HIV testing is an entry point both for HIV prevention and care.1 Early detection of HIV not only reduces the chance of transmitting the virus to uninfected individuals but also enables timely treatment to reduce mortality and morbidity.2 HIV testing is also the backbone of combination HIV prevention highlighting testing and linkage to care.3 The United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS strategy 2011 to 2015 proposed to reduce HIV sexual transmissions by half among men who have sex with men (MSM) and to offer universal access to combination antiretroviral therapy for eligible people living with HIV by 2015.1 These goals are achievable only if a high proportion of at-risk persons go for periodic HIV testing to know their status.
The Chinese government has implemented free HIV testing in HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clinics under the “Four Frees and One Care” policy since 2003.4 By the end of 2009, 7335 VCT clinics had been established with at least 1 or 2 per county, of which 43.4% were in local Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) venues, 26.1% in general hospitals (including traditional Chinese medicine hospitals), 14.8% in township health centers, and 15.7% elsewhere.4 Despite the efforts made by the government to facilitate universal access to HIV testing, 56% of an estimated 780,000 individuals living with HIV/AIDS in mainland China did not know their status at the end of 2011.5 National sentinel surveillance data have suggested that MSM have now become one of the subgroups at highest risk for HIV in China, as is the case worldwide.6,7 The national average prevalence of HIV infection among MSM in the sentinel sites surpassed that among intravenous drug users for the first time in 2010.5 Moreover, approximately 17% of MSM in China are currently married, and 26% of MSM had female sexual partners in the last 6 months; unawareness of their HIV status could increase the risk of MSM to both men and women.8
Chongqing City, located in southwestern China, is among the world’s largest cities. In Chongqing, HIV incidence rate among MSM was nearly twice that in other Chinese cities (8.3% vs. 4.6%), whereas the average testing rate in 2009 was only 34.5%.9,10 Our study aimed to assess the history of and the barriers to HIV testing among MSM in Chongqing City, with the goal of providing guidance for design of future interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Design and Procedures
We conducted the study between September and December 2010 in Chongqing City, China. This was the second round of cross-sectional surveys after the first survey in 2009. The original aim of the serial cross-sectional surveys was to evaluate the change of HIV prevalence and risk behaviors in the MSM population over time. The study procedures and sampling strategies were described in detail elsewhere.11 In brief, participants were recruited using a respondent-driven sampling approach.12 Six MSM were selected as initial seeds by several local gay-friendly community-based organizations: 3 recruited from gay Web sites by Lan Yu, Hua Yang Nian Hua Tong Xin, and Yang Guan Volunteer Groups; 2 recruited from bars by Cai Hong and Zhi Ai Volunteer Groups; and 1 from brothel by Lan Tian Volunteer Group. They were chosen through focus group discussion, taking into consideration their demographic characteristics and subgroup memberships, active social networks, and motivation to recruit peers. Each seed and each of his referred peers were allowed to recruit up to 3 participants. All referred participants had to be a member of the recruiter’s social network and meet the eligibility criteria for the study. Participants were compensated with 30 Chinese Yuan (≈US $4.5) for their participation in the study and an additional 20 Chinese Yuan (≈US $3.0) for those who successfully recruited eligible MSM who subsequently completed the study interview. Eligible participants (≥18 years old) completed a computer-assisted self-interview on their history of receiving HIV testing, barriers and facilitators for taking a test, and, when applicable, reasons for not taking one. For the perceived barriers, all participants were asked, “In your opinion, what prevents a gay man from having an HIV test?” To probe for reasons (barriers) for not taking a test, men who never took a test were asked, “Why have you never tested for HIV?” Venous blood samples were collected to test for HIV and syphilis. All eligible persons expressing interest and providing written consent were enrolled in the study. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of the National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention; Chinese CDC; University of California, San Francisco; and Vanderbilt University.
Venous blood specimens were first screened for HIV-1 using a rapid test (Determine HIV-1/2; Inverness Medical Japan Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) at the study site, and the result was given to the participant immediately after the interview, with counseling as to its meaning. All samples were then sent to laboratories in Chongqing CDC for testing using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Vironostika HIV Uni-Form plus O; bioMérieux Shanghai Company Ltd, Shanghai, China). Positive samples were confirmed by Western blot for HIV-1 (HIV Blot 2.2 WBTM; Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore, Singapore). Only the ELISA and Western blot positive tests were deemed seropositive. Syphilis antibody testing used the Treponema pallidum particle assay (InTec Products, Inc, Xiamen, China).
