Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with achondroplasia

case report

Benavides, Lizettea; Heredia, Rubén Darioa; Sauza, Nataliab; Meléndez-Flórez, Héctor Julioc

doi: 10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000062
Spanish Version


The perioperative management of achondroplastic pregnant patients that will undergo lower segment cesarean section represents a clinical challenge to the anesthesiologist.


To describe the anesthetic management of a pregnant patient with achondroplasia, programed for lower segment cesarean section using single-dose regional subarachnoid anesthesia, and to review the general guidelines for anesthetic management emphasizing the role of anesthesia in these patients.


Case report and subject review.


The case of a first pregnancy in an achondroplastic, 117-cm tall patient and 38.5 weeks of gestation, programed for lower segment cesarean section is discussed. The patient received single-dose subarachnoid regional anesthesia and adjuvant opioids, with satisfactory results.


The ideal anesthetic technique is controversial and the decision shall be based on the individual patient characteristics. The spinal technique, as the anesthetic approach to lower segment cesarean section, was satisfactory and safe in this particular patient.

Resumen Introducción:

El manejo perioperatorio de pacientes acondroplásicas embarazadas que van ser llevadas a cesárea segmentaria representa un reto clínico para el anestesiólogo.


Describir el manejo anesteésico de una paciente gestante con acondroplasia programada para cesárea segmentaria utilizando anestesia regional subaracnoidea con dosis única y realizar una revisión acerca de las pautas generales del manejo anestésico destacando el papel de la anestesia regional en este tipo de pacientes.


Reporte de caso y revisión de tema.


Presentamos el caso de una primigestante acondroplásica de 38.5 semanas y altura de 117 cm programada para cesárea segmentaria a la que se realizó una técnica anestésica regional tipo subaracnoidea con dosis única de anestésico local más coadyuvante opioide con resultados satisfactorios.


La técnica anestésica ideal para emplear es controversial y debe ser decidido con base en las características individuales de cada paciente. La técnica espinal fue satisfactoria y segura en esta paciente en particular como técnica anestésica para cesárea segmentaría.

aSpecialization in Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Department of Surgery, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia

bPost-Anesthesia Care Unit, Hospital Universitario de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia

cDepartment of Surgery, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.

Correspondence: Specialization in Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Department of Surgery, Facultad Salud, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 32 No. 29-31, Bucaramanga, Colombia. E-mail:

How to cite this article: Benavides L, Heredia R, Sauza N, Meléndez-Flórez HJ. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with achondroplasia: case report. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;00:000–000.

Read the Spanish version of this article at:

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (

Back to Top | Article Outline


Achondroplasia is an autosomal dominant disease resulting from fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutations,1 which is the most common skeletal dysplasia worldwide, with a global prevalence of around 1 per 15,000 to 25,000 live births,1 with 80% of the cases secondary to de novo mutations.2,3

This clinical entity is characterized by disproportionate dwarfism associated with craniofacial and musculoskeletal malformations, with alteration of the central nervous system, the respiratory, and the cardiovascular systems.2,4 Women affected have low fertility rates and the delivery approach at the end of pregnancy is usually cesarean section because of the cephalopelvic disproportion.5

The management of anesthesia in a pregnant achondroplastic patient undergoing cesarean section is a clinical challenge.5–9 In general, there is no consensus regarding the ideal anesthetic technique as the evaluation of both, general and regional anesthesia, in conjunction with the anatomical alterations typical of the disease and the physiological changes of pregnancy, results in a different risk and complications profile. Consequently, the approach in each case is based on individualized decision-making.10

This article discusses a case of a successful management of an achondroplastic pregnant patient undergoing lower segment cesarean section under subarachnoid anesthesia, and reviews the general guidelines for the management of anesthesia, emphasizing the role of regional anesthesia in this type of patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Case description

This is a 23-year-old patient in her first pregnancy, with achondroplasia—functional thanatophoric dwarfism—in her 38.5 weeks of gestation, programed for lower segment cesarean section + surgical sterilization. The patient has a history of occasional alcohol use, with no allergies or prior surgeries, and normal pre-natal control visits. The ultrasound records show a normal development fetus and apparently normal anatomy for gestational age. The patient was admitted to the institution's delivery room with irregular uterine activity. The physical examination indicated the following findings: height: 117 cm, weight: 50 kg, Body Mass Index (BMI): 36.76 (obesity Grade 2), blood pressure: 118/70 mm Hg, Heart Rate (HR) 90×min, respiratory rate (RR) 19×min, O2 sat: 96%. Mallampati 2, short neck, thyromental distance less than 6 cm, and mild limitation for cervical extension, uneventful cardiopulmonary auscultation, bulky abdomen due to pregnant uterus with fundal height of 32 cm, fetal tachycardia: 145 bpm, present uterine activity with irregular contractions. The osteomuscular exploration showed thoracolumbar scoliosis and short extremities with preserved mobility and no evidence of neurological dysfunction.

The patient was admitted to the operating room (OR) after obtaining her informed consent for the suggested subarachnoid neuraxial anesthesia. The 8-hour fasting time was confirmed, basic American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) monitoring is conducted, and the difficult airway cart is readied. Intravenous fluids are initiated—bolus of 10 cm3/kg (500 cm3). With the patient in the sitting position, the intervertebral L2–L3 space is identified using anatomic landmarks and a puncture was performed using a 27-G Quincke needle, with a successful first attempt to reach the subarachnoid space, which was confirmed with the return of clear cerebrospinal fluid and normal pressure. An amount of 6 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine with 15 μg of fentanyl was injected, confirming sensitive blockade down to T4. There were no complications over the course of the procedure.

The intraoperative period evolved with hemodynamic stability and no vasoactive support was required. An amount of 1500 cm3 of intravenous fluids was administered and supplementary oxygen with a face mask at 5 L/min, pursuant to the institutional protocol. The patient was placed in lateral decubitus with lateralization of the uterus to the left, to facilitate the venous return and avoid compression of the aorta and the vena cava. In addition, anti-emetic prophylaxis was administered using intravenous (IV) dexamethasone 4 mg, 30 minutes before the start of the surgical procedure and analgesia was supplemented with Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-IV diclofenac 50 mg after birth. A full-term baby was born, with no anatomic alterations, and a 1-minute Apgar score at birth of 8/10, and of 9/10 after 5 minutes. The weight of the baby was 2970 g. There were 600 cm3 of intraoperative bleeding with no complications. The patient signed her consent to write the case report, which was endorsed by the local ethics committee.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The management of anesthesia in an achondroplastic patient undergoing lower segment cesarean section is a clinical challenge for the anesthesiologist, not just as a result of the anatomic and pathophysiological changes, but also due to the particular influence of these changes on the selection of the anesthetic technique (Table 1).4,7

Table 1

Table 1

Some of the relevant anatomic characteristics include the maxillofacial and airway morphology, with patients usually presenting with broad head, prominent forehead, short maxilla, large mandible, macroglossia, limited neck extension, and pharyngeal, laryngeal, and/or tracheal stenosis,4,7 which in combination may lead to difficult airway management during general anesthesia.

A different but no less important consideration—when considering the possibility of a neuraxial regional anesthesia technique—are the musculoskeletal abnormalities of the spine, such as lumbar hyperlordosis, thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis, and spinal stenosis, combined with the physiological changes typical of pregnancy that may give rise to technical complications and increased risk of complications.4,7

Considering these 2 probable scenarios, it is absolutely critical to do a complete and rigorous pre-anesthetic evaluation that contributes to a sound clinical judgment to select the appropriate anesthetic technique for each individual case, and to plan in advance for any potential complications.11

There is the idea that general anesthesia is the preferred technique in patients with achondroplasia4,11; however, this recommendation lacks a strong evidence to proof its superiority against regional anesthesia.11 Moreover, a review of the various cases available in the literature suggests that the latter option is indeed a management option.7,10,12–14

Among the regional techniques, the single-dose spinal anesthesia is one of the most frequently used techniques for managing cesarean sections in achondroplastic patients.7,11,15 However, there are also some failed case reports8 that may be accounted for on the basis of the anatomical alterations of the neuroaxis4; depending on the severity of these alterations, spinal anesthesia may be technically challenging, and some authors do not recommend its routine use due to the potential risk of a neurological injury or even to avoid blaming the anesthetic technique for any neurological anomaly.2,4 It should be noted that currently there are no reports in the literature of neurological injury in this type of patients due to the use of regional nauraxial anesthesia. So the recommendation is to conduct a strict perioperative neurological evaluation and to maintain a close clinical follow-up of the patient's postoperative recovery of the motor and sensory function.2

In the case herein discussed, a successful management was achieved using a subarachnoid regional anesthetic technique with single-dose local anesthetic and opioid adjuvant, consistent with the reports in the literature.7,11,16 It is worth noting that a difficult airway team was constantly available as a safety measure.

With regards to the selection of the anesthetic agent, and the dose used in the neuraxial technique, there is no consensus yet on this matter,8,11,12 although the trend in most successful cases reported is toward the use of bupivacaine in combination with various opioid adjuvants (fentanyl or morphine).7 In this particular case, the level identification based on the spinal anatomy allowed us to use relatively low doses of bupivacaine (6 mg) that ensured adequate conditions for this type of surgery.

