Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Stress Hormones

Cohen, Sheldon PhD; Doyle, William J. PhD; Baum, Andrew PhD

doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221236.37158.b9
Original Articles
Buy

Objective: We assess whether socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with basal levels of cortisol and catecholamines and determine if any association between SES and these hormones can be explained (is mediated) by behavioral, social, and emotional differences across the SES gradient.

Methods: One hundred ninety-three adult subjects, including men and women and whites and African-Americans, provided 24-hour urine catecholamine samples on each of 2 days and seven saliva cortisol samples on each of 3 days beginning 1 hour after wakeup and ending 14 to 16 hours later. Values for both hormones were averaged across days to obtain basal levels.

Results: Lower SES (income and education) was associated with higher levels of cortisol and epinephrine and marginally higher levels of norepinephrine. These associations were independent of race, age, gender, and body mass. Low SES was also associated with a greater likelihood of smoking, of not eating breakfast, and with less diverse social networks. Further analyses provided evidence consistent with the hypothesis that these behavioral and social variables mediate the link between SES and the three stress hormones.

Conclusions: Lower SES was associated in a graded fashion with higher basal levels of cortisol and catecholamines. These associations occurred independent of race, and the data were consistent with mediation by health practices and social factors.

AUC = area under the curve; BMI = body mass index; CARDIA = Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary adrenocortical axis; ISEL = Interpersonal Support Evaluation List; LET = Life Engagement Test; SES = socioeconomic status; SNS = sympathetic nervous system.

From the Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.C.); Department of Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (W.J.D.); University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (A.B.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sheldon Cohen, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail: scohen@cmu.edu

Received for publication October 14, 2005; revision received January 19, 2006.

Supported by a grant from the Pittsburgh NIH Mind-Body Center (HL65111 and HL65112) and by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health. We are indebted to Ellen Conser, Jeffrey Best, and the volunteers for their contributions to the research.

Copyright © 2006 by American Psychosomatic Society
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website