The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that the prevalence of primary and secondary syphilis was 2.6% among HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men (MSM) and 10.1% among HIV-infected MSM seen at sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in 2011.1 In 2012, 75% of primary and secondary syphilis cases occurred in MSM.2 A 2009 study among a population of 4376 HIV-infected MSM found that 43.6% of the cases of syphilis were diagnosed in only 3.8% of the patient population.3 Based on these data, it is reasonable to consider the presence of a core group of HIV-infected MSM who disproportionally contribute to the current epidemic of syphilis and to target that population for interventions.4
Although it is believed that most of new HIV infections originate from individuals who do not know they are HIV infected, it is clear that many HIV-infected individuals who do know their status continue to engage in sexual behaviors capable of transmitting HIV and other STDs.5 There is bidirectional biological synergy between HIV and syphilis. Risk for increased transmission of HIV is evidenced by a transient but significant increase in plasma viral load in HIV-infected individuals who have primary and secondary syphilis, even among those whose HIV viral loads had previously been controlled.6,7 On the other hand, HIV acquisition is increased 2- to 9-fold when syphilis is already present.8 It remains unclear whether there is an increased biological susceptibility to HIV infection when HIV is transmitted at the same time as syphilis.
From a behavioral standpoint, it is doubtful that further exhortations for HIV-infected MSM to practice safer sex to avoid STDs will be successful, at least for the “core transmitters” described above. Although several investigators have remarked upon a sharp decline in HIV and STD transmission risk behavior after an HIV diagnosis, Gorbach and others have shown that after 9 months, there is a rebound in unprotected anal intercourse with serodiscordant or unknown serostatus partners.9,10 Reducing rates of syphilis incidence among HIV-infected MSM, especially the core group of transmitters, theoretically could lower HIV transmission rates and importantly, syphilis transmission. Novel strategies are needed to accomplish those goals in such persistently high-risk subpopulations for whom the usual messages to practice safer sex have failed.
This pilot study investigated the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial to determine if daily prophylactic doxycycline was efficacious in reducing STDs among high-risk, HIV-positive MSM when compared with those who were provided contingency management (CM) incentives. The objectives of this study were 4-fold: (1) measure adherence to study visits; (2) measure adherence to the prophylaxis regimen; (3) measure any changes in risk behaviors, such as drug use, condom use, and number of partners; and (4) to the extent possible in a brief pilot study, compare the effectiveness of doxycycline with that of a monetary incentive for remaining STD-free.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-seven participants drawn from the Los Angeles LGBT Center (the Center) HIV Clinic were screened and underwent informed consent. Participants were required to meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) 18 years or older, (2) HIV-infected MSM or transgender women who have sex with men, and (3) at least 2 documented and adequately treated episodes of syphilis since HIV diagnosis. Participants were excluded from participation if either (1) had a known allergy or intolerance to doxycycline and/or (2) abused alcohol or other substances, which, in the opinion of the investigators, would jeopardize adherence to study procedures. Of the 37 participants screened for participation, 30 participants satisfied all inclusion criteria and were enrolled into the study.
Participants were block randomized to 1 of 2 groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio: (1) doxycycline hyclate, 100 mg once daily for 36 weeks, or (2) an incentive-based financial CM arm for remaining STD-free. Although all participants were compensated $25 per visit, participants in the CM arm received an additional $50, $75, and $100 if they tested STD-free at weeks 12, 24, and 36, respectively. No allocation concealment measures or specific measures for implementation were used; neither the researchers nor the analysts were blinded to the study group assignment.
The single daily dose of 100 mg was chosen to help adherence by conforming to the increasingly common use of once daily regimens for HIV treatment and because dosing as infrequent as once weekly was shown to be effective as prophylaxis against leptospirosis, another spirochetal disease.11 Doxycycline is a well-absorbed antibiotic with a half-life of about 12 hours and a steady-state level of 1000 to 4000 ng/mL based on 100 mg daily dosing.12 Adherence to doxycycline was defined as a blood concentration of at least 1000 ng/mL at a given visit.
