Share this article on:

Association of Mobiluncus curtisii With Recurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis

Meltzer, Michelle C. BS, MT (ASCP); Desmond, Renee A. DVM, PhD; Schwebke, Jane R. MD

Sexually Transmitted Diseases: June 2008 - Volume 35 - Issue 6 - p 611-613
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318167b105

From the Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

This work was supported by NIH grant Therapy and Prevention of Bacterial Vaginosis, R01 AI048044.

Correspondence: Jane R. Schwebke, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham, ZRB 239, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007. E-mail:

Received for publication March 5, 2007, and accepted January 8, 2007.

DESPITE THE FACT THAT bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most prevalent cause of symptomatic vaginal discharge in the United States1,2 and is a risk factor for preterm birth3and acquisition of HIV,4 its cause remains unknown and its treatment suboptimal. Not only are initial cure rates of BV poor, but recurrence rates are high.5 Debate exists as to whether recurrences are due to relapse or reinfection. However, 1 hypothesis is that relapse may occur secondary to inadequate treatment of BV-associated organisms, either due to resistance of BV-associated organisms to metronidazole or to inadequate penetration of a biofilm community.6,7 Anecdotally it is more difficult to eradicate BV in some women compared with others. Recent data substantiates this by the finding that women with more complicated vaginal flora reflected by higher Nugent scores (predominantly because of morphotypes consistent with Mobiluncus), are more likely to fail therapy than those with lower scores.8 The presence of Mobiluncus spp. (M. curtisii and M. mulieris) in the vagina is highly specific although not sensitive for the diagnosis of BV.9,10 Of the two, M. curtisii appears to predominate and in vitro is resistant to metronidazole, the most commonly used therapy for BV.11 Therefore, recurrence of BV could be related to failure to clear this organism. Using specimens obtained from a prospective study of the treatment of BV, we determined if there was an association between persistence of M. curtisii and recurrence of BV at 65 to 70 days after completion of initial therapy.

Vaginal swabs were collected during a prospective treatment study of BV. Women attending the Jefferson County Health Department STD Clinic with symptomatic BV were enrolled and treated for BV as previously described.8 All women received metronidazole for 7 or 14 days plus or minus azithromycin. Subjects were reevaluated at 21, 35 to 40, and 65 to 70 days after beginning the study. Subjects were discontinued from the study upon recurrence of symptomatic BV but were followed if the BV was asymptomatic. Vaginal swabs for Gram stain and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were collected at baseline and each follow-up visit. For this substudy we included only those women who had M. curtisii present at baseline as detected by PCR and who completed 3 follow-up visits for the main study. Recurrence of BV at 65 to 70 days was defined as a Nugent score of 7 to 10 at that follow-up visit regardless of symptoms. Persistence of M. curtisii was defined as the organism being present at baseline and at least one of the follow-up visits.

Baseline characteristics of the subsample and larger cohort were compared by the chi-square test for categorical variables and the t test for continuous variables. The relationship between the persistence of M. curtisii the development of recurrence was examined by the chi-square test. A stratified analysis was used to examine the relationship between M. curtisii and recurrence controlling for treatment and the Breslow-Day statistic was used to test homogeneity of the strata. All analyses were conducted with SAS Ver. 9.1 and a P value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Swabs for PCR were eluted into sterile, deionized water. DNA was extracted from the eluate using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) following the provided method for isolation of DNA from Gram-negative bacteria. Extracted DNA was rehydrated in 40 μL of the kit’s DNA rehydration solution.

Two separate PCR amplifications were performed on the extracted DNA. The first was done with a genus-specific primer set for Mobiluncus, Mob-s and Mob-as12 The second was performed using a species-specific primer set for M. curtisii, Mob-V3 and Mob-V4.12 The reaction volume was 20 or 50 μL consisting of 1 or 2 μL of rehydrated, extracted DNA, 1X buffer (50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris–HCl (pH 9.0 at the rate of 25°C), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100), 200 μmol/L dNTPs, 1 μmol/L of each primer, and 0.025 U Taq Polymerase. Amplification conditions were 30 or 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute with a final extension of 72°C for 10 minutes. Extracted M. curtisii ATCC 35,241 and M. mulieris ATCC 35,243 DNA was used for positive amplification controls, and water in place of DNA was used for a negative control. Amplification products were electrophoresed on 2% to 4% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized using UV light, and documented with a digital imager. The amplicons produced were 423 base pairs for the genus-specific and 130 base pairs for the species-specific primers. Samples that exhibited only the 423 bp product were considered positive for M. mulieris. Those that exhibited the 423 and 130 bp products were considered positive for M. curtisii without the ability to determine the presence or absence of M. mulieris.

Gram stains were interpreted according to the method of Nugent et al.13 Curved rod morphotypes were presumed to be Mobiluncus spp. No attempt was made to differentiate the 2 species of Mobiluncus based on Gram stain morphology.

