Scoring the APPT provides the individual with 5 subscale scores. The first subscale is pain location and is calculated by counting the number of pain sites marked on the body outline diagram.15 The second subscale is pain intensity and is calculated by using a 10-cm ruler to measure where the child placed his or her line on the word graphic rating scale.15 The third subscale is pain quality that is calculated by counting the number of sensory, affective and evaluative pain descriptor words circled by the child.15 The fourth subscale is temporal pain quality and is calculated by counting the number of temporal pain descriptors identified.15 Finally, adding both pain quality subscales provides a total pain quality subscale score.15
The APPT has been used and validated as a multidimensional measure of child and adolescent pain in a wide variety of conditions.15 , 26 , 27 Because this tool does not produce a total score, the APPT in its entirety has not been validated, but each dimension of the tool (location, intensity, quality) has demonstrated adequate reliability and validity independently.15 , 26 , 27 Several researchers have used the APPT to assess pain in children with hematologic and oncologic diseases as it is one of the only measures to address the quality of a child's pain.15 , 26 Responsiveness data have not been reported.
Six measures of pain were deemed reasonable to use by the task force. Although these tools may demonstrate good clinical utility (Table 4), the authors did not recommend or highly recommend these tools for the reasons highlighted below. The Brief Pain Inventory was developed to measure pain in adults with cancer and has been used in those as young as 18 years.45 However, this tool has not been validated in the pediatric population and can therefore not be given a higher ranking despite its relevance to oncology. The COMFORT Behavior Scale is used to measure pain in infants and young children aged birth to 3 years and appears to have sound psychometric properties and good clinical utility.46 There are no studies regarding the use of or validity of this tool in infants with cancer, but it remains a viable option for those under age 3 as none of the recommended or highly recommended measures are appropriate for this age group.
The Visual Analog Scale and the Numeric Rating Scales demonstrate good psychometric properties and clinical utility in the adult and young adult populations but have less impressive psychometric properties or limited study in pediatrics and a lack of research in pediatric oncology.47 , 48 The Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Pediatric Pain Questionnaire are the final 2 measures deemed reasonable to use. They both demonstrate good psychometric properties and clinical utility in children but have had inadequate study thus far in the pediatric oncology population.8 , 40 , 49 , 50
The task force did not recommend the use of 7 measures. The Preschool and Adolescent Body Outlines do not measure pain intensity and would therefore need to be combined with another measure to accurately reflect a child's pain.11 The Color Analogue Scale has been shown to be valid and reliable in the acute care setting, but the authors were unable to locate the tool.51 Because of this difficulty in acquiring the sliding scale tool, the measure is not recommended. Similarly, the Rainbow Pain Scale could not be located and does not demonstrate adequate validity and reliability testing.52 The Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale has been used extensively with infants and children, but it is based on caregiver report, not child self-report.53 Also, a recent systematic review uncovered limited and conflicting data regarding psychometric properties of the tool that do not support its use at this time.54 The Pain Squad APP for the iPhone or iPad appeared promising as it was developed for measuring pain in children with cancer.55 However, it only allows pain to be recorded at specific times and therefore does not seem appropriate for use during individual therapy sessions. Finally, the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Iowa Pain Thermometer demonstrate sound psychometric properties and clinical utility with adults, but have limited study in children.56 , 57 They are therefore not recommended for use at this time.
The authors recognize that new studies may have been published since the date of this literature search (July 31, 2017). There may be outcome measures that have been excluded from this review because of limited data available at the time. Similarly, a measure may have been given a lower rating score because of lack of study in the target population that has since been rectified. This search was limited to English-language journals, which could also limit the number of measures reviewed. This review did not assess the quality of study methodology, so it is possible that some psychometric data are flawed.
1. American Cancer
Society. Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer
2. Eiser C, Eiser JR, Stride CB. Quality of life in children
newly diagnosed with cancer
and their mothers. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:29.
3. Pizzo PA, Poplack DG. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
4. Raphael J, Hester J, Ahmedzai S, et al Cancer
pain: part 2: physical, interventional and complimentary therapies; management in the community; acute, treatment-related and complex cancer
pain: a perspective from the British Pain Society endorsed by the UK Association of Palliative Medicine and the Royal College of General Practitioners. Pain Med. 2010;11(6):872–896.
