Henry’s approach is widely considered the “workhorse” for exposing the volar radius and has not really changed since his original description in 1945. We describe a pronator teres–sparing volar approach to the forearm, for osteosynthesis of midshaft diaphyseal radius fractures. We believe this approach is safe, simple, and reproducible, and has several practical and theoretical advantages over Henry’s original description.
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
*Division of Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
∥Upper Limb Unit, Wrightington Hospital, Lancashire
#The Evelyn Cambridge Surgical Training Centre, Hertfordshire, UK
†Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide
‡University of Adelaide Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
§Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shriners Hospital, Portland, OR
¶Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website, www.techhandsurg.com.
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no source of funding.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to James M. McLean, MS, MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthA, Division of Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.