Journal Logo

Experimental

Increasing Perfusion Pressure Does Not Distend Perforators or Anastomoses but Reveals Arteriovenous Shuntings

Gascoigne, Adam C. MBBS*,†; Taylor, G. Ian AOFRACS*,†; Corlett, Russell J. FRACS; Briggs, Chris MBBS; Ashton, Mark W. FRACS

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open: June 2020 - Volume 8 - Issue 6 - p e2857
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002857
  • Open
  • Australia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cadaver studies of the vasculature using an injection of radiographic contrast solutions have a long history, from the seminal works of Manchot,1,2 Spalteholz,3 and Salmon4,5 to modern studies culminating in the development of the angiosome concept.6,7

Taylor8 and Chubb et al9 and Sur et al10 have highlighted the importance of “true” versus “choke” anastomoses between angiosomes as a major determinant of tissue perfusion. Furthermore, the identification of true anastomoses has been shown to be a valuable preoperative adjunct in the optimal design of large fasciocutaneous flaps. True anastomoses differ from choke anastomoses in their vessel diameter and function.11 True anastomoses link adjacent perforators without a reduction in vessel caliber, allowing an unimpeded flow between territories, whereas choke anastomoses are of reduced caliber, are capable of spasm, and regulate flow between adjacent territories.

To date, the effect of varying perfusion pressure on the diameter of these vessels between perforators has not been investigated. Of particular interest is whether it is possible to distend cutaneous perforating arteries and their anastomotic connections in fresh cadaveric studies, resulting in the conversion of small-caliber choke anastomoses to large caliber true anastomoses.8,9 This study is aimed at answering this question. This is particularly relevant given recent theories regarding perfusion of perforator flaps, such as “perforator hyperperfusion,” and in particular the suggestion that increasing the flow within, and hence the perfusion pressure of a perforator, may enable dilatation of anastomotic vessels and “capture” of additional territories.12–15

To achieve this, we investigated the effect of increasing perfusion pressure by comparing the radiographic appearance of paired upper limbs injected at the same site with those injected with identical solutions but at different rates, while monitoring pressure in a distal artery.

METHODS

Ethics approval for the project was obtained from our institution’s Human Ethics Advisory Group. Ten fresh cadavers were acquired (5 men and 5 women, age range, 63–94 years). Specimens with severe peripheral vascular disease or operative scars (eg, from radial artery harvest) were avoided. Limbs from 3 cadavers were excluded from analysis due to technical difficulties during injection. Seven pairs of upper limbs were ultimately included in the study, and 6 were analyzed for results. The aim was to control all variables except for pressure, including the site of injection, temperature, and concentration of injection solution, and the method of assessment.

Preparation

A standardized contrast solution composed of lead oxide and milk powder, based on that originally described by Rees and Taylor16 and modified by Suami et al,17,18 was prepared. Similarly to Tang et al,19 we found that a dilute solution was ideal (1 L tap water, 100 g lead oxide, and 10 g milk powder), particularly for studies of small vessels such as a perforator’s anastomotic network. A satisfactory mixing of components was achieved by adding a small amount of boiling water to the lead oxide and milk powder to create a paste, then adding the remaining water gradually while mixing the solution. The preparation was maintained in solution by a magnetic stirrer while the injection was in progress.

Upper limbs were removed above the elbow from each cadaver. The brachial and radial arteries were cannulated separately using 16G cannulas. The radial artery cannula was attached to a pressure transducer (Hospira Transpac IV; ICU Medical Inc., San Clemente, Calif.) (Fig. 1). The pressure transducer was calibrated using a mercury sphygmomanometer before each experiment. Data acquisition was performed using ADInstruments PowerLab 7 software. Intravascular pressure was monitored throughout the injection, and the maximum perfusion pressure achieved for each study was recorded.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.:
Cadaveric forearm with brachial artery cannulated proximally (blue arrow) and radial artery cannulated distally (yellow arrow). Note the blood pressure transducer attached to the radial artery cannula. Lead oxide contrast solution was injected via the brachial artery cannula.