Of the 594 women enrolled in the main study, 100 women met the inclusion criteria for this substudy (presence of M. curtisii by PCR at baseline visit and samples for 3 follow-up visits). The major reasons for exclusion were absence of M. curtisii at baseline, discontinuation from the study for failed therapy, and loss to follow-up. In total, 400 PCR results were available from these 100 subjects and their 4 visits. Of these visits, 29 were positive for M. mulieris and were not included in the comparison of Gram stain versus PCR detection of M. curtisii. Three Gram stain results were not available.

There were no significant differences in the majority of baseline characteristics of the women who met the inclusion criteria for this study compared with the other women in the main treatment study including race, age, education level, douching behavior, methods of birth control, and number of sexual partners. Interestingly, more women in the substudy reported a history of STDs (83.0%) compared with the entire sample (71.2%) (P = 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of PCR for M. curtisii using the presence of curved rods on Gram stain as gold standard were 91.0% and 73.7%, respectively.

Persistence of M. curtisii, defined as present at baseline and at least one other visit was significantly associated with recurrence of BV (P <0.001). Nearly 67.9% (38/56) of women with persistence of M. curtisii had recurrence of BV (Nugent score 7–10) compared with 11.4% (5/44) of women with no evidence of M. curtisii by PCR after the baseline treatment visit (Table 1). The patterns of M. curtisii positivity by study visit are shown in Table 2. The 2 most common patterns of M. curtisii persistence were absence of the organism at visits 2 and 3 with detection at visit 4, and presence of the organism at each visit. The former suggests reinfection whereas the latter suggests that M. curtisii was never cleared by the initial therapy. There was no significant difference in the association of M. curtisii with recurrent BV when stratified by the addition of azithromycin to the treatment regimen (Table 3).







Adequate treatment for BV remains a goal, not a reality. Initial cure rates range from 50% to 80% and recurrence is common, especially in some women.5 Until the etiology of BV is discovered, both in terms of microbiology and transmission, it is unlikely that better therapies will emerge. It has long been appreciated, based on Gram stains of vaginal flora from women with BV, that BV represents a spectrum of abnormalities in the vaginal ecosystem.13 Curved rods, felt to represent primarily Mobiluncus spp., may be seen in some but not all women with BV.13 Because Gram stain detection of Mobiluncus is solely dependent on morphotypical analysis, whereas PCR should be highly sensitive and specific, it is not surprising that we did not find complete agreement between Gram stain and PCR for the presence of Mobiluncus. We recently showed that higher Nugent scores, reflecting the presence of Mobiluncus morphotypes, were significantly associated with failure of initial therapy for BV.8 Results from this current study indicate that the presence of M. curtisii at baseline along with persistence of this organism as detected by PCR is highly associated with recurrence after initial cure. The reasons for persistence of this organism are unknown and could stem from relapse after therapy or reinfection from a sexual partner. Nevertheless, it appears that the more complex the ecosystem changes associated with BV are, as demonstrated by the presence of anaerobes such as Mobiluncus, the more difficult BV is to cure.

In summary, the presence and persistence of M. curtisii detected by PCR was found to be highly associated with recurrence of BV. Whether this organism is truly pathogenic or simply a marker for greater disturbances of vaginal flora remains unknown.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Fleury FJ. Adult vaginitis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1981; 24:407–438.
2. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Non-specific vaginitis: Diagnostic and microbial and epidemiological associations. Am J Med 1983; 74:14–22.
3. Gravett M, Nelson H, DeRouen T, et al. Independent associations of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome. JAMA 1986; 256:1899–1903.
4. Hillier S. The vaginal microbial ecosystem and resistance to HIV. AIDS 1998; 14:17–21.
5. Joesoef MR, Schmid GP, Hillier SL. Bacterial vaginosis: Review of treatment options and potential clinical indications for therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28:S57–S65.
6. Ferris M, Masztal A, Aldridge KE, et al. Association of Atopobium vaginae, a recently described metronidazole resistant anaerobe, with bacterial vaginosis. BMC Infect Dis 2004; 4:5.
7. Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, et al. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:1013– 1023.
8. Schwebke JR, Desmond RA. A randomized trial of metronidazole duration plus or minus azithromycin for treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:213–219.
9. Holst E, Wathne B, Hovelius B, et al. Bacterial vaginosis: Microbiological and clinical findings. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1987; 6: 536–541.
10. Roberts MC, Hillier SL, Schoenknecht FC, et al. Comparison of gram stain, DNA probe and culture for the identification of species of Mobiluncus in female genital specimens. J Infect Dis 1985; 152:74–77.
11. Spiegel CA. Susceptibility of Mobiluncus species to 23 antimicobial agents and 15 other compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:249–252.
12. Tiveljung A, Forsum U, Monstein H. Classification of the genus Mobiluncus based on comparative partial 16S rRNA gene analysis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:332–336.
13. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297–301.
© Copyright 2008 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association