Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Cost Variation Within Spinal Fusion Payment Groups

Wright, David J. MS; Mukamel, Dana B. PhD; Greenfield, Sheldon MD; Bederman, S. Samuel MD, PhD, FRCSC§

doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001649
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Buy
SDC

Study Design. Retrospective, large administrative database.

Objective. To investigate cost variation within current spinal fusion diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).

Summary of Background Data. Medicare reimbursement to hospitals for spinal fusion surgery is provided as a fixed payment for each admission based on DRG. This assumes that patients can be grouped into homogenous units of resource use such that a single payment will cover the costs of hospitalization for most patients within a given DRG. However, major differences in costs exist for different methods of spinal fusion surgery. A previous study in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) showed that variation within DRGs can lead to differences between hospital costs and Medicare reimbursement, resulting in predictable financial losses to hospitals and hindering access to care for some patients. No study to our knowledge has investigated cost variation within current spinal fusion DRGs.

Methods. Direct hospital costs were obtained from the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for patients in spinal fusion DRGs 453–460 and TJA DRGs 466–470. Our primary outcome was the coefficient of variation (CV), defined as the ratio of the standard deviation (SD) to the mean (CV = SD/mean × 100), for all costs within a given DRG. CVs were compared to an established TJA benchmark for within-DRG cost variation.

Results. CVs for costs within spinal fusion DRGs ranged from 44.16 to 52.6 and were significantly higher than the CV of 38.2 found in the TJA benchmark group (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion. As in TJA, the cost variation observed within spinal fusion DRGs in this study may be leading to differences between costs and reimbursement that places undue financial burden on some hospitals and potentially compromises access to care for some patients. Future studies should seek to identify drivers of cost variation to determine whether changes can be made to further homogenize current payment groups and ensure equal access for all patients.

Level of Evidence: 3

Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange County, CA

Division of General Internal Medicine, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange County, CA

Irvine Health Policy Research Institute, University of California, Irvine, CA

§Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to S. Samuel Bederman, MD, PhD, FRCSC, Restore Orthopedics and Spine Center, 1120 West La Veta Avenue, Suite 300, Orange, CA 92868; E-mail: sbederman@restoreorthopedics.com

Received 13 November, 2015

Revised 11 March, 2016

Accepted 4 April, 2016

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

Scoliosis Research Society grant funds were received in support of this work.

No relevant financial activities were there outside the submitted work.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (www.spinejournal.com).

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.