Injection

Injection of radiographic contrast was performed via the brachial artery cannula. A proximal tourniquet was used to limit loss of contrast from the cut edge, and leaks were rigorously controlled using surgical clips, clamps, ties, thermoplastic adhesive, and direct pressure. In each pair of limbs, 1 was injected slowly and the other was injected rapidly to produce low and high pressures, respectively. Each pair of limbs was injected with an equal volume of the contrast solution. Following injection, limbs were stored at 4°C for 24 hours to delay putrefaction and allow the lead oxide solution to set.

Manual Injection Studies

Initially, the solution was injected manually using a syringe as has been the Unit’s practice in the past. However, when attempts were made to increase the perfusion pressure, there was leakage of contrast solution from the cut edges of the specimen, reducing the maximum achievable perfusion pressure, or alternatively vessel blowout, resulting in a radiographic “whiteout” and failure to fully perfuse the specimen. To avoid this, attempts were made at pulsing the injection to achieve a more consistent perfusion pressure; however, this was technically difficult and had only minimal effect on the pressure curve.

Peristaltic Pump Studies

Because of these unsatisfactory results, the experimental technique was modified by introducing a peristaltic pump (Masterflex peristaltic pump; Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, Ill.) for injection of contrast solution in the remaining pairs of limbs. This allowed more accurate regulation of rate of injection, leaving the investigator free to control the leakage of contrast solution and to monitor perfusion pressure. Using the peristaltic pump, high and low-rate injection rates corresponded to an average of 1.5 and 0.5 mL/s, respectively. This resulted in a more even, consistent perfusion pressure, with a gradual increase in pressure over time and without vessel blowout (Figs. 2, 3).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.:
One of the recorded high-pressure curves for fast pump injection (No. 9). Note the rapid increase in pressure at the commencement of injection, followed by a gradual increase with pressure spikes when contrast leakage is controlled. Recorded maximum perfusion pressure (211 mm Hg) is indicated via a yellow arrow.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.:
Graphic representation of average pressure curves for (A) manual, (B) fast pump, and (C) slow pump injections. Note the rapid peak and dropoff in pressure during manual injections, compared to a gradual increase in pressure using a peristaltic pump. Injecting at a faster rate resulted in a higher peak perfusion pressure. Identical volumes were injected in each specimen. Only 4 manual injections are shown because many injections were required to perfuse the specimen with a similar volume of contrast solution.

Dissection and Radiography

The skin and subcutaneous tissue were dissected free of the underlying muscle and bone at the subfascial plane and were laid flat. Significant perforators (>0.5 mm diameter) were identified and marked during dissection. The specimens were radiographed (MC-150 Linear Collimator; EUREKA Progeny Inc., Buffalo Grove, Ill.) with digital x-ray acquisition (FCR CapsulaX; Fujifilm Australia, Macquarie Park, Australia.).

Image and Statistical Analysis

Image analysis and processing was performed in a DICOM viewer (OsiriX 64-bit; Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Switzerland). Overall and selected areas were compared with horizontal mirroring of 1 image from each pair of limbs for ease of comparison. These images were reviewed by 3 of the authors (G.I. Taylor, R.J. Corlett, M.W. Ashton), comparing vessel caliber and the number of true anastomoses in each limb, and were blinded as to whether individual images represented low- or high-pressure injections. True anastomoses were defined as connections between adjacent perforators that maintained the same caliber between their primary branches. Following identification, the average caliber of the true anastomoses was measured at 3 points: at each end and in the center (Fig. 4). The mean average was then calculated for the true anastomoses in each specimen. Statistical analysis (Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear regression analysis) was performed in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y.).

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.:
Method for approximating average caliber of true anastomoses. Two perforators are shown (red dots) with their primary branches connected by a true anastomosis. This has been measured at each end and in the center (arrows).

RESULTS

Recorded pressure data are shown in Table 1, and outcome measures are shown in Table 2. On performing a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, it was found that regardless of the rate of the injection, there was no alteration in the structural architecture of the vasculature, including the number of true anastomoses (P = 0.32) and their caliber (P = 0.46). Linear regression analysis revealed no association between maximum perfusion pressure and number (P = 0.94) or caliber (P = 0.10) of true anastomoses.