5. Kozlowski LJ, Kost-Byerly S, Colantuoni E, et al Pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a hospitalized pediatric population. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15(1):22–35.
6. Finley GA, Forgeron P, Amaout M. Action research: developing a pediatric cancer
pain program in Jordan. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35(4):447–454.
7. Hester NO. Assessment of pain in children
. In: Chapman CR, Foley KM, eds. Current and Emerging Issues in Cancer
Pain: Research and Practice. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993:219–245.
8. Cohen L, Lemanek K, Weiss K. Evidence-based assessment of pediatric pain. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(9):939–955.
9. von Baeyer CL. Children
's self-reports of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations and interpretation. Pain Res Manag. 2006;11(3):157–162.
10. Sutters KA, Miaskowski C. The problem of pain in children
: a research review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19(3):465–471.
11. Bossert EA, Van Cleve L, Savedra MC. Children
: the pain experience away from the health care setting. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1996;13(3):109–120.
12. Van Cleve L, Bossert E, Beecroft P, Adlard K, Alvarez O, Savedra MC. The pain experience of children
with leukemia during the first year after diagnosis. Nurs Res. 2004;53(1):1–10.
13. Van Cleve L, Munoz C, Bossert EA, Savedra MC. Children
's and adolescents' pain language in Spanish: translation of a measure. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001;2(3):110–118.
14. Jacob E, Hesselgrave J, Sambuco G, Hockenberry M. Variations in pain, sleep, and activity during hospitalization in children
. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2007;24(4):208–219.
15. Jacob E, Mack AK, Savedra M, Van Cleve L, Wilkie DJ. Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool for multidimensional measurement of pain in children
and adolescents. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15(3):694–706.
16. Jacob E, McCarthy KS, Sambuco G, Hockenberry M. Intensity, location, and quality of pain in Spanish-speaking children
. Pediatr Nurs. 2008;34(1):45–52.
17. Tutelman PR, Chambers CT, Stinson JN, et al Pain in children
: prevalence, characteristics, and parent management. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(3):198–206.
18. Batalha LMC, Fernandes AM, De Campos C, Perdigao AMPM. Pain assessment in children
: a systematic review. J Nurs Referencia. 2015;4(5):119–127.
19. Harrington SE, Gilchrist L, Lee J, Westlake F, Baker A. Oncology Section EDGE Task Force on cancer
: a systematic review of clinical measures for pain. Rehabil Oncol. 2018;36(2):83–92.
21. Wong D, Baker C. Pain in children
: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988;14(1):9–17.
22. Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, et al Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):50–54.
23. Keck JF, Gerkensmeyer JE, Joyce BA, Schade JG. Reliability and validity of the faces and word descriptor scales to measures procedural pain. J Pediatr Nurs. 1996;11(6):368–374.
24. Luffy R, Grove SK. Practice applications of research. Examining the validity, reliability, and preference of three pediatric pain measurement
tools in African-American children
. Pediatr Nurs. 2003;29(1):54–59.
25. Miro J, Castarlenas E, la Vega R, et al Validity of three rating scales for measuring pain intensity in youths with physical disabilities. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(1):130–137.
26. Fernandes AM, De Campos C, Batalha L, Perdigao A, Jacob E. Pain assessment using the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool: a systematic review. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19(4):212–218.
27. Savedra M, Holzemer WL, Tesler MD, Wilkie DJ. Assessment of postoperative pain in children
and adolescents using the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool. Nurs Res. 1993;42:5–8.
29. Beyer J, Aradine C. Content validity of an instrument to measure young children
's perceptions of the intensity of their pain. J Pediatr Nurs. 1986;1:386–395.
30. Beyer J, Aradine C. Patterns of pediatric pain intensity: A methodological investigation of a self-report scale. Clin J Pain. 1987;3:130–141.
31. Beyer J, Aradine C. The convergent and discriminant validity of a self-report measure of pain intensity for children
. Child Health Care. 1988;16:274–282.
32. Aradine C, Beyer J, Tomkins J. Children
's pain perceptions before and after analgesia: a study of instrument construct validity. J Pediatr Nurs. 1988;3:11–23.
