In 2017, nearly 2.3 million cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis were diagnosed in the United States, marking the fourth consecutive year of sharp increases in sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (collectively referred to as MSM) have an increased incidence of many STI, including syphilis and antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea, compared with women and men who have sex with women only. 1 Among MSM, extragenital infections (pharyngeal or rectal) with 1 Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) or Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are common, and these infections tend to be asymptomatic, potentially serving as reservoirs of infection and contributing to the development of antimicrobial resistance. 2 Extragenital STIs have also been shown to increase the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and acquisition, particularly among MSM with repeat gonococcal and chlamydial rectal infections. 3 4,5
STI screening—testing for an STI in the absence of any clinical signs and symptoms—is crucial to detecting and treating asymptomatic STI. Current CDC screening guidelines for CT and GC recommend that MSM be screened at least annually for both infections at exposed anatomic sites, regardless of condom use, including the urethra and rectum for CT, and the urethra, rectum, and pharynx for GC.
Extragenital STI screening cannot only aid in identifying MSM at high risk of HIV, but in many cases, an extragenital infection is the only indication that an individual has an STI. Most MSM with extragenital STI do not have a concurrent urogenital infection. 6 Adherence to these screening guidelines is important to control further increases in the rates of bacterial STI, including CT and GC. 2,7
Data on the prevalence of extragenital STI screening among MSM are limited. A 2010 medical record review of HIV-positive MSM accessing care in HIV clinics found that only 2% to 9% of MSM had been tested for rectal CT/GC in the past 12 months.
Among MSM attending STD clinics, slightly more than half were tested for pharyngeal or rectal GC in the past 12 months, with a smaller proportion being tested for pharyngeal or rectal CT in the past 12 months. 8 Examining how frequently bacterial STI screening occurs is important to evaluate adherence to CDC screening guidelines across demographic and behavioral categories and to help with interpreting trends in rates of diagnosed STI over time. STI screening guidelines for users of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommend more frequent than annual STI screening (every 6 months). 7 As HIV PrEP access expands and bacterial STI screening becomes more frequent among PrEP users, monitoring the prevalence of STI screening will be helpful in understanding how trends in STI screening are changing over time. HIV PrEP implementation could reduce STIs, but this relies on adherence to STI screening guidelines. 9 The objective of this analysis was to determine the proportion of MSM who reported receiving any STI test and the proportion who reported receiving an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months among an internet-recruited sample of MSM in the United States. 10 METHODS
Data used for this analysis were collected from the 2017 American Men's Internet Survey (AMIS). AMIS is an annual, cross-sectional internet survey conducted to assess the behaviors of MSM in the United States.
MSM are recruited to participate in AMIS through convenience sampling from a variety of websites or geospatial social networking applications using banner advertisements or e-mail blasts. Men were eligible to participate if they were ≥15 years of age, identified as male, lived in the United States, and reported at least 1 lifetime sex act (oral or anal) with a male partner. The analytical sample was further limited to MSM who had completed the survey, who were not duplicate respondents, who had sex with a male in the past 12 months, and who provided a valid US ZIP code. For this analysis, the objectives were to (1) determine the prevalence of MSM reporting any STI test in the past 12 months and (2) to determine the prevalence of MSM reporting an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months. The prevalence of any STI testing in the past 12 months was determined by positive responses to 2 questions. Men were first asked “Have you ever been tested for STIs gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis?” and if they answered “Yes” to this question, they were asked “In the past 12 months, that is, since [MONTH/YEAR], were you tested by a doctor or other healthcare provider (HCP) for an STI like gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis?” If men reported getting tested for an STI in the past 12 months, they were asked “In the past 12 months, when you were tested by a doctor or other HCP for an STI like gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis, what samples did you provide?” Men were allowed to check more than one of the response options provided—“I had my blood drawn,” “I gave a urine sample,” “I had my rectum (butt) swabbed,” “I had my throat swabbed,” “I prefer not to answer,” and “Do not know.” Extragenital STI screening in the past 12 months was defined as men selecting either “I had my rectum (butt) swabbed” or “I had my throat swabbed” regardless of which other response options were also selected. Bivariate analyses were conducted to explore differences by demographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics for the 2 outcomes of interest. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from generalized linear models to determine factors associated with reporting any STI and extragenital STI testing in the past 12 months. We also examined demographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics of MSM reporting an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months stratified by the participants' self-reported HIV status (HIV-positive or HIV-negative). Race/ethnicity was defined as self-identification as black non-Hispanic, Hispanic, or white non-Hispanic. Due to small sample sizes, MSM who reported other or multiple race/ethnicities were combined into a single group (hereafter referred to as “Other” race/ethnicity). Sexual behavioral categories included reporting any condomless anal sex with a man in the past 12 months and reporting any female sex partners in the past 12 months. The number of male sex partners reported in the past 12 months was categorized as 1 partner, 2 to 6 partners, and 7 or more partners. All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). 11,12
All procedures performed as part of AMIS involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Emory University Institutional Review Board. Incentives or compensation for study participation were not provided. For this secondary analysis of deidentified data, formal consent was not required.
