Secondary Logo

MOF, MODS, AND SIRS: WHAT IS IN A NAME OR AN ACRONYM?

Baue, Arthur E.

doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000228172.32587.7a
Mini-Review
Free

ABSTRACT The most prominent contributions to multiple organ failure, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome are described in this article. However, it is quite possible that there are others that have been missed. The problem of organ failure continues to perplex clinicians and scientists, and it contributes to fatal outcomes for patients with illnesses, infections, and injuries after operations. Although we know a fair bit about these problems, we frequently can do little about it. The best approach remains support to prevent failure.

Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Received 11 Apr 2006; first review completed 17 Apr 2006; accepted in final form 27 Apr 2006

Address reprint requests to Arthur E. Baue, MD, PO Box 396, Fishers Island, NY 06390.

Though old the thought and oft expressed, tis his at last who says it best. James Russell Lowell, For an Autograph, 1868

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Early in World War II, the major problem after injury was hemorrhagic shock (wound shock). As blood transfusions were made available and fluids, along with surgical intervention, were used, this became less of a problem (1). Late in World War II, renal failure or post-traumatic renal insufficiency was found to be a problem in the severely wounded, which continued through the Korean conflict (2). With more rapid fluid resuscitation, renal failure was prevented more frequently. The problem then became the lungs-post-traumatic pulmonary insufficiency (shock lung), which was most evident during the Vietnam conflict (3). Burke et al. reported on high-output respiratory failure as an important cause of death with peritonitis in 1963 (4). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was described by Ashbaugh et al. in 1967 (5). Early aggressive use of positive pressure ventilation decreased the incidence of pulmonary failure. Thus, single organ failure as a cause of death decreased. There was identification of multiple organ problems. Skillman et al. (6) described respiratory failure, hypotension, sepsis, and jaundice as a complication leading to death in stress ulceration of the stomach.

The descriptions of multiple organ problems began with sequential systems failure (SSF) after ruptured abdominal aneurysms by Tilney et al. (7) in 1973. Then I described multiple progressive or SSF, a syndrome of the 1970s, in 1975 (8). Eiseman et al. (9) first used the term multiple organ failure (MOF) in 1977.

Border et al. (10) wrote about multiple system organ failure in 1976. In 1977, Polk and Shields (11) described remote organ failure as a valid sign of occult intra-abdominal infection. In 1980, Fry and colleagues (12) stressed the role of uncontrolled infection in multiple system organ failure. Chaudry and I (13) wrote about the prevention of multiple system failure at the same time. There was then an explosion of contributions to our knowledge and more acronyms about organ failure (Table 1). Goris et al. (14) described MOF as a problem of generalized acute destructive inflammation, and later, a model for MOF without sepsis and bacteria. Faist et al. (15) described MOF in polytrauma patients. McMenamy et al. (16) described the basal state in MOF. Meakins (17) emphasized the 1-hit/2-hit multiple hits in the development of MOF. He, along with Marshall (18), called the gastrointestinal tract the "motor of MOF." Carrico et al. (20) used the expression "multiple organ failure syndrome."

Knaus and colleagues (21) developed a scoring system for acute organ system failure and emphasized the high mortality. This became the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system. Wilmore and Orlick (22) described the systemic responses to injury and wounds. Cerra (23) wrote about the hypermetabolism organ failure complex in 1987. Bell et al. (24) wrote about multiple organ system failure in 1983. Darling et al. (25) described multiorgan failure in critically ill patients in 1988. Crump et al. (26) described MOF after trauma.

Maier (27), in a review of critical care and metabolism, describes MOF as a "malignant systemic inflammatory response caused by the host's own immune system." Carrico et al. (28) described the incidence and problems of the multiple organ failure syndrome.

Members of the Canadian Multiple Organ Failure Study Group (29) proposed discriminating between the phenomenon of the effects of micro-organism (infection) and the response of the host (sepsis). Pruitt (30) reviewed the proposal of Nuytinek et al. of increased organ weight and intraorgan accumulation of neutrophils as the preclinical stage of MOF.

