Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

A Novel Strategy in Trauma and Sepsis

Williams, Aaron M.; Dennahy, Isabel S.; Bhatti, Umar F.; Biesterveld, Ben E.; Graham, Nathan J.; Li, Yongqing; Alam, Hasan B.

doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001308
Review Articles
Free
Editor's Choice

ABSTRACT Trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups in the United States. Hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are major causes of preventable death in trauma. Initial treatment involves fluid resuscitation to improve the intravascular volume. Although crystalloids may provide volume expansion, they do not have any pro-survival properties. Furthermore, aggressive fluid resuscitation can provoke a severe inflammatory response and worsen clinical outcomes. Due to logistical constraints, however, definitive resuscitation with blood products is often not feasible in the prehospital setting—highlighting the importance of adjunctive therapies. In recent years, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have shown promise as pharmacologic agents for use in both trauma and sepsis. In this review, we discuss the role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and pharmacologic agents that inhibit them (HDACis). We also highlight the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action of HDACis in hemorrhagic shock, TBI, polytrauma, and sepsis. With further investigation and translation, HDACis have the potential to be a high-impact adjunctive therapy to traditional resuscitation.

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Address reprint requests to Hasan B. Alam, MD, Norman Thompson Professor of Surgery, and Head of General Surgery, University of Michigan Hospital, 2920 Taubman Center/5331, University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5331. E-mail: alamh@med.umich.edu

Received 26 October, 2018

Revised 16 November, 2018

Accepted 17 December, 2018

Level of Evidence: Review Article.

The research included in this review was supported by numerous grants from the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health to HBA.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups in the United States (U.S.) (1). In 2016, 2.8 million people were hospitalized for severe injuries (1, 2). Furthermore, approximately 230,000 people die each year from such injuries, which results in costs of $671 billion dollars to the healthcare system annually in the U.S (3). The majority of these deaths occur within the first few hours following injury, half of which are secondary to hemorrhagic shock (4–7). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is responsible for the majority of deaths thereafter (8). The combination of hemorrhagic shock and TBI is highly lethal with an early death rate of approximately 80% (9). Even when patients survive the early period, these injuries predispose them to severe immune dysregulation, often resulting in septic complications and late deaths.

Although resuscitative fluids replace intravascular volume and improve both systemic and cerebral circulation in the setting of trauma, they must be administered with caution. Fluid resuscitation does not have any innate pro-survival properties (10). When administered aggressively, crystalloid fluids can even lead to worsened clinical outcomes by increasing the blood loss, inflammation, and coagulopathy (11). At present, damage control resuscitation (DCR) is a major tenet of trauma care. DCR discourages crystalloid resuscitation in favor of early blood product administration, and promotes early hemostasis, correction of acidosis/coagulopathy, and limited resuscitation until control of hemorrhage (12–14). Due to logistical constraints, however, blood products are often not available in prehospital or far-forward settings. As such, development of life-sustaining adjunctive strategies for the prehospital setting has become a priority.

In recent years, many groups have demonstrated that pharmacologic agents can be used to prevent and even reverse trauma-induced cellular dysfunction (15–17). Among the drugs that have been investigated are agents such as histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), which have demonstrated promise in both trauma and sepsis. As austere environments are often resource-limited and logistically constrained, HDACis offer a potential treatment strategy that is low volume, stable, cheap, and easy to administer. Studies demonstrate that these agents can improve survival, minimize neurologic injury, and attenuate organ dysfunction. In this narrative review, we highlight our and other's work of HDACi treatment in trauma and sepsis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

THE ROLE OF EPIGENETIC MODULATION

In recent years, it has been discovered that there is significant alteration of gene expression following hemorrhagic shock (18, 19). This impacts downstream protein expression, and impairs cells’ ability to employ pro-survival mechanisms to recover from injury. As such, epigenetic modulation has been suggested as a potential approach for the reversal of trauma-induced cellular dysfunction. Epigenetic modulation refers to mechanisms that alter gene expression through regulation of transcription (20). Modifications in histone and non-histone proteins reversibly alter the 3D chromatin structure, which changes the ability of transcription machinery to bind and transcribe genes (20).

Following hemorrhagic shock, the primary genomic alteration is hypoacetylation of lysine residues on histone proteins (16). Acetylation of histone proteins, mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs), promotes chromatin relaxation, allowing greater accessibility to transcription factors; likewise, hypoacetylation, mediated by histone deacetylases (HDACs), encourages condensation of chromatin structure, decreasing accessibility to transcription factors (21, 22). This global hypoacetylation in hemorrhagic shock represents an overall state of decreased transcriptional activity with downstream effects on the cell cycle, stress response, cell signaling, repair and healing, and proliferation (23–25). As such, preventing or reversing this change in transcription dynamics offers the potential to improve cell survival following hemorrhagic shock and other traumatic injuries.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HISTONE DEACETYLASES AND THEIR INHIBITORS

HDACs have been widely described and classified based on cellular and tissue distribution (Table 1). In humans, approximately 18 unique HDACs have been identified to date (26, 27). HDACS are subdivided into zinc-dependent classes (classes I, II, and IV) and NAD+ dependent classes (class III) (26–30). Beyond differential activity according to class, each individual HDAC is noted to have distinct physiologic functions and unique organ distribution. This suggests that each HDAC may play a very specific role in different disease processes (26, 27, 31, 32).