Table 1. - Recorded Pressure Data
Cadaver Low High Volume, mL Method
1 Discarded: proximal vessel blowout Manual
2 51 99 125 Manual
3 77 137 250 Manual
4 60 101 500 Manual
5 Discarded: poor perfusion due to atheroma Manual
6 Discarded: proximal vessel blowout Manual
7 75 155 250 Pump
8 53 115 250 Pump
9 71 211 250 Pump
10 103 170 250 Pump
Average 70 141
Data showing the maximum low and high pressure recordings (mm Hg) in each pair of limbs, corresponding to low and high rates of injection, respectively. Three studies were discarded for the reasons indicated.

Table 2. - The Number of TA Observed in Each Study and the Average Diameter Thereof
Cadaver Low Pressure High Pressure
TA Number Average Diameter, mm TA Number Average Diameter, mm
1 Discarded: proximal vessel blowout
2 2 0.39 3 0.35
3 4 0.39 5 0.44
4 3 0.40 2 0.39
5 Discarded: poor perfusion due to atheroma
6 Discarded: proximal vessel blowout
7 2 0.49 1 0.51
8 2 0.38 2 0.43
9 Excluded from analysis: uninterpretable
10 4 0.45 3 0.43
Average 2.8 0.42 2.6 0.43
Note that although the diameter varied moderately between cadavers, their caliber was comparable in each pair of limbs. Four studies were not included in the statistical analysis for the reasons indicated.
TA, true anastomoses.

Instead of distending anastomotic vessels, high-pressure injections resulted in more distal filling of each perforator’s anastomotic network and overflow into veins. Comparisons of the radiographic appearance of these injections are shown in Figure 5. Slow, low-pressure injections resulted in filling of perforators and their large caliber branches, including true anastomoses, but with limited filling of the smaller caliber choke anastomotic vessels (Fig. 5A, C, E). Rapid, high-pressure injections resulted in (1) better filling of perforators; (2) more distal filling of small-caliber choke anastomotic vessels; (3) significant filling of the major superficial veins with retrograde filling of their tributaries as the pressure increased; but (4) no increase in vessel caliber (Fig. 5B, D, F). Notably in paired specimens, large caliber true anastomotic connections were found in comparable locations (Fig. 5C, D) and with no greater frequency in number in higher pressure studies. In 1 specimen (No. 9), attentive control of leaks and fast-rate injection resulted in extreme (211 mm Hg) perfusion pressure, with excessive filling of smaller branches of the arterial perforators and more extensive retrograde filling of the superficial veins, rendering vascular territories indistinct (Figs. 6, 7).

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.:
Montage of radiographs of paired forearms from same cadaver (No. 7), showing low-pressure injection (75 mm Hg, A, C, and E) and high-pressure injection (155 mm Hg, B, D, and F). Note that the images on the right have been reversed so that direct comparisons could be made between the 2 specimens. Overview radiographs (A, B) showing areas of interest, with veins highlighted in blue. In the magnified panels note (1) the large caliber true anastomotic vessels between perforators highlighted in both low- and high-pressure injections (yellow arrows, C and D) and (2) increased filling of small-caliber choke anastomotic vessels (asterisks, E and F) at a high pressure. Note that there has been no change in the overall architecture or in the caliber of either true or choke anastomoses in the limb perfused at a high pressure when the studies are compared and backfilling of venous tributaries which is enhanced by high-pressure injection.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.:
Comparison of radiographs of (A) low- and (B) very high–pressure injection studies from the same cadaver (No. 9). In the very high–pressure study (B, 211 mm Hg), note the diffuse filling of perforators, their small and large caliber branches, and significant venous filling. This “snowstorm” renders the study difficult to interpret as overlapping arterial and venous territories are virtually indistinguishable. Significantly, however, the perforators and their branches are not increased in size by comparison with low-pressure injection in the contralateral limb (A, 71 mm Hg), and there is again more extensive filling of venous tributaries at a high pressure.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.:
Schematic diagram of (A) low- and (B) high-pressure filling of the same perforator’s anastomotic network. Note that there is increased perfusion of the finer network at a high pressure, but the diameter of the perforators branches and their true (large arrows) and choke (small arrows) anastomoses are unchanged.

