, including coronary artery disease (CAD) and rejection after kidney transplantation.47-49 Two different polymorphisms in the TGFB1 gene were identified in relation to outcomes after heart transplantation: rs1800470 in codon 10 and rs1800471 in codon 25. Several studies found an association between rs1800471 and acute cellular rejection, and/or CAD posttransplantation.21-24,49 However, these findings were inconsistent because 3 studies showed no significant association between acute cellular rejection and rs1800471,50-52 and another 3 studies failed to find an association between this SNP and chronic rejection.25,52,53 Two studies found rs1800471 to be associated with renal function after transplantation27,28 and 3 found no significant association.54-56 The SNP rs1800470 was also associated with accelerated CAD after transplantation25 and with renal function posttransplantation.29

Many loci were published in only a single study, or tested in multiple studies but could not be consistently replicated. For instance, the IL10 SNP rs1800896 has been reported as significantly associated with rejection in 3 studies (Table S2, SDC,http://links.lww.com/TXD/A172).50,57,58 However, 6 other studies were not able to find a significant effect for the same SNP on any form of rejection.52,53,59-62 Publication bias, that is, the fact that negative findings are less likely to be published, makes it even more difficult to establish the true association between this SNP and rejection.

This lack of replication of findings could have various reasons. First, sample sizes of most studies are limited, which reduces statistical power to detect significant associations. Most transplant centers perform less than a few dozen of heart transplants per year, making it difficult to collect larger numbers of samples that are needed for genetic studies. Second, the definitions of the investigated phenotype varied greatly. For instance, the definition of acute rejection varied from “any histological evidence of rejection” to “acute cellular rejection grade 2R or higher.” If the biological mechanisms leading to clinical outcomes are different, the underlying genes and loci involved may also vary. Combining clinical outcomes may lead to more noise and thus less statistical power, whereas testing a gene found for 1 outcome for association with a slightly different outcome, may lead to nonreplication. Third, patient characteristics of the included studies were heterogeneous, which is not unexpected because of the limited numbers of transplants performed each year. The studies samples differ for instance in ethnicity, sex, age, and underlying disease causing the need for heart transplantation. Fourth, the vast majority of studies did not correct for potential confounding due to population structure or cryptic relatedness. Also, many studies did not correct for HLA type in the recipient, or HLA mismatches between donors and recipients. Lastly, many reports studied more than 1 polymorphisms and did not correct for multiple testing, most likely resulting in a number of false-positive results. Overall, the quality of the candidate gene studies was limited, with none of the studies fulfilling our quality criteria.

Candidate gene studies are hypothesis driven, assuming that prior knowledge of the gene function will lead to identification of genetic variants associated with clinical traits. Complex conditions, such as acute and chronic rejection or renal dysfunction posttransplantation, are believed to be influenced by multiple genetic polymorphisms that individually contribute only a small proportion to the overall risk. Various biological pathways are involved in the development of these conditions, but in many cases, it is unclear which pathways are involved or how important a specific pathway is. Thus, a candidate gene study may not be ideal to identify SNPs related to clinical outcomes after heart transplantation.

Genomewide association studies, incorporating millions of genetic variants, would likely be a more appropriate study design because it has an agnostic approach. However, the combination of a need for large sample sizes to be appropriately powered to detect significance in a GWAS and the limited amount of cardiac transplantations being performed could prove to be challenging. This is reflected by the lack of genomewide studies on heart transplant outcomes, and the small number of GWAS on solid organ transplant outcomes in general. Thus far, only 8 GWAS have been published in this field, and all involved renal transplants.43,44,63-68 Outcomes investigated were medium-term graft function, new onset diabetes after transplantation, acute cellular rejection, and tacrolimus concentrations.

More research into the genetic factors associated with outcomes posttransplantation can lead to the discovery of novel pathways or biological processes involved and a better understanding of already known biological pathways. Large consortiums are key to allow these large-scale genetic analyses, potentially testing tens of millions of genetic variants. The International Genetics & Translational Research in Transplantation Network (www.igenetrain.org) was designed to this end, and now consist of more than 30 studies with extensive phenotypic and genomics and other -omics data.69,70 The ultimate goal is to use the knowledge from this research to improve outcomes for transplant recipients, for example, by better individualized dosing and selection of immunosuppressive medication and possibly even risk stratification for adverse outcomes after heart transplantation.