Table 1

Table 1

HDAC inhibition has gained attention as a mechanism to temporarily alter transcription to create a favorable gene expression profile. HDACis have the potential to have rapid, reversible effects, and have also been recognized to exhibit effects specific to injured/diseased cells, while sparing normal cells, due to differential HDAC activity according to cell state (33–41). Some HDACis are non-selective (valproic acid [VPA]), acting on more than one HDAC class. Others target individual classes (isoform selective HDACis). Over the last decade, both non-selective and isoform-selective HDACis have demonstrated promise in preclinical models of trauma and sepsis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

NON-SELECTIVE HDACi TREATMENT IN HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK AND POLYTRAUMA

Therapeutic effects

One of the first applications of HDACis in trauma models was in hemorrhagic shock. VPA, a non-selective HDACi, was evaluated as pretreatment in a rodent model of hemorrhagic shock (40% total blood volume) (24). Pretreatment with VPA in lethal hemorrhagic shock significantly improved survival time compared with normal saline (NS) alone. In follow-up studies assessing biological activity, VPA and other non-selective HDACis (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA], and trichostatin A) were found to induce histone acetylation in tissues in both a fluid- and organ-specific manner (25). These agents also stimulated changes in cellular metabolism, proliferation, growth, differentiation, and signaling. Overall, these “proof of concept” studies demonstrated that non-selective HDACIs can prolong survival, and this may be mediated, in part, through histone hyperacetylation.

Given the initial success with pretreatment, post-hemorrhage administration of non-selective HDACis was then evaluated. In a rodent model of lethal hemorrhagic shock without fluid resuscitation, post-hemorrhage administration of VPA and SAHA improved survival from 25% (no treatment) to 75% and 83%, respectively (42). VPA and SAHA also conferred cytoprotection to several major organs including the kidney (43), intestine (44), and lung (45, 46). Addition of VPA as a post-hemorrhage treatment to other management strategies, including therapeutic hypothermia (30 ± 2°C), revealed that combined treatment offers better cytoprotection than individual treatment in hemorrhagic shock (47). The success of non-selective HDACis in these studies demonstrates their potential as both a stand-alone and adjunctive treatment in hemorrhagic shock.

Despite the success of non-selective HDACis in models of hemorrhagic shock, little was known about their impact on complications of hemorrhagic shock. In a rodent model of isolated intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury, which simulates organ dysfunction commonly encountered after hemorrhagic shock, VPA improved short-term survival and decreased acute lung injury (48). Further testing in a more translational swine model of 35% total blood volume hemorrhage followed by lethal ischemia-reperfusion injury provided evidence of physiologic benefit (49). VPA treatment significantly decreased acidosis, coagulopathy, and resuscitation requirements (crystalloids and epinephrine) following injuries (49). These effects, in part, were thought to be related to an increased expression of heat shock proteins (HSP), which helped mediate the stress responses in liver and lung tissues (49).

Even in complex animal models of hemorrhagic shock and polytrauma, the beneficial effects of VPA are evident. In a polytrauma model involving femur fracture, 60% hemorrhage, and a Grade V liver injury, swine were randomized to receive fresh whole blood, VPA (400 mg/kg), or no treatment (control) (50). Following injuries, VPA treatment was associated with a comparable improvement in short-term survival to fresh whole blood (50). At a reduced dose, VPA (300 mg/kg) still facilitated decreased resuscitation requirements and improved hemodynamics and physiology during resuscitation (51). Overall, the results of these studies suggest that treatment with HDACis can improve outcomes following a wide range of injuries.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Mechanisms of action

In addition to increasing HSP expression, numerous pro-survival pathways, including phosphorylated-Akt, GSK-3, and B-catenin pathways, are upregulated following VPA administration (50, 52, 53). These pathways promote transcription factor binding and gene transcription, improve protein stability, and regulate protein interactions (52, 53). Phosphorylated-JNK expression, which upregulates apoptotic proteins, has also been shown to be attenuated by VPA administration (54). As a whole, activation of these pathways translates into significant downstream effects. For example, VPA administration potentiates improvement in ischemia-induced endothelial injury, and reduces expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (55, 56). Additional pathways regulated by VPA in hemorrhagic shock and polytrauma have been investigated (17), although further work is required to gain a more comprehensive understanding as VPA has significant pleiotropic effects.

Back to Top | Article Outline

NON-SELECTIVE HDACi TREATMENT IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Therapeutic effects

TBI remains a leading cause of preventable death following trauma. It is also considered the signature injury of current military conflicts, affecting over 30,000 military members in combat zones yearly (57, 58). Existing strategies for TBI are not only limited in efficacy, but are also somewhat contradictory to those employed in hemorrhagic shock. A central tenet of TBI care is to maintain arterial pressure to drive cerebral perfusion pressure, which is incongruous with the principles of DCR. Investigation of adjunctive therapies is therefore becoming an essential part of TBI research.