We examined correlates of prior HIV testing among MSM who participated in the cross-sectional survey in 2010. The 6 seeds were excluded in all analyses because they were not recruited by peers.13 Descriptive analyses of HIV and syphilis prevalence and characteristics of social demographics and sexual behaviors were conducted using RDSAT software (Respondent-Driven Sampling Analysis Tool V 5.6.0; www.respondentdrivensampling.org), which adjusted for personal social network size and patterns of recruitment.12 Such adjustments compensate for potential bias arising from different personal social network sizes and respondents’ homophily (recruitment of participants often occurs within certain groups).12 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using RDSAT-generated individual weights for prior HIV testing (outcome variable). Variables significantly associated with prior HIV testing at the level of P < 0.1 in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate logistic regression model, calculating adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were carried out using STATA/SE V11.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants
Among the 492 respondents, 16 individuals (3.3%; 16/492) had enrolled in the 2009 survey. Of these 16, 3 individuals had been tested only once, all during the 2009 survey; the other 13 had been tested more than once. Because none of these 16 individuals tested HIV positive in the 2010 survey, we included them in the calculation of the HIV testing rate.
Of the 492 participants, 87% were never married and 98% were of Han ethnic origin. The median age was 24 years (interquartile range [IQR], 21–28; range, 18–65); 78% were registered residents in Chongqing City. No income was reported by 29%, and 45% were not enrolled in any health insurance plan. A quarter (25.2%) were students, of whom 88% were currently enrolled in college. The median age of having their first sex with a man was 20 years (IQR, 18–23). More than 1 male sex partner in the past 6 months was reported by 56%, 18% of participants were currently living with a male sexual partner, and 40% had ever had sex with women. Two thirds self-reported as preferring homosexual relations. Of 485 MSM (98.6%) who ever had anal sex, 33% preferred an insertive role, 30% preferred a receptive role, and 37% preferred both. Only half (51%) of participants perceived a high risk of getting HIV through homosexual contact. Among 477 MSM who had a recent male partner in the past 6 months, 94% (444/474) of them used condoms during anal sex and 19% (89/474) always used condoms (Table 1).
The adjusted HIV and syphilis prevalence rates were 11.7% (95% CI, 8.6%–11.6%) and 4.7% (95% CI, 2.6%–7.3%), respectively.
Barriers and Facilitators for HIV Testing
Perceived barriers for taking an HIV test were assessed in 492 participants regardless of whether or not they had a history of HIV testing. The top 4 reasons for perceived barriers to HIV testing were psychological, including fear of knowing a positive result (78.7%), fear of discrimination with HIV positivity (76.7%), unwillingness of going to an HIV clinic (67.5%), and concern about meeting acquaintances at testing (67.1%). The response rates were similar between those who had and those who did not have a prior HIV testing for these 4 barriers. A structural barrier often mentioned was that persons did not know where to get tested; those who had not had prior testing (63%) were more likely to mention this reason than those who had (49%, P = 0.001) (Fig. 1).
Facilitating factors for HIV testing in the 492 MSM were a more sympathetic attitude from health staff (98.8%), guaranteed confidentiality (98.8%), a free or low cost test (98.2%), higher HIV/AIDS knowledge (98.0%), advice from a doctor/nurse (97.8%), anonymity (96.3%), including testing in a standard public health or medical visit (95.5%), availability of medicine for AIDS treatment (94.3%), no discrimination against AIDS in the community (94.1%), and the fact that other MSM had gone for testing (87.8%).
Never having had an HIV test was reported by 205 participants (42%), of whom 203 (99%) reported the actual reasons why they did not do so. The top 5 reasons were as follows: no perceived HIV risk, not knowing where to get a test, fear of having a positive result, concern about the reporting of a positive result to the government, and having no free time to get tested (Fig. 2).
Factors Associated With Prior HIV Testing
Of the 58% (287/492) of participants who had ever taken an HIV test, 29% had taken the test once, 29% twice, and 42% 3 times or more. Forty-five percent reported that their recent test was taken, thanks to involvement in government or nongovernment organization projects. More persons (47%) were willing to go to a local CDC VCT clinic compared with a VCT clinic in a hospital (8%). Nearly three-quarters (73%) of ever-tested MSM had taken their tests in the past 12 months before this 2010 survey. Higher educational level, cohabitation with a male partner, preferred insertive role in anal sex, condom use with a recent male sexual partner during the past 6 months, and self-perceived HIV risk were positively associated with prior HIV testing in the univariate analysis. A multivariable analysis model showed that those who had ever attended a college were more likely to take an HIV test than those who had not (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.16–2.62; P = 0.008), as were MSM who used condoms with the recent male partner during the past 6 months were more likely to get tested (AOR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.25–6.62; P = 0.01). Those who preferred a receptive role in the anal intercourse were less likely to take an HIV test compared with those who preferred an insertive role (AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35–0.94; P = 0.03), as were men cohabitating with female sexual partners or living alone, compared with those living with a male sexual partner (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38–1.28; P = 0.06) (Table 1).
Our study found that 58% of MSM had a history of HIV testing in Chongqing City in southwestern China with an HIV prevalence rate in MSM of more than 11.7%. This testing frequency was higher than the national average of 44% in all risk groups estimated in 2011 and was also a bit higher than the estimated testing rate of 51% among MSM in 2009.5,14 China seems to be doing better than many other nations; a weighted average testing rate of 33% was reported from 34 low- and middle-income countries in 2008.15 Although the continuously increasing HIV testing rates among MSM in Chongqing City since 2006 suggest progress,14 the rates are still disappointing compared with MSM in some metropolitans in high-income countries, for example, 90% in 21 cities in the United States16 and 80.5% in Australia.17
Higher education, insertive roles in anal sex, and condom use were associated with prior HIV testing. Men with a college education were more likely to have been tested, perhaps due to their higher awareness of HIV risk. Well-educated MSM may have been oversampled with our respondent-driving sampling because the study sample included a significant proportion of college students and college students may be more likely to bring their fellow students to take a test.
Those who preferred receptive anal sex were less likely to have had an HIV test, and we think that it is important to study why men preferring receptive anal intercourse are less likely to test. That MSM who preferred receptive anal sex perceived themselves to have lower risk of HIV infection than those who preferred insertive anal sex (OR, 2.0; 95% CI,1.3–3.2; P = 0.003) is especially worrisome.18
Those who used condoms during anal sex with their recent male sexual partner in the past 6 months were more likely to take a test. Condom use was measured within a time frame of the last 6 months, whereas testing experience was a lifetime measurement in our study. It is possible that those who used condoms more often may have gotten information about safe sex in their prior testing and counseling experience and thus increased their condom use.
Chongqing is one of the large cities in China where MSM are more visible, and HIV prevalence is much higher than middle and small cities.19 Men who have sex with men prefer to seek sexual partners in large cities, often hiding their sexual identities from their families and friends in their hometowns.20 HIV prevalence in the 2010 survey was 11.7%, higher than syphilis (4.7%). This difference was also seen in the 2009 survey (15.7% HIV vs.6.6% syphilis).11 This may reflect local public health interventions targeting at HIV/STD prevention and care among MSM.9
We found that fear of finding out about a positive result was the number 1 perceived barrier for taking an HIV test, followed by fear of discrimination, a closely related fear. These testing barrier findings have been seen worldwide, from Beijing migrant workers21 to Peruvian MSM22 to high-income country MSM.23 Such universal reported barriers suggested that psychological support, modifying general social attitudes, and education about the benefits of early therapy are essential to motivate MSM for HIV testing. Unwillingness to go to an HIV clinic and concern about meeting acquaintances at the testing clinic were additional barriers to testing. Rapid oral testing has become available in recent years in the Chinese market and could be considered an alternative for a clinic-based ELISA testing strategy.24 Its advantages include less invasiveness, easy access and application, ease of maintaining confidentiality, and elimination of anxiety associated with the waiting period for results.24 However, linkage to counseling and care may be more difficult if self-testing becomes a norm. For persons getting clinic-based testing, high-quality counseling and nonjudgmental staff attitudes can help the clients to reduce their fear and concerns and can facilitate the linkage of seropositive persons to care.
The current version of Chinese HIV testing guidelines requires 2 ELISAs for screening and Western blot for confirmatory testing; Chinese policy makers realized the limitations of this expensive and time-consuming strategy, and a new version of HIV testing guidelines is being developed. Naturally, MSM who had no history of HIV testing were less likely to know where to get a test than those who had been tested before. Educating MSM about access to HIV service is important, particularly among male migrants (i.e., nonresidents of Chongqing) who are unfamiliar with available services in their new environment.
More than half of the participants perceived themselves not at risk for HIV infection, particularly those who had never tested. Approximately 90% (176/196) of those who never tested used condom during anal sex with their recent male partner in the past 6 month and 18% (36/196) reported always using a condom. Those men using condoms during sex might have considered themselves at lower risk for infection. Equally likely, men taking preventive precautions might not seek HIV testing because of their lower perception of HIV risk.
Education about HIV/AIDS and safer sex can motivate HIV testing. A study from Shenyang, China demonstrated that recently acquired knowledge about HIV might be a trigger for HIV testing.25 In comparison, the 2 main reasons for not taking an HIV test in our study were low perceived risk of HIV infection and not knowing where to get tested. According to the Health Belief model, perceived susceptibility (potential risk to contract HIV) and perceived severity (understanding risk of AIDS and death) are positive predictors for behavioral change.26 This emphasizes that both HIV education and counseling are top priorities to improve HIV testing in Chinese MSM; education can increase risk awareness, and counseling can help reduce fear of taking HIV testing. Future intervention strategies should encourage MSM to go for HIV testing (cues to action) while helping establish confidence to achieve a long-term goal of reduced risk (self-efficacy). A study from Hong Kong found that cognitive variables such as attitudes, subjective norms, perceived control, and behavioral intentions that were derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviors were independently associated with lifetime and 12-month uptake of VCT.27
In China, VCT clinics offer free HIV testing, whereas health care settings provide paid testing.28 The coverage of the testing clinics has been extended to all 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities, although many Chinese live far from testing centers.4 In addition, the Chinese government has implemented guidelines for provider-initiated testing and counseling in medical facilities to further expand VCT to routine medical services.4 The percentage of MSM who had been tested for HIV increased from 32.7% in 2007 to 44.9% in 2009, but has not risen markedly since.4,5 The Chinese government has launched a “Five Year Plan” to strengthen the prevention and control for new HIV infections in most at-risk groups. In addition, the government also collaborated with international organizations to develop large-scale public health programs for HIV/AIDS prevention and care. For example, achieving universal access to prevention, treatment, and care for HIV-infected people is the goal of Chinese engagement with the Global Fund to Fight HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (Dr Shaodong Ye, personal communication). Despite efforts to date, the MSM testing rate lags that of higher-income nations, although VCT for MSM in China is highly cost-effective.29 Several limitations existed in our study. First, self-reported information about the prior HIV testing experience may be subject to recall bias and social desirability bias, especially for sensitive questions that challenge social norms. Computer-assisted self-interview likely reduced but did not eliminate these biases. Second, we could not disaggregate the motivations for taking an HIV test in our survey. Nearly half of the participants took a test because of enrollment in a public health project and may not do so of their own initiative.
Innovative interventions for improving uptake of HIV testing are needed among Chinese MSM. Multimedia social marketing campaigns can be effective intervention approaches to increase HIV testing.30 Internet-delivered interventions via chat room, Web sites, or short message service could be further developed for their acceptability and feasibility to promote testing in Chinese MSM.31 In addition, mobile vans for HIV testing in communities may provide easier access to testing.32
In summary, the HIV testing rate in the MSM population of Chongqing is still low. Mental and psychological support from health providers, family and friends, and the society as a whole are critical to encourage MSM to get tested. Education and social marketing need to be emphasized and expanded.33 Structural interventions such as oral testing and expanded, convenient test sites are important strategies to increase HIV testing, as are behavioral, contingency management, and social marketing interventions.
1. UNAIDS. Getting to Zero: 2011–2015 Strategy. UNAIDS Resources Documents. December 21, 2010.Available at: http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2010/JC2034_UNAIDS_Strategy_en.pdf
. Accessed December 1, 2011.
2. Thompson MA, Aberg JA, Cahn P, et al.. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2010 recommendations of the International AIDS Society—USA panel. JAMA 2010; 304: 321–333.
3. Kurth AE, Celum C, Baeten JM, et al.. Combination HIV prevention: Significance, challenges, and opportunities. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2011; 8: 62–72.
4. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. China 2010 UNGASS Country Progress Report. UNAIDS China. 2010. Available at: http://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/monitoringcountryprogress/2010progressreportssubmittedbycountries/china_2010_country_progress_report_en.pdf
. Accessed December 5, 2011.
5. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. 2012 China AIDS Response Progress Report. UNAIDS 2012 Progress reports submitted by countries. March 31,2012. Available at: http://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/monitoringcountryprogress/progressreports/2012countries/ce_CN_Narrative_Report
%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2012.
