Identification of Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis Among Patients With Positive Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Results: Value of a Deep Learning-based Computer-aided Detection System in Different Scenarios of Implementation : Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Identification of Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis Among Patients With Positive Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Results

Value of a Deep Learning-based Computer-aided Detection System in Different Scenarios of Implementation

Park, Jongsoo MD*,†; Hwang, Eui Jin MD, PhD*,‡; Lee, Jong Hyuk MD, PhD*; Hong, Wonju MD*,§; Nam, Ju Gang MD, PhD*; Lim, Woo Hyeon MD*; Kim, Jae Hyun MD*; Goo, Jin Mo MD, PhD*,‡; Park, Chang Min MD, PhD*,‡

Author Information
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 38(3):p 145-153, May 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000691

Abstract

Purpose: 

To evaluate the accuracy of a deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system in identifying active pulmonary tuberculosis on chest radiographs (CRs) of patients with positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) results in different scenarios of clinical implementation.

Materials and Methods: 

We collected the CRs of consecutive patients with positive IGRA results. Findings of active pulmonary tuberculosis on CRs were independently evaluated by the CAD and a thoracic radiologist, followed by interpretation using the CAD. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in different scenarios: (a) radiologists’ interpretation, (b) radiologists’ CAD-assisted interpretation, and (c) CAD-based prescreening (radiologists’ interpretation for positive CAD results only). We conducted a reader test to compare the accuracy of the CAD with those of 5 radiologists.

Results: 

Among 1780 patients (men, 53.8%; median age, 56 y), 44 (2.5%) were diagnosed with active pulmonary tuberculosis. The CAD-assisted interpretation exhibited a higher sensitivity (81.8% vs. 72.7%; P=0.046) but lower specificity than the radiologists’ interpretation (84.1% vs. 85.7%; P<0.001). The CAD-based prescreening exhibited a higher specificity than the radiologists’ interpretation (88.8% vs. 85.7%; P<0.001) at the same sensitivity, with a workload reduction of 85.2% (1780 to 263). In the reader test, the CAD exhibited a higher sensitivity than radiologists (72.7% vs. 59.5%; P=0.005) at the same specificity (88.0%), and CAD-assisted interpretation significantly improved the sensitivity of radiologists’ interpretation (72.3%; P<0.001).

Conclusions: 

For identifying active pulmonary tuberculosis among patients with positive IGRA results, deep learning-based CAD can enhance the sensitivity of interpretation. CAD-based prescreening may reduce the radiologists’ workload at an improved specificity.

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid