Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Comments on: “Intralipotherapy, the State of the Art”

Rauso, Raffaele, MD, PhD

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open: February 2017 - Volume 5 - Issue 2 - p e1224
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001224
Letter to the Editor

Department of Dentistry, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy,

Disclosure: The author has no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication. Dr. Rauso received grants from Healthxchange and Marrlor, the companies that distribute the drug solution in the United Kingdom and Italy, respectively. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the author.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Back to Top | Article Outline


I read with a lot of interest the article entitled “Intralipotherapy, the State of the Art” written by Amore et al.1 As soon I read it, I noted it is really close to the already published Italian article “Intralipoterapia, lo stato dell’arte.”2

When this article was published in Italy, the editor of the journal asked me to comment on the article and clarify some points.3

Aqualyx (Marllor International, San Giovanni in Marignano, Italy) is a DC-based solution with a lactose-based delivery system formulated for the purpose of controlling and enhancing the action of external ultrasound waves for the microcavitation of adipose tissue for the medical treatment of localized adiposity’s reduction (Table 1).4 This solution is not recorded as a drug but only as a medical device, although it is a DC-based solution; this anomaly was first underlined by Duncan in a recent multiplex assay published in 2013.5

Table 1.

Table 1.

Duncan compared Aqualyx with a PC/DC solution and with placebo (saline solution alone); the first solution was shown to be more unselective and cytolytic.5

Effectiveness of Aqualyx injections without external ultrasound application has been already described in literature6–8; moreover, skin necrosis secondary to injections has also been described9 although this complication is not described as side effect in the package leaflet.4

As underlined by Amore et al, recently ATX-101, a DC-based solution for the unwanted submental fat (Kybella in the United States and Belkyra in Canada; Kythera Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Westlake Village, Calif. [an affiliate of Allergan Plc, Dublin, Ireland]), has been sold in United States and Canada; however, there is a big difference between this solution and Aqualyx, although both contain DC: the first is recorded as a drug, and the second as a medical device; a claim regarding this issue has been raised with the Italian Ministry of the Health.8

Since 2004, Rotunda et al10 isolated DC from PC and identified it as the predominant lytic agent in the PC/DC formulation.

The use of DC alone to reduce localized adiposity can be very damaging, inducing skin necrosis in some cases; however, a recent study, published by Dayan et al,11 stated that ATX-101 injections, in a 4-year follow-up study, were a safe and predictable mini- invasive procedure for nonsurgical reduction of submental fullness. I thank Amore et al for their interesting results; however, as I already commented in the Italian version of this article,3 it would be really interesting to understand why a DC solution is recorded as a medical device and not as a drug. Most of the authors of the commented article are external medical advisors for Aqualyx; at least they should have specified whether in their large-case series Aqualyx has been used with or without the application of external ultrasound after the injections, as recommended by the manufacturer of the solution.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Amore R, Pinto H, Gritzalas K, et al. Intralipotherapy, the state of the art. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e1085.
2. Amore R, Gritzalas K, Amuso D, et al. Intralipoterapia, lo stato dell’arte. 2016.La Medicina Estetica Anno 40 n.1 Gennaio-Marzo;
3. Rauso R. Commento a: “Intralipoterapia, lo stato dell’arte”. 2016.La Medicina Estetica Anno 40 n.2 Aprile-Giugno;
4. Aqualyx package leaflet. Motolese’s solution. CE 0373. LELX0010 Rev.00.
5. Duncan DI. Response to “Injection lipolysis with phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate.” Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:1073–1075.
6. Rauso R, Rusciani A, Curinga G. An adipocitolitic aqueous micro-gelatinous solution for buffalo hump deformity reduction. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:1282–1284.
7. Pinto H, Hernandez C, Turra C, et al. Evaluation of a new adipocytolytic solution: adverse effects and their relationship with the number of vials injected. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:1451–1455.
8. Rauso R, Salti G. A CE-marked drug used for localized adiposity reduction: a 4-year experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:850–857.
9. Di Toro G, Rauso R. Skin necrosis following adipocitolitic solution injections. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:NP74–NP76.
10. Rotunda AM, Suzuki H, Moy RL, et al. Detergent effects of sodium deoxycholate are a major feature of an injectable phosphatidylcholine formulation used for localized fat dissolution. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:1001–1008.
11. Dayan SH, Humphrey S, Jones DH, et al. Overview of ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid injection): a nonsurgical approach for reduction of submental fat. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(Suppl 1):S263–S270.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.