Unsurprisingly, there was a significant association between rate of injection and recorded maximum perfusion pressure (P = 0.018). It is worth nothing that optimal perfusion of perforators and their anastomotic network was obtained with the peristaltic pump at a high injection rate (155–211 mm Hg perfusion pressure). However, even following low-rate injection (51–103 mm Hg), perforators and their large caliber branches demonstrated good filling. Smaller caliber anastomotic vessels, by comparison, only filled at a higher pressure (Fig. 5E, F).

DISCUSSION

Though contrast studies of the cadaveric vasculature have a long history and continue to be widely used, the effect of perfusion pressure has not been studied previously. In the past, most of the cadaver injection studies by the unit had been done manually,6–9 pulsing the injectant into arteries to simulate the heart beat and to avoid vessel rupture. This has been the case especially when injecting the thin-walled lymphatics.17,18 In most cases of arterial injection, the rate of injection has been low, and the perfusion pressure has also been presumably low. During this study, when the rate of injection was increased, it was noted that vessel rupture occurred more frequently, resulting in 2 studies being discarded. These blowouts tended to occur in the larger vessels, consistent with the protective effect of small vessel diameter because wall tension increases with vessel radius for a given internal pressure as expressed by the Law of Laplace ().20 Vessel rupture did not occur when high-rate injections were performed with a peristaltic pump. Fortuitously, although not the aim of this study, we found that the best results were obtained using the peristaltic pump with a high-rate injection.

In addition to rate and volume of injection, the maximum perfusion pressure achievable in each study was largely dependent on the degree of leakage control. To achieve sufficient perfusion pressure and to perfuse the specimen satisfactorily, it was necessary to secure the injection cannula firmly and control assiduously any leakage of contrast solution. Constant injection using a peristaltic pump resulted in a smoother pressure curve with a very gradual increase in overall pressure and perfusion of the vasculature without rupture. According to Poiseuille’s equation (), flow is a function of pressure, vessel radius and length, and viscosity.21 Accordingly, increasing resistance (by reducing radius or increasing length) or viscosity diminishes flow, while increasing pressure enhances it. In the current study, variables other than injection rate, and hence perfusion pressure, were controlled. Composition, temperature, and preparation of the lead oxide solution was identical for each injection, and the same volume was injected in each limb at the same site and under the same conditions. The anatomical characteristics of the vessels were similar, as left and right upper limbs from the same cadaver were used for comparison. Hence, we consider that the appearance of the vasculature between low- and high-pressure injection studies can be attributed to the difference in perfusion pressure.

Limitations of the study included the relatively small sample size, as well as the use of a cadaveric model, findings from which may not translate directly into clinical surgery. Nevertheless, by controlling as much as possible all variables aside from perfusion pressure on the structure of the cutaneous vasculature, the below conclusions are supported by our findings.

The major findings in this study were (1) the inability to distend the vasculature at a higher pressures and convert small-caliber choke anastomoses to large caliber true anastomoses and (2) demonstration of widespread arteriovenous shunting into major superficial veins.

Effect of Perfusion Pressure on Anastomotic Vessels

Perforators and their larger caliber branches have relatively low resistance and fill at low pressure, while smaller caliber branches and anastomotic vessels, by comparison, exhibited greater (more distal) filling with higher pressures (Fig. 8). However, although the extent of filling varied, their relative size remained unchanged despite a range of perfusion pressures.

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.:
Overview of a rabbit with delayed thoraco-groin flap at day 7. Note true anastomoses (yellow arrow) connecting the LTA and DCIA territories (labelled black arrows). DCIA indicates deep circumflex iliac artery; LTA, lateral thoracic artery.

