Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

RESULTS OF RETINAL DETACHMENT SURGERY IN EYES WITH OSTEO-KERATOPROSTHESIS

Vilaplana, Ferran, MD*,†; Nadal, Jeroni, MD, PhD†,‡; Temprano, José, MD, PhD†,§; Julio, Gemma, PhD¶,**; Barraquer, Rafael I., MD, PhD*,†,††

doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001865
Original Study: PDF Only

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional results of pars plana vitrectomy in eyes with osteo-keratoprosthesis, who have suffered retinal detachment.

Methods: An observational, retrospective study of 18 eyes which underwent pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment after an implantation of an osteo-keratoprosthesis, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. A descriptive study and a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for anatomical and functional success were performed. Anatomical success was defined as an attached retina at the end of vitreoretinal surgery with no redetachment during the follow-up. Functional success was defined as a postoperative visual acuity of more than or equal to 20/400.

Results: The overall rate of anatomical success was 56%, and the anatomical survival rates were 67% and 53% at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, maintaining this last value at 24 months after pars plana vitrectomy. The overall rate of functional success was 17%, and the functional survival rates were 83%, 39%, and 14% at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after pars plana vitrectomy, respectively. The most frequent complication after retinal surgery was retroprosthetic membrane (33%).

Conclusion: Despite the reserved prognosis and the severe complications, vitrectomy represents a valid method for treating retinal detachment in patients with osteo-keratoprosthesis, with good anatomical results but poor visual acuity.

The functional and anatomical results of retinal detachment surgery performed on patients with osteo-keratoprosthesis was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The most frequent complication was retroprosthetic membrane. Vitrectomy represents a valid method with good anatomical results but poor visual acuity, both in the medium and long terms.

*Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain;

Institut Universitari Barraquer, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;

Retina Department, Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain;

§Cornea Department, Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain;

Clinical Investigation Department, Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain;

**Optics and Optometry Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; and

††Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

None of the authors has any financial/conflicting interests to disclose.

© 2018 by Ophthalmic Communications Society, Inc.