Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Factors associated with failed weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults on ventilatory support during 48 hours or more

Sandoval-Moreno, Lina Marcelaa,b,c; Díaz-Henao, William Antonioa,b

doi: 10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000079
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Spanish Version

Introduction:

Failed weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) has been reported in a proportion ranging from 10% to 20% of patients requiring ventilation support; this population has a longer duration of MV and risk of mortality.

Objective:

To evaluate factors associated with failed weaning from MV.

Methodology:

Descriptive study of a cohort of 139 patients, who participated in the clinical trial. Efficacy of respiratory muscle training (RMT) for weaning from MV in patients on MV during 48 hours or more. Clinical and sociodemographic exposure variables were measured. The outcome variable evaluated was failed weaning from MV. A descriptive analysis was carried out, and relative risks (RRs) were estimated using the Poisson regression. Single and multiple models were built.

Results:

The incidence of failed weaning was 24.09%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16.83 to 31.33. Independent associated factors were the respiratory system as the main compromised system upon admission to the intensive care unit (RR: 3.89; 95% CI 1.33–11.37; P = 0.01) and the Apache score (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92–0.98; P = 0.02). Modifiable factors such as pulmonary rehabilitation interventions, physical rehabilitation, RMT, and specific ventilatory strategies showed no association (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

There are non-modifiable factors related to failed weaning from MV in adults. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with the respiratory system as the main system compromised have a higher risk of failed weaning; modifiable factors were not found to be associated with failed weaning in the population studied.

Resumen Introducción:

El destete fallido de la ventilación mecánica se ha reportado en una proporción que va del 10 al 20% de los pacientes que requieren soporte ventilatorio; esta población presenta mayor duración de la ventilación mecánica y riesgo de mortalidad.

Objetivo:

Evaluar factores asociados a destete fallido de la ventilación mecánica en pacientes adultos con soporte ventilatorio igual y mayor a 48 horas

Metodología:

Estudio observacional de una cohorte de 139 pacientes, quienes participaron en el ensayo clínico. Eficacía del entrenamiento muscular respiratorio en el destete de la ventilación mecánica en pacientes con ventilación mecánica por 48 horas o más; variables de exposición clínicas y sociodemográficas fueron medidas. La variable resultado evaluada fue destete fallido de la ventilación mecánica. Se realizó análisis descriptivo, y se estimaron riesgos relativos a través de la regresión Poisson. Se construyeron modelos simples y un modelo múltiple.

Resultados:

La incidencia de destete fallido fue 24.09% IC95%:16.83–31.33. Los factores independientemente asociados fueron sistema respiratorio como principal comprometido al ingreso a UCI (RR:3.89 IC95%:1.33–11.37 p = 0.01) y Apache (RR:0.96 IC95%:0.92–0.98 p = 0.02). Factores modificables como intervenciones de rehabilitación pulmonar, rehabilitación física, entrenamiento muscular respiratorio, y estrategías ventilatorias especificas no mostraron asociación (p > 0.05).

Conclusiones:

Factores no modificables están relacionados con el destete fallido de la ventilación mecánica en la población estudiada. El sistema respiratorio como principal comprometido al ingreso a la unidad de cuidado intensivo fue el factor de riesgo asociado a falla en el destete de la ventilación mecánica, los factores modificables no se encontraron asociados con el evento estudiado.

aHealth School, Physiotherapy Program, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Colombia

bHuman Rehabilitation, Health School, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia

cExercise and Cardiopulmonary Health Research Group (GIESC), Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.

Correspondence: Health School, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Calle 5 No. 62-00, 76001000 Cali, Colombia. E-mail: linamarce48@gmail.com

How to cite this article: Sandoval-Moreno LM, Díaz-Henao WA. Factors associated with failed weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults on ventilatory support during 48 hours or more. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;00:000–000.

Read the Spanish version of this article at: http://links.lww.com/RCA/A824.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (www.www.revcolanest.com.co).

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a vital support strategy frequently used in the intensive care unit (ICU). Multicenter studies have shown that, of the population requiring management in the ICU, 35% need MV support.1 The majority of these patients are capable of spontaneous breathing once their clinical condition has been stabilized, and consequently, 60% to 70% are extubated early on (within the first 24 hours); however, a minority corresponding to 20% to 30% have failed weaning episodes. Of this population, close to 50% requires MV for a period of 7 days or more, and, consequently, close to 15% of the patients admitted to the ICU need prolonged MV.2–6

The incidence of reintubation within 48 to 72 hours after extubation ranges between 10% and 20% of the total population requiring MV support.7–10 Patients in MV are exposed to significant risks and complications, and these increase with failed extubation episodes.11–13 Survival after discharge of patients requiring prolonged MV has been reported to be significantly lower than in patients requiring MV for a period of up to 48 hours.3 Moreover, studies have determined that the time on MV is one of the main factors associated with significantly higher costs in the ICU. Consequently, prolonged MV and difficult weaning results in higher consumption, accounting for 40% of the ICU resources.14–16

Lung gas exchange capacity, cardiovascular integrity, neuromuscular status, psychological conditions, and nutritional status, among other things, have been described as determining factors for the process of weaning from MV. Therefore, failed weaning from MV is considered a multifactorial event.6

Prior studies that have examined factors associated with failed extubation taking into consideration variables related to the ability to protect the airway17–19 have reported an increased risk of failed extubation with ineffectual cough patterns and accumulation of endotracheal secretions. Frutos-Vivar et al20 assessed risk factors for failed extubation and determined that a high fluid balance 24 hours after extubation and the presence of pneumonia at the start of MV are the best predictors for failed extubation.

There are few studies on factors associated with failed weaning from MV, and there are no local reports. The main objective of this research was to evaluate factors associated with failed weaning from MV in patients needing MV support during 48 hours or more, and to determine the incidence of failed weaning in the same population.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methodology

Observational study of a cohort nested in the controlled clinical trial (CCT) Eficacía del entrenamiento muscular respiratorio en el destete de la ventilación mecánica en pacientes con ventilación mecánica por 48 horas o más: un ensayo clínico controlado (Efficacy of respiratory muscle training [RMT] in weaning from MV in patients with 48 hours or more of MV: a CCT)21 which assessed the efficacy of RMT for weaning from MV and inspiratory muscle strength in an adult intensive care unit of a Level IV clinic in the city of Cali.21 The main outcome variable analyzed from the data gathered during the trial was failed weaning from MV, and the secondary outcome variables were need for reintubation, need for tracheostomy, or death. Exposure variables were those related to the clinical and sociodemographic conditions of the study population.

The study followed the standards set forth under Resolution 008430 of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection and the Declaration of Helsinki, and was reviewed and endorsed by the Ethics Committee of Santiago de Cali University, pursuant to approval minutes No. 01 of February 3, 2017.

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study only if they agreed to participate and signed the informed consent. The informed consent was based on the guidelines contained in Resolution 8430 and was taken only by the principal investigator during the recruitment phase of the macro study. During the study, the patients authorized the use of their data for further studies.

The population consisted of records of patients who were part of the macro study and met the following inclusion criteria, which were the same inclusion criteria for the patients in the macro study: “Ventilation support during 48 hours or more; 18 years of age or older; first event requiring ventilation support; intubation in a Level IV healthcare institution or in peripheral centers and referred within 12 hours after intubation; with oxygen blood pressure (PaO2) > 60 mm Hg, FiO2 ≤ de 0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) < 8 cmH2O, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) between −1 and 022,23 and mean arterial pressure greater than 60 mmHg, in the absence of vasopressor support or minimum requirement (dobutamine or dopamine <5 μg/kg/min or epinephrine <1 μg/kg/min). Patients with any of the following conditions were excluded: progressive neuromuscular disease; central nervous system lesion; spinal lesion above T5; skeletal disease of the rib cage or spine; ventilation support at home before admission; tracheostomy; infection from multiresistant germs; and pregnant women.”21 The sample consisted of 139 patients corresponding to the calculated sample size for estimating a 15% incidence of failed weaning,5 an alpha error of 5%, and a 20% adjustment for losses.

Clinical as well as sociodemographic exposure variables were considered; these variables were recorded upon admission of the patients to the ICU. The sociodemographic variables were age, sex, and height, and the clinical variables were diagnostic classification and main system compromised on admission to the ICU, Apache severity index, time on MV according to the assisted, controlled or spontaneous ventilation modalities, dose of sedatives and analgesics received, inspiratory muscle strength measured by means of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), receiving non-invasive ventilation after extubation, receiving pulmonary rehabilitation treatment or physical rehabilitation, and receiving RMT. The main outcome variable was failed weaning from MV, defined as the need for reintubation or tracheostomy within the next 48 hours following extubation, and the need for tracheostomy during MV after a failed attempt at spontaneous breathing.7

Variables in the macro study were documented by 5 physical therapists trained in accordance with the guidelines of the Standard Operating Manual designed by the research team of the CCT.

The information was entered in a database previously designed in EpiInfo and later exported to STAT14 for analysis. Data entry was performed by an individual who received training to that effect, and adjustments and analyses were conducted by the researchers of this study using the STATA14 software package (Licencia de la Universidad del Valle. ESP 02. Numero serial: 1910557280).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

Data behavior and normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity assumptions for the application of a given test were evaluated by means of an initial exploratory analysis. Continuous quantitative variables with a normal distribution were expressed as means and standard deviations (SDs), and variables with asymmetrical distribution were expressed as medians and interquartile (IQ) ranges. Categorical variables were described by means of the proportions calculation and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed afterward. The overall incidence of failed weaning from MV was determined as well as incidence according to the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics identified.

Relative risks (RRs) with their respective 95% CIs were estimated using the Poisson regression for estimating crude associations between independent variables and failed weaning from MV, given that the dependent variable of interest (failed weaning from MV) corresponds to a rate with dichotomic outcome, explained by categorically defined predictors.24

The respiratory muscle strength variable (MIP) was dichotomized according to the cutoff point reported in the literature as predictor of failed intubation.25

Variables that showed statistical significance lower than 0.2 (P < 0.2) in the univariate analysis were selected to construct the final multivariate model. Later, the backward methodology was used to build and select the final multiple model. The models were then evaluated using the likelihood ratio test, and the presence of confusion and interaction was also evaluated.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

The clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the patients enrolled in the study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1

Mean age was 60 years (IQ range: 40–71), and mean height was 162.97 cm (SD: 8.91). Of the study population, 73 patients were males and 64 females; 105 were admitted to the ICU with a medical diagnosis and 34 with a surgical diagnosis; the median time in controlled MV modes was 18 hours (IQ range: 1–42), median time in assisted modes was 70 hours (IQ range: 37–119), and the median time in spontaneous MV modes was 5 (IQ range: 2–13); the median midazolam dose received was 471 μg/kg (IQ range: 69–383); the median fentanyl dose received was 13,650 μg/kg (range: 6050–25,530); physical therapy was implemented in 75 patients, and pulmonary rehabilitation was implemented in 18.

Table 2 shows the incidence of overall failed weaning in the study patients.

Table 2

Table 2

The incidence of failed weaning from MV in the study population was 24.09%, 95% CI (16.83–31.33).

Table 3 presents the incidence and RR of failed weaning from MV according to clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. The univariate analysis showed association between failed weaning and the respiratory system as the main compromised system (RR: 6.9, CI: 2.36–20.10 P = 0.00), and with assisted and spontaneous MV modes (RR: 1.00, 95% CI 1.000–1.007 P = 0.03) and (RR: 1.00 95% CI: 1.00–1.01 P = 0.007), respectively. In average, the incidence of failed weaning from MV dropped 0.96 for every increment in the Apache score; therefore, the Apache score was significantly lower in patients with failed weaning (RR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–0.96, P = 0.02). Analyses did not show association between failed weaning and having received RMT, pulmonary rehabilitation, physical rehabilitation, or with any other sociodemographic or clinical characteristics assessed.

Table 3

Table 3

Table 3

Table 3

Table 4 shows factors associated with failed weaning from MV. The variables included in the multiple are sex, Apache score, main compromised system, and time in assisted modes. Independent factors associated with failed weaning were compromise of the respiratory system as the main compromise on admission to the ICU (RR 3.89; 95% CI 1.33–11.33) and the Apache score (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91–0.98, P = 0.009).

Table 4

Table 4

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

The results obtained indicate that factors associated with failed weaning from MV in patients with MV support for 48 hours or longer were identified. Those factors were non-modifiable factors and the most frequent was admission to the ICU with the respiratory system being the most compromised (RR 3.89; 95% CI 1.33–11.37; P = 0.01), whereas the incidence of failed weaning dropped with the increase in the Apache level (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92–0.98; P = 0.02). The incidence of failed weaning from MV in the cohort was 24.09%, 95% CI 16.83–31.33.

Of the patients with failed weaning (n = 33), the largest proportion (n = 17–15, 82%) needed tracheostomy during the period of MV. Consequently, the main mechanism for failed weaning in the study cohort was apparently related to the lack of airway integrity, considering that patients with upper airway obstruction or disorder were not excluded. This may also explain why the incidence of failed weaning dropped as the Apache score increased (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92–0.98; P = 0.02), probably as these patients had respiratory compromise only with no other system compromise, hence the lower Apache score.

Factors such as the neuromuscular component, nutritional status, respiratory and cardiovascular integrity, and psychological conditions did not influence weaning from MV.6

In this study, compromise mainly of the respiratory system on admission to the ICU was the risk factor most frequently associated with a higher frequency of failed weaning. This category includes patients with respiratory disorders involving the lung parenchyma, the pleura cavity, airway integrity, or rib cage mechanics as main diagnoses on admission to the ICU.

Modifiable factors, such as receiving physical therapy or RMT, were not found to be associated with failed weaning from MV. Therefore, data related to the characteristics of physical therapy such as the number of sessions, goals, and activities were not recorded or evaluated as part of this study. On the other hand, patients who received RMT (n = 69) received between 1 and 14 sessions; 50% (n = 34) received up to two sessions and the remaining 50% (n = 35) received between 3 and 14 RMT sessions; this was due to the short period of MV received by the patients once they met the inclusion criteria. Authors have determined that close to 14 days of RMT are needed to produce significant changes in muscle strength that may be reflected on weaning from MV26,27; consequently, the patients did not receive the number of RMT sessions needed to create significant clinical changes.

Prior studies have evaluated factors associated with failed weaning from MV and failed extubation.

In 1998, Capdevila et al,28 in 17 patients with prolonged MV followed prospectively, determined that failed weaning is associated with prolonged MV, minute ventilation, respiratory rate, high arterial CO2 pressure, and presence of intrinsic PEEP. In 2009, Carlucci et al29 identified, in a population of 30 patients with difficult weaning from MV, that inspiratory burden is higher in relation to neuromuscular capacity, and this is a pathophysiological determining factor for failed weaning.

In 2000, Coplin et al determined, in 136 subjects with brain lesion, that the risk of failed extubation increases in the absence of reflex cough and the presence of secretions in the respiratory tract.18 In a prospective study with 91 patients conducted in 2001, Khamiees et al concluded that the coughing force and the volume of endotracheal secretions are determining factors for extubation results.19

In 2003, Smina et al determined, in a cohort of 95 patients, that coughing force is an important predictor of extubation outcomes.20 In a multicenter study conducted in 2006 by Frutos-Vivar et al in 900 patients who passed a spontaneous breathing test, the authors identified that a high positive fluid balance and the presence of pneumonia as the main reasons for requiring MV were the main factors associated with failed extubation.21

The results of this study and of prior studies are related to differences in the target population, the methodological design, sample size, exposure variables measured, and the definition of the outcome variable.

This study is an observational study of a cohort recorded during an experimental trial conducted with 139 patients exposed to ventilation support during 48 hours or more; it included patients with various diagnoses and excluded patients with tracheostomy. Studies that have evaluated associated factors are prospective analyses, and 2 of them have been conducted in patients with prolonged MV and included patients with tracheostomy.25,26 The remaining studies were conducted in patients that passed a trial of spontaneous breathing, without specifying MV time,18–20 and in the case of the study by Coplin et al, only patients with brain injury were included.18

On the other hand, only 1 study with a multicenter design has been conducted to date with a sample size larger than the one included in this research,21 and moreover, each author has focused on the measurement of specific exposure variables. Carlussi et al assessed respiratory pattern, respiratory mechanics, respiratory muscle function, and diaphragm tension-time index.30 Capdevila et al measured respiratory pattern, fast and shallow breathing rate, tracheal occlusion pressure, MIP, and inspiratory muscle tension-time index.25 Coplin et al assessed neurological status and airway function.18 Frutos-Vivar et al measured secretions, coughing pattern efficacy, presence of leukocytosis, temperature higher than 38 °C, and positive fluid balance.21 Smina et al measured length of intubation, the Apache score, fast and shallow breathing rate, hemoglobin levels, peak expiratory volume, and volume of secretions.20 This research assessed clinical factors considered critical for weaning from MV, as well as sociodemographic factors such as age, height, sex, dose of sedative and analgesic medications received, time on MV according to each ventilation modality, Apache level, respiratory muscle strength (MIP), and the main system compromised on admission to the ICU, among others, are already mentioned.

The outcome variable assessed in this study was failed weaning from MV, defined as the need for reintubation, tracheostomy, or death up to 48 hours following extubation, or the need for tracheostomy after 1 or more failed trials at spontaneous breathing.7 Frutos-Vivar and Ferguson20 evaluated risk factors associated with failed extubation without setting a time threshold, including only patients who required reintubation, and excluding patients who required tracheostomy or who died.

Previous studies have reported values for failed weaning from MV ranging between 26% and 42%,11,25,30,31 and, therefore, the results of this study are similar.

Given that specific conditions are required for measuring and recording exposure variables such as secretion volume and consistency and fluid balance, this study did not consider those variables, and that is a limitation. Other variables such as the level of consciousness and oxygen status were not considered as this study included patients with no oxygenation disorder and with the ability to respond to commands (PaO2 > 60 mm Hg, FiO2 ≤ 0.5, PEEP < 8 cmH2O, RASS between −1 and 0). Another limitation was the sample size which may have been insufficient to identify modifiable factors associated with weaning from MV.