In 2017, a total of 21,731 eligible and consenting men participated in the 2017 AMIS survey. After excluding those with duplicate and incomplete surveys, those with an invalid zip code, and limiting to men who had sex with another male in the past 12 months, 10,049 (46%) remained in the analysis sample (
Fig. 1). Respondents were mostly 40 years and older (45%), non-Hispanic white (71%), resided in urban areas (42%), and had a college or postgraduate degree (54%). A large majority had health insurance coverage and had visited a HCP in the previous 12 months ( Table 1). Less than half of respondents had ever disclosed their same-sex behavior to a HCP. Among HIV-negative MSM, 16% had used HIV PrEP in the last 12 months. Two thirds of respondents had ever been tested for an STI, such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis, and 42% reported being tested for an STI in the past 12 months. Information on the types of specimens provided for STI testing was available for 3285 survey respondents. Of these, 42% provided blood, urine, and extragenital (rectal or pharyngeal) specimens, 15% only had their blood drawn, 1% provided only extragenital specimens, and 5% provided only a urine sample ( Fig. 2). Among those who reported getting an extragenital STI test in the previous 12 months, 19% reported providing a throat swab only, 14% reported providing a rectal swab only, and 68% reported providing both a rectal and throat swab for STI testing. Figure 1:
Flowchart outlining participants included in the analytical sample—American Men's Internet Survey, 2017.
Demographic and Behavioral Characteristics of Sexually Active MSM Participating in AMIS—United States, 2017
Venn diagram showing the distribution of sample types provided (total number = 3258) by participants for STI testing in the past 12 months—American Men's Internet Survey, 2017.
Any STI Testing by Demographic, Clinical, and Behavioral Characteristics
Compared with MSM aged 15 to 24 years, older MSM were more likely to report being screened for any STI in the past 12 months (
Table 1). Across categories of race, black non-Hispanic MSM and Hispanic MSM were more likely to report being screened for an STI in the past 12 months compared with white non-Hispanic MSM. MSM living in nonurban areas (suburban, small/medium metro areas, and rural areas) were less likely to report being tested for any STI in the past 12 months compared with MSM living in urban areas. MSM who reported no health insurance coverage were less likely to report an STI test in the past 12 months compared with MSM who reported having health insurance. Visiting an HCP in the past 12 months and having ever disclosed same-sex behavior to an HCP were both associated with a higher prevalence of an STI test in the past 12 months compared with MSM who had not visited an HCP in the past 12 months or had never disclosed same-sex behavior to an HCP respectively. More than 80% of HIV-negative MSM who used PrEP in the past 12 months had an STI test and greater than half had an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months. Extragenital STI Testing by Demographic, Clinical, and Behavioral Characteristics
Compared with MSM aged 15 to 24 years, older MSM were more likely to report being screened for an extragenital STI in the past 12 months (
Table 1). Compared with white MSM, black non-Hispanic MSM, Hispanic MSM, and MSM reporting another race were also more likely to report extragenital STI testing in the past 12 months. MSM who reported having health insurance coverage did not have a significantly different prevalence of reporting extragenital STI testing compared with MSM who did not report health insurance coverage. MSM who had visited an HCP in the past 12 months and who had ever disclosed their same-sex behavior to an HCP had a higher prevalence of reporting extragenital STI testing in the last 12 months compared with those who had not. Among HIV-negative MSM, men who reported using PrEP in the past 12 months had a higher prevalence of self-reported extragenital STI testing compared with men who did not report PrEP use. Extragenital STI testing stratified by HIV status
