Retrospective database analysis.
To investigate national trends
of cervical spine surgical procedures from 2002 to 2011.
Summary of Background Data.
There is a paucity of literature assessing the current practice trends and outcomes of cervical spine surgery
following the 2008 Food and Drug Administration public health notifications regarding bone morphogenetic protein
(BMP) utilization in cervical spine surgical procedures.
The National Inpatient Sample database was accessed for each year across 2002 to 2011. Patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion
, posterior cervical fusion
, and posterior cervical decompression
were identified. Patient and hospitalization parameters including demographics, BMP utilization, costs, early postoperative outcomes, and mortality were assessed for each surgical cohort. A Pearson correlation coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (P
< 0.05) was used to analyze trends in patient and hospital outcome parameters during this 10-year period.
A total of 307,188 cervical spine procedures were performed from 2002 to 2011. Both the anterior cervical fusion
and posterior cervical fusion
cohort demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of procedures performed over time (r
= +0.9, P
< 0.001). A significant uptrend in patient age (r
= +1.0, P
< 0.001) and comorbidity burden (r
= +0.9, P
< 0.001) was demonstrated during the studied decade. Overall, BMP utilization (r
= +0.7, P
= 0.02) also demonstrated a significant increase during this time period, but demonstrated a decline after peaking in 2007. The posterior cervical fusion
cohort demonstrated the greatest comorbidity, length of stay, costs, and mortality.
This study demonstrates that the number of cervical spine procedures has increased between 2002 and 2011, irrespective of the change in BMP utilization after the 2008 Food and Drug Administration warning. Despite an older patient population with greater comorbidities undergoing cervical spine surgeries, hospital length of stay and mortality has not significantly changed. However, we did note a significant increase in costs during this time period. These findings may be related to advances in surgical technology and instrumentation that may be associated with rising hospital costs.
Level of Evidence: N/A