Article

Universal Screening or Prophylactic Treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Among Women Seeking Induced Abortions: Which Strategy Is More Cost-Effective?

Chen, Shumin MD, MPH*; Li, Jianhong MD*; van den Hoek, Anneke MD, PhD†

Sexually Transmitted Diseases 34(4):p 230-236, April 2007. | DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000233739.22747.12

Objective: 

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of universal screening and azithromycin-based prophylaxis against no intervention for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women seeking induced abortions.

Methods: 

A decision tree was constructed to evaluate health effects of the program. Cost-effectiveness was estimated for universal screening and azithromycin-based prophylaxis against no intervention with a C. trachomatis test prevalence of 4.8%.

Results: 

Azithromycin-based prophylaxis produced higher cost but prevented 289 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) for a cost of 397 RMB (U.S. $48) per case of PID prevented over no intervention. Universal screening by polymerase chain reaction test prevented 253 cases of PID at a cost of 3,049 RMB (U.S. $372) per case of PID prevented over no intervention. Azithromycin-based prophylaxis prevented an additional 36 cases of PID, costing 18,239 RMB (US $2,224) less per case of PID prevented over universal screening.

Conclusions: 

Azithromycin-based prophylaxis provided a cost savings over universal screening for chlamydial infection among women seeking induced abortion.

© Copyright 2007 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid