Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Supine Thoracolumbar Sagittal Spine Alignment: Comparing Computerized Tomography and Plain Radiographs

Abdel, Matthew P., MD*; Bodemer, William S., MD; Anderson, Paul A., MD

doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821946d1
Surgery
Buy

Study Design. Imaging supine sagittal alignment study.

Objective. Our goal was to determine differences between plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in supine sagittal alignment and to establish supine reference Cobb angles for both.

Summary of Background Data. Few studies have compared plain radiographs versus CT scans with regard to sagittal spine alignment. None have utilized supine patients.

Methods. Fifty sequential blunt trauma individuals who had routine clearance of the thoracolumbar spine had their plain radiographs and CT scans reviewed independently by 2 spine surgeons. The Cobb method was utilized to determine angles at each spine level from T4 to L5. All imaging was obtained in the supine position, and no patient had acute ligamentous or bony pathology. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were utilized to determine intraobserver, interobserver, and method reliability.

Results. Every level within the thoracic region was kyphotic, with a peak at T6. The lumbar region demonstrated a fairly linear progression from a near-neutral alignment at L1 to approximately 50° of lordosis at L5. The intraobserver reliability was consistent, with ICCs for Observer 1 plain radiographs at 0.653, Observer 2 plain radiographs at 0.891, Observer 1 CT scans at 0.677, and Observer 2 CT scans at 0.648. The interobserver reliability was very high, with ICCs for plain radiographs at 0.902 and 0.895 for CT scans. Finally, method reliability (between plain radiographs and CT scans) was excellent as well, with ICCs of 0.808 for Observer 1, 0.781 for Observer 2, and 0.817 after averaging the 2 observers.

Conclusion. The results from this study provide a supine reference for sagittal spine alignment using the Cobb method for both CT scans and plain radiographs. It also demonstrates the high degree of reliability between measurements from 2 imaging sources and various observers as shown with the ICC values.

No studies have compared computed tomographies (CTs) versus plain radiographs in regards to supine sagittal spine alignment. The Cobb method was used to determine angles in 50 patients from T4 to L5. Intraobserver, interobserver, and method reliability were excellent. This study provides a supine reference for sagittal spine alignment for CTs and plain radiographs.

*Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Sauk Prairie Memorial Hospital & Clinics, Prairie du Sac, WI

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Paul A. Anderson, MD, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin, UWMF Centennial Bldg, 1685 Highland Ave, 6th floor, Madison, WI 53705; E-mail: anderson@orthorehab.wisc.edu

Acknowledgment date: January 17, 2011. First revision date: March 4, 2011. Acceptance date: March 5, 2011.

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.