Systematic review of literature.
To perform a comprehensive English language systematic literature review of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF), concentrating on incidence, risk factors, health related quality of life impact, prevention strategy, and classification systems.
PJK and PJF are well described clinical pathologies and are a frequent cause of revision surgery. The development of a PJK classification that correlates with clinical outcomes and guides treatment decisions and possible prevention strategies would be of significant benefit to patients and surgeons.
The phrases “proximal junctional,” “proximal junctional kyphosis,” and “proximal junctional failure” were used as search terms in PubMed for all years up to 2014 to identify all articles that included at least one of these terms.
Fifty-three articles were identified overall. Eighteen articles assessed for risk factors. Eight studies specifically reviewed prevention strategies. There were no randomized prospective studies. There were 3 published studies that have attempted to classify PJK. The reported incidence of PJK ranged widely, from 5% to 46% in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation and fusion for adult spinal deformity. It is reported that 66% of PJK occurs within 3 months and 80% within 18 months after surgery. The reported revision rates due to PJK range from 13% to 55%. Modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for PJK have been characterized.
PJK and PJF affect many patients after long segment instrumentation after the correction of adult spinal deformity. The epidemiology and risk factors for the disease are well defined. A PJK and PJF scoring system may help describe the severity of disease and guide the need for revision surgery. The development and prospective validation of a PJK classification system is important considering the prevalence of the problem and its clinical and economic impact.
Level of Evidence: N/A
Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) frequently occur after surgery for adult spinal deformity. There is a lack of consensus optimal methods for treatment and prevention. Classification systems have been proposed but not prospectively validated. The adult deformity committee of the Scoliosis Research Society presents a systematic literature review of PJK and its classification in preparation for the development of a PJK classification.
*Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
†Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
‡University of Nevada, School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV
§Silicon Valley Spine Institute, Campbell, CA
¶Norwich Orthopedic Group, North Franklin, CT
∥Private Practice, Amarillo, TX
**Bronson HealthCare Midwest Spine & Scoliosis Specialists, Kalamazoo, MI
††Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, Sao Paulo, Brazil
‡‡Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
§§College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
¶¶Chirurgia del Rachide, Padova, Italy
∥∥Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
***Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
†††Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; and
‡‡‡Hey Clinic, Raleigh, NC.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Christopher P. Ames, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center, 400 Parnassus Ave, A850, San Francisco, CA 94143; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Acknowledgment date: June 18, 2014. Acceptance date: September 10, 2014.
The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).
No funds were received in support of this work.
Relevant financial activities outside the submitted work: board membership, consultancy, payment for lectures, payment for manuscript preparation, employment, patents, royalties, payment for development of educational presentation, stocks, expert testimony, travel/accommodations/meeting expenses.