Furthermore, in terms of needle selection for the lumbar puncture, a 27-G Quincke needle was used as this is the only needle routinely available in the institution; however, it should be noted that the use of pencil point needles, such as Whitacre, significantly reduces the incidence of postpuncture headache as an emerging complication.17

Although in this particular case the single-dose neuraxial anesthesia technique led to an adequate clinical outcome, with no perioperative complications, it is also worthwhile considering the use of a titrated regional technique such as the combined spinal–epidural or continuous spinal as a management option, with a higher safety profile.7,8,11,15,16 Moreover, with the advent of tools such as ultrasound, a US-guided puncture may contribute to lower the risks and increase the success rate of the technique.18

Back to Top | Article Outline


A pre-anesthesia evaluation is essential in every achondroplastic pregnant patient to lower the risk of potential complications during the perioperative period, considering the number of morphological and physiological alterations present in these patients. The choice of which anesthetic technique to use is a controversial topic and the decision shall be based on the individual patient characteristics, the experience of the surgical team, and the technical devices available. Moreover, the spinal technique was satisfactory and safe in this particular patient as an anesthetic approach for lower segment cesarean section. The difficult airway team must always be available in case of an event or a potential failed or incomplete anesthesia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Ethical liabilities

Protection of persons and animals. The authors declare that no experiments were made in humans or in animals for this research.

Confidentiality of information. The authors declare that their workplace protocols on disclosure of patient information have been followed.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data are disclosed in this article.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Funding comment

The authors declare that they did not receive any funding.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Ornitz DM, Legeai-Mallet L. Achondroplasia: development, pathogenesis, and therapy. Dev Dyn 2017; 246:291–309.
2. Osorio Rudas W, Socha García NI, Upegui A, et al. Anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with achondroplasia. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2012; 40:309–312.
3. Richette P, Bardin T, Stheneur C. Achondroplasia: from genotype to phenotype. Joint Bone Spine 2008; 75:125–130.
4. Dubiel L, Scott GA, Agaram R, et al. Achondroplasia: anaesthetic challenges for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23:274–278.
5. Chestnut DH, Wong CA, Tsen LC, et al. Musculoeskeletal disorders. Chestnut's obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice 5th ed.2014; Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 1093–1112.
6. Monedero P, Garcia-Pedrajas F, Coca I, et al. Is management of anesthesia in achondroplastic dwarfs really a challenge? J Clin Anesth 1997; 9:208–212.
7. İnan G, Yayla E, Taş Ü, et al. Single shot spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery of two achondroplasic parturients. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015; 43:285–287.
8. DeRenzo JS, Vallejo MC, Ramanathan S. Failed regional anesthesia with reduced spinal bupivacaine dosage in a parturient with achondroplasia presenting for urgent cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14:175–178.
9. Li X, Duan H, Zuo M. Case report: anesthesia management for emergency cesarean section in a patient with dwarfism. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15:59.
10. Nath S, Kapoor R, Saxena AK. Case report successful management of an achondroplastic dwarf for emergency caesarean section using intrathecal clonidine. J Anesth Crit Case Rep 2015; 1:9–11.
11. Mitra S, Dey N, Gomber KK. Emergency cesarean section in a patient with achondroplasia: an anesthetic dilemma. J Anesth Clin Pharmacol 2007; 23:315–318.
12. Samra T, Sharma S. Estimation of the dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section in an achondroplastic dwarf. Indian J Anaesth 2010; 54:481.
13. Lim SH, Shin C, Kim Y, et al. Epidural anesthetic management of achondroplastic parturient dwarf undergoing cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med 2012; 7:181–184.
14. Ekwere IT, Edomwonyi NP, Imarengiaye CO. Anaesthetic challenges associated with achondroplasia: a case report. Afr J Reprod Heal 2010; 14:149–155.
15. Palomero MA, Vargas MC, Peláez EM, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section in an achondroplastic patient. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24:981–982.
16. Mikhael H, Vadivelu N, Braveman F. Safety of spinal anesthesia in a patient with achondroplasia for cesarean section. Curr Drug Saf 2011; 6:130–131.
17. Marrón-Peña M, Mille-Loera JE. Therapeutic realities of the dural post- puncture headache. Rev Mex Anestesiol 2013; 36:277–282.
18. Wight JM, Male D, Combeer A. Ultrasound-guided combined spinal–epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section in a patient with achondroplasia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22:168–169.

Anesthesia; Cesarean Section; Achondroplasia; Pregnant Women; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anestesia; Cesárea; Acondroplasia; Mujeres Embarazadas; Anestesia Raquídea

© 2018 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.