Among HIV-positive MSM, there was no significant variation in the prevalence of reporting an extragenital STI test by health insurance coverage, having visited an HCP in the past 12 months, or disclosure of same-sex behavior to an HCP (
Table 2). The prevalence of reporting an extragenital STI test among HIV-positive MSM increased as the number of sex partners reported in the past 12 months increased—those reporting ≥7 sex partners were more likely to report an extragenital STI test compared with HIV-positive MSM reporting 1 partner in the past 12 months. HIV-positive MSM who reported condomless anal sex in the past 12 months were more likely to report extragenital STI testing in the past 12 months compared with those who did not report condomless anal sex ( Table 2). HIV-negative MSM who visited an HCP in the past 12 months were significantly more likely to report an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months compared with MSM who did not visit an HCP in the past 12 months. HIV-negative MSM who had ever disclosed engaging in same-sex behavior to an HCP were also significantly more likely to report extragenital STI testing in the past 12 months compared with HIV-negative MSM who had never disclosed ( Table 2). TABLE 2:
Prevalence of Self-reported Extragenital* STI Testing in the Past 12 Months by HIV Status Among MSM Participating in AMIS—United States, 2017
Current STD screening guidelines recommend that sexually active MSM be tested at least annually for gonorrhea and chlamydia at sites of sexual contact regardless of condom use. In a large sample of internet-using MSM in the United States, we found that levels of STI screening were suboptimal, with fewer than half (42%) of MSM reporting an STI test in the past 12 months and only 16% reporting an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months. The prevalence of self-reported STI testing in the past 12 months was higher among certain demographic subgroups—older MSM, black, non-Hispanic, and Hispanic MSM compared with white, non-Hispanic MSM, MSM who reside in urban areas compared with residents in suburban or rural areas, and college-educated MSM compared with MSM with less than a college degree. A number of population-based studies have reported higher levels of STI screening among younger MSM,
however we found the lowest prevalence of STI screening among those aged 15 to 24 years. This is concerning given that incidence and prevalence estimates suggest that those aged 15 to 24 years acquire half of all new STDs. 13,14 Younger age has also been associated with a higher likelihood of an unknown HIV status among a similar population, suggesting a gap in STI health care in this particular subgroup. 1,15 The higher prevalence of STI screening among black, non-Hispanic, and Hispanic MSM compared with white, non-Hispanic MSM has been reported before, 16 but is notable given the high proportion of white, non-Hispanic participants in this sample. 13
Similar associations between participant characteristics (demographic, clinical, and behavioral) and the report of an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months were seen as with the report of any STI test in the past 12 months. However, although MSM with health insurance coverage were more likely to report any STI test compared with MSM without health insurance coverage, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of reporting an extragenital STI test by health insurance coverage. This finding may reflect differences in where STI care is being sought. Public STD clinics have been shown to have higher levels of extragenital STI screening
and are utilized by individuals historically underserved in the traditional health care system, 7,17 including uninsured individuals. Efforts to improve STI screening rates should focus on both private and public health care settings. 18
Visiting an HCP in the past 12 months and ever disclosing same-sex behavior to an HCP was significantly associated with the reporting of any STI test in the past 12 months in the past 12 months. The comfort level of HCPs in eliciting sexual behaviors, particularly same-sex behaviors, can serve as a barrier to appropriate STI screening.