Findings of this systematic review of current literature support the hypothesis that non-HLA polymorphisms are involved in outcomes after heart transplantation, but evidence for individual SNPs associated with specific phenotypes is limited. Larger studies incorporating genetic variation on a genomewide scale may be able to discover novel loci and to validate known genetic variation associated to outcomes after cardiac transplantation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:1–23.
2. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-first official adult heart transplant report–2014; focus theme: retransplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:996–1008.
3. Lund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fourth adult heart transplantation report—2017; focus theme: allograft ischemic time. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1037–1046.
4. Lopez MM, Valenzuela JE, Alvarez FC, et al. Long-term problems related to immunosuppression. Transpl Immunol. 2006;17:31–35.
5. Jarcho J, Naftel DC, Shroyer TW, et al. Influence of HLA mismatch on rejection after heart transplantation: a multiinstitutional study. The Cardiac Transplant Research Database Group. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994;13:583–595; discussion 595–586.
6. Ingulli E. Mechanism of cellular rejection in transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:61–74.
7. Holweg CT, Weimar W, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Clinical impact of cytokine gene polymorphisms in heart and lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23:1017–1026.
8. Dragun D. Humoral responses directed against non-human leukocyte antigens in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2008;86:1019–1025.
9. Almoguera B, Shaked A, Keating BJ. Transplantation genetics: current status and prospects. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:764–778.
10. Jordan de Luna C, Herrero Cervera MJ, Sanchez Lazaro I, et al. Pharmacogenetic study of ABCB1 and CYP3A5 genes during the first year following heart transplantation regarding tacrolimus or cyclosporine levels. Transplant Proc. 2011;43:2241–2243.
11. Zheng HX, Webber SA, Zeevi A, et al. The impact of pharmacogenomic factors on steroid dependency in pediatric heart transplant patients using logistic regression analysis. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8:551–557.
12. Zheng H, Webber S, Zeevi A, et al. The MDR1 polymorphisms at exons 21 and 26 predict steroid weaning in pediatric heart transplant patients. Hum Immunol. 2002;63:765–770.
13. Zheng H, Webber S, Zeevi A, et al. Tacrolimus dosing in pediatric heart transplant patients is related to CYP3A5 and MDR1 gene polymorphisms. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:477–483.
14. Barnard JB, Richardson S, Sheldon S, et al. The MDR1/ABCB1 gene, a high-impact risk factor for cardiac transplant rejection. Transplantation. 2006;82:1677–1682.
15. Sanchez-Lazaro I, Herrero MJ, Jordan-De Luna C, et al. Association of SNPs with the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressant therapy after heart transplantation. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16:971–979.
16. Deininger KM, Vu A, Page RL 2nd, et al. CYP3A pharmacogenetics and tacrolimus disposition in adult heart transplant recipients. Clin Transpl. 2016;30:1074–1081.
17. Diaz-Molina B, Tavira B, Lambert JL, et al. Effect of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 genotypes as determinants of tacrolimus dose and clinical outcomes after heart transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:2635–2638.
18. Kniepeiss D, Renner W, Trummer O, et al. The role of CYP3A5 genotypes in dose requirements of tacrolimus and everolimus after heart transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2011;25:146–150.
19. Uno T, Wada K, Matsuda S, et al. Impact of the CYP3A5*1 allele on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Japanese heart transplant patients. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2018;43:665–673.
20. de Denus S, Zakrzewski M, Barhdadi A, et al. Association between renal function and CYP3A5 genotype in heart transplant recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:326–331.
21. Benza RL, Coffey CS, Pekarek DM, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta polymorphisms and cardiac allograft rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:1057–1062.
22. Densem CG, Hutchinson IV, Cooper A, et al. Polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene correlates with the development of coronary vasculopathy following cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19:551–556.