The primary outcome measure was contraction of syphilis, gonorrhea, and/or chlamydia at or between study visits. A new case of syphilis was defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in rapid plasma reagin titer.1 We regularly reminded participants that we had no knowledge about whether doxycycline would prevent syphilis and that condoms should be consistently used. Doxycycline prescriptions in the doxycycline arm and financial incentives in the CM arm were stopped after the 36-week visit. Participants were followed up for an additional 12 weeks to allow sufficient follow-up time to ascertain whether there were cases of subclinical syphilis that were not prevented by doxycycline but were incompletely treated.
Study visits (baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48) included (1) a self-administered computerized behavioral risk assessment; (2) collection of adverse events and concomitant medications; (3) a physical examination limited to skin, mucous membranes, lymph nodes, and anogenital areas; (4) collection of rectal swabs and urine samples for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), pharyngeal swab for NG NAAT, a blood draw for rapid plasma reagin, and, for participants randomized to the doxycycline arm, a blood draw at 12, 24, and 36 weeks to measure doxycycline serum levels; and (5) pill counts and self-report of pill taking history since last visit. Because of cost considerations, we did not measure doxycycline in CM participants. GC NAATs were performed using APTIMA Combo 2 Assay (Hologic Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA), a transcription-mediated amplification test that detects RNA.
Participants were asked to report their race (white, African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and/or Native American), ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic), age, and year diagnosed with HIV at the baseline visit. An age group variable was subsequently created in 10-year increments from 20 to 29 years up to 50 years and older. The year diagnosed with HIV was subtracted from each participant’s baseline visit date to create the number of years since HIV-positive diagnosis. Fisher exact tests were used to assess independence of study arm at baseline with the demographic variables (race, ethnicity, age group, and years since HIV positive diagnosis) and loss to follow-up.
All analyses were intent to treat. Two-sample t tests were used to determine differences in the number of regular sex partners at baseline (count of partners with whom the participant has had sex more than twice and with whom they plan on having further sexual encounters) and casual partners at baseline (count of partners with whom the participant has had sex once or a few times and with whom they are not planning on having further sexual encounters). Poisson random intercept generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to compare differences at follow-up between the doxycycline and CM arms in the number of regular and casual partners. Logistic random intercept GLMMs were used to assess differences between the doxycycline and CM arms at follow-up on (1) receptive or insertive anal intercourse without condoms for regular partners, (2) receptive or insertive anal intercourse without condoms for casual partners, (3) meth use at any point in the past 3 months, (4) sex without a condom at any point in the past 3 months, (5) sex with an anonymous partner at any point in the past 3 months, and (6) identification of a primary sexual partner. Similarly, logistic random intercept GLMMs were used to compare (1) any new syphilis infection, (2) any new NG or CT infection, or (3) any NG, CT, or syphilis infection (any STD) through both 36 and 48 weeks of follow-up between the doxycycline and CM arms. All GLMM analyses were performed using PROC GLIMMIX in SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
The study received approval from the University of California, Los Angeles South General Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 00004474; Project No. 11-001869-CR-00003). The trial was subsequently registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02257658).
Participants were recruited between September 6, 2011, and January 30, 2012. Participants at baseline were comparable across treatment groups on race (P = 0.31), ethnicity (p =1.0), age group (P = 0.63), and years since HIV positive diagnosis (P = 0.46; Table 1). Twelve (80%) of 15 individuals from the doxycycline arm and 11 (73%) of 15 from the CM arm completed the study through 48 weeks (Fig. 1). All visits attended were analyzed for both the doxycycline arm (53/60) and the CM arm (49/60). The study ended when the final participant completed their 48-week study visit on January 23, 2013.
Participant 08 (doxycycline arm) experienced an adverse event of gastroesophageal reflux that was found to be related to the drug. The doxycycline was discontinued at week 29, and the symptoms resolved. This participant had not had any STDs at weeks 12 and 24 but did have rectal CT at the week 36 visit.
