Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Total Nose and Upper Lip Replantation

A Case Report and Literature Review

Elzinga, Kate, MD, FRCSC; Medina, Abelardo, MD, PhD; Guilfoyle, Regan, MD, FRCSC

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open: October 2018 - Volume 6 - Issue 10 - p e1839
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001839
Case Report
Canada

Summary: The nose plays a critical role in olfaction, air filtration and humidification, and facial aesthetics. Most nasal amputations result from animal bites, human bites, and lacerations from glass. Successful replantation yields the best aesthetic and functional outcomes and is preferred compared with multistage nasal reconstruction. However, nasal replantation is technically challenging; establishing venous outflow can be particularly difficult. A 17-year-old male sustained a complete nose and upper lip amputation in a motor vehicle accident. The midface segment was emergently replanted. Two arteries (left dorsal nasal artery, left superior labial artery) and 1 vein (branch of the left supratrochlear artery) were anastomosed using microsurgical technique. A vein graft, systemic anticoagulation, and postoperative leeching were important adjuncts. Total operative time was 10 hours. Cold ischemia time was 2 hours and warm ischemia time was 1 hour. Two arteries were anastomosed to minimize the risk of ischemia of the nose and/or upper lip. Complete survival of the replanted segment was achieved. Eighteen months postoperatively, the patient has bilateral nasal patency, intact septal support, and an excellent aesthetic result. All efforts should be made to establish a venous anastomosis during nasal replantation to maximize functional and aesthetic outcomes. Partial necrosis is common following artery-only replantation, leading to tissue loss and contracture.

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Published online 3 October 2018.

Received for publication November 28, 2017; accepted May 4, 2018.

Presented at the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting 2017, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the authors.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Clickable URL citations appear in the text.

Kate Elzinga, MD, FRCSC, c/o Melissa Nickoleff, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 ST NW, 2C3.49 WMC, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7, E-mail: kateelzinga12@gmail.com

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

James published the first successful microvascular nasal replantation in 1976.1 Multiple reports of partial nasal replantation1–15 and near total nasal replantation16–19 have been published since. Common postoperative complications include tissue necrosis and secondary scar contractures.1 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 Total nasal replantation is uncommon. We present a case of a total nose and upper lip replantation following traumatic amputation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT

A 17-year-old male presented to the emergency room 2 hours after sustaining an amputation of his nose and upper lip as he was ejected through the windshield in a motor vehicle accident. The patient was a smoker but was otherwise healthy. The amputated nose and upper lip had been wrapped in gauze and placed on ice at the scene of the accident. The nose had been amputated from the cephalad aspect of the upper lateral cartilages to the columella including the septum, and upper and lower lateral cartilages. The upper lip was amputated in continuity with the nose, resulting in a 90% defect of the upper lip (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

OPERATIVE COURSE

The amputated nose and upper lip segment was immediately brought to the operating room for exploration. Microsurgical clamps were used to mark the superior labial arteries (1.0 mm in diameter) bilaterally and the left dorsal nasal artery (0.5 mm) (Fig. 2; see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which displays the posterior surface of the amputated nose and upper lip midface segment, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A841). A branch of the supratrochlear vein (0.5 mm) was identified on the left cranial aspect of the nose. No further veins were found despite extensive dissection.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

The patient was placed under general anesthesia. Following debridement of the facial lacerations, the mucosa of the left naris was sutured to the remaining intact mucosa on the face. This rapidly stabilized the nose for microsurgical anastomosis of the left dorsal nasal artery and then the left superior labial artery. The amputated part recovered appropriate capillary refill and abundant bleeding was present from its tissues.

The venous anastomosis was completed, repairing a branch of the left supratrochlear vein. Despite initial adequate venous outflow, the replanted segment became congested after 20 minutes. The anastomosis was excised, a thrombus was evacuated, and a second attempt was performed using an alternative 0.5 mm recipient vein located in the left glabella. This venous anastomosis also failed after 30 minutes of adequate flow.

Further dissection was performed from the glabellar wound cranially to move further away from the zone of injury. A suitable 0.8 mm vein was found 3.5 cm cranially. A 4 cm interposition vein graft was harvested from the medial aspect of the right foot. As the venous anastomoses were completed, a 5,000 unit heparin bolus was given intravenously. Good venous outflow was achieved and maintained (Fig. 3; see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 2, which displays a 4 cm vein graft was harvested from the medial aspect of the right foot for use as an interposition vein graft from the nose to a glabellar vein, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A842).