Use of HDACis alone or in combination with traditional resuscitative strategies for TBI has demonstrated promising results. In small animal models, VPA improves outcomes in rat models of TBI, conferring both neuroprotection and attenuation of early injury progression (59). The benefit of VPA in both hemorrhagic shock and TBI is maintained in more complex models of combined injuries in large animal models. Multiple studies demonstrate that VPA administration following combined hemorrhagic shock and TBI reduces brain lesion size, improves long-term neurologic outcomes, and promotes a faster rate of neurologic recovery (60). VPA has also been shown to be synergistic with 6% hetastarch (Hextend [Hex]) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (61, 62). In a swine model of 40% hemorrhage and cortical impact TBI, followed by a 2-h period of hemorrhagic shock, VPA (300 mg/kg) administration significantly decreased brain lesion size in the Hex + VPA group compared with those animals treated with Hex alone (62). Follow-up studies demonstrated that the addition of VPA to FFP in a similar model decreased brain swelling by 40% and lesion size by 25% compared with FFP alone (61).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Mechanisms of action

The mechanisms of the neuroprotection conferred by VPA in TBI have been investigated within recent years. VPA appears to improve cerebral metabolism as shown through decreased cerebral lactate and pyruvate levels (63); decrease excitotoxicity through reduction of extracelluar glutamate and glycerol accumulation (64–67); improve mitochondrial membrane function and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) retention (63); and decrease perivascular albumin extravasation and preserve blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity (68). The neuroprotective effects of VPA have also been demonstrated through significant alterations in gene expression profiles following VPA treatment. Nine hours following hemorrhagic shock and TBI, peri-injured brain was assessed using RNA sequencing (69). VPA was found to upregulate gene pathways involved in neurogenesis and neural development, while inhibiting pathways involved in apoptosis and neuroinflammation (69).

Proteomic and transcriptomic assessment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) has been performed in 30-day survival studies of swine subjected to TBI, hemorrhagic shock, and polytrauma to identify gene expression changes after VPA treatment (70). Molecular changes in neurologic disorders are reflected in PBMCs, which can provide a window into brain pathology. VPA was found to upregulate pathways involved in cell proliferation and differentiation, and inhibit the pathways involved in apoptosis and inflammation (70). These protective effects were shown to occur within minutes following VPA administration (71), and were sustained for 24 h (70). VPA's effects on pathways regulating inflammation translate into changes in associated biomarkers (72). In animals given NS alone, serum glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NF-L) levels increase immediately following injuries and peak at 24 h. However, VPA administration significantly attenuated these levels (72), which also correlated with decreased brain lesion size and edema and earlier time to normalization of neurocognitive function following TBI (73).

Back to Top | Article Outline

NON-SELECTIVE HDACi TREATMENT IN SEPSIS

Non-selective HDACis have also been investigated for use in sepsis. The inflammatory response induced by sepsis is considered to be similar to that induced by hemorrhagic shock (74). Furthermore, the development of sepsis is a potential sequela of the immune dysregulation following injury. Trauma often acts as an initial insult and primes the body for a “second hit,” potentiating susceptibility to infection (75, 76). As such, evaluating the effects of non-selective HDACis in sepsis remains crucial to their evaluation for use in trauma.

SAHA, a non-selective HDACi, was tested in a lethal mouse model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis (77). Pretreatment with SAHA improved survival to 87.5% in lethal sepsis (77). SAHA also markedly reduced the severity of acute lung injury at 48 h following LPS. Follow-up studies have shown that post-LPS administration of SAHA maintains this survival advantage, even in the absence of fluid resuscitation (78). SAHA has also been shown to provide hepatoprotection in LPS-mediated shock (79, 80).

LPS-induced endotoxic shock, however, does not fully replicate the complexities of a polymicrobial infection. Therefore, testing of both SAHA and VPA in models of cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), which more accurately represent polymicrobial sepsis, has been done. In a murine model of CLP-induced sepsis, treatment with SAHA produced a significant long-term survival benefit (81). VPA administration showed efficacy in combined hemorrhagic shock + CLP, significantly improving survival and decreasing the severity of secondary acute lung injury (82).

Back to Top | Article Outline

ISOFORM-SELECTIVE HDACis

Use of non-selective HDACis has raised concerns about unintended effects; therefore, targeting specific HDACs to provide selective therapeutic effects has become an area of interest. Early studies suggest that VPA and SAHA likely inhibit class I and class II HDACs; however, the specific class responsible for their clinical benefit still needs to be better defined (52). These HDAC classes therefore represented potential for targeted HDAC inhibition.

In recent years, isoform-selective HDACis have been evaluated in trauma and sepsis models. In a rodent model of hemorrhagic shock evaluating different classes of HDACis, class IIa (MC1568, 5 mg/kg) and IIb (ACY1083, 30 mg/kg) HDACis demonstrated the most promising results (52). MC1568 and ACY1083 significantly improved 24-h survival compared to untreated controls, while class III inhibition (EX527, 50 mg/kg) improved survival, but did not meet statistical significance. Class I HDACi, MS275 (50 mg/kg), however, showed no improvement in survival. Overall, this suggested that the benefit observed with non-selective HDAC inhibition may be mediated largely through class II HDAC inhibition.

Additional studies have been conducted using class II HDACis including, Tubastatin A (TubA), a selective HDAC6 inhibitor (Class IIb). TubA has been tested in models of hemorrhagic shock and CLP, and it significantly improves survival compared to no treatment (83, 84). Furthermore, administration of TubA has been shown to protect intestinal tight junction integrity in hemorrhagic shock (85). TubA has also been shown to restore immune function by following CLP (86, 87). Initial results with novel HDAC6 inhibitors, including ACY-1083, are promising (88); however, further work needs to be done to isolate the specific isoforms within each class. Additional studies evaluating class II HDACis are currently underway.