These findings are consistent with previous work done in this laboratory that has focused on true and choke anastomoses and the delay phenomenon.22–25 It should be emphasized that though it is impossible to distend small-caliber choke connections through direct application of pressure, it is possible for this conversion to take place in vivo over time using surgical delay procedures. This leads to remodeling and enlargement of the vessels within a flap, with conversion of choke to true anastomoses. Previous research has demonstrated that these changes do not take place until 48–72 hours postsurgery (see Figs. 8, 9).24 They involve hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the endothelial and smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall and are likely to be a physiological response to ischemia26 mediated by cytokines such as vascular endothelium growth factor and nitric oxide.27–29

Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.:
Five different delayed thoraco-groin flaps at different times based on the lateral thoracic artery (black arrow) in the rabbit demonstrating arteriovenous shunting between the flap artery and its venae comitantes (blue arrows). Note also the choke vessel communications between the LTA and DCIA territories that show progression to true anastomoses after 48 hours (yellow arrows). DCIA indicates deep circumflex iliac artery; LTA, lateral thoracic artery. Reproduced with permission from Taylor GI, Pan WR. The Angiosome Concept and Tissue Transfer. NY: Thieme; 2014:441.

Arteriovenous Shunting

The revelation of lead oxide appearing in the cephalic and other major veins, especially with back filling of their tributaries as the pressure increased, would strongly support the presence of arteriovenous shunts in the cutaneous circulation. Though lead oxide particles are similar in diameter to red blood cells (4–10 μm; c.f. 6.2–8.2 μm),30 they usually form aggregates within the radiographic contrast solution. In addition, the fact that the veins filled in a retrograde manner with smaller tributaries only appearing with very high pressure of 211 mm Hg demonstrates that this filling is taking place through proximal arteriovenous shunting in the vascular network rather than across the capillary bed itself. Though not highlighted before, we have observed this phenomenon of arteriovenous shunting in vivo in animal studies. In many postmortem angiographic studies of delayed flaps in dogs and rabbits, we observed lead oxide in the venae comitantes of the flap artery but not in their tributaries (see Figs. 8, 9).

It is interesting to speculate about the clinical and pathological implications of this observation. The superficial veins and venae comitantes being anatomically in juxtaposition to the arteries throughout the body are ideally situated for arteriovenous shunting. This may well be a protective mechanism against (1) sudden raised intra-arterial pressure and major vessel rupture and (2) a bypass pathway to divert a toxin away from the capillary bed, especially if combined with choke vessel spasm to limit the area of impact.11,31 This has been demonstrated recently in an animal model in a specific study of embolization of hyaluronic acid (HA) injected as a cosmetic filler. HA was injected into the central auricular artery of a rabbit and was found on histology to be present also within the accompanying vein.32 Though the authors hypothesize that these particles have been forced through the capillary bed, given the very large size of the HA particles, it seems more likely that they passed via arteriovenous shunts, as demonstrated in the current study. Similar shunting phenomena have previously been shown in vivo in studies of the coronary circulation33 and also in the microcirculation of patients with septic shock.34

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that the effect of high perfusion pressure on the radiographic appearance of the vessels in cadaveric studies is to increase the distal filling of small-caliber, high resistance, choke anastomotic vessels, without affecting their relative caliber or distorting the vascular architecture. The appearance of perforators and their large caliber, low resistance, true anastomotic vessels was unchanged because these vessels fill at lower injection pressures. Most notably, the number and caliber of true anastomoses observed in specimens perfused at a high pressure were not increased, demonstrating that high perfusion pressure does not convert choke to true anastomoses in the cadaver. These findings suggest that it is not possible to alter the structural architecture of the vasculature by application of high perfusion pressure alone. Though it is certainly possible to cause remodeling through use of a surgical delay, it is likely that large perforator flaps are otherwise dependent on the presence of preexisting large caliber true anastomotic vessels. In addition, significant filling of large superficial veins was observed, a phenomenon that was enhanced by a high-pressure injection, likely due to arteriovenous shunting in the cutaneous circulation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of Mr Alan Lambell, Mr Dale Baum, Dr. Leni Rivera, and Prof. John Furness of the University of Melbourne in performing this study. The authors thank Mrs Prue Dodwell for her help with the presentation of text and figures in this article. This study was approved by the University of Melbourne Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences Health Ethics Advisory Group, ID: 1340700.2.