Ueno et al. (31) noted a correlation between thrombocytopenia and MOF in critically ill patients. A number of studies of the mediators and causes of MOF after trauma have been reported such as those by Waydhas et al. (32) and Nuytinck et al. (33), who described whole-body inflammation leading to MOF. Roumen et al. (34) studied inflammatory mediators leading to MOF after trauma. DeCamp and Demling (35) explored post-traumatic organ failure. A cellular injury score was developed by Oda et al. (36).

The group in Denver with Ofner and Moore, Moore et al., and Sauaia et al. (37-41) made many contributions to our knowledge of MOF. They emphasized the risk factors for MOF in trauma patients, including massive blood transfusions, major abdominal trauma, and multiple fractures. They found that early deaths were associated with interleukin 6 going up (inflammation out of control), and late deaths were due to infection (42). In 1983, Ozawa et al. (43) developed a redox theory for the metabolic abnormalities associated with postoperative organ failure.

Hyers et al. (44) reviewed cellular interactions in the multiple organ injury syndrome. Bumaschny et al. (45) describe MOF occurring after postoperative acute gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage. Godin and Buchman (46) offered a complementary hypothesis, the uncoupling of biological oscillators in the pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Vincent and DeBacker (47) emphasized the importance of treatment of circulatory shock to prevent MSOF.

A number of books have been written about MOF. The first was my book on MOF in 1990, (48) which I wrote myself, with a chapter written by my wife Rosemary on the "Patient as a Person: Ethical Considerations of Patients with MOF." et al. (49) edited a multiauthored book on MOF. Matuschak (50), and also Deitch (51), edited multiauthored books on MOF. Fry (52) also wrote a book. There are other books resulting from symposia and Congresses. MOF has been reported in patients with burns, after liver transplantation and cardiac surgery, in children, in patients with perforated viscera, splanchnic ischemia, and many other problems.

A change in focus occurred with the development of the concept of MODS and its score and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was defined by a consensus conference of the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (53) as a clinical syndrome that is thought to be the result of an overly active inflammatory response. Vincent (54), Bone (55), Opal (56), and others believe that the concept of SIRS does not help, and I agree. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is defined as two or more of the following conditions:

  1. Temperature greater than 38°C or less than 36°C;
  2. Heart rate greater than 90 beats/min;
  3. Respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths/ min or PaCO2 less than 32 torr;
  4. White blood cell (WBC) greater than 12,000 cells mm−3 or less than 4000 cells mm−3 or greater than 10% immature (band) forms.

I have no problem with the use of SIRS as a nonspecific description of being sick. I do have a problem with going beyond that such as using SIRS criteria for randomized trials of therapy. No one has reported on the appearance of patients with SIRS. Don't they look sick? Can't clinical observation also tell you that they are sick? Anyone with SIRS is sick. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome has been highly touted as a way to define and measure sickness. Has it helped? Is it worthwhile? Let us go beyond the hype of those who have a vested interested in SIRS because they invented the concept. The trained clinician observes his patients beyond just vital signs. I recommend to my students and residents that during rounds, they should go into the patient's room or cubicle in the intensive care unit or elsewhere and observe and talk to the patient before they check the chart and the vital signs. This allows them to determine the patient's state as the patient feels it or experiences it.

On the other hand, MODS emphasized an early phase of organ dysfunction before overt failure occurred. It is defined as "the presence of altered organ function in an acutely ill patient such that homeostasis cannot be maintained without intervention." The concept of MODS was developed by Marshall et al. (57) Identification of this abnormality might occur in a period when organ support can yield better function and prevention of organ failure. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was an attempt to describe a state of illness resulting from trauma or infection-the early response of the individual by inflammation and the clinical characteristics of that state.

It is important to remember that SIRS, MODS, MOF, and all the other names and descriptions of multiple organ problems are not diseases or even syndromes. They are terms with arbitrary definitions that cannot be treated as such. The specific underlying diseases causing these conditions must be identified and treated while organ function is supported. Thus, trying to keep SIRS from progressing and trying to improve MODS and prevent MOF is all we can do. Success of the effort will depend primarily on whether we can find, diagnose, and treat the specific problem making the patient sick. Irrespective of whether it is an undrained abscess, a nosocomial infection, a severe injury, end-stage cardiac or pulmonary disease, or other problems, our success depends on being able to correct, treat, or stamp out the problem.

We all seem to have a great need to name things. The plethora of alphabet soups or acronyms, terms, and expressions for the pathophysiologic state of sick, injured patients is overwhelming. We try to reduce complex clinical problems in even more complex patients to simplistic concepts of sickness, inflammation, and sepsis. It is true that the human body can respond clinically to an insult in only so many ways. Similar changes in vital signs, respiration, mentation, organ function, and circulating blood elements or mediators occur with many clinical problems, but the question is, "Does this reductionism helps us to take better care of such patients?"

The information learned from molecular biology is extremely complex. The overlap and redundancy of mediators and receptors of cascades, of signaling, and mechanisms of remote organ damage in the endothelium and microcirculation are wondrous to behold but difficult to understand and put into a coherent whole. We are learning of so many pieces in the biological puzzle, but what is the picture? Can we inter-relate these complexities into an understandable pattern and, more specifically, can we use such information for therapy? So far, this has not been possible. The failure of so-called magic bullets attests to this dilemma. The terms, expressions, and acronyms used for organ difficulties after the description of MOF are shown in Table 1. Those used for infection and inflammation are shown in Table 2. The teleology of SIRS, MODS, and MOF is listed in Table 3. It is amazing how many articles on MOF do not refer to the original articles. It should be possible to summarize all of the definitions and scoring systems for organ failure into some coherent system. There are more than 20 definitions, descriptions, classifications, or scoring systems of organ failures-MOF. At least 6 of these went on to develop scoring systems to calculate the severity of MOF. These descriptions are all very similar and allow the development of a common definition, which can be acceptable to everyone, if they accept it and use it. Because these definitions have already been developed and can be collated and codified, it should not be necessary to develop a whole new system of multiple organ dysfunction definitions. Twenty-two examples of various scores are provided in Table 4. A scoring system has also been developed by DeCamp and Demling (35). Baker (70) collated the scoring systems into a very sensible one, with the list of organ systems put in the order in which they fail.

Table 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 3

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Table 4

Siegel et al. (71) studied the early predictors of injury severity and death after blunt trauma. Deitch (72) reviewed the pathophysiology and therapy for MOF. Anderson and Harken (73) described the autologous tissue injury that can occur with inflammation. Goodwin and Session (74) provided an overview of MOF. I have also written about the horror autotoxicus and MOF (75); an update on MOF/MODS and SIRS (76); why there are no magic bullets for MOF, MODS, and SIRS (77); whether we are winning the battle against MOF Baue et al. (78); whether SIRS and MODS are important entities in the clinical evaluation of patients (79); and about MOF in this new millenium (80). Chaudry (81) has reviewed the cellular and molecular biologic approaches to MOF.