The therapeutic effects of class III HDACis appear specific to pathology. Class III HDACs, the sirtuins (SIRTs), have been thoroughly investigated in models of sepsis. EX-527, a class III-specific agent that acts on SIRT1, has been shown to significantly reduce mortality in a lethal model of CLP-induced sepsis (89). AGK2, a SIRT2-selective inhibitor, has also been shown to reduce mortality in a similar model of lethal sepsis (90). In a model of hemorrhagic shock, EX-527, however, failed to provide any statistically significant improvement in survival (52). As such, it appears that class III HDACs may play a greater role in sepsis than in hemorrhagic shock, although more work needs to be done to elucidate the effects of this class.

Isoform-specific HDAC inhibition for TBI is complex and currently being investigated. Isoform-selective HDACis must not only have desirable tissue-specific effects but should also have the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier. The impact of HDACis on neuronal viability appears to be more isoform-specific, with studies showing opposing effects of different isoforms even within the same class (ex. class II HDACs) (91). Since specific HDAC isoforms are thought to have distinct roles in brain development and function, targeting these differential roles may be promising for the treatment of TBI.

At present, studies assessing the effects of isoform-specific HDACis in models of TBI are limited. SIRT1 has been suggested as a potential target for TBI based on studies in neonatal brain injury (92), while class I inhibitors have been evaluated for their neuroprotective potential (93) and in traumatic spinal cord injury (94). We have recently demonstrated that ACY-1083 decreases brain lesion size and edema following injuries in a model of combined hemorrhagic shock and TBI (88). However, further investigation of these specific agents in TBI is needed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HUMAN TRANSLATION

Among HDACis, VPA has the most experimental data to support human use. It was originally approved by the FDA for clinical use in epilepsy in 1978. However, VPA doses that have been used in preclinical swine studies of trauma are much higher (3–5×) than doses conventionally used in humans for epilepsy. To address this, a phase I, dose-escalation trial of VPA to evaluate the maximum safe dose in healthy human subjects, was recently conducted (95). In this study, no dose-limiting toxicities or significant adverse events were observed in healthy human subjects until the dose of 150 mg/kg. At this dose, toxicities and events were relatively minor, and included nausea and headache. However, all of these resolved within 24 h without intervention. Furthermore, no significant drug-related abnormalities were seen in terms of clinical laboratories, ECG studies, organ injury, or cognitive functions. The study concluded that the maximum tolerated human dose is 140 mg/kg, which is factor-equivalent to the 150 mg/kg dose observed to have clinical benefit in swine models (95). Despite these findings, the pharmacokinetic profile of VPA in trauma patients may be different than the healthy subjects. A dose-escalation trial evaluating the safety in patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock (Clinical Trials Identifier NCT02872428; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02872428) is currently underway. This will be correlated with dose-optimization studies in large animal models, which is currently underway.

In addition to optimal dosing, confirmation of VPA's mechanisms of action in humans is required. PBMCs of healthy humans from the dose-escalation trial were analyzed for proteomic changes following VPA administration (96). Gene pathways most significantly affected included those related to apoptosis, cell death, cell proliferation, amyloidosis, fatty acid metabolism, steroid metabolism, and cell movement (96). Interestingly, no significant changes in the acetylation status of histone and non-histone proteins were observed in these healthy individuals (96). However, a recent human study evaluating HDAC expression in leukocytes in blunt trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock highlights the role of protein acetylation (97). Expression of HDAC1, HDAC3, and HDAC11 was higher in patients with complicated outcomes, including death or no recovery by 28 days following injures, and HDAC3 and SIRT5 expression was correlated with multi-organ failure. These findings highlight the role of HDACs in traumatic injuries. With further studies, targeted HDAC inhibition may help to improve clinical outcomes for trauma patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

