Psychological Impact on Women of Miscarriage Versus Induced Abortion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study : Psychosomatic Medicine

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Psychological Impact on Women of Miscarriage Versus Induced Abortion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

Broen, Anne Nordal MD; Moum, Torbjörn PhD; Bödtker, Anne Sejersted MD; Ekeberg, Öivind MD, PhD

Author Information
Psychosomatic Medicine 66(2):p 265-271, March 2004. | DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000118028.32507.9d

Abstract

Objective 

To compare the psychological trauma reactions of women who had either a miscarriage or an induced abortion, in the 2 years after the event. Further, to identify important predictors of Impact of Event Scale (IES) scores.

Method 

A consecutive sample of women who experienced miscarriage (N = 40) or induced abortion (N = 80) were interviewed 3 times: 10 days (T1), 6 months (T2), and 2 years (T3) after the event.

Results 

At T1, 47.5% of the women who had a miscarriage were cases (IES score 19 points on 1 or both of the IES subscales), compared with 30% for women who had an induced abortion (p = .60). The corresponding values at T3 were 2.6% and 18.1%, respectively (p = .019). At all measurement time points, the group who had induced abortion scored higher on IES avoidance. Women who had a miscarriage were more likely to experience feelings of loss and grief, whereas women who had induced abortion were more likely to experience feelings of relief, guilt, and shame. At T3, IES intrusion was predicted by feelings of loss and grief at T1, whereas avoidance at T3 was predicted by guilt and shame at T1.

Conclusion 

The short-term emotional reactions to miscarriage appear to be larger and more powerful than those to induced abortion. In the long term, however, women who had induced abortion reported significantly more avoidance of thoughts and feelings related to the event than women who had a miscarriage.

Copyright © 2004 by American Psychosomatic Society

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid