Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients With Low Back Pain

Adamu, Aisha S. PT, BPT; Ibrahim, Aminu A. PT, MPT; Ahmad, Rufa’i Y. PT, PhD; Akindele, Mukadas O. PT, PhD; Kaka, Bashir PT, PhD; Mukhtar, Naziru B. PT, MSc

doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003068
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Buy
SDC

Study Design. Validation of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.

Objective. To translate the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1a into Hausa Language and to validate its use in a cohort of patients with low back pain (LBP).

Summary of Background Data. The ODI is one of the most commonly used condition-specific questionnaires for assessing functional disability in patients with LBP, yet, no formal cross-culturally adapted and validated Hausa version exists.

Methods. The Hausa version of the ODI 2.1a (ODI-H) was developed according to established guidelines. Validation was performed among 200 patients with LBP recruited from both rural and urban Nigeria. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach α), test–retest reliability by computing intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the ODI-H with Visual Analogue Scale for pain, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and finger-floor distance test. Divergent validity was assessed by correlating the ODI-H with age, educational level, and occupational status. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were also performed. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed with three models: 1) one-factor theory-driven model, 2) two-factor theory-driven model (dynamic and static factors), and 3) a model based on our EFA.

Results. The ODI-H had high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.87) and excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.937) with standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change being 3.69 and 10.2 respectively. The construct validity (convergent and divergent validity) is supported as all (6:6, 100%) the a priori hypotheses were confirmed. The EFA yielded a two-factor model explaining 54.3% of the total variance but demonstrated poor fit. The one-factor and two-factor theory-driven model had acceptable fit but the one-factor theory-driven model was better.

Conclusion. The ODI-H version 2.1a was transculturally equivalent, reliable, and valid tool for assessing functional disability among Hausa-speaking patients with LBP. The use of this tool can be recommended for future clinical and research purposes.

Level of Evidence: 3

This study described the translation of the ODI version 2.1a into Hausa language, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the questionnaire in a cohort of patients with LBP. The results of the study suggest that the Hausa ODI version 2.1a is reliable and valid and can be recommended for future use.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano State, Nigeria.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Aminu A. Ibrahim, PT, MPT, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, P.M. B 3011, Kano State, Nigeria; E-mail: amenconafs@gmail.com

Received 11 October, 2018

Revised 7 March, 2019

Accepted 25 March, 2019

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

No funds were received in support of this work.

No relevant financial activities outside the submitted work.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (www.spinejournal.com).

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.