This article cites the most prominent contributions to MOF, MODS, and SIRS. I am sure there are others that I missed. The whole problem of organ failure continues to perplex clinicians and scientists, and it contributes to fatal outcomes for patients with illnesses, infections, and injuries after operations. We know a lot about these problems but frequently can do little. The best approach remains patient and organ support to prevent failure.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Churchill ED: Surgeon to Soldiers. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co, 1972.
2. Teschan PE, Post RS, Smith LH Jr., Abernathy RS, Davis JH, Gray DM, Howard JM, Johnson KE, Klopp E, Mundy RL, et al. Post-traumatic renal insufficiency in military casualties. Am J Med 18:172-186, 1955.
3. Fulton RL, Jones CE: The cause of post-traumatic pulmonary insufficiency in man. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:179-186. 1975.
4. Burke JF, Pontoppidan H, Welch CE: High output respiratory failure-an important cause of death ascribed to peritonitis or ileus. Ann Surg 158:581-592, 1963.
5. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow D, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 11:319-325, 1967.
6. Skillman JJ, Bushnell LS, Goldman H: Respiratory failure, hypotension, sepsis and jaundice: a clinical syndrome associated with lethal hemorrhage from acute stress ulceration of the stomach. Am J Surg 117:523-530, 1969.
7. Tilney NL, Ballet GL, Morgan AP: Sequential systems failure after rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms: an unsolved problem in postoperative care. Ann Surg 178:117-122, 1973.
8. Baue AE: Multiple, progressive, or sequential system failure. A syndrome of the 1970s. Arch Surg 110:779-781, 1975.
9. Eiseman B, Beart R, Norton L: Multiple organ failure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 144:323-326, 1977.
10. Border JR, Chemier R, McManamy RH: Multiple systems organ failure. Muscle fuel deficit with visceral protein malnutrition. Surg Clin North Am 56:1147-1167, 1976.
11. Polk HC, Shields CL: Remote organ failure: a valid sign of occult intra-abdominal infection. Surgery 81:310-313, 1977.
12. Fry DE, Pearlstein L, Fulton RL, Polk HC Jr. Multiple system organ failure: the role of uncontrolled infection. Arch Surg 115:136-140, 1980.
13. Baue AE, Chaudry IH: Prevention of multiple systems failure. Surg Clin North1 Am 60:1167-1178, 1980.
14. Goris R, Bookhorst P, Nuytinick JK, Gimbere JS. Multiple organ failure: generalized autodestructive inflammation. Arch Surg 120:1109-1115, 1985.
15. Faist E, Baue AE, Dittmer H, Heberer G. Multiple organ failure in trauma patients. J Trauma 23:775-787, 1983.
16. McMenamy R, Birkhahn, Reed R, Rumph C, Vaidyanath N, Yu L, Cerra FB, Sorkness R, Border JR. Multiple systems organ failure. The basal state. J Trauma 21:99-114, 1981.
17. Meakins JL: Etiology of multiple organ failure. J Trauma 30 (12 (Suppl)):5165-5166, 1990.
18. Meakins JL, Marshall JC: The gastrointestinal tract: the "motor" of MOF. Arch Surg 121:197-201, 1986.
19. Marshall JC, Christou NV, Meakins JL: The gastrointestinal tract. The "undrained abscess" of multiple organ failure. Ann Surg 218:111-119, 1993.
20. Carrico CJ, Meakins JL, Marshall JC: Multiple organ failure syndrome. Arch Surg 121:196-208, 1986.
21. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. Prognosis in acute organ-system failure. Ann Surg 65:685-693, 1985.
22. Wilmore DW, Orlick L: Systemic responses to injury and healing wound. J Parent Ent Nutr 4:147-151, 1984.
23. Cerra FB: Hypermetabolism organ failure and metabolic support. Surgery 191:1-5, 1987.
24. Bell RC, Coalson JJ, Smith JD, Johanson WG Jr. Multiple organ systems failure and infection in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intern Med 99:293-298, 1983.
25. Darling GE, Duff JH, Mustard RA, Finley RJ. Multiorgan failure in critically ill patients. Can J Surg 31:172-176, 1988.
26. Crump JM, Duncan DA, Wears R: Analysis of multiple systems failure in trauma and non-trauma patients. Am Surg 54:702-708, 1988.
27. Maier RV: Critical care and metabolism. Bull Am Coll Surg 77:22-26, 1991.
28. Carrico CJ, Meakins JL, Marshall JC, Fry D, Maier RV. Multiple-organ-failure syndrome. Arch Surg 121:196-201, 1986.