Over the last few decades, tremendous improvements in trauma care have been made; however, there is still room for additional refinements, especially in austere/prehospital settings (98). HDACis represent a potential strategy in patients subjected to trauma and sepsis. They have been shown to improve survival and minimize neurologic injury, coagulopathy, inflammation, and oxidative stress in models of hemorrhagic shock, TBI, polytrauma, and sepsis. As definitive strategies, including blood products and hemorrhage control, remain difficult to implement in the prehospital setting, HDACi administration may provide a bridge to definitive resuscitation. Of numerous HDACis, VPA appears to be the most promising in preclinical studies and is currently in clinical evaluation. Further work, including dose optimization and further assessment in clinical trials, is required for human translation. Overall, HDACis may represent a high-impact strategy for use in far-forward and austere settings in the near future.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) Nonfatal Injury Data. (2015). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nonfatal.html. Last accessed September 20, 2018.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) Fatal Injury Data. (2015). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html. Last accessed September 20, 2018.
3. World Health Organization. Injuries and violence: the facts 2014. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/media/news/2015/Injury_violence_facts_2014/en/. Last accessed September 20, 2018.
4. Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ, Simons RK, Fortlage DA, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Hoyt DB. Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg 186 5:528–533, 1998.
5. Kauvar DS, Wade CE. The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectives. Crit Care 9 (suppl 5):S1–S9, 2005.
6. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Hedegaard HB, Meng K. Epidemiology of urban trauma deaths: a comprehensive reassessment 10 years later. World J Surg 31 7:1507–1511, 2007.
7. Shackford SR, Mackersie RC, Holbrook TL, Davis JW, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Hoyt DB, Wolf PL. The epidemiology of traumatic death. A population-based analysis. Arch Surg 128 5:571–575, 1993.
8. Sobrino J, Shafi S. Timing and causes of death after injuries. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 26 2:120–123, 2013.
9. Meislin H, Criss EA, Judkins D, Berger R, Conroy C, Parks B, Spaite DW, Valenzuela TD. Fatal trauma: the modal distribution of time to death is a function of patient demographics and regional resources. J Trauma 43 3:433–440, 1997.
10. Kwan I, Bunn F, Chinnock P, Roberts I. Timing and volume of fluid administration for patients with bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:Cd002245, 2014.
11. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, Martin RR, Ginger VF, Allen MK, Mattox KL. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 331 17:1105–1109, 1994.
12. Duchesne JC, McSwain NE Jr, Cotton BA, Hunt JP, Dellavolpe J, Lafaro K, Marr AB, Gonzalez EA, Phelan HA, Bilski T, et al. Damage control resuscitation: the new face of damage control. J Trauma 69 4:976–990, 2010.
13. Holcomb JB, Jenkins D, Rhee P, Johannigman J, Mahoney P, Mehta S, Cox ED, Gehrke MJ, Beilman GJ, Schreiber M, et al. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma 62 2:307–310, 2007.
14. Gurney JM, Spinella PC. Blood transfusion management in the severely bleeding military patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 31 2:207–214, 2018.
15. Weniger M, Angele MK, Chaudry IH. The role and use of estrogens following trauma. Shock 46 3:S4–S11, 2016.
16. Nistor M, Behringer W, Schmidt M, Schiffner R. A systematic review of neuroprotective strategies during hypovolemia and hemorrhagic shock. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18 11: E2247. [Epub ahead of print].
17. Halaweish I, Nikolian V, Georgoff P, Li Y, Alam HB. Creating a “prosurvival phenotype” through histone deacetylase inhibition: past, present, and future. Shock 44 1:6–16, 2015.
18. Alam HB, Stegalkina S, Rhee P, Koustova E. cDNA array analysis of gene expression following hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in rats. Resuscitation 54 2:195–206, 2002.
19. Chen H, Alam HB, Querol RI, Rhee P, Li Y, Koustova E. Identification of expression patterns associated with hemorrhage and resuscitation: integrated approach to data analysis. J Trauma 60 4:701–723, 2006.
20. Feinberg AP. The key role of epigenetics in human disease prevention and mitigation. N Engl J Med 378 14:1323–1334, 2018.
21. Polo SE. Reshaping chromatin after DNA damage: the choreography of histone proteins. J Mol Biol 427 3:626–636, 2015.
22. Hebbes TR, Thorne AW, Crane-Robinson C. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. Embo J 7 5:1395–1402, 1988.
23. Alam HB, Shults C, Ahuja N, Ayuste EC, Chen H, Koustova E, Sailhamer EA, Li Y, Liu B, de Moya M, et al. Impact of resuscitation strategies on the acetylation status of cardiac histones in a swine model of hemorrhage. Resuscitation 76 2:299–310, 2008.
24. Gonzales E, Chen H, Munuve R, Mehrani T, Britten-Webb J, Nadel A, Alam HB, Wherry D, Burris D, Koustova E. Valproid acid prevents hemorrhage-associated lethality and affects acetylation pattern of cardiac histonres. Shock 25 4:395–401, 2006.
25. Lin T, Chen H, Koustova E, Sailhamer EA, Li Y, Shults C, Liu B, Rhee P, Kirkpatrick J, Alam HB. Histone deacetylase as therapeutic target in a rodent model of hemorrhagic shock: effect of different resuscitation strategies on lung and liver. Surgery 141 6:784–794, 2007.
