Retrospective cohort study.
To examine health care services use after a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the lumbosacral or cervical spine ordered by a primary care physician.
The use of MRI of the spine in the primary care setting is increasing, yet little is known about the relationship between MRI scan findings and subsequent patterns of health care utilization.
Linkage of records from an audit of outpatient MRI scans of the spine performed in Ontario, Canada, to administrative databases.
Of the 647 patients who had a lumbosacral spine MRI scan ordered by a primary care physician, 288 (44.5%) were seen in consultation by an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon, and 42 (6.5%) received spine surgery during 3 years of follow-up. Of the 373 patients who had a cervical spine MRI scan ordered by a primary care physician, 164 (44.0%) were seen in consultation by an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon, and none had spine surgery during 3 years of follow-up. Patients with severe disc herniation (likelihood ratio, 5.62, 95% confidence interval, 2.64–12.00) or severe spinal stenosis (likelihood ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–4.85) on lumbosacral spine MRI were more likely to undergo subsequent surgery. However, many patients with these MRI abnormalities did not receive surgery, and the absence of these MRI findings did not significantly lower the likelihood of subsequent surgery.
Patients receiving MRI scans of the spine in the primary care setting are frequently referred for surgical assessment and most do not receive subsequent surgery. MRI scan results do not discriminate very well between those who will and will not undergo surgery, suggesting that alternative models for the assessment of patients with spinal complaints in primary care should be explored, particularly in jurisdictions with long wait times for elective spinal surgery consultation.
Patients receiving spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the primary care setting will almost always have an abnormal MRI, are frequently referred for surgical assessment, and most do not receive subsequent surgery. MRI scan results do not discriminate very well between those who will and will not undergo surgery.
*Departments of Medicine, and of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
†Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
‡Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California at Irvine
§Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
¶Departments of Medicine, and of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
‖Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
**Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to John J. You, MD, MSc, 1280 Main Street W, HSC-2C8, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Acknowledgment date: September 15, 2011. Revision date: April 20, 2012. Acceptance date: May 22, 2012.
The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).
This study was conducted at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario MOHLTC. This study also received partial funding from the Minimal Access Ambulatory Surgical Spine Research and Education Fund, and Toronto General & Western Hospital Foundation.
One or more of the author(s) has/have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript: for example, honoraria, gifts, consultancies.