Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Versus Nerve Stimulator Guidance for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block

Barrington, Michael J. PhD, MBBS, FANZCA; Gledhill, Samuel R. MMedStat; Kluger, Roman FANZCA, PGDipBiostat; Clarke, Alexander L. MBBS; Wong, Daniel M. FANZCA; Davidson, Henry MBBS; Thomas, Rowan FANZCA, MPH

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine: November/December 2016 - Volume 41 - Issue 6 - p 671–677
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000486
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND ACUTE PAIN: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Buy

Background Ultrasound-guided techniques improve outcomes in regional anesthesia when compared with traditional techniques; however, this assertion has not been studied with novices. The primary objective of this study was to compare sensory and motor block after axillary brachial plexus block when performed by novice trainees allocated to an ultrasound- or nerve–stimulator-guided group. A secondary objective was to compare the rates of skill acquisition between the 2 groups.

Methods This study was a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, 2-arm controlled trial. Anesthesia trainees participating in this trial were novices to axillary brachial plexus block and sonography. All trainee participants underwent a standardized training program. The primary outcome was combined sensory and motor block in the relevant territories 30 minutes after completion of block. A global rating scale was used to assess trainee block performance.

Results The study was ceased after 12 trainees completed 153 blocks. There was no difference between groups in combined motor/sensory score (P = 0.28) or as a function of block number (P = 0.38). There was no difference in onset between groups (P = 0.38). In both groups, there was an increase in the global rating scale score (P < 0.0001) and reduced preblock survey and block performance times (P = 0.001) with experience.

Conclusions We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block performed by novices when ultrasound guidance was compared with a nerve stimulator technique. There was evidence of similarly improved clinical performance of novices in both groups.

From the Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Accepted for publication June 17, 2016.

Address correspondence to: Michael J. Barrington, PhD, MBBS, FANZCA, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria Parade, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065; Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia (e-mail: Michael.BARRINGTON@svha.org.au).

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This project was funded by a research grant from the Australian Society of Anaesthetists.

Copyright © 2016 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.