23. Densem CG, Hutchinson IV, Yonan N, et al. Donor and recipient-transforming growth factor-beta 1 polymorphism and cardiac transplant-related coronary artery disease. Transpl Immunol. 2004;13:211–217.
24. Filippo S, Zeevi A, McDade KK, Bastien O, Webber SA. Impact of TGFbeta1 gene polymorphisms on acute and chronic rejection in pediatric heart transplant allografts. Transplantation. 2006;81:934–939.
25. Holweg CT, Baan CC, Balk AH, et al. The transforming growth factor-beta1 codon 10 gene polymorphism and accelerated graft vascular disease after clinical heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71:1463–1467.
26. Aziz T, Hasleton P, Hann AW, et al. Transforming growth factor beta in relation to cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:700–708.
27. Di Filippo S, Zeevi A, McDade KK, et al. Impact of TGFbeta1 gene polymorphisms on late renal function in pediatric heart transplantation. Hum Immunol. 2005;66:133–139.
28. van de Wetering J, Weimar CH, Balk AH, et al. The impact of transforming growth factor-beta1 gene polymorphism on end-stage renal failure after heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82:1744–1748.
29. Baan CC, Balk AH, Holweg CT, et al. Renal failure after clinical heart transplantation is associated with the TGF-beta 1 codon 10 gene polymorphism. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19:866–872.
30. Pastan I, Gottesman M. Multiple-drug resistance in human cancer. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1388–1393.
31. Shen DW, Fojo A, Chin JE, et al. Human multidrug-resistant cell lines: increased mdr1 expression can precede gene amplification. Science. 1986;232:643–645.
32. Zhao JJ, Wang D, Yao H, et al. CTLA-4 and MDR1 polymorphisms increase the risk for ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:10025–10040.
33. Safa AR, Stern RK, Choi K, et al. Molecular basis of preferential resistance to colchicine in multidrug-resistant human cells conferred by Gly-185—Val-185 substitution in P-glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:7225–7229.
34. Staatz CE, Goodman LK, Tett SE. Effect of CYP3A and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors: part II. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:207–221.
35. Staatz CE, Goodman LK, Tett SE. Effect of CYP3A and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors: part I. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:141–175.
36. Wolking S, Schaeffeler E, Lerche H, et al. Impact of genetic polymorphisms of ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein) on drug disposition and potential clinical implications: update of the literature. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:709–735.
37. Llaudo I, Colom H, Gimenez-Bonafe P, et al. Do drug transporter (ABCB1) SNPs and P-glycoprotein function influence cyclosporine and macrolides exposure in renal transplant patients? Results of the pharmacogenomic substudy within the symphony study. Transpl Int. 2013;26:177–186.
38. Cholerton S, Daly AK, Idle JR. The role of individual human cytochromes P450 in drug metabolism and clinical response. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:434–439.
39. Xi B, Wang C, Liu L, et al. Association of the CYP3A5 polymorphism (6986G>a) with blood pressure and hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:1216–1220.
40. Dai Y, Hebert MF, Isoherranen N, et al. Effect of CYP3A5 polymorphism on tacrolimus metabolic clearance in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006;34:836–847.
41. Jacobson PA, Oetting WS, Brearley AM, et al. Novel polymorphisms associated with tacrolimus trough concentrations: results from a multicenter kidney transplant consortium. Transplantation. 2011;91:300–308.
42. Kobashigawa JA, Patel J, Furukawa H, et al. Five-year results of a randomized, single-center study of tacrolimus vs microemulsion cyclosporine in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:434–439.
43. Oetting WS, Schladt DP, Guan W, et al. Genomewide association study of tacrolimus concentrations in African American kidney transplant recipients identifies multiple CYP3A5 alleles. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:574–582.
44. Oetting WS, Wu B, Schladt DP, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies the common variants in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 responsible for variation in tacrolimus trough concentration in Caucasian kidney transplant recipients. Pharm J. 2018;18:501–505.
45. Attisano L, Wrana JL, Lopez-Casillas F, et al. TGF-beta receptors and actions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1222:71–80.
46. Bommireddy R, Doetschman T. TGFbeta1 and Treg cells: alliance for tolerance. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13:492–501.
