We conducted formative research to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of continuous diaphragm use among low-income women highly exposed to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Madagascar.
To identify potential obstacles to researching the effectiveness of diaphragm use for STI prevention in a randomized controlled trial.
Mixed methods to collect complex information. In a quantitative pilot study, women were asked to use diaphragms continuously (removing once daily for cleaning) for 8 weeks and promote consistent male condom use; they were interviewed and examined clinically during follow-up. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted pre-/postpilot study. Audiotaped FGDs were transcribed, translated, coded, and analyzed.
Ninety-three women participated in prepilot FGDs, 91 in the pilot study, and 82 in postpilot FGDs. Diaphragm use was acceptable and feasible, but participants reported lower condom use in FGDs than during interviews. Most participants reported in interviews that they used their diaphragms continuously, but FGDs revealed that extensive intravaginal hygiene practices may impede effective continuous diaphragm use. Despite counseling by study staff, FGDs revealed that participants believed the diaphragm provided effective protection against STIs and pregnancy.
Mixed methods formative research generated information that the prospective pilot study alone could not provide and revealed contradictory findings. Results have methodological and ethical implications that affect trial design including provision of free hormonal contraceptives, and additional instructions for vaginal hygiene to avoid displacing the diaphragm. Mixed methods formative research should be encouraged to promote evidence-based study design and implementation.
Mixed-methods acceptability/feasibility research before an RCT provided crucial understanding of continuous diaphragm use including inconsistent reporting by sex workers in Madagascar compared to pilot study alone.
From the Departments of *Epidemiology, and †Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ‡UNC-MAD, Antananarivo, Madagascar; §Department of Family Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and Departments of ∥Social Medicine and ¶Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The authors thank Myron Cohen, Barbara Savarese, Carolyn Deal, Wendy Githens Benazerga, and Jocelyne Andriamiadana for their support.
The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the funding agencies.
Supported by Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinical Trials Unit, NO1-75329; United States Agency for International Development, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Correspondence: Frieda Behets, PhD, MPH, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. E-mail: email@example.com.
Received for publication April 2, 2007, and accepted September 9, 2007.