26. Haberland M, Montgomery RL, Olson EN. The many roles of histone deacetylases in development and physiology: implications for disease and therapy. Nat Rev Genet 10 1:32–42, 2009.
27. Kim HJ, Bae SC. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: molecular mechanisms of action and clinical trials as anti-cancer drugs. Am J Transl Res 3 2:166–179, 2011.
28. Verdin E, Dequiedt F, Kasler HG. Class II histone deacetylases: versatile regulators. Trends Genet 19 5:286–293, 2003.
29. Blander G, Guarente L. The Sir2 family of protein deacetylases. Annu Rev Biochem 73:417–435, 2004.
30. Benedetti R, Conte M, Altucci L. Targeting histone deacetylases in diseases: where are we? Antioxid Redox Signal 23 1:99–126, 2015.
31. Delcuve GP, Khan DH, Davie JR. Roles of histone deacetylases in epigenetic regulation: emerging paradigms from studies with inhibitors. Clin Epigenetics 4 1:5, 2012.
32. Kelly WK, O’Connor OA, Marks PA. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: from target to clinical trials. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 11 12:1695–1713, 2002.
33. Brogdon JL, Xu Y, Szabo SJ, An S, Buxton F, Cohen D, Huang Q. Histone deacetylase activities are required for innate immune cell control of Th1 but not Th2 effector cell function. Blood 109 3:1123–1130, 2007.
34. Butler R, Bates GP. Histone deacetylase inhibitors as therapeutics for polyglutamine disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 7 10:784–796, 2006.
35. Cao H, Jung M, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Hydroxamide derivatives of short-chain fatty acid have erythropoietic activity and induce gamma gene expression in vivo. Exp Hematol 33 12:1443–1449, 2005.
36. Cheng X, Liu Z, Liu B, Zhao T, Li Y, Alam HB. Selective histone deacetylase 6 inhibition prolongs survival in a lethal two-hit model. J Surg Res 197 1:39–44, 2015.
37. Lin HS, Hu CY, Chan HY, Liew YY, Huang HP, Lepescheux L, Bastianelli E, Baron R, Rawadi G, Clement-Lacroix P. Anti-rheumatic activities of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in vivo in collagen-induced arthritis in rodents. Br J Pharmacol 150 7:862–872, 2007.
38. Minetti GC, Colussi C, Adami R, Serra C, Mozzetta C, Parente V, Fortuni S, Straino S, Sampaolesi M, Di Padova M, et al. Functional and morphological recovery of dystrophic muscles in mice treated with deacetylase inhibitors. Nat Med 12 10:1147–1150, 2006.
39. Romagnani P, Lasagni L, Mazzinghi B, Lazzeri E, Romagnani S. Pharmacological modulation of stem cell function. Curr Med Chem 14 10:1129–1139, 2007.
40. Routy JP. Valproic acid: a potential role in treating latent HIV infection. Lancet 366 9485:523–524, 2005.
41. Smith KT, Workman JL. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: anticancer compounds. J Biochem Cell Biol 41 1:21–25, 2009.
42. Shults C, Sailhamer EA, Li Y, Liu B, Tabbara M, Butt MU, Shuja F, Demoya M, Velmahos G, Alam HB. Surviving blood loss without fluid resuscitation. J Trauma 64 3:629–638, 2008.
43. Zacharias N, Sailhamer EA, Li Y, Liu B, Butt MU, Shuja F, Velmahos GC, de Moya M, Alam HB. Histone deacetylase inhibitors prevent apoptosis following lethal hemorrhagic shock in rodent kidney cells. Resuscitation 82 1:105–109, 2011.
44. Li Y, Liu B, Dillon ST, Fukudome EY, Kheirbek T, Sailhamer EA, Velmahos G, deMoya M, Libermann TA, Alam HB. Identification of a novel potential biomarker in a model of hemorrhagic shock and valproic acid treatment. J Surg Res 159 1:474–481, 2010.
45. Kochanek AR, Fukudome EY, Li Y, Smith EJ, Liu B, Velmahos GC, deMoya M, King D, Alam HB. Histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment attenuates MAP kinase pathway activation and pulmonary inflammation following hemorrhagic shock in a rodent model. J Surg Res 176 1:185–194, 2012.
46. Fukudome EY, Li Y, Kochanek AR, Lu J, Smith EJ, Liu B, Kim K, Velmahos GC, deMoya MA, Alam HB. Pharmacologic resuscitation decreases circulating cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 levels and attenuates hemorrhage-induced acute lung injury. Surgery 152 2:254–261, 2012.
47. Bambakidis T, Dekker SE, Liu B, Maxwell J, Chtraklin K, Linzel D, Li Y, Alam HB. Hypothermia and valproic acid activate prosurvival pathways after hemorrhage. J Surg Res 196 1:159–165, 2015.
48. Kim K, Li Y, Jin G, Chong W, Liu B, Lu J, Lee K, Demoya M, Velmahos GC, Alam HB. Effect of valproic acid on acute lung injury in a rodent model of intestinal ischemia reperfusion. Resuscitation 83 2:243–248, 2012.
49. Causey MW, Miller S, Hoffer Z, Hempel J, Stallings JD, Jin G, Alam H, Martin M. Beneficial effects of histone deacetylase inhibition with severe hemorrhage and ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Surg Res 184 1:533–540, 2013.
50. Alam HB, Shuja F, Butt MU, Duggan M, Li Y, Zacharias N, Fukudome EY, Liu B, Demoya M, Velmahos GC. Surviving blood loss without blood transfusion in a swine poly-trauma model. Surgery 146 2:325–333, 2009.
51. Nelson DW, Porta CR, McVay DP, Salgar SK, Martin MJ. Effects of histone deacetylase inhibition on 24-hour survival and end-organ injury in a porcine trauma model: a prospective, randomized trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75 6:1031–1039, 2013.
52. Chang P, Weykamp M, Dennahy IS, Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Liu B, Nikolian VC, Li Y, Alam HB. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: isoform selectivity improves survival in a hemorrhagic shock model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 84 5:795–801, 2018.
