Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Pregnancy Outcomes Following In Utero Exposure to Second-Generation Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Terrana, Nathan BSc*; Koren, Gideon MD*†; Pivovarov, Jacklyn BSc*; Etwel, Fatma MSc; Nulman, Irena MD*

Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology: October 2015 - Volume 35 - Issue 5 - p 559–565
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000391
Review Articles
Buy
SDC

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are increasingly used for a variety of mental illnesses; however, the data regarding the safety of these medications during pregnancy are inconclusive and contradictory. We examined the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in utero exposure to SGAs by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

 We searched the databases EMBASE and MEDLINE from January 1990 to December 2014. Eligible studies had to report pregnant women who took SGAs during pregnancy (first trimester exposure if analyzing congenital malformations), follow a healthy comparison group in a similar manner, and report data on pregnancy outcomes. There was no restriction on language, sample size, or publication date. The primary outcome analyzed was major congenital malformations, and secondary outcomes included miscarriages, stillbirths, preterm births, small or large for gestational age neonates, and differences in gestational ages and birth weights.

 A total of 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, totalling 1782 cases and 1,322,749 controls. The use of SGA during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with a significant increased risk for major congenital malformations (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.41–2.93); however, no specific pattern of malformations was found. An increased risk was also found for preterm births (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20–2.86). The use of SGA during pregnancy was not found to be associated with an increased risk for secondary outcomes analyzed. The absence of a specific pattern of malformations makes it difficult to identify an explicit risk posed by SGAs, and therefore, further studies sufficiently controlling for confounding factors are needed to validate these findings.

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

From the *Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto; and †Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Received August 12, 2014; accepted after revision July 3, 2015.

Reprints: Irena Nulman, MD, University of Toronto, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Motherisk Program, Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada (e-mail: irena.nulman@sickkids.ca).

Supplemental digital contents are available for this article. Direct URL citation appears in the printed text and is provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.psychopharmacology.com).

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.