Journal Logo

Viewpoint

Machine Learning and Ethics in Plastic Surgery

Koimizu, Jungen MD*; Numajiri, Toshiaki MD, PhD*; Kato, Kazuto PhD

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open: March 2019 - Volume 7 - Issue 3 - p e2162
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002162
  • Open
  • Japan

Sir,

Machine learning is expected to help humans evolve even in the field of plastic surgery.1 However, plastic surgeons must be aware that the artificial intelligence (AI) could create a biased view on patients, instead of promoting objectivity.

One comprehensive example is the AI for measurement of facial attractiveness based on semisupervised machine learning.1,2 At the beginning of the procedure, researchers give scores of attractiveness to portraits of famous actors and actresses as a group of the most beautiful faces. Subsequently, AI memorizes the combinations of the score and photograph as a sample dataset. In addition, the AI memorizes the least attractive portraits prepared by computer simulation. Based on this learning of the most and least attractive face, the AI predicts the attractiveness of the other faces.

The researchers insist that this AI can predict the attractiveness of a “moderate” face, for which people would give variable scores based on their preferences, and that it allows us to evaluate beauty objectively.2,3

However, whether such measurement collating AI is ethically sound is questionable. One of the ethical reservations is the possible failure in shared decision-making.4 In fact, AI could propose a biased view, attributed to the bias in the values and the dataset on which AI is based. First, it is impossible to be perfectly free from biases when individuals score attractiveness, as a common and objective scale of attractiveness is not available. Second, existing databases employed in the researches on attractiveness have biased ethnicity and gender ratio,3 which could lead to a biased prediction. Therefore, if our clinical practice relied on the AI, it would force the biased perspective of an individual (neither the surgeon nor the patients) onto patients. It could disturb the shared decision-making, which is the process for respecting the autonomy of the patients.4

The other concern is that AI use in esthetic evaluations might destroy the cultural diversity in the cognition of beauty. Even before the AI era, there were concerns of plastic and esthetic surgery causing biased cultural values. The techniques in plastic and esthetic surgery, which have been mainly developed in Western countries, are considered to conflict with the cultural value on beauty in other countries.5

This tendency for plastic surgery might be amplified by the AI, because of the dataset developed in the Western or wealthy Asian countries. This biased ethnicity of participants could cause biased suggestions toward preferences of these cultures. Consequently, this might result in destruction or marginalization of values of beauty in the other cultures.

In conclusion, plastic surgeons must consider the ethical issues in the clinical use of AI, to achieve the well-being of the patients. We must explore the communication and shared decision-making between the surgeons and patients when we employ new technology. As views on ethical and social issues are specific to each country, each society of plastic surgeons should deliberate what the emerging technology brings, elucidating the ethical responsibility of plastic surgeons and diversity in the values on beauty.

REFERENCES

1. Kanevsky J, Corban J, Gaster R, et al. Big data and machine learning in plastic surgery: a new frontier in surgical innovation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:890e–897e.
2. Zhang L, Zhang D, Sun M, et al. Facial beauty analysis based on geometric feature: toward attractiveness assessment application. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;82:252–265.
3. Liu S, Fan YY, Samal A, et al. Advances in computational facial attractiveness methods. Multimed Tools Appl. 2016;75:16633–16663.
4. McDougall RJ. Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2018. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018–105118.
5. Fayemi AK. Racial identity, aesthetic surgery and Yorùbá African values. Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18:250–257.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.