Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Genetic Overview of Syndactyly and Polydactyly

Ahmed, Humayun, BA*†; Akbari, Hossein, MD; Emami, Abdolhasan, MD; Akbari, Mohammad R., MD, PhD*†§

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open: November 2017 - Volume 5 - Issue 11 - p e1549
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001549
Original Article
Canada

Summary: Syndactyly and polydactyly—respectively characterized by fused and supernumerary digits—are among the most common congenital limb malformations, with syndactyly presenting at an estimated incidence of 1 in 2,000–3,000 live births and polydactyly at a frequency of 1 in approximately 700–1,000 live births. Despite their relatively regular manifestation in the clinic, the etiologies of syndactyly and polydactyly remain poorly understood because of their phenotypic and genetic diversity. Further, even though concrete knowledge of genotypic links has been established for some variants of syndactyly and polydactyly, there appears to be no single comprehensive published summary of all syndromic and nonsyndromic syndactyly and polydactyly presentations, and there is decidedly no resource that maps all syndromic and nonsyndromic syndactylies and polydactylies to their genetic bases. This gap in the literature problematizes comprehensive carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis and complicates novel diagnostic attempts. This review thus attempts to collect all that is known about the genetic bases of syndromic and nonsyndromic syndactylies and polydactylies, as well as to highlight the dactyly manifestations for which no genetic bases are as yet known. Then, having established a summation of existing and missing knowledge, this work briefly outlines the diagnostic techniques that a genetics-reinforced understanding of syndactyly and polydactyly could inform.

From the *Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Burn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; and §Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Received for publication March 6, 2017; accepted September 6, 2017.

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the authors.

Mohammad R. Akbari, MD, PhD, 76 Grenville St., Room 6421, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada, E-mail: mohammad.akbari@utoronto.ca

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SYNDACTYLY AND POLYDACTYLY PHENOTYPES

Syndactyly (ie, digit fusion, typically via webbing) is a common inherited and clinically heterogeneous malformation.1 It can be syndromic, comprising more than 300 distinct anomalies,1 or nonsyndromic, existing as 1 of 9 nonsyndromic forms.2 It also varies phenotypically between families. Even a single patient’s phenotype may be severe or mild, unilateral or bilateral, symmetrical or asymmetrical, complete or incomplete, cutaneous or bony, and involving many distinct bones, with inter-limb phenotypic variation.1

Polydactyly is another hereditary limb malformation, characterized by supernumerary digits (ie, more than 5 digits per limb). Like syndactyly, polydactyly is phenotypically variable3 in terms of the limb affected (hand or foot),4 its severity, and its syndromicity or lack thereof.3

Though syndactyly and polydactyly are phenotypically well understood, their genetic bases have not been synthesized in writing and remain unclear for some types. This study reviews the current knowledge on the genetics of these anomalies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SYNDACTYLY AND POLYDACTYLY GENETICS

Given the aforementioned morphological variation, it is not surprising that the genetic bases of syndactyly and polydactyly are diverse, polygenic,5 and as yet unclear in some cases. New causative genes and mutations are being discovered with advances in sequencing technology.

The genes involved in syndactyly and polydactyly tend to affect specific bodily regions, including the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA): an area that controls limb structure and positional identity.6–9 The ZPA disappears by day 44 of embryonic development, after which time the phalanges form.10 Aside from the ZPA, which is on the posterior embryo and produces fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8), the apical ectodermal ridge, which is on the dorsal-ventral margin and produces FGF8, also aids in limb development.

The HOX genes, hedgehog pathways [Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) and Indian hedgehog (IHH)], FGFs, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), and cartilage-derived morphogenetic proteins are also involved.11

Thirty-nine HOX genes exist in humans; the HOXA and HOXD clusters have been associated with syndactyly and polydactyly.12 Genes within the HOXD cluster and locus chr2q31 seem to be involved in syndactyly13: the HOXD13 gene, for example, is linked to syndactyly type V (SD5) and a brachydactyly-syndactyly syndrome.14

The SHH signaling pathway plays key roles in limb development.15 SHH is affected by—or affects—several transcription factors, namely HAND2, GLI3, ALX4, and certain BMP antagonists (formin and gremlin), changes to which have led to syndactyly and polydactyly.10 If disrupted, as if ZPA activity is impacted, then SHH cannot lead to normal limb development; this often results in syndactyly.16

