Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Letters to the Editors

Paliperidone Palmitate Long-Acting Injectable Given Intramuscularly in the Deltoid Versus the Gluteal Muscle

Are They Therapeutically Equivalent?

Ravenstijn, Paulien PhD; Samtani, Mahesh PhD; Russu, Alberto PhD; Hough, David MD; Gopal, Srihari MD

Author Information
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology: December 2016 - Volume 36 - Issue 6 - p 744-745
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000610
  • Open

To the Editors

In the report by Yin et al,1 the statement that “many clinicians may misinterpret these directions (in paliperidone palmitate product monograph) to mean that these intramuscular sites (deltoid or gluteal) are interchangeable, and thus therapeutically equivalent” is, in our opinion, not correct. We are writing to clarify some statements from the Yin et al article concerning the deltoid versus gluteal intramuscular injection of paliperidone palmitate.

The recommended initiation as stated in the product label of paliperidone palmitate 1-month injection is with a dose of 150 mg eq on treatment day 1 and 100 mg eq 1 week later, both administered in the deltoid muscle. Here, the deltoid and gluteal injection sites are not interchangeable, and from a clinical point of view, it is important to reach therapeutic concentrations quickly when starting a new antipsychotic. However, after the second initiation dose, monthly maintenance doses can be administered in either the deltoid or gluteal muscle. The injection sites of the maintenance doses can be used interchangeably, but for deltoid injections, the appropriate needle length is based on the patient's weight (1-in 23G needle for patients weighing <90 kg and 1.5-in 22G needle for patients weighing ≥90 kg). For gluteal injection, regardless of patient weight, the use of a 1.5-in 22G needle is recommended. The use of differently sized needles depending on the weight of the patient for injection into the deltoid muscle is recommended to limit the risk of drug administration into the subcutaneous tissues, which would result in a decreased rate of absorption from the intramuscular site of injection.

Different distributions of muscle and adipose tissue, as well as difference in blood flow between the deltoid and gluteal sites,2–4 may affect the uptake rate of paliperidone into the circulation from the site of injection. At the deltoid site, the likelihood of an injection that is purely intramuscular is higher compared with that at the gluteal injection site. The hypovascularity of subcutaneous adipose tissue compared with muscle tissue may result in a slower uptake of paliperidone from the gluteal compared with the deltoid injection site. We agree that there is a different rate of absorption between the deltoid and gluteal injection sites, as presented in the articles cited by Yin et al,4–6 as well as in a more recent publication,7 but we do not consider these differences therapeutically relevant after multiple doses as discussed hereinafter.

The statement made by Yin et al,1 “This is concerning as the observed Cmax for the 150 mg dose is considerably higher (i.e., 65%) than the average value reported in the product monograph,” is based on a single dose pharmacokinetic study by Cleton et al.6 In the study described by Rossenu et al,7 a Cmax difference was also observed after the first and fourth injections (30% higher Cmax after deltoid injection compared with gluteal injection). However, Rossenu et al7 showed that steady state was not reached entirely after the 4 gluteal injections, and so this difference in Cmax cannot be extrapolated to Cmax at steady state. In addition, Samtani et al8 have shown that the median peak paliperidone concentrations at steady state for repeated gluteal and deltoid injections were 46 versus 50 ng/mL, respectively, for a dose strength of 150 mg eq, which is only a 9% difference. Thus, the statistics obtained from only a single dose or even a few doses at initiation cannot be extrapolated to the steady state condition during maintenance therapy.

The following statement made by Yin et al1 is taken out of context: “the observed Cmax and AUC were 20% to 50% higher after injection in the deltoid muscle compared with the gluteal muscle.” The 50% higher area under the curve (AUC) is not total exposure but a partial AUC (AUC0-36 days) from Study USA-03, which studied deltoid dosing with a longer 1.5-in needle length. Yin et al fail to mention that the AUC∞ in the same study was similar between deltoid and gluteal dosing (4% higher AUC∞ after deltoid injection of 150 mg eq, which is a commonly used PP1M dose).9 This similarity in AUC∞ for deltoid versus gluteal dosing was also observed in the study by Cleton et al6 where the AUC∞ was only 3% to 18% higher across the 4 dose strengths after a single deltoid dose compared with a single gluteal dose.

