Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Cervical and Cervicothoracic Sagittal Alignment According to Roussouly Thoracolumbar Subtypes

Theologis, Alekos A., MD; Iyer, Sravisht, MD; Lenke, Lawrence G., MD; Sides, Brenda A., MA; Kim, Han Jo, MD; Kelly, Michael P., MD, MSc

doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002941
CERVICAL SPINE
Buy

Study Design. Cross-sectional cohort.

Objective. To determine normative radiographic sagittal cervical alignment in asymptomatic volunteers based on Roussouly thoracolumbar sagittal alignment subtypes.

Summary of Background Data. Comprehension of differences in cervicothoracic alignment with respect to variations in thoracolumbar alignment is limited.

Methods. Asymptomatic adults were recruited and the following parameters measured: PI, PT, SS, LL, orbital tilt, orbital slope, occipital slope and incidence, occiput-C2 lordosis, C2–7 lordosis, occiput-C7 lordosis, CBVA, T1 slope, cervicothoracic alignment, T2–5 kyphosis, and C2–C7 sagittal vertebral alignment (SVA). Each was classified into one of Roussouly's four thoracolumbar subtypes and cervical alignment parameters were compared between groups.

Results. Eighty-seven individuals [male-23; female-64; average age 49 ± 16 yr (22–77 yr)] were included for analysis. The four groups were not different by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Lumbopelvic parameters (PI, SS, PT, LL) were different between Roussouly types. Average values for all patients included: CBVA (−1 ± 9°), occiput-C2 lordosis (28 ± 9°), occiput-C7 lordosis (39 ± 14°), C2–7 lordosis (11 ± 14°), C2-7 SVA (21 ± 9 mm), T1 slope (25 ± 9°), C6-T4 angle (5 ± 8°), T2-5 angle (16 ± 7°), thoracic kyphosis (47 ± 13°). No sagittal radiographic alignment measurements of the cervical spine and cervicothoracic junction were different between groups, except for the global cervical lordosis (occiput-C7 Cobb), which was found to be lowest for Roussouly type 2 (35 ± 14°) and highest for type 4 (48 ± 14°) (P = 0.01). Mean C2–C7 sagittal Cobb, T2–T5 sagittal Cobb, and T1 slope were not different between groups.

Conclusions. In asymptomatic volunteers, normative sagittal alignment parameters of the cervical spine, cervicothoracic junction, and thoracic spine based on variations in thoracolumbar sagittal alignment, as proposed by Roussouly, are established. These data may guide surgical correction of cervicothoracic deformities to ensure appropriate restoration of normal cervicothoracic parameters to maintain good horizontal gaze and overall sagittal plane alignment.

Level of Evidence: 3

In this cross-sectional cohort study of asymptomatic volunteers, normative sagittal alignment parameters of the cervical spine, cervicothoracic junction, and thoracic spine based on variations in thoracolumbar sagittal alignment, as proposed by Roussouly, are established. These data may guide surgical correction of cervicothoracic deformities.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michael P. Kelly, MD, MSc, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, IOH 5th Floor, Box 8233, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110; E-mail: kellymi@wustl.edu

Received 2 August, 2018

Revised 28 September, 2018

Accepted 26 October, 2018

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

EOS Imaging provided direct support for image acquisition.

Relevant financial activities outside the submitted work: consultancy, grants, royalties, expert testimony, travel/accommodations/meeting expenses.

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.