33. Belter R, McIntosh J, Finch A, Saylor C. Preschooler's ability to differentiate levels of pain: relative efficacy of three self-report measures. J Clin Child Psychol. 1988;17:329–335.
34. Hester NK. The preoperational child's reaction to immunization. Nurs Res. 1979;28(4):250–255.
35. Thirion J, O'Riordan MA, Stormorken A. Revisiting the Pieces of Hurt pain assessment tool—do the pieces matter? Pediatr Pain Lett. 2015;17:1–4.
36. Srouji R, Ratnapalan S, Schneeweiss S. Pain in children
: Assessment and nonpharmacological management. Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:11.
37. Cheng SF, Foster RL, Hester NO. A review of factors predicting children
's pain experiences. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2003;26:203–216.
38. Rømsing J, Hertel S, Møller-Sonnergaard J, Rasmussen M. Postoperative pain in Danish children
: self-report measures of pain intensity. J Pediatr Nurs. 1996;11:119–124.
39. St-Laurent-Gagnon T, Bernard-Bonnin AC, Villeneuve E. Pain evaluation in preschool children
and by their parents. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88:422–427.
40. Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children
and adolescents. Pain. 2006;125(1):143–157.
41. Suraseranivongse S, Montapaneewat T, Manon J, Chainchop P, Petcharatana S, Kraiprasit K. Cross-validation of a self-report scale for postoperative pain in school-aged children
. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(3):412–418.
42. Gharaibah M, Abu-Saad H. Cultural validation of pediatric pain assessment tools: Jordanian perspective. J Transcult Nurs. 2002;13:12–18.
43. Hester NO, Foster RL, Kristensen K. Measurement of pain in children
: generalizability and validity of the pain ladder and the poker chip tool. In: Tyler DC, Krane EJ, eds. Advances in pain research and therapy. Vol. 15. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1990.
44. Goodenough B, Addicoat L, Champion GD, et al Pain in 4- to 6-year-old children
receiving intramuscular injections: a comparison of the Faces Pain Scale with other self-report and behavioral measures. Clin J Pain. 1997;13(1):60–73.
46. van Dijk M, de Boer JB, Koot HM, Tibboel D, Passchier J, Duivenvoorden HJ. The reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants. Pain. 2000;84(2/3):367–377.
47. Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, Miro J. Psychometric properties of the numerical rating scale to assess self-reported pain intensity in children
and adolescents: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2017;33:376–383.
48. Bailey B, Gravel J, Daoust R. Reliability of the visual analog scale in children
with acute pain in the emergency department. Pain. 2012;153(4):839–842.
49. Gragg RA, Rapoff MA, Danovsky MB, et al Assessing chronic musculoskeletal pain associated with rheumatic disease: further validation of the Pediatric Pain Questionnaire. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996;21(2):237–250.
50. Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion GD, Addicoat L, Ziegler JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experience by children
: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990;41(2):139–150.
51. Bulloch B, Garcia-Filion P, Notricia D, Bryson M, McConahay T. Reliability of the Color Analog Scale: repeatability of score in traumatic and nontraumatic injuries. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:465–469.
52. Mahon P, Holsti L, Siden H, Strahlendorf C, Turnham L, Giaschi D. Using colors to assess pain in toddlers: validation of “The Rainbow Pain Scale”—a proof-of-principle study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2015;32(1):40–46.
53. Willis MH, Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S. FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child's self-report. Pediatr Nurs. 2003;29(3):195–198.
54. Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Babl FE. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children
: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use? Pain. 2015;156(11):2132–2151.
55. Stinson JN, Jibb LA, Nguyen C, et al Construct validity and reliability of a real-time multidimensional smartphone app to assess pain in children
and adolescents with cancer
. Pain. 2015;156(12):2607–2615.
56. Wilkie DJ, Savedra MC, Holzemer WL, Tesler MD, Paul SM. Use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to measure pain: a meta-analysis. Nurs Res. 1990;39(1):36–41.
57. Taylor LJ, Harris J, Epps CD, Herr K. Psychometric evaluation of selected pain intensity scales for use with cognitively impaired and cognitively intact older adults. Rehabil Nurs. 2005;30(2):55–61.
58. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.