This finding underscores the importance of routine sexual histories in guiding appropriate clinical care. Furthermore, current guidelines for more frequent STI screening (every 3–6 months) are based on the presence of sexual risk behaviors that cannot be implemented without conducting a sexual risk assessment. MSM may also be reticent to disclose their same-sex behavior to an HCP because of concerns about confidentiality, discrimination, or stigma 19 and may have discomfort around communicating about same-sex behavior. 20 It is important to create health care environments that foster more supportive and open communication between MSM and their HCPs around same-sex behavior and sexual risk behaviors. Among HIV-positive MSM, disclosure of same-sex behavior to an HCP did not have a significant association with reporting an extragenital STI test in the past 12 months. This finding may reflect differences in risk perceptions of STI acquisition by the HCP. STI screening may also be more routinized in the setting of HIV medical care and not dependent on the elicitation of sexual risk behaviors by the HCP or self-report of these behaviors by the patient. 21
Among HIV-negative MSM, men who used PrEP in the past 12 months had a higher prevalence of any STI testing and a higher prevalence of extragenital STI testing, in the past 12 months, compared with MSM overall. Although it is reassuring to see a higher prevalence of STI screening among PrEP users, given the more frequent recommended STI screening intervals, it is concerning to see less than two thirds being screened for an extragenital STI in the past 12 months. PrEP visits as part of routine care present opportunities for users to complete preventive health care recommendations including STI screening. Although there have been concerns in the public health community about PrEP use being associated with decreased condom use
and higher STI transmission, 22,23 PrEP-associated care may lead to higher levels of STI screening among a population at risk of HIV and STI acquisition. Mathematical modeling of NG and CT transmission dynamics among MSM in the United States suggests that the implementation of biannual STI screening recommendations outlined in the CDC PrEP guidelines, while scaling up PrEP coverage, could result in a decline in STI incidence among MSM. 24 10
This sample of internet-recruited MSM is predominantly white, non-Hispanic, and college-educated limiting the generalizability of our findings to other MSM populations. The prevalence of any STI screening in the past 12 months in this population is lower than that reported by a sample of community venue-attending MSM in 5 US cities.
The prevalence of extragenital STI screening in the past 12 months in this population is higher than that reported for HIV-positive MSM accessing HIV care, 25 but considerably lower than the prevalence of extragenital STI screening reported for STD clinic-attending MSM. 8 Data are self-reported and so may be subject to respondent biases, such as underreporting of sexual risk behaviors, and recall bias. Given the phrasing of the question assessing any extragenital STI screening, participants may not have reported provider-collected specimens, which could have resulted in an underreporting of STI screening. While the AMIS 2017 survey does collect sexual behavioral information, there is limited information on the specific anatomic sites exposed—we do not know the percentage of men who engaged in receptive anal sex in the past 12 months or the percentage of men who engaged in receptive oral sex in the past 12 months. However, 51% of MSM reported engaging in receptive anal sex during the last time they had sex, indicating that while not everyone may have been indicated for extragenital STI testing in the past 12 months, the prevalence of extragenital STI screening was suboptimal. Despite these limitations, AMIS is the largest ongoing survey of gay, bisexual, and other MSM in the United States allowing for robust statistical analyses assessing risk behaviors and STI/HIV outcomes among internet-using MSM. 7
STI screening, followed by prompt and effective treatment, is a crucial public health intervention to disrupt further disease transmission. STI screening is particularly important for extragenital infections, since these are common among MSM, are mostly asymptomatic, and as a result can remain undiagnosed and untreated for longer.
Additionally, many patients with extragenital STI do not have concurrent urethral infections and therefore the extragenital infection(s) would not be identified with urogenital screening alone. 26,27 Extragenital STI have been associated with a significantly increased risk of HIV transmission among MSM 2,7,28 and can serve as a reservoir of disease and contribute to the development of reduced antimicrobial susceptibility, 4 further underscoring the importance of extragenital STI screening. In summary, STI testing in the past 12 months in this large sample of internet-using MSM was low. Enhanced efforts to improve compliance with STI screening guidelines are warranted. 29 REFERENCES
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, 2018.
2. Kent CK, Chaw JK, Wong W, et al. Prevalence of rectal urethral and pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhea detected in 2 clinical settings among men who have sex with men: San Francisco, California, 2003. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:67–74.
3. Unemo M, Shafer WM. Antimicrobial resistance in
in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27:587–613.
4. Bernstein KT, Marcus JL, Nieri G, et al. Rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia reinfection is associated with increased risk of HIV seroconversion. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:537–543.
5. Jin F, Prestage GP, Imrie J, et al. Anal sexually transmitted infections and risk of HIV infection in homosexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:144–149.
6. Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64:1–137.
7. Patton ME, Kidd S, Llata E, et al. Extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and infection among men who have sex with men—STD Surveillance Network, United States, 2010–2012. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:1564–1570.
8. Hoover KW, Butler M, Workowski K, et al. STD screening of HIV-infected MSM in HIV clinics. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:771–776.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2017 Update: a clinical practice guideline. Published March 2018. Available at:
10. Jenness SM, Weiss KM, Goodreau SM, et al. Incidence of gonorrhea and chlamydia following human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: A modeling study. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:712–718.
11. Sanchez TH, Sineath RC, Kahle EM, et al. The Annual American Men's Internet survey of behaviors of men who have sex with men in the United States: Protocol and key indicators report 2013. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2015; 1:e3.
12. Zlotorzynska M, Sullivan P, Sanchez T. The Annual American Men's Internet survey of behaviors of men who have sex with men in the United States: 2016 Key indicators report. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2019; 5:e11313.
13. Hoots BE, Torrone EA, Bernstein KT, et al. Self-Reported Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing and Diagnosis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men-20 US Cities, 2011 and 2014. Sex Transm Dis 2018 45:469–475.
14. Tai E, Sanchez T, Lansky A, et al. Self-reported syphilis and gonorrhoea testing among men who have sex with men: National HIV behavioural surveillance system, 2003–5. Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84:478–482.
15. Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: Prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:187–193.
16. Traynor SM, Brincks AM, Feaster DJ. Correlates of unknown HIV status among MSM participating in the 2014 American Men's Internet Survey (AMIS). AIDS Behav 2018; 22:2113–2126.
17. Leichliter JS, Heyer K, Peterman TA, et al. US public sexually transmitted disease clinical services in an era of declining public health funding: 2013-14. Sex Transm Dis 2017; 44:505–509.
18. Schiller JS, Clarke TC, Norris T. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the January–September 2017 National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. March 2018. Available at:
19. Ford JV, Barnes R, Rompalo A, et al. Sexual health training and education in the U.S. Public Health Rep 2013; 128(suppl 1):96–101.
20. Bird JD, Voisin DR. "You're an open target to be abused": a qualitative study of stigma and HIV self-disclosure among Black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:2193–2199.
21. Klitzman RL, Greenberg JD. Patterns of communication between gay and lesbian patients and their health care providers. J Homosex 2002; 42:65–75.
22. Paz-Bailey G, Mendoza MC, Finlayson T, et al. Trends in condom use among MSM in the United States: The role of antiretroviral therapy and seroadaptive strategies. AIDS 2016; 30:1985–1990.
23. Strauss BB, Greene GJ, Phillips G 2nd, et al. Exploring patterns of awareness and use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2017; 21:1288–1298.
24. Montaño MA, Dombrowski JC, Dasgupta S, et al. Changes in sexual behavior and STI diagnoses among MSM initiating PrEP in a clinic setting. AIDS Behav 2019; 23:548–555.
25. Jones Johnson ML, Chapin-Bardales J, Bizune D, et al. Extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea among community venue-attending men who have sex with men—five cities, United States, 2017. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:5.
26. Peters RPH, Verweij SP, Nijsten N, et al. Evaluation of sexual history-based screening of anatomic sites for
infection in men having sex with men in routine practice. BMC Infect Dis 2011; 11:7.
27. Workowski KA. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61(suppl 8):S759–S762.
28. Marcus JL, Bernstein KT, Kohn RP, et al. Infections missed by urethral-only screening for chlamydia or gonorrhea detection among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:922–924.
29. Unemo M, Nicholas RA. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol 2012; 7:1401–1422.