Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Validation of Fall Risk Assessment Specific to the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Setting

Thomas, Dan MSN, RN, CRRN1; Pavic, Andrea MS, OTR/L1; Bisaccia, Erin PT, DPT, NCS1; Grotts, Jonathan MA1

doi: 10.1002/rnj.211
Current Issues: CE ARTICLES
Buy
Continuing Education

Purpose To evaluate and compare the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) and the Casa Colina Fall Risk Assessment Scale (CCFRA) for identification of patients at risk for falling in an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility. The primary objective of this study was to perform a retrospective validation study of the CCFRAS, specifically for use in the inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) setting.

Design Retrospective validation study.

Method The study was approved under expedited review by the local Institutional Review Board. Data were collected on all patients admitted to Cottage Rehabiliation Hospital (CRH), a 38-bed acute inpatient rehabilitation hospital, from March 2012 to August 2013. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a length of stay less than 3 days or age less than 18. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the diagnostic odds ratio were used to examine the differences between the MFS and CCFRAS. AUC between fall scales was compared using the DeLong Test.

Findings There were 931 patients included in the study with 62 (6.7%) patient falls. The average age of the population was 68.8 with 503 males (51.2%). The AUC was 0.595 and 0.713 for the MFS and CCFRAS, respectively (0.006). The diagnostic odds ratio of the MFS was 2.0 and 3.6 for the CCFRAS using the recommended cutoffs of 45 for the MFS and 80 for the CCFRAS.

Conclusion The CCFRAS appears to be a better tool in detecting fallers vs. nonfallers specific to the IRF setting.

Clinical Relevance The assessment and identification of patients at high risk for falling is important to implement specific precautions and care for these patients to reduce their risk of falling. The CCFRAS is more clinically relevant in identifying patients at high risk for falling in the IRF setting compared to other fall risk assessments. Implementation of this scale may lead to a reduction in fall rate and injuries from falls as it more appropriately identifies patients at high risk for falling.

1 Cottage Rehabilitation Hospital, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Email: d1thomas@sbch.org

Accepted 21 January 2015

Correspondence

Dan Thomas, Cottage Rehabilitation Hospital, PO Box 689, Santa Barbara, CA 93102.

E-mail: d1thomas@sbch.org

© 2016 Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website