Share this article on:

Understanding HIV Risks Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Africa

van Griensven, Frits*†; Sanders, Eduard J.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases: April 2008 - Volume 35 - Issue 4 - p 355-356
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816bf64c

From the *Thailand Ministry of Public Health – US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand; †Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Tuberculosis Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and ‡Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kilifi, Kenya, and University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Correspondence: Dr. Frits van Griensven, Thailand MOPH – US CDC Collaboration, DDC7 Building, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand. E-mail:

The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Kenyan Medical Research Institute.

Received for publication January 17, 2008, and accepted January 31, 2008.

In this issue of the Journal, Sharma et al.1 reported the results of focus group discussions regarding HIV risks in relation to emerging group identities, sexual risk taking, and health care usage among 30 men who have sex with men (MSM) from Nairobi, Kenya. This study shows us a rare glimpse into the private lives of Kenyan MSM and the myriad of legal, social, and economic problems confronting MSM in Kenya and likely in many other African countries. These problems include stigma and discrimination, fear of humiliation when accessing health care, concerns about involuntary disclosure of sexual behavior, power differentials between partners in negotiating condom use, fundamental misconceptions about HIV risk, self-medication for sexually transmitted diseases, and low uptake of HIV testing. Because discrimination of MSM is strong in Kenya, the men who came forward to participate in these focus groups are likely a selected population and the problems they discussed may be worse for those outside the focus groups. Obviously, these types of problems are not unique to MSM in Kenya or Africa, but in the African context of strong societal disapproval and risk for legal and other repercussions in case of disclosure they are much more difficult to address. Indeed, in a study among 224 MSM in Kampala, Uganda HIV/AIDS was given a low priority compared with other concerns and was ranked well behind discrimination and lack of acceptance in society.2 Findings from the Kenyan and the Uganda studies1,2 show the urgent need for HIV preventive interventions in African MSM.

The high levels of unprotected anal intercourse and low levels of awareness of HIV risk in Kenyan MSM1 suggest that such interventions can have a huge impact on the HIV epidemic in this population. The need and potential for preventive interventions among MSM can also be derived from data recently obtained in a cohort study in Mombasa, another Kenyan city.3 Among the 285 MSM who enrolled in this HIV vaccine preparedness study, a 24.6% HIV prevalence was found at baseline. The crude HIV incidence density during the first year of follow-up of the HIV negative fraction of the MSM cohort exceeded 8 per 100 person years.4 Unsurprisingly, levels of HIV risk behavior in these MSM were high, with more than 75% reporting at least one instance of unprotected anal sex in the past 3 months.3

For HIV preventive interventions to be successful they should include the specific social and legal issues that African MSM face in their daily lives. Emphasis on protection of confidentiality during HIV and STI testing, education and sensitivity training of health care workers, and acceptance of MSM to government and private health facilities are some examples that can be worked on immediately. The improvement of legal and human rights of African MSM will likely take more time, but should be addressed simultaneously.

Even though the study of Sharma et al.1 is one of the first of its kind in Africa, some important qualitative questions remain unaddressed. It would be valuable for instance to explore to what extent concepts of biologic sex, self-prescribed gender and sexual role identities, and sexual role separation are components in the discourse and sexual arrangements among African MSM. Another area that should be explored is sex with women in addition to men and differential risk perception and protective behavior with women and men. Answers to these questions are not only important to inform HIV preventive interventions but also to guide future research and to better understand the dynamics of HIV transmission in this population. Furthermore, they may help to select and adapt HIV preventive interventions that have been proven to be successful in MSM populations elsewhere in the world. With the HIV research and prevention agenda for African MSM now gaining momentum, these important questions need to be addressed urgently.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Sharma A, Busuki E, Gorbach P, et al. Sexual identity and HIV/STI among men who have sex with men in Nairobi. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:352–354.
2. Kajubi P, Kamya RK, Fisher Raymond H, et al. Gay and bisexual men in Kampala, Uganda. AIDS Behav; doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9323-7.
3. Sanders EJ, Graham SM, Okuku HS, et al. HIV infection in high risk men who have sex with men in Mombasa, Kenya. AIDS 2007; 21:2513–2520.
4. Sanders EJ, Graham SM, Okuku HS, et al. Risk factors for HIV-1 infection and high HIV-1 incidence of men who have sex with men, in and around Mombasa, Kenya. [Abstract] Trop Med Int Health 2007; 12 (suppl 1):88 (O26–O59).
© Copyright 2008 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association