The population pharmacokinetic model (built on 1795 subjects from 6 phase 1 trials and 5 phase 2 and 3 trials, with a total of 18 530 pharmacokinetic samples from many different countries and ethnicities) confirmed not only the observed differences in pharmacokinetics upon the initiation of paliperidone palmitate treatment but also that differences between the gluteal and deltoid injection sites become less apparent after multiple injections.10 The final covariate model indicated that, among other variables, injection site had a significant influence also on the first-order absorption rate constant (ka), indicating a slower absorption rate after gluteal injection. However, paliperidone palmitate offered complete bioavailability of paliperidone at all dose strengths and from both injection sites.10 Taken together, these data confirm that the total exposure at steady state is similar between the deltoid and gluteal injection sites.

We acknowledge that, in principle, the time to reach steady state is longer for the gluteal injection site. This is why the 2 initiation doses of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate are required to be administered in the deltoid muscle, in addition to the requirement for weight-based selection of the appropriate needle size for administration, to rapidly attain therapeutic concentrations. Therefore, Yin et al did not provide the appropriate background and context when they state that “The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also reviewed this data and commented that ‘compared with deltoid injections, repeated administration in the gluteal muscle resulted in a delayed time to achieve steady state (approximately 4 weeks longer)’.1

In summary, the results of multiple studies of paliperidone palmitate indicate that, at the initiation of treatment, injection in the deltoid muscle results in higher initial exposures compared with injection in the gluteal muscle. After multiple injections and at steady state, the difference in exposure between gluteal and deltoid muscles is less apparent. In view of the totality of the evidence as described in this letter, we do not agree with the statement by Yin et al1 that the deltoid and gluteal injection sites are not interchangeable or therapeutically not equivalent.

Paulien Ravenstijn, PhD
Janssen Research & Development
LLC, a Division of Janssen
Pharmaceutica NV
Beerse, Belgium
[email protected]
Mahesh Samtani, PhD
Janssen Research & Development
LLC, Raritan, NJ
Alberto Russu, PhD
Janssen Research & Development
LLC, a Division of Janssen
Pharmaceutica NV
Beerse, Belgium
David Hough, MD
Srihari Gopal, MD
Janssen Research & Development
LLC, Titusville, NJ

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Ellen Baum, PhD, for editorial assistance provided for this Letter to the Editors. They also thank Theresa Carneiro for assistance with formatting and submission.

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

All authors are employees of Janssen Research & Development LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company. Both the 1- and 3-month formulations of paliperidone palmitate were developed by Janssen Research & Development, and the authors participated in the development programs. The company also provided a formal review of this letter before submission to the journal.

REFERENCES

1. Yin J, Collier AC, Barr AM, et al. Paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable given intramuscularly in the deltoid versus the gluteal muscle: are they therapeutically equivalent? J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;35:447–449.
2. Cockshott WP, Thompson GT, Howlett LJ, et al. Intramuscular or intralipomatous injections? N Engl J Med. 1982;307:356–358.
3. Haramati N, Lorans R, Lutwin M, et al. Injection granulomas. Intramuscle or intrafat? Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:146–148.
4. Evans EF, Proctor JD, Fratkin MJ, et al. Blood flow in muscle groups and drug absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1975;17:44–47.
5. Hough D, Lindenmayer JP, Gopal S, et al. Safety and tolerability of deltoid and gluteal injections of paliperidone palmitate in schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33:1022–1031.
6. Cleton A, Rossenu S, Crauwels H, et al. A single-dose, open-label, parallel, randomized, dose-proportionality study of paliperidone after intramuscular injections of paliperidone palmitate in the deltoid or gluteal muscle in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54:1048–1057.
7. Rossenu S, Cleton A, Hough D, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile after multiple deltoid or gluteal intramuscular injections of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2015;4:270–278.
8. Samtani MN, Gopal S, Gassmann-Mayer C, et al. Dosing and switching strategies for paliperidone palmitate: based on population pharmacokinetic modelling and clinical trial data. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:829–845.
9. US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Review. Available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2009/022264s000clinpharmr.pdf. Accessed October 2015.
10. Samtani MN, Vermeulen A, Stuyckens K. Population pharmacokinetics of intramuscular paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia: a novel once-monthly, long-acting formulation of an atypical antipsychotic. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48:585–600.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.