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Given the intraoperative difficulties with venous outflow, leeching was started immediately after the replantation. An incision was made on the right distal septum intranasally to allow leech attachment while avoiding external scarring (see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 3, which displays an intranasal incision was made on the right distal septum to allow for venous leeching at the end of the operation, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A843). Ciprofloxacin was used for antibiotic prophylaxis until the leeches were discontinued. A Doyle Airway Splint (Doyle Medical, Ohio) was placed in each naris for 7 days to maintain patency.

Back to Top | Article Outline

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

An intravenous heparin infusion was used for 36 hours after surgery to maintain a partial thromboplastin time 1.5 times the normal value. The patient was then transitioned to a daily prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 40 mg SC) for the duration of his hospitalization.

Hourly clinical assessment was performed, and a leech was applied when venous congestion was noted. This resulted in hourly application for the first 12 hours, then every 2 hours for 24 hours, every 3 hours on postoperative day (POD) 2, every 4 hours on POD 3, and every 6–10 hours on POD 4–6. No further leeches were required after POD 7. The patient required 6 units of blood, all during the first 48 hours, due to significant bleeding during surgery and continuous blood loss from the wound edges postoperatively.

The patient was kept on bed rest for the first 3 days with his head elevated in a warm room (26–28°C). His diet and activity level were gradually increased. He was discharged home on POD 10. He was able to quit smoking following surgery.

No complications occurred postoperatively. At his 18 month follow-up, the patient demonstrated excellent nasal airway patency and was very satisfied with his aesthetic result (Fig. 4; see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 4, which displays clinical appearance 4 months postoperatively, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A844; see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 5, which displays clinical appearance 4 months postoperatively, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A845; see figure, Supplemental Digital Content 6, which displays MRI axial imaging 18 months postoperatively, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A846). He had regained motor function of the upper lip orbicularis oris bilaterally. Circumoral muscle movement and symmetry were present, on visual inspection and by palpation, when the patient pursed his lips and spoke. At rest, there was a mild deficiency of the left upper lip vermilion, compared with the right. With light touch sensory testing, the patient stated that his replanted nose and upper lip sensation were near-normal compared with the surrounding tissues (cheeks and lower lip). No contact, thermal, and cold injuries had occurred, and the patient denied any difficulty with oral continence.

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Nasal Replantation Literature Review

For successful replantation of the nose, arterial anastomosis is an absolute requisite. Recipient arteries include the lateral nasal artery, dorsal nasal artery, supratrochlear artery, angular artery, superior labial arteries, or a branch of the anterior ethmoidal artery.7 Establishing adequate venous outflow minimizes the risk of partial or complete necrosis of the replanted part and subsequent scar contracture.

The veins that accompany the facial artery in the midface region are small, fragile, and difficult to locate.21 Although most technically challenging, venous drainage is most reliably established via venous anastomosis, particularly in replantation of large composite parts, as in our case. Alternate outflow techniques include leech therapy, arteriovenous fistula, pinpricks, heparinized abrasions, heparin injections in the replanted part, an open venous vacuum drain system, and systemic anticoagulation.21–23

Successful artery-only replantation of partial nasal defects has been reported. Stillaert et al.4 described 2 cases of successful replantation of the distal half of the nose using leeching when a suitable vein could not be found in the wound bed. Sun et al.5 described a partial nasal replantation using an arterial venous bypass and multi-point blood drainage for venous outflow.

If nasal replantation fails, secondary nasal reconstruction can be performed with various grafts and flaps. Partial success can facilitate further reconstruction if the skin of the replanted nose necroses but the underlying cartilage and mucosa survive.24

Back to Top | Article Outline

Upper Lip Replantation Literature Review

In a multi-institutional study, successful lip replantation was achieved with artery-only anastomoses in 54% of cases.25 The identification of recipient veins was challenging as the lip drains through small venous plexuses in the subdermis and submucosa. Of 13 patients, 11 required leech therapy for an average of 5.5 days. Systemic heparin was used for 10 patients. An average of 6.2 units of blood was transfused in 12 patients. Four patients had a vessel diameter less that 0.5 mm.

Cooney et al.20 described the replantation of a composite nasal, upper lip, and lower lip midface segment based on the labial arteries and glabellar veins. Secondary deformities were addressed with an open rhinoplasty and local flaps. Larsson et al.19 performed an artery-only replant of a composite nose and upper lip defect. Three hundred fifty-eight leeches, 39 units of blood, and 24 days of hospitalization were required. Partial necrosis and scarring of the upper lip required revision with a dermal graft and an Abbe flap.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SUMMARY

There are reports of viable replantation of both the nose and upper lip with establishment of venous outflow with either venous anastomosis or leeching. In our case, we used both techniques, given the large segment replanted and the high stakes of this procedure. If a return to the operating room had been required for inadequate venous outflow, it is unlikely the entire replanted part would have survived. For our patient, the clinical resolution of venous congestion and the decreasing need for leech therapy corresponded to the theoretical neoangiogenesis that takes 5–7 days to establish new venous outflow.

Successful nasal replantation restores form and function. To achieve a similar result with secondary reconstruction, multiple staged surgeries would be required with numerous donor sites. Despite its technical challenges, nasal replantation should be attempted as it provides superior aesthetic and functional outcomes compared with other reconstructive techniques.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Gilleard O, Smeets L, Seth R, et al. Successful delayed nose replantation following a dogbite: arterial and venous microanastomosis using interpositional vein grafts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:992–994.
2. Ueda K, Nuri T, Okada M, et al. 28 years’ follow-up of bitten-off nose replantation performed in a 9-year-old girl. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:904e–905e.
3. Stemann Andersen P, Elberg JJ. Microsurgical replantation and postoperative leech treatment of a large severed nasal segment. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46:444–446.
4. Stillaert FB, Roche N, Zeltzer A, et al. Artery only microanastomosis in nose replantation: a report of two cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:513–516.
5. Sun W, Wang Z, Qiu S, et al. Successful microsurgical replantation of the amputated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:74e–76e.
6. Okumuş A, Vasfi Kuvat S, Kabakaş F. Successful replantation of an amputated nose after occupational injury. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:289–290.
7. Kim S, Jeong H, Choi TH, et al. Successful re-plantation of an amputated nasal segment by supermicrosurgery: a case report and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e380–e383.
8. Flores RL, Bastidas N, Galiano RD. Successful replantation of an amputated nose after dog bite injury. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:326–327.
9. Yao JM, Yan S, Xu JH, et al. Replantation of amputated nose by microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:171–173.
10. Hussain G, Thomson S, Zielinski V. Nasal amputation due to human bite: microsurgical replantation. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:382–384.
11. Jeng SF, Wei FC, Noordhoff MS. Replantation of amputated facial tissues with microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery. 1994;15:327–333.
12. Niazi Z, Lee TC, Eadie P, et al. Successful replantation of nose by microsurgical technique, and review of literature. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:617–620.
13. Tajima S, Ueda K, Tanaka Y. Successful replantation of a bitten-off nose by microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery. 1989;10:5–7.
14. Stupka I, Dvorak Z, Vesely J, et al. Reconstruction of a nose bitten and eaten by a dog: a ten-year follow-up of a bitten-off nose replantation performed on an eleven-year-old boy. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;75:585–587.
15. Øregaard JS, Lang CL, Venzo A. Partial salvage of avulsed tissue after dog bite. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98:e22–e25.
16. Kayikçioğlu A, Karamürsel S, Keçik A. Replantation of nearly total nose amputation without venous anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:702–704.
17. Hammond DC, Bouwense CL, Hankins WT, et al. Microsurgical replantation of the amputated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2133–2136; quiz 2137; discussion 2138.
18. Marsden NJ, Kyle A, Jessop ZM, et al. Long-term outcomes of microsurgical nasal replantation: review of the literature and illustrated 10-year follow-up of a pediatric case with full sensory recovery. Front Surg. 2015;2:6.
19. Larsson J, Klasson S, Arnljots B. Successful nose replantation using leeches for venous draining. Facial Plast Surg. 2016;32:469–470.
20. Cooney DS, Fletcher DR, Bonawitz SC. Successful replantation of an amputated midfacial segment: technical details and lessons learned. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:663–665.
21. Pribaz JJ. Microsurgical replantation of the amputated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2138–2139.
22. Momeni A, Liu X, Januszyk M, et al. Microsurgical ear replantation-is venous repair necessary? A systematic review. Microsurgery. 2016;36:345–350.
23. Sánchez-Olaso A. Replantation of an amputated nasal tip with open venous drainage. Microsurgery. 1993;14:380–383.
24. Cantarella G, Mazzola RF, Pagani D. The fate of an amputated nose after replantation. Am J Otolaryngol. 2005;26:344–347.
25. Walton RL, Beahm EK, Brown RE, et al. Microsurgical replantation of the lip: a multi-institutional experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:358–368.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.