6. Beyrer C, Wirtz AL, Walker D, et al. The Global HIV Epidemics Among Men Who Have Sex with Men. The World Bank Documents & Reports. May 27, 2011. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTHIVAIDS/Resources/375798-1103037153392/MSMReport.pdf
. Accessed Ocotober 15, 2012.
7. Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, et al.. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet 2012; 380: 367–377.
8. Chow EP, Wilson DP, Zhang L. What is the potential for bisexual men in China to act as a bridge of HIV transmission to the female population? Behavioral evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2011; 11: 242.
9. Zhang Y, Chen P, Lu R, et al.. Prevalence of HIV among men who have sex with men in Chongqing, China, 2006–2009: Cross-sectional biological and behavioural surveys. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88: 444–450.
10. Li HM, Peng RR, Li J, et al.. HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in China: A meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS One 2011; 6: e23431.
11. Zhang L, Ding X, Lu R, et al.. Predictors of HIV and syphilis among men who have sex with men in a Chinese metropolitan city: Comparison of risks among students and non-students. PLoS One 2012; 7: e37211.
12. Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl 1997; 44: 174–199.
13. Volz E, Heckathorn DD. Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. J Official Stat 2008; 24: 79–97.
14. Chow E, Wilson D, Zhang L. The rate of HIV testing is increasing among men who have sex with men in China. HIV Med 2012; 13: 255–263.
15. Adam PC, de Wit JB, Toskin I, et al.. Estimating levels of HIV testing, HIV prevention coverage, HIV knowledge, and condom use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in low-income and middle-income countries. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 52 (suppl 2): S143–S151.
16. Finlayson TJ, Le B, Smith A, et al.. HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men—National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 21 U.S. cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 2011; 60: 1–34.
17. Lyons A, Pitts M, Grierson J, et al.. Sexual behavior and HIV testing among bisexual men: A nationwide comparison of australian bisexual-identifying and gay-identifying men. AIDS Behav 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
18. Dosekun O, Fox J. An overview of the relative risks of different sexual behaviours on HIV transmission. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2010; 5: 291–297.
19. Xiao Y, Ding X, Li C, et al.. Prevalence and correlates of HIV and syphilis infections among men who have sex with men in Chongqing Municipality, China. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36: 647–656.
20. Lau JT, Lin C, Hao C, et al.. Public health challenges of the emerging HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in China. Public Health 2011; 125: 260–265.
21. Song Y, Li X, Zhang L, et al.. HIV-testing behavior among young migrant men who have sex with men (MSM) in Beijing, China. AIDS Care 2011; 23: 179–186.
22. Blas MM, Alva IE, Cabello R, et al.. Risk behaviors and reasons for not getting tested for hiv among men who have sex with men: An online survey in Peru. PLoS One 2011; 6: e27334.
23. Lorenc T, Marrero-Guillamon I, Aggleton P, et al.. Promoting the uptake of HIV testing among men who have sex with men: Systematic review of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87: 272–278.
24. Chen MY, Bilardi JE, Lee D, et al.. Australian men who have sex with men prefer rapid oral HIV testing over conventional blood testing for HIV. Int J STD AIDS 2010; 21: 428–430.
25. Zhou L, Guo J, Fan L, et al.. Survey of motivation for use of voluntary counseling and testing services for HIV in a high risk area of Shenyang, China. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 23.
26. Glanz K, Rimer BK. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 2005.
27. Gu J, Lau JT, Tsui H. Psychological factors in association with uptake of voluntary counselling and testing for HIV among men who have sex with men in Hong Kong. Public Health 2011; 125: 275–282.
28. Wei C, Ruan S, Zhao J, et al.. Which Chinese men who have sex with men miss out on HIV testing? Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87: 225–228.
29. Wang S, Moss JR, Hiller JE. The cost-effectiveness of HIV voluntary counseling and testing in China. Asia Pac J Public Health 2011; 23: 620–633.
30. Wei C, Herrick A, Raymond HF, et al.. Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male-to-female transgender women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 9: CD009337.
31. Noar SM. Computer technology-based interventions in HIV prevention: State of the evidence and future directions for research. AIDS Care 2011; 23: 525–533.
32. Lahuerta M, Sabido M, Giardina F, et al.. Comparison of users of an HIV/syphilis screening community-based mobile van and traditional voluntary counselling and testing sites in Guatemala. Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87: 136–140.
33. Hong Y, Li X. HIV/AIDS behavioral interventions in China: A literature review and recommendation for future research. AIDS Behav 2009; 13: 603–613.