The IHH signaling pathway may influence later development, considering its roles in chondrocyte differentiation and ossification.17 Further, IHH is repressed by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors,18 functioning at a different time than WNTs and FGFs, which are involved in the final stages of mesenchymal ossification19; later, in the last stage of digit formation, there is down-regulation of gremlin and restriction of FGF8 expression.20

Wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration sit family members 6 and 10B (WNT6, WNT10B) are involved in the developing limb bud and related to the chr2q35 region [a locus implicated in syndactyly type I (SD1)].21 BMPs and their antagonist noggin (NOG), when blocked, also lead to syndactyly.10 GLI3 may also contribute22: it is involved in a range of syndromes, and a GLI3 missense mutation led to syndactyly and polydactyly.23 N-Myc and zinc-finger transcription factors have caused soft-tissue syndactyly in mice.24

Syndactylies and polydactylies also vary in their patterns of inheritance. Most syndactyly types follow autosomal dominant inheritance,25 but SD7 and SD9 are autosomal recessive,1 and SD5 is X-linked recessive.26 Generally, autosomal dominant phenotypes are less severe with variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

NONSYNDROMIC DACTYLIES: PHENOTYPES AND GENETICS

Syndactyly

Nonsyndromic syndactyly manifests itself as 9 distinct types; at least 11 loci and 8 relevant genes have been identified27 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type I

SD1 is one of the most common nonsyndromic syndactylies28 and is associated with the third and fourth fingers or the second and third toes.28 SD1 is so diverse that it can be divided into 4 subtypes.28 Subtype 1 (Weidenreich type or zygodactyly) accounts for 70% of nonsyndromic syndactyly cases1 , 29; it is bilateral, symmetrical, found exclusively in the feet, and free of bone involvement. Subtype 1 is associated with the 3p21.31 locus, but no disease-causing gene has been identified. It has been explored in a large Pakistani family.29 Subtype 2 (Lueken type, type Ib) is usually bilateral, in both the hands and feet, and can be either bony or cutaneous. It is associated with the chr2q34-q36 locus and has been studied in German and Iranian families.30 The disease-causing gene has not been identified. Subtype 3 (type Ic, Montagu type) involves the third and fourth fingers, is typically bilateral, and can be either bony or cutaneous. It is linked to the chr2q31-q32, and mutations p.R306Q and p.R306G in HOXD13. It has been studied in 2 Chinese families.31 Finally, subtype 4 (type I-d, Castilla type) involves the fourth and fifth toes and is typically bilateral and cutaneous.1 Little is known about its genetic basis, but it is typically inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.28 , 30

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type II

Syndactyly type II (SPD) is one of the most heterogeneous nonsyndromic types.1 , 10 , 29 Like SD1, SPD tends to involve the third and fourth fingers.1 However, unlike SD1, SPD is also associated with the fifth toe.10 SPD manifests itself in 3 types: SPD1 (Vordingborg type), SPD2 (Debeer type), and SPD3 (Malik type). In SPD1, both the HOXA and the HOXD clusters are involved; often, a polyalanine expansion on HOXD13 is present.30 The locus affected is usually chr2q31 on HOXD13. In SPD2, it is usually fibulin-1 (FBLN1) on chromosome 12 that is modified, and the locus involved is usually chr22q13.3.28 The mutations responsible for SPD2 are usually missense mutations or deletions. Finally, in SPD3, the chr14q11.2-q13 locus is affected. SPD as a whole is characterized by incomplete penetrance and high variability and has been studied in Turkish,32 Greek, Pakistani, Chinese, and Belgian families,30 as well as in mice.33 SPD is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner with reductive penetrance.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type III

Syndactyly type III (SD3; Johnston-Kirby type, 4/5 fingers or 3/4/5 fingers fusion) usually involves soft tissue and only the hands1: specifically, there is complete, bilateral syndactyly between the fourth and fifth fingers, the fifth finger is often shortened, and the middle digit may be missing or underdeveloped.10 SD3 usually involves the connexin-43 (GJA1) gene at the chr6q21-3 and sometimes chr6q22-24 loci.30 SD3 has been studied in a Pakistani family.30 This type exhibits autosomal dominant inheritance with complete penetrance.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type IV