Standardization of the process for measuring the study variables and recording the data, and the quality control over the collection, entry, and storage of the original data during the CCT, Efficacy of RMT in weaning from MV in patients on MV during 48 hours or more: a clinical controlled trial,1 minimize the possibility of information bias and are a methodological strength.

In conclusion, this research determines that non-modifiable conditions such as the compromised system that leads to ICU admission and the Apache level are mainly associated with failed weaning episodes; modifiable factors such as the level of muscle strength, lung rehabilitation, physical rehabilitation, RMT interventions, and specific ventilation strategies did not show association with this event in the study population.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Ethical disclosures

Human and animal protection: The authors declare that no experiments were conducted in humans or animals for this research.

Data confidentiality: The authors declare having followed the protocols of their institution regarding disclosure of patient information.

Right to privacy and informed consent: The authors have obtained the informed consent of the patients and/or subjects referred to in the article. This document work in the power of the correspondence author. The authors declare that the names of the patients do not appear in this study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Funding

The macro study was funded by the internal call of 2014 from the Research Vice President's Office of Universidad del Valle.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos-Vivar F, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. JAMA 2002; 287:345–355.
2. Lone NI, Walsh TS. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: epidemiology, outcomes and modelling the potential cost consequences of establishing a regional weaning unit. Crit Care 2011; 15:R102.
3. MacIntyre NR, Epstein SK, Carson S, et al. Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference. Chest 2005; 128:3937–3954.
4. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 2002; 287:345–355.
5. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, et al. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:220–230.
6. Boles J-M, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007; 29:1033–1056.
7. Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, et al. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150:896–903.
8. Ely EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP, et al. Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1864–1869.
9. Esteban A, Alía I, Gordo F, et al. Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation: the Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156:459–465.
10. Esteban A, Alia I, Tobin MJ, et al. Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation: Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:512–518.
11. Barbier F, Andremont A, Wolff M, et al. Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent advances in epidemiology and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2013; 19:216–228.
12. Niederman M, Craven D, Bonten M. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171:388–416.
13. Touat L, Fournier C, Ramon P, et al. Intubation-related tracheal ischemic lesions: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:575–582.
14. Cox CE, Carson SS, Lindquist JH, et al. Differences in one-year health outcomes and resource utilization by definition of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2007; 11:R9.
15. Garrigues, Lefrant JY, Bazin JB, et al. The cost per day of intensive care units (ICU) in France: The Crrea Study. Value Health 2011; 14:A346–A347.
16. Wagner DP. Economics of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140 (2_pt_2):S14–S18.
17. Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, et al. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:1530–1536.
18. Khamiees M, Raju P, DeGirolamo A, et al. Predictors of extubation outcome in patients who have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial. Chest 2001; 120:1262–1270.
19. Smina M, Salam A, Khamiees M, et al. Cough peak flows and extubation outcomes. Chest 2003; 124:262–268.
20. Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, Esteban A. Risk factors for extubation failure in patients following a successful spontaneous breathing trial. Chest 2006; 130:1664–1671.
21. Sandoval L, Casas I, Wilches E, et al. Efficacy of respiratory muscle training in weaning of mechanical ventilation in patients with mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Medicina Intensiva Forthcoming 2018.
22. Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, et al. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients. JAMA 2003; 289:2983–2991.
23. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:1338–1344.
24. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiología Intermedía, Conceptos y aplicaciones. Segunda edición2006.
25. Yang KL. Inspiratory pressure/maximal inspiratory pressure ratio: a predictive index of weaning outcome. Intensive Care Med 1993; 19:204–208.
26. SIlVa PE. Inspiratory muscle training in mechanical ventilation: suitable protocols and endpoints, the key to clear results-a critical review. ASSOBRAFIR Ciência 2015; 6:21–30.
27. Romer LM, McConnell AK. Specificity and reversibility of inspiratory muscle training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35:237–244.
28. Capdevila X, Perrigault P-F, Ramonatxo M, et al. Changes in breathing pattern and respiratory muscle performance parameters during difficult weaning. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:79–87.
29. Carlucci A, Ceriana P, Prinianakis G, et al. Determinants of weaning success in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2009; 13:R97.
30. Vallverdu I, Calaf N, Subirana M, et al. Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T-piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Resp Crit Med 1998; 158:1855–1862.
31. Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155:906–915.
Keywords:

Respiration, Artificial; Critical Care; Weaning; Intensive Care Units; Adult; Respiración artificial; Cuidados críticos; Destete; Unidades de cuidados intensivos; Adulto

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
© 2018 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.