Most participants in the doxycycline arm were adherent to the medication at weeks 12, 24, and 36, with doxycycline serum levels exceeding 1000 ng/mL in 24 of 39 visits (Table 2). There were no significant differences between arms in only syphilis incidence or only NG/CT incidence at either the 36-week visits (the end of on-drug phase for the doxycycline arm and incentive payments for the CM arm) or the 48-week follow-up analysis. However, there was a significant difference between the doxycycline and CM arms on incidence of any STD in the follow-up analysis that included week 48 (P = 0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.83), although not in the analysis through week 36, with participants in the doxycycline arm less likely to test positive for NG, CT, or syphilis (6 visits with STDs of 53 total visits) compared with the CM arm (15 visits with STDs of 49 visits; Table 3). Follow-up analysis included data from all visits up to week 48, although doxycycline administration was stopped at week 36.
There were no differences between study arms in either self-reported number of regular partners (P = 0.14) or casual partners (P = 0.29) at follow-up (Table 4). There were also no differences between study arms in self-reported condom use for regular partners (P = 0.55), condom use for casual partners (P = 0.30), meth use (P = 0.78), sex without a condom in the past 3 months (P = 0.10), sex with an anonymous partner (P = 0.45) in the past 3 months, or having a main/primary partner (P = 0.14).
We completed a randomized, controlled pilot study designed to investigate the feasibility of conducting a definitive study to determine whether daily doxycycline prophylaxis compared with a financial incentive could impact incident syphilis infections in HIV-infected MSM who have had syphilis twice or more since their HIV diagnosis. The 76.7% overall retention rate in this pilot study suggests that a clinical trial in a persistently high-risk group of HIV-infected MSM is feasible.
In this small study, we did not expect to find significant differences in the incidence of STDs between the study arms. Considering only the on-drug study visits (through week 36), there were 5 STDs in the doxycycline group and 12 STDs in the CM group. When looking specifically at syphilis, there were only 2 cases in the doxycycline group compared with 6 cases in the CM group through 36 weeks, a 3-fold difference. Although the difference through 36 weeks was not statistically significant, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of any STD among participants in the doxycycline arm compared with the CM arm through 48 weeks.
The reason for this finding is not clear, but differences in behavior between the arms do not seem to explain it. Because we did not measure doxycycline levels at week 48, we do not know whether some participants continued to take doxycycline, whether unused study drug or from another source. When analyzing syphilis alone, the nonsignificant OR of 0.24 for syphilis incidence in the doxycycline arm compared with the CM arm is suggestive of a lower incidence possibly attributable to doxycycline. A larger study may have the power to detect an association.
There is no established doxycycline concentration level which is known to prevent syphilis. However, the half-life of doxycycline in most patients is approximately 12 hours and serum levels indicative of recent dosing will be 1000 to 4000 ng/mL (B. J. Guglielmo, personal communication, 2013). Given this, 8 (62%) of 13 participants took doxycycline during 2 of 3 study visits and 4 (31%) of 13 participants did so at all 3 visits.
There was 1 participant in the doxycycline arm who reported gastroesophageal reflux. No rashes, photosensitivity or other adverse events were reported. It is important to note that the daily administration of doxycycline during this study was in combination with other medications taken for HIV and other medical diagnoses.
Our study has several limitations. Drug levels were measured only for the doxycycline arm because of cost considerations. Doxycycline drug levels are important for documenting medication adherence and for determining serum levels that would be protective against syphilis. However, doxycycline is a commonly prescribed antibiotic for a diversity of conditions, and it is possible that individuals in the nondrug arm may intermittently have taken it for these other indications, or even that individuals in the drug arm continued to take it after the 36-week on-drug phase of the study. Pill count and self-reported drug taking data are not shown but suggest that some participants probably had unused drug at home. For these reasons, a future study should measure doxycycline levels in both drug and nondrug study arms and at all visits, including those that are unscheduled due to a suspected STD. This would serve to document potential contamination effects and to query drug taking at any time STD testing is done.
Given the inclusion criteria of this pilot study, the results generalize to those MSM in HIV care who have elevated sexual risk profiles but are likely not generalizable to all MSM. Because this was a pilot study with only 30 participants enrolled, further study with a much larger sample size is needed to determine if these results are reproducible. Lastly, 1000 ng/mL was set as a minimum protective doxycycline serum level, but the literature is unclear if levels less than 1000 ng/mL confer a modest amount of protection. A larger study may determine the protection conferred at other concentrations of the drug. We further recommend that a future study be simplified to include only drug and nondrug arms, eliminating the CM arm.
Doxycycline is often prescribed for a variety of common conditions but usually for durations of 2 weeks or less. Exceptions to this would include longer courses for prostatitis or even chronic use for acne suppression. Concerns about antimicrobial resistance among various organisms, whether sexually transmitted or not, are legitimate. However, for 4 organisms that may be of special public health concern in this core transmitter group, there is perhaps reason to be less concerned about doxycycline resistance. For N. gonorrhoeae, doxycycline is not used for treatment and there is little evidence for C. trachomatis resistance to the tetracycline class of antibiotics. treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium relies on azithromycin and newer fluoroquinolones, and although there is concern over resistance to these agents, doxycycline has not been considered very effective treatment despite absence of demonstrated in vitro resistance.13 There are choices other than tetracyclines for treatment of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and they are not used for hospital treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections with this organism.14 Nevertheless, antibiotic resistance is becoming an increasingly important issue and a future study of doxycycline syphilis prophylaxis could include monitoring resistance among a selected panel of organisms. Finally, the use of daily doxycycline prophylaxis against syphilis would not be an appropriate prevention tool for most HIV-infected MSM but only for a relatively small, yet epidemiologically important population, where its use may outweigh the theoretical resistance risks. As for any prophylactic intervention, if shown to be effective, it would only be recommended after careful review of the individual clinical circumstances.
Population-based efforts to control the HIV and STD epidemics must recognize the synergy between the spread and infectiousness of the various organisms, and the importance of core transmitter groups. Furthermore, it is important to investigate whether well tolerated and safe pharmacologic agents can be added to our prevention tools, thus giving us more options in populations where behavioral prevention has not worked and is not likely to work.
3. Bolan RK, Rudy ET, Cheng KJ, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among HIV positive persons before and after entry into HIV care: The need for priority interventions. Presented at: National HIV Prevention Conference, 2009, Atlanta.
4. Yorke JA, Nold A, Hethcote HW. Dynamics and control of the transmission of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 1978; 5: 51–6.
5. Hall HI, Holtgrave DR, Maulsby C. HIV transmission rates from persons living with HIV who are aware and unaware of their infection. AIDS 2012; 26: 893–6.
6. Jarzebowski W, Caumes E, Dupin N, et al. Effect of early syphilis infection on plasma viral load and CD4 cell count in human immunodeficiency virus-infected men: Results from the FHDH-ANRS CO4 cohort. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 1237–43.
7. Buchacz K, Patel P, Taylor M, et al. Syphilis increases HIV viral load and decreases CD4 cell counts in HIV-infected patients with new syphilis infections. AIDS 2004; 18: 2075–9.
8. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: The contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Trans Infect 1999; 75: 3–17.
9. Marks G, Crepez N, Senterfitt JW, et al. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States—Implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005; 39: 446–53.
10. Gorbach PM, Weiss RE, Jeffries R, et al. Behaviors of recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men in the year postdiagnosis: Effects of drug use and partner types. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56: 176–82.
11. Takafuji ET, Kirkpatrick JW, Miller RN, et al. An efficacy trial of doxycycline chemoprophylaxis against leptospirosis. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 497–500.
12. Vu B, Nguyen C, Nguyen T, et al. Sex affects the steady-state pharmacokinetics of primaquine but not doxycycline in healthy subjects. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2009; 81: 747–753.
13. Taylor-Robinson D. Diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium
infection: Sobering thoughts. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014; 12: 715–22.
14. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: E18–E55.
1 For clarification, there is a 2-titer increase between 1:4 and 1:16 (i.e., the progression is 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16), but this represents a 4-fold increase in titer (referring to the numerical difference between 4 and 16).© Copyright 2015 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association