Syndactyly type IV (SD4; Haas type1) is very rare.34 It is complete and bilateral12; often, polydactyly is associated.10 No associated conditions of the feet or bone fusion have been mentioned.10 SD4 involves a range of genes, including the SHH signaling pathway, limb development membrane protein 1 (LMBR1), and the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) regulatory sequence (ZRS) locus at chr7q36.3.30 It can also further be divided into 2 subtypes: SDTY4 (Haas type) and Andersen-Hansen type. The former usually involves the ZRS locus and LMBR1, while the genetic basis of the latter is not known.30 This syndactyly has been studied in Chinese families.35 SD4 is autosomal dominant.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type V

Syndactyly type V (SD5; Dowd type) is another rare form of syndactyly. This syndactyly is usually complete and involves fusion of both cutaneous and bony tissue.10 Soft-tissue syndactyly affects the third and fourth fingers and the second and third toes; conversely, the metacarpals and metatarsals are most commonly fused in the case of the fourth and fifth or third and fourth digits.10 Sometimes, this syndactyly exists without metatarsal fusion, but in this case, there are usually other foot abnormalities.10 SD5, like SD1 and SPD, usually involves HOXD13 (namely a c.950A>G mutation or a polyalanine expansion as per SPD). The locus affected is usually chr2q31.30 This syndactyly has been studied in a Han Chinese family.14 SD5 is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type VI

Syndactyly VI (SD6; mitten hand syndactyly) is perhaps the least researched type. It is typically unilateral36; as its name suggests, it affects the second through fifth digits,36 generating a mitten-like appearance. The genetic basis of SD6 is unknown.30 It has an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with reductive penetrance.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type VII

Syndactyly VII (SD7) is another very rare phenotype.1 It is similar to Apert syndrome but includes additional, severe shortening and fusion of the ulna and radius, as well as fusion of the metacarpals and disorganized phalangeal development.10 The SD7 syndactyly group appears to contain 2 phenotypes: one involving a “spoon hand,” and the other an oligodactyly.37 It is sometimes similar to SPD1.38 SD7 usually involves formin 1 (FMN1) and gremlin 1 (GREM1) on chr15q13.3 on,1 as well as low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 (LRP4) on chr11p12-p11.2. Specifically, SD7 can be subdivided into 2 types: Cenani-Lenz type (spoon-hand type) and oligodactyly type. The former is usually associated with LRP4 mutations, whereas the latter is usually associated with GREM1 and FMN1 mutations.29 This type has been studied in a Pakistani family30; LRP4 mutations have been studied in cows, as well.39 This syndactyly type is autosomal recessive in inheritance, but sometimes also autosomal dominant.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type VIII

Syndactyly VIII (SD8) is not common40 and involves fusion of the fourth and fifth metacarpals.10 It can be divided into 2 subtypes: Orel-Holmes type and Lerch type. SD8 is associated with chrXq26 and the split hand/foot malformation type 2 (SHFM2) gene. It has also been associated with 2 nonsense mutations p.R179X and p.S157X in exon 3 of the FGF16 gene on chrXq21.1.29 FGF16 is known to function in limb development. It has been studied in both Polish and German families.41 SD8 is autosomal dominant in inheritance.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syndactyly Type IX

Finally, syndactyly IX (SD9; mesoaxial synostotic syndactyly or Malik-Percin type) is another highly rare form and has only been described in 2 families.10 SD9 is associated with chr17p13.3. No causative gene has been pinpointed.31 It has been studied in Turkish and Pakistani families.42 SD9 is inherited in an autosomal recessive fashion.1

Novel cases may necessitate expanded classification schemes. For example, Avina and Hernandez43 described a case they believe constitutes a new nonsyndromic syndactyly.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Polydactyly

Polydactyly is classified into 3 main phenotypes: preaxial, central, and postaxial44 (Fig. 2). Preaxial polydactyly (medial ray polydactyly) usually includes the thumb44 and can manifest itself in 1 of 4 types (types 1, 2, 3, and 4).45 It tends to be associated with GLI3 on chr7p13 and SHH on chr7q36. Central polydactyly (also “central ray” polydactyly) is associated with syndactyly and cleft hand.45 It dominantly appears syndromically. Finally, postaxial polydactyly (lateral ray polydactyly) is characterized by a hypoplastic or fully developed little finger, is often bilateral, can be simple or complex, and tends to be associated with foot deformations44a; it can also manifest in 2 types (types A and B).46 It is associated with GLI3 on chr7p13, and PAPA2 and PAPA3 on chr13q21-q32 and chr19p13.2-p13.1, respectively. It is also associated with SHH mutations, MIPOLI, and PITXI.30

