Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability in the Load Sharing Classification of the Assessment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Abstract

Study Design. 

The Load Sharing Classification of spinal fractures was evaluated by 5 observers on 2 occasions.

Objective. 

To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Load Sharing Classification of spinal fractures in the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Summary of Background Data. 

The Load Sharing Classification of spinal fractures provides a basis for the choice of operative approaches, but the reliability of this classification system has not been established.

Methods. 

The radiographic and computed tomography scan images of 45 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were reviewed by 5 observers on 2 different occasions 3 months apart. Interobserver reliability was assessed by comparison of the fracture classifications determined by the 5 observers. Intraobserver reliability was evaluated by comparison of the classifications determined by each observer on the first and second sessions. Ten paired interobserver and 5 intraobserver comparisons were then analyzed with use of kappa statistics.

Results. 

All 5 observers agreed on the final classification for 58% and 73% of the fractures on the first and second assessments, respectively. The average kappa coefficient for the 10 paired comparisons among the 5 observers was 0.79 (range 0.73–0.89) for the first assessment and 0.84 (range 0.81–0.95) for the second assessment. Interobserver agreement improved when the 3 components of the classification system were analyzed separately, reaching an almost perfect interobserver reliability with the average kappa values of 0.90 (range 0.82–0.97) for the first assessment and 0.92 (range 0.83–1) for the second assessment. The kappa values for the 5 intraobserver comparisons ranged from 0.73 to 0.87 (average 0.78), expressing at least substantial agreement; 2 observers showed almost perfect intraobserver reliability. For the 3 components of the classification system, all observers reached almost perfect intraobserver agreement with the kappa values of 0.83 to 0.97 (average, 0.89).

Conclusions. 

Kappa statistics showed high levels of agreement when the Load Sharing Classification was used to assess thoracolumbar burst fractures. This system can be applied with excellent reliability.

In Brief

This study evaluated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Load Sharing Classification of spinal fractures in the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures and showed high levels of agreement. The authors concluded that this system can be applied with excellent reliability.