29. Canadian Multiple Organ Failure Study Group. Sepsis clarity of existing terminology… or more confusion. Crit Care Med 19:996-998, 1999.
30. Pruitt BA: The pathogenesis of multiple organ failure. Arch Surg 123:1518-1523, 1988.
31. Ueno H, Hirasawa H, Sugai T, Ohtake Y, Oda S, Nakanishi K, Matsuda K, Kitamura N. Correlation between thrombocytopenia and development of MOF in critically ill patients. Shock 5: 1996. >abstract 14>.
32. Waydhas C, Nastkolb D, Jochum M, Trupka A, Lenk S, Fritz H, Duswald KH, Schweiberer L. Inflammatory mediators, infection, sepsis and multiple organ failure after severe trauma. Arch Surg 127:460-467, 1992.
33. Nuytinck HKS, Xavier JM, Goris JA: Whole-body inflammation in trauma patients. Arch Surg 123:1519-1524, 1988.
34. Roumen RM, Redl H, Schlag G, Zilow G, Sandtner W, Koller W, Hendriks T, Goris RJ. Inflammatory mediators in relation to the development of multiple organ failure in patients after severe blunt trauma. Crit Care Med 23:474-480, 1995.
35. DeCamp MM, Demling RH: Posttraumatic multisystem organ failure. JAMA 260:530-534, 1988.
36. Oda S, Hirasawa H, Sugai T, Shiga H, Matsuda K, Ueno H. Cellular injury score for multiple organ failure severity scoring system. J Trauma 45:304-309, 1998.
37. Offner PF, Moore EE: Risk factors for MOF and pattern of organ failure following severe trauma. Chapter 4. In Baue AE, Faist E, Fry DF, (eds.): Multiple Organ Failure. New York: Springer, 2000.
38. Moore FA, Haenel JB, Moore EE, Whitehill TA: Incommensurate oxygen consumption in response to maximal oxygen availability predicts postinjury multiple organ failure. J Trauma 33:58-63, 1992.
39. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, Lezotte DC: Early risk factors for postinjury multiple organ failure. World J Surg 20:392-400, 1996.
40. Moore FA, Moore EE, Sauaia A: Blood transfusion: an independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure. Arch Surg 132:620-624, 1997. (discussion 624-625).
41. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, et al Norris JM. Lezotte DC, Hamman RF. Multiple organ failure can be predicted as early as 12 hours after injury. J Trauma 45:291-301, 1998. (discussion 301-303).
42. Moore FA, Sauaia A, Moore EE, Haenel JB, Burch JM, Lezotte DC. Postinjury multiple organ failure: a bimodal phenomenon. J Trauma 40:501-510, 1996. (discussion 510-512).
43. Ozawa K, Aoyama H, Yasuda K, Shimahara Y, Nakatani T, Tanaka J, Yamamoto M, Kamiyama Y, Tobe T. Metabolic abnormalities associated with postoperative organ failure. Arch Surg 118:1245-1251, 1983.
44. Hyers TM, Gee M, Andreadis NA: Cellular interactions in the multiple organ injury syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 135:952-953, 1987.
45. Bumaschny E, Doglio G, Pusajo J, Vetera L, Parra C, Grosso RM, Schieppati E. Post-operative acute gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and multiple organ failure. Arch Surg 123:722-726, 1988.
46. Godin PJ, Buchman TG: Uncoupling of biological oscillators: a complementary hypothesis concerning the pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med 24:1107-1116, 1996.
47. Vincent JL, DeBaker D: Initial management of circulating shock as prevention of MSOF. Crit Care Clin 5:369-378, 1989.
48. Baue AE: Multiple organ failure. Patient Care and Prevention. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book, 1990.
49. Baue AE, Faist E, Fry DE: Multiple organ failure. Pathophysiology, Prevention and Therapy. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
50. Matuschak GM, (ed.): Multiple systems organ failure. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993.
51. Deitch EA: Multiple Organ Failure: Pathophysiology and Basic Concepts of Therapy. New York: Thieme, 1990.
52. Fry DE: Multiple Systems Organ Failure. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1991.
53. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. Definitions for sepsis and multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med 20:864-874, 1992.
54. Vincent JL: Dear SIRS, I'm sorry to say that I don't like you. Crit Care Med 25:372-374, 1997.
55. Bone RL: Let's agree on terminology: definitions of sepsis. Crit Care Med 19:973-976, 1991.
56. Opal SM: The uncertain value of the definition for SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Chest 113:1442-1443, 1998.
57. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 23:1638-1645, 1995.
58. Norton LW: Does drainage of intraabdominal pus reverse multiple organ failure? Am J Surg 149:347-350, 1985.
59. Pine RW, Wertz MJ, Lennard ES, Dellinger EP, Carrico CJ, Minshew BH. Determinants of organ malfunction or death in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. A discriminant analysis. Arch Surg 118:242-249, 1983.
60. Manship L, McMillian RD, Brown JJ: The influence of sepsis and multisystem organ failure on mortality in the surgical intensive care unit. Ann Surg 50:94-101, 1984.
    61. Marshall JC, Christou NV, Horn R, Meakins JL: The microbiology of multiple organ failure. The proximal gastrointestinal tract as an occult reservoir of pathogens. Arch Surg 123:309-315, 1988.
    62. Dobb GJ: Multiple organ failure-"Words mean what I say they mean." Intensive Care World 14:61-63, 1992.
      63. Hebert PC, Drummond AJ, Singer J, Bernard GR, Russell JA. A simple multiple system organ failure scoring system predicts mortality of patients who have sepsis syndrome. Chest 104:230-235, 1993.
      64. Rubin DB, Matthay MA, Weinberg PF, et al: Factor VIII antigen: possible plasma marker of progressive acute lung injury in patients with sepsis. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:A142, 1985.
      65. Kollef M: Ventilator-associated pneumonia. A multivariate analysis. JAMA 270:1965-1970, 1993.
      66. Tran DD, Cuesta MA, van Leeuwen PA, Nauta JJ, Wesdorp RI. Risk factors for multiple organ systems failure and death in critically injured patients. Surgery 114:21-30, 1993.
      67. Bihari D, Smithies M, Gimson A, Tinker J. The effects of vasodilation with prostacyclin on oxygen deliver and uptake in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 317:397-403, 1987.
      68. Saffle JR, Larson CM, Sullivan J, Shelby J. The continuing challenge of burn care in the elderly. Surgery 3:534-543, 1990.
      69. Henao FJ, Daes JE, Dennis RJ: Risk factors of multiorgan failure: a case-control study. J Trauma 31:74-80, 1991.
      70. Baker CC: Trauma in the 1980s: the "success story" of multiple organ failure. Adv Trauma 3:37-52, 1988.
      71. Siegel JH, Rivkind AI, Dalal SA, Goodarzi S. Early physiological predictors of injury severity and death in blunt multiple trauma. Arch Surg 125:498-508, 1990.
      72. Deitch EA: Multiple organ failure. Pathophysiology and basic concepts of therapy. New York: Thieme, 1990.
      73. Anderson B, Harken A: Multiple organ failure; inflammatory priming and activation sequences promote autologous tissue injury. J Trauma 30:544-549, 1990.
      74. Goodwin CW, Session V: Sepsis and organ failure. Multiple organ failure: clinical overview of the syndrome. J Trauma 20 (Suppl):S163-S169, 1990.
      75. Baue AE: The horror autotoxicus and multiple-organ failure. Arch Surg 127:1451-1462, 1992.
      76. Baue AE: MOF/MODS, SIRS: an update. Shock 6(Suppl 1):S1-S5, 1996.
      77. Baue AE: Multiple organ failure, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Why no magic bullets? Arch Surg 132:703-707, 1997.
      78. Baue AE, Durham R, Faist E: SIRS, MODS, MOF-are we winning the battle? Shock 10:79-89, 1998.
      79. Baue AE: A debate on the subject "Are SIRS and MODS important entities in the clinical evaluation of patients?" The con position. Shock 14:590-593, 2000.
      80. Baue AE: Multiple organ failure (MOF) in this new millenium. Crit Care Shock 4:1-9, 2001.
      81. Chaudry IH: Cellular and molecular biological approaches to the pathophysiology of multiple organ failure. J Jpn Soc Int Care Med 6 (Suppl):82-83, 1999.
      82. Ruokonen E, Takala J, Kari A: Regional blood flow and oxygen transport in patients with low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med 21:1296-1302, 1993.
      83. Dorinsky PM, Gadek JE: Multiple organ failure clinics. Clin Chest Med 11:581-591, 1990.
      84. Cerra FB, Siegel JH, Coleman B, Border JR, McMenamy RR. Autocannibalism, a failure of exogenous nutritional support. Ann Surg 192:570-577, 1980.
      85. Yao YM, Redl H, Bahrami S, Schlag G: The inflammatory basis of trauma/shock associated with multiple organ failure. Inflamm Res 47:201-210, 1988.
      Keywords:

      MOF; MODS; SIRS

      ©2006The Shock Society