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

SYNDROMIC DACTYLIES: PHENOTYPES AND GENETICS

Acrocephalosyndactyly

Acrocephalosyndactyly syndromes are characterized by craniosynostosis (early fusion of skull bones) alongside syndactyly and polydactyly. Apert syndrome is primarily characterized by craniosynostosis and syndactyly in which fingers and toes are either entirely fused or webbed. At minimum 3 digits on each hand and foot are fused together, though all digits can be fused. Polydactyly is less commonly found in Apert. Apert is associated with FGFR2 mutations on chr10q26.1346 and autosomal dominant inheritance.

Carpenter syndrome is another manifestation of craniosynostosis, involving a pointed head (acrocephaly) and, severely, a cloverleaf skull. Typically, Carpenter syndrome involves cutaneous syndactyly between 2 or more fingers or toes, most commonly between the third and fourth fingers. Polydactyly most often occurs next to the first or second toe or fifth finger. Carpenter syndrome is typically associated with RAB23 at the chr6p11.2 locus47 and is primarily autosomal recessive.

Pfeiffer syndrome, a third kind of craniosynostosis, results in a misshapen head and face, and is most commonly associated with syndactyly. It is associated with FGFR1 on chr8p11.23 and FGFR2 on chr10q26.1348 and presents with autosomal dominant inheritance.

Finally, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome is dominantly characterized by craniosynostosis but also involves syndactyly between the second and third fingers on each hand, and polydactyly involving a duplicated first toe. It is associated with TWIST1 on chr7p21.1 and FGFR2 on chr10q26.1349 and presents with autosomal dominant inheritance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Bardet-Biedl Syndrome

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is associated with syndactyly and polydactyly in both the fingers and the toes. BBS can result from mutations in at least 20 genes. It is associated with CCDC28B on chr1p35.2, ARL6 on chr3q11.2, BBS1 on chr11q13.2, BBS2 on chr16q13, BBS6 (MKKS) on chr20p12.2, BBS10 on chr12q21.2, BBS9 (PTHB1) on chr7p14.3, BBS4 on chr15q24.1, BBS7 on chr4q27, BBS5 on chr2q31.1, MKS1 on chr17q22, BBS8 (TTC8) on chr14q31.3, SDCCAG8 on chr1q43-q44, LZTFL1 on chr3p21.31, WDPCP on chr2p15, BBS4 on chr15q24.1, BBS12 on chr4q27, TMEM67 on chr8q22.1, CEP290 on chr12q21.32, TRIM32 on chr9q33.1, BBIP1 on chr10q25.2, chr22q12.3 on IFT27, and IFT172 on chr2p23.3. These syndromes typically present with autosomal recessive or digenic recessive inheritance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Greig Cephalopolysyndactyly Syndrome

Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome is another limb-anomaly-heavy disorder, involving the limbs, the head, and the face. Polydactyly of the finger or toes as well as cutaneous syndactyly are common. Greig cephalopolysyndactyly is associated with GLI3 mutations on chr7p14.150 and is primarily autosomal dominant.

Back to Top | Article Outline

McKusick-Kaufman Syndrome

McKusick-Kaufman syndrome is characterized by 3 features: heart defects, genital abnormalities, and polydactyly. McKusick-Kaufman syndrome is associated with MKKS on chr20p12.251 and autosomal recessive inheritance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pallister-Hall Syndrome

Pallister-Hall syndrome is characterized by an assortment of developmental defects, including polydactyly and cutaneous syndactyly. Pallister-Hall syndrome is associated with GLI3 on chr7p14.152 and autosomal dominant inheritance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Poland Syndrome

Poland syndrome involves underdeveloped muscles and hand abnormalities, including syndactyly. The genetic basis of Poland syndrome appears to be unknown, but this syndrome exhibits autosomal dominant inheritance.53