REFERENCES

1. Manchot C. Die Hautarterien des Menschlichen Körpers. 1889.Leipzig, Saxony: Vogel;
2. Manchot C. The Cutaneous Arteries of the Human Body. 1983.New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag;
3. Spalteholz W. Der Vertheilung der Blutgefasse in der Haut. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie. 1893;1:London: Churchill Livingstone; 54.
4. Salmon M. Arteres de la Peau: E’tude Anatomique et Chirurgicale. 1936.Paris, France: Masson;
5. Salmon M, Taylor GI, Tempest MN. Taylor GI, Tempest MN. Arteries of the Skin. 1988:London: Churchill Livingstone;1
6. Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:113–141.
7. Taylor GI, Pan WR. The Angiosome Concept and Tissue Transfer. 2013:Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press; 1
8. Chubb DP, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. True and “choke” anastomoses between perforator angiosomes: part II. dynamic thermographic identification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1457–1464.
9. Taylor GI, Chubb DP, Ashton MW. True and “choke” anastomoses between perforator angiosomes: part I. anatomical location. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1447–1456.
10. Sur YJ, Morsy M, Mohan AT, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography study of the interperforator flow of the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1615–1628.
11. Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW. The functional angiosome: clinical implications of the anatomical concept. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:721–733.
12. Rubino C, Coscia V, Cavazzuti AM, et al. Haemodynamic enhancement in perforator flaps: the inversion phenomenon and its clinical significance. A study of the relation of blood velocity and flow between pedicle and perforator vessels in perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:636–643.
13. Miyamoto S, Minabe T, Harii K. Effect of recipient arterial blood inflow on free flap survival area. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:505–513.
14. Lecours C, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, et al. Freestyle pedicle perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1589–1603.
15. Pennington DG, Rome P, Kitchener P. Predicting results of DIEP flap reconstruction: the flap viability index. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:1490–1495.
16. Rees MJ, Taylor GI. A simplified lead oxide cadaver injection technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:141–145.
17. Suami H, Taylor GI, Pan WR. A new radiographic cadaver injection technique for investigating the lymphatic system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:2007–2013.
18. Suami H, Taylor GI, O’Neill J, et al. Refinements of the radiographic cadaver injection technique for investigating minute lymphatic vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:61–67.
19. Tang M, Yang D, Geddes CR, et al. Anatomic techniques. In: Perforator Flaps. 2013:Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC, eds. St Louis, Mo.: Quality Medical Publishing; 77–95.
20. Burton AC. Relation of structure to function of the tissues of the wall of blood vessels. Physiol Rev. 1954;34:619–642.
21. Blondeel PN, Neligan PC. Avoiding complications. In: Perforator Flaps. 2013:Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC, eds. St Louis, Mo.: Quality Medical Publishing; 163–178.
22. Callegari PR, Taylor GI, Caddy CM, et al. An anatomic review of the delay phenomenon: I. Experimental studies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:397–407; discussion 417.
23. Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Caddy CM, et al. An anatomic review of the delay phenomenon: II. Clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:408–416; discussion 417.
24. Dhar SC, Taylor GI. The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2079–2091.
25. Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Dhar SC, et al. The anatomical (angiosome) and clinical territories of cutaneous perforating arteries: development of the concept and designing safe flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1447–1459.
26. Myers MB, Cherry G. Mechanism of the delay phenomenon. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;44:52–57.
27. Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med. 2000;6:389–395.
28. Lineaweaver WC, Lei MP, Mustain W, et al. Vascular endothelium growth factor, surgical delay, and skin flap survival. Ann Surg. 2004;239:866–873; discussion 873.
29. Schaper W. Collateral circulation: past and present. Basic Res Cardiol. 2009;104:5–21.
30. Gillian WF, Hardman AM, Kiessling R, et al. Technical and research aspects of lead/acid battery production. J Power Sources. 1989;28:217–235.
31. Ashton MW, Taylor GI, Corlett RJ. The role of anastomotic vessels in controlling tissue viability and defining tissue necrosis with special reference to complications following injection of hyaluronic acid fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:818e–830e.
32. Zhuang Y, Yang M, Liu C. An islanded rabbit auricular skin flap model of hyaluronic acid injection-induced embolism. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40:421–427.
33. James TN. The delivery and distribution of coronary collateral circulation. Chest. 1970;58:183–203.
34. De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, et al. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:98–104.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.