Share this article on:

Efficacy of Brexpiprazole as Adjunctive Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder With Irritability: Post Hoc Analysis of 2 Pivotal Clinical Studies

Fava, Maurizio MD; Weiller, Emmanuelle PsyD; Zhang, Peter PhD; Weiss, Catherine PhD

Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology: April 2017 - Volume 37 - Issue 2 - p 276–278
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000678
Letters to the Editors - Research Reports

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,;

H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark;

Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Development & Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

To the Editors

Irritability in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) has been associated with greater overall severity, previous suicide attempts, and suicidal ideations.1 Irritability in MDD is also associated with longer duration of episodes, a more chronic course of illness, impaired functioning, and less favorable outcomes.2–4 Irritability is a symptom often addressed with the use of an antipsychotic as adjunctive therapy to antidepressant treatment (ADT).5 The adverse effects profile of atypical antipsychotics, however, may limit their use in clinical practice.6 Aripiprazole is associated with activating adverse effects, including akathisia and anxiety,7 whereas quetiapine is associated with sedation.8 Brexpiprazole is a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator that is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptors, and an antagonist at 5-HT2A and noradrenaline alpha1B/2C receptors, all at similar potencies.9 Brexpiprazole was approved in 2015 in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia and for use as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants for the treatment of MDD. Here we assess the efficacy of adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with MDD and irritability, comparing brexpiprazole to placebo as adjunctive therapy to ADT in patients with and without self-rated irritability, using pooled data from the 2 similarly designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pivotal phase 3 studies.10,11 Briefly, each study included a screening phase, an 8-week single-blind prospective phase, and a 6-week double-blind randomized treatment phase. Patients aged 18 to 65 years diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision with a single or recurrent nonpsychotic episode of MDD of 8 weeks or more duration were recruited. Patients had to have inadequate response, defined as less than 50% reduction in Massachusetts General Hospital Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire score to an adequate treatment course of 1 to 3 ADTs administered for 6 weeks or more. Eligible patients also had Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17)12 total scores 18 or higher at screening and at start of the prospective treatment phase. Patients were randomized to treatment if they had an inadequate response throughout the prospective treatment phase defined as a HAM-D17 score 14 or higher, less than 50% reduction from start of prospective phase in HAM-D17, as well as less than 50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)13 total score between start of prospective phase and each visit, and a Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) score 3 or higher at each visit. Based on their self-assessment of irritability during the preceding week on Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report (IDS-SR) item 6 at randomization, patients were categorized as “with irritability” (IDS item 6 score ≥ 1) or “without irritability” (IDS item 6 score = 0) with IDS-SR scores being defined as follows14: 0, does not feel irritable; 1, feels irritable less than half the time; 2, feels irritable more than half the time; and 3, feels extremely irritable virtually all of the time. High level of irritability was defined as IDS-SR item 6 scores of 2 or higher. Patients were randomized to 2 mg brexpiprazole + ADT or placebo + ADT (1:1 ratio) or 1 mg brexpiprazole + ADT, 3 mg brexpiprazole + ADT, or placebo + ADT (1:1:1 ratio) in the 2 studies, respectively. The primary efficacy end point was change in MADRS total score from baseline, and efficacy analyses with pooled placebo groups in patients with and without irritability were conducted with a mixed model for repeated measures methodology as previously reported.10,11 Of the 987 patients who were randomized and fulfilled inadequate response criteria throughout the prospective ADT treatment phase, 811 (82.2%) reported irritability at baseline. At baseline, patients with and without irritability showed similar characteristics (mean age, 44.7 vs 47 years; 70% vs 61% female; mean number of lifetime depressive episodes, 3.6 vs 3.6), although patients with irritability appeared more severely ill than patients without irritability as reflected by higher baseline MADRS total scores (Fig 1). In patients with irritability, all doses of adjunctive brexpiprazole showed greater improvement than adjunctive placebo in MADRS total scores at week 6: least squares (LS) mean differences (95% confidence interval) versus adjunctive placebo were −2.18 (−3.58 to −0.78), P = 0.0023 for the 1 mg brexpiprazole, −2.09 (−3.62 to −0.56), P = 0.0074 for the 2 mg brexpiprazole, and −2.55 (−3.97 to −1.14), P = 0.004 for the 3 mg brexpiprazole groups (Fig. 1A). In patients without irritability, adjunctive brexpiprazole 2 mg/d showed greater improvement than adjunctive placebo in MADRS total score with LS mean differences versus placebo of −3.04 (−6.07 to −0.01), P = 0.0496, and numerical improvements of −1.55 (−4.65 to 1.55), P = 0.32 for 1 mg brexpiprazole, and −2.60 (−5.63 to 0.42), P = 0.09 for 3 mg brexpiprazole (Fig. 1B). Brexpiprazole 3 mg/d demonstrated efficacy on MADRS total score also in patients with higher levels of irritability (IDR-SR item 6 score ≥ 2; n = 63; LS mean difference vs placebo −3.18 [−5.46 to −0.90], P = 0.0064), whereas the lower doses did not (1 mg: n = 69, −1.71 [−3.97 to 0.54], P = 0.14; 2 mg: n = 69, −1.75 [−3.99 to 0.49], P = 0.12). The most common (incidence ≥5%) treatment-emergent adverse events in patients with irritability receiving brexpiprazole were akathisia (7.8%), weight increase (7.2%), and headache (7.0%). There were dose-dependent increases in the incidence of akathisia in patients with irritability, with no apparent difference in the overall incidence of akathisia between patients with and without irritability (7.8% vs 9.9%). Similarly, there were no clinically relevant differences in the incidence of other activating treatment-emergent adverse events (ie, agitation [0.8% vs 0%], anxiety [2.6% vs 2.0%], and insomnia [2.2% vs 1.0%]) between patients with and without irritability.



Back to Top | Article Outline


The efficacy of brexpiprazole at all tested doses was retained in depressive patients with irritability, demonstrating consistent improvements versus placebo on symptoms of depression; the highest dose of brexpiprazole demonstrated efficacy on MADRS total score also in patients with higher levels of irritability. The 2 mg dose of brexpiprazole demonstrated efficacy on MADRS total score in patients without irritability, reaching significance despite modest sample sizes in this subpopulation. These results did not seem to stem from a difference in tolerability profile of brexpiprazole in patients with and without irritability. The pharmacological profile of brexpiprazole, with partial agonism and lower intrinsic activity at the D2 receptor in combination with antagonism at the 5-HT2A receptor, suggests lower potential to induce D2 receptor-mediated adverse effects, such as akathisia, as compared with other antipsychotics commonly used as adjunctive treatment in MDD.15,16 The present results suggest that the efficacy of brexpiprazole in patients with MDD and irritability are achieved independently of activating or sedating adverse effects. Limitations of this analysis include that irritability was relying on a single item from a self-rated measurement and defined post hoc, and that the studies did not obtain clinician-rated or objective measures of irritability. Further, the post hoc definition of irritability (IDS item 6 score ≥ 1) resulted in an unbalanced number of patients with and without irritability. Consequently, the analyses in patients without irritability (and also in patients with higher levels of irritability) have a limited statistical power to detect significant differences and the results here should be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size. In conclusion, these post hoc analyses suggest that adjunctive brexpiprazole has comparable efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with MDD with irritability compared with the patients with MDD without irritability.