Back to Top | Article Outline

Short-Rib Polydactyly

Short-rib polydactyly syndromes are characterized by a narrow thorax as well as preaxial polydactyly. They include Jeune syndrome, Ellis van Creveld syndrome, Saldino-Noonan syndrome (Verma-Naumoff syndrome), and Majewski syndrome. These syndromes are largely phenotypically heterogeneous but are all characterized by polydactyly. Jeune syndrome is associated with ATD1 on chr15q13, and Ellis van Creveld syndrome is associated with LBN (EVC) on chr4p16.2. Saldino-Noonan and Majewski syndromes result from DYNC2H1 mutations on chr11q22.3.54 These syndromes are typically digenic and autosomal recessive.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome

Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome is characterized by several affected body parts. Syndactyly primarily affects the second and third toes, and polydactyly affects either fingers or toes. This syndrome is associated with DHCR7 on chr11q13.455 and presents with autosomal recessive inheritance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Triphalangeal Thumb-Polydactyly Syndrome

Triphalangeal thumb-polydactyly syndrome is a hand-foot malformation characterized by pre- and postaxial polydactyly, isolated syndactyly, complex polydactyly, and triphalangeal thumbs. Typically, the hands are more affected. This syndrome is associated with LMBR1 on chr7q36.3 and presents with autosomal dominant inheritance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT

Syndactyly and polydactyly are mostly diagnosed at birth.1 Management is surgical and postnatal and has remained unchanged for decades.10

However, prenatal diagnostics also exist.56 Dysmorphology examinations (ie, examinations of structural abnormalities) can be conducted. Prenatal (in utero) surgery is still not viable: it presents more risks than benefits.10

Whether prenatal diagnosis is possible depends upon the digits involved. Prenatal diagnosis of simple toe syndactyly is nearly impossible, whereas prenatal diagnosis of simple finger syndactyly is possible, though very difficult.56 Diagnosis is most readily carried out when syndactyly is both complete and complex, as this tends to result in prenatally detectable synchronous movements.56

Where prenatal diagnoses is unclear, molecular/genetic methods can be complementary. First, DNA must be extracted from the fetus in utero via different methods.57 Next, the DNA is analyzed for relevant mutations via sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, or cytogenetic/fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis.

The benefits of genetic diagnosis of syndactyly and polydactyly lie beyond the affected individual. The same genetic testing methods can also be generalized to adults to allow for carrier testing (ie, for detecting a carrier of an abnormal gene in a disease where the condition is not clinically expressed), which can aid in giving families preventative information.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SUMMARY

Syndactyly and polydactyly are both clinically and genetically complex. Phenotypically, the dactylies are diverse: 9 nonsyndromic syndactylies and a range of nonsyndromic polydactylies exist. This intrinsic complexity is amplified by the fact that each dactyly can also exist in a range of syndromic manifestations: more than 300 distinct syndromic syndactylies58 and more than 300 distinct syndromic polydactylies exist.59

This phenotypic complexity is paralleled by the dactylies’ varied genetic bases and patterns of inheritance. A range of genes—namely, the hedgehog pathways (SHH and IHH), WNTs, HOX genes (especially HOXD13), GJA1, LMBR1, FMN1, GREM1, LRP4, SHFM2, GLI3, FGFs, BMPs, and cartilage-derived morphogenetic proteins—have been implicated, but the genetic basis of certain syndactyly types, like nonsyndromic subtypes VI and IX, remains unknown.