53. Li Y, Liu B, Sailhamer EA, Yuan Z, Shults C, Velmahos GC, deMoya M, Shuja F, Butt MU, Alam HB. Cell protective mechanism of valproic acid in lethal hemorrhagic shock. Surgery 144 2:217–224, 2008.
54. Butt MU, Sailhamer EA, Li Y, Liu B, Shuja F, Velmahos GC, DeMoya M, King DR, Alam HB. Pharmacologic resuscitation: cell protective mechanisms of histone deacetylase inhibition in lethal hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res 156 2:290–296, 2009.
55. Causey MW, Salgar S, Singh N, Martin M, Stallings JD. Valproic acid reversed pathologic endothelial cell gene expression profile associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury in a swine hemorrhagic shock model. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 4: 1096–1103.e51.
56. Luo HM, Du MH, Lin ZL, Zhang L, Ma L, Wang H, Yu W, Lv Y, Lu JY, Pi YL, et al. Valproic acid treatment inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha accumulation and protects against burn-induced gut barrier dysfunction in a rodent model. PLoS One 8 10:e77523, 2013.
57. Difede J, Barchas JD. Psychiatric and neurologic aspects of war: an overview and perspective. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1208:1–9, 2010.
58. Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 66 9:1–16, 2017.
59. Jepsen CH, deMoya MA, Perner A, Sillesen M, Ostrowski SR, Alam HB, Johansson PI. Effect of valproic acid and injury on lesion size and endothelial glycocalyx shedding in a rodent model of isolated traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77 2:292–297, 2014.
60. Halaweish I, Bambakidis T, Chang Z, Wei H, Liu B, Li Y, Bonthrone T, Srinivasan A, Bonham T, Chtraklin K, et al. Addition of low-dose valproic acid to saline resuscitation provides neuroprotection and improves long-term outcomes in a large animal model of combined traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79 6:911–919, 2015.
61. Jin G, Duggan M, Imam A, Demoya MA, Sillesen M, Hwabejire J, Jepsen CH, Liu B, Mejaddam AY, Lu J, et al. Pharmacologic resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock combined with traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73 6:1461–1470, 2012.
62. Jin G, DeMoya MA, Duggan M, Knightly T, Mejaddam AY, Hwabejire J, Lu J, Smith WM, Kasotakis G, Velmahos GC, et al. Traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock: evaluation of different resuscitation strategies in a large animal model of combined insults. Shock V 38 2012; 1:49–56.
63. Hwabejire JO, Jin G, Imam AM, Duggan M, Sillesen M, Deperalta D, Jepsen CH, Lu J, Li Y, deMoya MA, et al. Pharmacologic modulation of cerebral metabolic derangement and excitotoxicity in a porcine model of traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock. Surgery 154 2:234–243, 2013.
64. Mark LP, Prost RW, Ulmer JL, Smith MM, Daniels DL, Strottmann JM, Brown WD, Hacein-Bey L. Pictorial review of glutamate excitotoxicity: fundamental concepts for neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22 10:1813–1824, 2001.
65. Morland C, Boldingh KA, Iversen EG, Hassel B. Valproate is neuroprotective against malonate toxicity in rat striatum: an association with augmentation of high-affinity glutamate uptake. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24 11:1226–1234, 2004.
66. Marklund N, Salci K, Lewen A, Hillered L. Glycerol as a marker for post-traumatic membrane phospholipid degradation in rat brain. Neuroreport 8 6:1457–1461, 1997.
67. Mellergard P, Sjogren F, Hillman J. The cerebral extracellular release of glycerol, glutamate, and FGF2 is increased in older patients following severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29 1:112–118, 2012.
68. Nikolian VC, Dekker SE, Bambakidis T, Higgins GA, Dennahy IS, Georgoff PE, Williams AM, Andjelkovic AV, Alam HB. Improvement of blood-brain barrier integrity in traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock following treatment with valproic acid and fresh frozen plasma. Crit Care Med 46 1:e59–e66, 2018.
69. Nikolian VC, Dennahy IS, Higgins GA, Williams AM, Weykamp M, Georgoff PE, Eidy H, Ghandour MH, Chang P, Alam HB. Transcriptomic changes following valproic acid treatment promote neurogenesis and minimize secondary brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 84 3:459–465, 2018.
70. Georgoff PE, Nikolian VC, Higgins G, Chtraklin K, Eidy H, Ghandour MH, Williams A, Athey B, Alam HB. Valproic acid induces prosurvival transcriptomic changes in swine subjected to traumatic injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 84 4:642–649, 2018.
71. Weykamp M, Nikolian VC, Dennahy IS, Higgins GA, Georgoff PE, Remmer H, Ghandour MH, Alam HB. Rapid valproic acid-induced modulation of the traumatic proteome in a porcine model of traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res 228:84–92, 2018.
72. Korley FK, Nikolian VC, Williams AM, Dennahy IS, Weykamp M, Alam HB. Valproic acid treatment decreases serum glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain levels in swine subjected to traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 35 10:1185–1191, 2018.
73. Nikolian VC, Georgoff PE, Pai MP, Dennahy IS, Chtraklin K, Eidy H, Ghandour MH, Han Y, Srinivasan A, Li Y, et al. Valproic acid decreases brain lesion size and improves neurologic recovery in swine subjected to traumatic brain injury, hemorrhagic shock, and polytrauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83 6:1066–1073, 2017.
74. Mollen KP, Levy RM, Prince JM, Hoffman RA, Scott MJ, Kaczorowski DJ, Vallabhaneni R, Vodovotz Y, Billiar TR. Systemic inflammation and end organ damage following trauma involves functional TLR4 signaling in both bone marrow-derived cells and parenchymal cells. J Leukoc Biol 83 1:80–88, 2008.
75. Keel M, Trentz O. Pathophysiology of polytrauma. Injury 36 6:691–709, 2005.
76. Moore FA, Moore EE. Evolving concepts in the pathogenesis of postinjury multiple organ failure. Surg Clin North Am 75 2:257–277, 1995.
77. Li Y, Liu B, Zhao H, Sailhamer EA, Fukudome EY, Zhang X, Kheirbek T, Finkelstein RA, Velmahos GC, deMoya M, et al. Protective effect of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid against LPS-induced septic shock in rodents. Shock V 32 2009; 5:517–523.
78. Li Y, Liu B, Fukudome EY, Kochanek AR, Finkelstein RA, Chong W, Jin G, Lu J, deMoya MA, Velmahos GC, et al. Surviving lethal septic shock without fluid resuscitation in a rodent model. Surgery 148 2:246–254, 2010.
79. Finkelstein RA, Li Y, Liu B, Shuja F, Fukudome E, Velmahos GC, deMoya M, Alam HB. Treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor attenuates MAP kinase mediated liver injury in a lethal model of septic shock. J Surg Res 163 1:146–154, 2010.
80. Zhao Y, Zhou P, Liu B, Bambakidis T, Mazitschek R, Alam HB, Li Y. Protective effect of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid against lipopolysaccharide-induced liver damage in rodents. J Surg Res 194 2:544–550, 2015.
81. Zhao T, Li Y, Liu B, Liu Z, Chong W, Duan X, Deperalta DK, Velmahos GC, Alam HB. Novel pharmacologic treatment attenuates septic shock and improves long-term survival. Surgery 154 2:206–213, 2013.
82. Liu Z, Li Y, Chong W, Deperalta DK, Duan X, Liu B, Halaweish I, Zhou P, Alam HB. Creating a prosurvival phenotype through a histone deacetylase inhibitor in a lethal two-hit model. Shock V 41 2014; 2:104–108.
83. Chang Z, Li Y, He W, Liu B, Halaweish I, Bambakidis T, Liang Y, Alam HB. Selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 promotes survival in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79 6:905–910, 2015.
84. Li Y, Zhao T, Liu B, Halaweish I, Mazitschek R, Duan X, Alam HB. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 improves long-term survival in a lethal septic model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78 2:378–385, 2015.
85. Chang Z, Li Y, He W, Liu B, Duan X, Halaweish I, Bambakidis T, Pan B, Liang Y, Nikolian VC, et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 restores intestinal tight junction in hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81 3:512–519, 2016.
86. Zhao T, Li Y, Bronson RT, Liu B, Velmahos GC, Alam HB. Selective histone deacetylase-6 inhibition attenuates stress responses and prevents immune organ atrophy in a lethal septic model. Surgery 156 2:235–242, 2014.
87. Deng Q, Zhao T, Pan B, Dennahy IS, Duan X, Williams AM, Liu B, Lin N, Bhatti UF, Chen E, et al. Protective effect of Tubastatin A in CLP-induced lethal sepsis. Inflammation 41:2101–2109, 2018.
88. Nikolian VC, Dennahy IS, Weykamp M, Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Eidy H, Ghandour MH, Chtraklin K, Li Y, Alam HB. Isoform 6-selective histone deacetylase inhibition reduces lesion size and brain swelling following traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 86 2:232–239, 2019.
89. Zhao T, Li Y, Liu B, Bronson RT, Halaweish I, Alam HB. Histone deacetylase III as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of lethal sepsis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77 6:913–919, 2014.
90. Zhao T, Alam HB, Liu B, Bronson RT, Nikolian VC, Wu E, Chong W, Li Y. Selective inhibition of SIRT2 improves outcomes in a lethal septic model. Curr Mol Med 15 7:634–641, 2015.
91. Morris MJ, Monteggia LM. Unique functional roles for class I and class II histone deacetylases in central nervous system development and function. Int J Dev Neurosci 31 6:370–381, 2013.
92. Jablonska B, Gierdalski M, Chew L-J, Hawley T, Catron M, Lichauco A, Cabrera-Luque J, Yuen T, Rowitch D, Gallo V. Sirt1 regulates glial progenitor proliferation and regeneration in white matter after neonatal brain injury. Nat Commun 7:13866, 2016.
93. Dresselhaus E, Duerr JM, Vincent F, Sylvain EK, Beyna M, Lanyon LF, LaChapelle E, Pettersson M, Bales KR, Ramaswamy G. Class I HDAC inhibition is a novel pathway for regulating astrocytic apoE secretion. PLoS One 13:e0194661, 2018.
94. Zhang S, Fujita Y, Matsuzaki R, Yamashita T. Class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor CI-994 promotes functional recovery following spinal cord injury. Cell Death Dis 9 5:460, 2018.
95. Georgoff PE, Nikolian VC, Bonham T, Pai MP, Tafatia C, Halaweish I, To K, Watcharotone K, Parameswaran A, Luo R, et al. Safety and tolerability of intravenous valproic acid in healthy subjects: a Phase I dose-escalation trial. Clin Pharmacokinetics 57 2:209–219, 2018.
96. Georgoff PE, Halaweish I, Nikolian VC, Higgins GA, Bonham T, Tafatia C, Remmer H, Menon R, Liu B, Li Y, et al. Alterations in the human proteome following administration of valproic acid. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81 6:1020–1027, 2016.
97. Sillesen M, Bambakidis T, Dekker SE, Fabricius R, Svenningsen P, Bruhn PJ, Svendsen LB, Hillingso J, Alam HB. Histone deactylase gene expression profiles are associated with outcomes in blunt trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80 1:26–32, 2016.
98. Alam HB. Trauma care: finding a better way. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 14 7:e1002350, 2017.
Keywords:

Epigenetic modulation; hemorrhage; histone deacetylase inhibitors; novel resuscitation strategies; polytrauma; sepsis; traumatic brain injury

© 2019 by the Shock Society