Maurizio Fava, MD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, MA

Emmanuelle Weiller, PsyD

H. Lundbeck A/S

Valby, Denmark

Peter Zhang, PhD

Catherine Weiss, PhD

Otsuka Pharmaceutical

Development & Commercialization

Inc, Princeton, NJ

Back to Top | Article Outline


This research and presentations was funded by H. Lundbeck A/S and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. The authors thank Anders Ettrup, PhD, and Johan Hellsten, PhD (employees of H. Lundbeck A/S), for the medical writing assistance with the manuscript.M.F. has received research support from AstraZeneca, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Cerecor, Eli Lilly and Company, EnVivo Pharmaceuticals, Euthymics Bioscience, Forest Pharmaceuticals, FORUM Pharmaceuticals, Janssen R&D, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Lundbeck, Methylation Sciences, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Coordinating Center for Integrative Medicine, National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, Neuralstem, Novartis AG, PamLab, Pfizer, PharmoRx Therapeutics, Photothera, Reckitt Benckiser, Roche Pharmaceuticals, RCT Logic (formerly Clinical Trials Solutions), Stanley Medical Research Institute, Takeda, Tal Medical; consults on behalf of his institution for Acadia, Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Auspex, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, AXSOME Therapeutics, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cerecor, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co, Eli Lilly and Company, Euthymics Bioscience, Forest Pharmaceuticals, FORUM Pharmaceuticals, GenOmind, GlaxoSmithKline, Intracellular, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Lundbeck, Merck & Co, MSI Methylation Sciences, Naurex, Nestle Health Sciences, Neuralstem, Novartis AG, Nutrition 21, Osmotica, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Pamlab, Pfizer, PharmoRx Therapeutics, Puretech Ventures, PsychoGenics, RCT Logic (formerly Clinical Trials Solutions, LLC), Ridge Diagnostics, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis US, Servier Laboratories, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tal Medical, VistaGen; has received speaking honoraria from American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Belvoir Media Group, CME Institute/Physicians Postgraduate Press, MGH Psychiatry Academy; and holds equity in Compellis and PsyBrain. E.W. is a full-time employee of H. Lundbeck A/S. P.Z. and C.W. are full-time employees of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Perlis RH, Fava M, Trivedi MH, et al. Irritability is associated with anxiety and greater severity, but not bipolar spectrum features, in major depressive disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119:282–289.
2. Fava M, Hwang I, Rush AJ, et al. The importance of irritability as a symptom of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:856–867.
3. Judd LL, Schettler PJ, Coryell W, et al. Overt irritability/anger in unipolar major depressive episodes: past and current characteristics and implications for long-term course. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70:1171–1180.
4. Perlis RH, Uher R, Ostacher M, et al. Association between bipolar spectrum features and treatment outcomes in outpatients with major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:351–360.
5. McIntyre RS, Weiller E. Real-world determinants of adjunctive antipsychotic prescribing for patients with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to antidepressants: a case review study. Adv Ther. 2015;32:429–444.
6. Wright BM, Eiland EH 3rd, Lorenz R. Augmentation with atypical antipsychotics for depression: a review of evidence-based support from the medical literature. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:344–359.
7. Pae CU, Forbes A, Patkar AA. Aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy for patients with major depressive disorder: overview and implications of clinical trial data. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:109–127.
8. Sanford M. Quetiapine extended release: adjunctive treatment in major depressive disorder. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:803–813.
9. Maeda K, Sugino H, Akazawa H, et al. Brexpiprazole I: in vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel serotonin-dopamine activity modulator. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;350:589–604.
10. Thase ME, Youakim JM, Skuban A, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole 2 mg in major depressive disorder: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:1224–1231.
11. Thase ME, Youakim JM, Skuban A, et al. Adjunctive brexpiprazole 1 and 3 mg for patients with major depressive disorder following inadequate response to antidepressants: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:1232–1240.
12. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.
13. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.
14. Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR, et al. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med. 1996;26:477–486.
15. Maeda K, Lerdrup L, Sugino H, et al. Brexpiprazole II: antipsychotic-like and procognitive effects of a novel serotonin-dopamine activity modulator. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;350:605–614.
16. Laoutidis ZG, Luckhaus C. 5-HT2A receptor antagonists for the treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathisia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:823–832.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.