This genetic complexity translates to great difficulty where genetic-based diagnosis and carrier testing are concerned. Although prenatal diagnosis via molecular and genetic methodologies exists, diagnosis is still largely postbirth, as not all genetic bases are effectively charted.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Malik S. Syndactyly: phenotypes, genetics and current classification. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:817–824.
2. Malik S, Ahmad W, Grzeschik KH, et al. A simple method for characterising syndactyly in clinical practice. Genet Couns. 2005;16:229–238.
3. Deng H, Tan T, Yuan L. Advances in the molecular genetics of non-syndromic polydactyly. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2015;17:e18.
4. Miura T, Nakamura R, Imamura T. Polydactyly of the hands and feet. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12:474–476.
5. Malik S, Percin FE, Ahmad W, et al. Autosomal recessive mesoaxial synostotic syndactyly with phalangeal reduction maps to chromosome 17p13.3. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;134:404–408.
6. Mariani FV, Martin GR. Deciphering skeletal patterning: clues from the limb. Nature. 2003;423:319–325.
7. Saunders JW Jr. The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. J Exp Zool. 1948;108:363–403.
8. Saunders JW, Gasseling MT. Ectodermal-mesenchymal interactions in the origin of limb symmetry. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. 1968:78–97.
9. Todt WL, Fallon JF. Posterior apical ectodermal ridge removal in the chick wing bud triggers a series of events resulting in defective anterior pattern formation. Development. 1987;101:501–515.
10. Jordan D, Hindocha S, Dhital M, et al. The epidemiology, genetics and future management of syndactyly. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:14–27.
11. Manouvrier-Hanu S, Holder-Espinasse M, Lyonnet S. Genetics of limb anomalies in humans. Trends Genet. 1999;15:409–417.
12. Schwabe GC, Mundlos S. Genetics of congenital hand anomalies. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2004;36:85–97.
13. Sarfarazi M, Akarsu AN, Sayli BS. Localization of the syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly) locus to 2q31 region and identification of tight linkage to HOXD8 intragenic marker. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:1453–1458.
14. Zhao X, Sun M, Zhao J, et al. Mutations in HOXD13 underlie syndactyly type V and a novel brachydactyly-syndactyly syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:361–371.
15. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, et al. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell. 1993;75:1401–1416.
16. Rindler M, Loomis C. Principles of limb development. Available at http://education.med.nyu.edu/courses/macrostructure/lectures/lec_images/limb.html.
17. Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, et al. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science. 1996;273:613–622.
18. Naski MC, Ornitz DM. FGF signaling in skeletal development. Front Biosci. 1998;3:d781–d794.
19. Kawakami Y, Capdevila J, Büscher D, et al. WNT signals control FGF-dependent limb initiation and AER induction in the chick embryo. Cell. 2001;104:891–900.
20. Mori C, Nakamura N, Kimura S, et al. Programmed cell death in the interdigital tissue of the fetal mouse limb is apoptosis with DNA fragmentation. Anat Rec. 1995;242:103–110.
21. Rankin J, Strachan T, Lako M, et al. Partial cloning and assignment of WNT6 to human chromosome band 2q35 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999;84:50–52.
22. Litingtung Y, Dahn RD, Li Y, et al. Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity. Nature. 2002;418:979–983.
23. Volodarsky M, Langer Y, Birk OS. A novel GLI3 mutation affecting the zinc finger domain leads to preaxial-postaxial polydactyly-syndactyly complex. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:110.
24. Talamillo A, Delgado I, Nakamura T, et al. Role of Epiprofin, a zinc-finger transcription factor, in limb development. Dev Biol. 2010;337:363–374.
25. Eaton CJ, Lister GD. Syndactyly. Hand Clin. 1990;6:555–575.
26. Lonardo F, Della Monica M, Riccardi G, et al. A family with X-linked recessive fusion of metacarpals IV and V. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124A:407–410.
27. Deng H, Tan T. Advances in the molecular genetics of non-syndromic syndactyly. Curr Genomics. 2015;16:183–193.
28. Malik S, Schott J, Ali SW, et al. Evidence for clinical and genetic heterogeneity of syndactyly type I: the phenotype of second and third toe syndactyly maps to chromosome 3p21.31. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:1268–1274.
29. Castilla EE, Paz JE, Orioli-Parreiras IM. Syndactyly: frequency of specific types. Am J Med Genet. 1980;5:357–364.
30. Debeer P, Schoenmakers EF, Twal WO, et al. The fibulin-1 gene (FBLN1) is disrupted in a t(12,22) associated with a complex type of synpolydactyly. J Med Genet. 2002;39:98–104.
31. Dai L, Liu D, Song M, et al. Mutations in the homeodomain of HOXD13 cause syndactyly type 1-c in two Chinese families. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96192.