47. Morris DR, Moxon JV, Biros E, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between transforming growth factor-beta polymorphisms and complications of coronary heart disease. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37878.
48. Hutchinson IV. The role of transforming growth factor-beta in transplant rejection. Transplant Proc. 1999;31:9S–13S.
49. Morris-Stiff G. TGFbeta-1 and the development of chronic graft nephropathy: relative roles of gene, mRNA and protein. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:326–330.
50. Awad MR, Webber S, Boyle G, et al. The effect of cytokine gene polymorphisms on pediatric heart allograft outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:625–630.
51. Bijlsma FJ, van der Horst AA, Tilanus MG, et al. No association between transforming growth factor beta gene polymorphism and acute allograft rejection after cardiac transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2002;10:43–47.
52. Tambur AR, Pamboukian S, Costanzo MR, et al. Genetic polymorphism in platelet-derived growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are significantly associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:690–698.
53. Vamvakopoulos JE, Taylor CJ, Green C, et al. Interleukin 1 and chronic rejection: possible genetic links in human heart allografts. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:76–83.
54. Densem CG, Hutchinson IV, Yonan N, et al. TGF-beta gene polymorphism does not influence the rise in creatinine following cardiac transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 1999;7:247–249.
55. Lacha J, Hubacek JA, Viklicky O, et al. TGF-beta1 gene polymorphism is a risk factor for renal dysfunction in heart transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1567–1569.
56. Lachance K, Barhdadi A, Mongrain I, et al. PRKCB is associated with calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal dysfunction in heart transplant recipients. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22:336–343.
57. McDaniel O, Perrin Roten D, Yamout SZ, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphism might affect the outcome of clinical rejection in cardiac transplantation. J Appl Res. 2004;5:68–80.
58. Girnita DM, Ohmann EL, Brooks MM, et al. Gene polymorphisms impact the risk of rejection with hemodynamic compromise: a multicenter study. Transplantation. 2011;91:1326–1332.
59. Densem CG, Hutchinson IV, Yonan N, et al. Influence of interleukin-10 polymorphism on the development of coronary vasculopathy following cardiac transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2003;11:223–228.
60. Girnita DM, Brooks MM, Webber SA, et al. Genetic polymorphisms impact the risk of acute rejection in pediatric heart transplantation: a multi-institutional study. Transplantation. 2008;85:1632–1639.
61. Gourley IS, Denofrio D, Rand W, et al. The effect of recipient cytokine gene polymorphism on cardiac transplantation outcome. Hum Immunol. 2004;65:248–254.
62. Bijlsma FJ, Bruggink AH, Hartman M, et al. No association between IL-10 promoter gene polymorphism and heart failure or rejection following cardiac transplantation. Tissue Antigens. 2001;57:151–153.
63. O'Brien RP, Phelan PJ, Conroy J, et al. A genome-wide association study of recipient genotype and medium-term kidney allograft function. Clin Transpl. 2013;27:379–387.
64. Pihlstrom HK, Mjoen G, Mucha S, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and long-term clinical outcome in renal transplant patients: a validation study. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:528–533.
65. McCaughan JA, McKnight AJ, Maxwell AP. Genetics of new-onset diabetes after transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:1037–1049.
66. Ghisdal L, Baron C, Lebranchu Y, et al. Genome-wide association study of acute renal graft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:201–209.
67. Sanders ML, Karnes JH, Denny JC, et al. Clinical and genetic factors associated with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in kidney and heart transplant recipients. Transplant Direct. 2015;1.
68. Hernandez-Fuentes MP, Franklin C, Rebollo-Mesa I, et al. Long- and short-term outcomes in renal allografts with deceased donors: a large recipient and donor genome-wide association study. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:1370–1379.
69. International Genetics & Translational Research in Transplantation Network (iGeneTRAiN). Design and implementation of the International Genetics and Translational Research in Transplantation Network. Transplantation. 2015;99:2401–2412.
70. Li YR, van Setten J, Verma SS, et al. Concept and design of a genome-wide association genotyping array tailored for transplantation-specific studies. Genome Med. 2015;7:90.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.