Review ArticlesTibial Inlay Posterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionStannard, James P. MDAuthor Information Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO Disclosure: J.P.S. is a paid consultant and receives some research support from Arthrex. AO Foundation: Board or committee member. AO North America: Board or committee member. Arthrex Inc.: paid consultant; research support. Coulter Foundation: research support. DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: paid consultant. Journal of Knee Surgery: Editorial or governing board. Orthopedic Designs North America: paid consultant. Smith & Nephew: paid consultant. Thieme: publishing royalties, financial or material support. US Department of Defense: research support. Reprints: James P. Stannard, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Avenue, Columbia, MO 65212. Online date: December 31, 2019 Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review: March 2020 - Volume 28 - Issue 1 - p 14–17 doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000258 Buy Metrics Abstract Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament is typically made through either tibial inlay or transtibial methods. Double-bundle reconstruction can be combined with either technique and has clear biomechanical advantages. On the basis of prior evidence and the author’s own surgical experiences, this technique paper provides the reasoning for using these methods. Further evidence and reasoning is given for when to use the inlay technique rather than the transtibial technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.