32. Akarsu AN, Akhan O, Sayli BS, et al. A large Turkish kindred with syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly). 2. Homozygous phenotype? J Med Genet. 1995;32:435–441.
33. Erickson RP, Wynshaw-Boris AJ. Epstein’s Inborn Errors of Development: The Molecular Basis of Clinical Disorders of Morphogenesis. 2016: Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1373.
34. Hass SL. Bilateral complete syndactylism of all fingers. Am J Surg. 1940;50:363–366.
35. Sun M, Ma F, Zeng X, et al. Triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly syndrome and syndactyly type IV are caused by genomic duplications involving the long range, limb-specific SHH enhancer. J Med Genet. 2008;45:589–595.
36. Temtamy SA, McKusick VA. The Genetics of Hand Malformations. 1978:New York, N.Y.: Alan R. Liss New York; 301–322.
37. Harpf C, Pavelka M, Hussl H. A variant of Cenani-Lenz syndactyly (CLS): review of the literature and attempt of classification. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:251–257.
38. Percin EF, Percin S. Two unusual types of syndactyly in the same family; Cenani-Lenz type and “new” type versus severe type I syndactyly? Genet Couns. 2003;14:313–319.
39. Drögemüller C, Leeb T, Harlizius B, et al. Congenital syndactyly in cattle: four novel mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 gene (LRP4). BMC Genet. 2007;8:5.
40. Faiyaz-Ul-Haque M, Zaidi SHE, King LM, et al. Fine mapping of the X-linked split-hand/split-foot malformation (SHFM2) locus to a 5.1-Mb region on Xq26.3 and analysis of candidate genes. Clin Genet. 2005;67:93–97.
41. Jamsheer A, Zemojtel T, Kolanczyk M, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies FGF16 nonsense mutations as the cause of X-linked recessive metacarpal 4/5 fusion. J Med Genet. 2013;50:579–584.
42. Percin EF, Percin S, Egilmez H, et al. Mesoaxial complete syndactyly and synostosis with hypoplastic thumbs: an unusual combination or homozygous expression of syndactyly type I? J Med Genet. 1998;35:868–874.
43. Avina Fierro JA, Hernandez Avina DA. A case of complete cutaneous syndactyly of the toes with non-syndromic phenotype. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther. 2014;5:240.
44. Polydactyly, postaxial, type A1; PAPA1 [Internet]. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University; c1986-2013. Available at http://www.omim.org/entry/174200. Accessed June 29, 2015.
45. Teaching Resources: Hand Malformations [Internet]. Gainesville, FL.: University of Florida. Available at https://www.peds.ufl.edu/divisions/genetics/_style/images/polydactyly-composite.gif. Accessed June 29, 2015.
46. Ibrahimi OA, Chiu ES, McCarthy JG, et al. Understanding the molecular basis of Apert syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;11:264–270.
47. Alessandri JL, Dagoneau N, Laville JM, et al. RAB23 mutation in a large family from Comoros Islands with Carpenter syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:982–986.
48. Cornejo-Roldan LR, Roessler E, Muenke M. Analysis of the mutational spectrum of the FGFR2 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome. Hum Genet. 1999;104:425–431.
49. de Heer IM, de Klein A, van den Ouweland AM, et al. Clinical and genetic analysis of patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1894–1902; discussion 1903.
50. Debeer P, Peeters H, Driess S, et al. Variable phenotype in Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome: clinical and radiological findings in 4 independent families and 3 sporadic cases with identified GLI3 mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;120A:49–58.
51. Stone DL, Slavotinek A, Bouffard GG, et al. Mutation of a gene encoding a putative chaperonin causes McKusick-Kaufman syndrome. Nat Genet. 2000;25:79–82.
52. Johnston JJ, Olivos-Glander I, Killoran C, et al. Molecular and clinical analyses of Greig cephalopolysyndactyly and Pallister-Hall syndromes: robust phenotype prediction from the type and position of GLI3 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:609–622.
53. Der Kaloustian VM, Hoyme HE, Hogg H, et al. Possible common pathogenetic mechanisms for Poland sequence and Adams-Oliver syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1991;38:69–73.
54. Short-Rib Thoracic Dysplasia 3 with or without Polydactyly; SRTD3 [Internet]. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University; c1986-2008. Available at https://www.omim.org/entry/613091. Accessed January 20, 2015.
55. Jira PE, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ, et al. Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome and the DHCR7 gene. Ann Hum Genet. 2003;67:269–280.
56. Ermito S, Dinatale A, Carrara S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of limb abnormalities: role of fetal ultrasonography. J Prenat Med. 2009;3:18–22.
57. Chorionic Villus sampling and amniocentesis: recommendations for prenatal counseling [Internet]. Atlanta, Ga.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; c1998-2001 [cited June 29, 2015]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00038393.htm.
58. Delgadillo D 3rd, Adams NS, Girotto JA. Supernumerary digits of the hand. Eplasty. 2016;16:ic3.
59. Biesecker LG. Polydactyly: how many disorders and how many genes? 2010 update. Dev Dyn. 2011;240:931–942.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.