Of the 143 patients included in the study, 130 were women (90.91%) and 13 were men (9.09%), and their ages ranged from 32 to 100 years (average age, 69 years). The size of tumor ranged from 2.5 to 6 cm. All defects included 70% or more of a lower lip and oral commissure, buccal mucosa, cheek skin, and upper lip. There were 9 patients with a recurrent tumor, and 10 patients received preoperative radiation treatment (6.99%).
There were no immediate complications, ie, bleeding and infection, except 1 patient with wound dehiscence, which required resuturing. One patient presented with a 6-cm recurrent tumor of the lower lip after excision with the Estlander flap, and a total lower lip reconstruction was performed. There was a slight limitation of mouth opening, which was improved without additional surgery. Another patient presented with 4.5-cm lesions, and a total lower lip reconstruction was performed. There was a minimal narrow oral commissure, and a commissuroplasty was later performed 3 months after operation. No patient required scar revision. Nineteen patients had recurrent tumors and additional surgery, such as surgical excision and neck dissection. Twenty-five patients (17.48%) received postoperative radiation treatment.
Twenty patients were followed up for outcome measures with a range of 6 to 132 months [mean, 53.35 months (±40.44)]. The defect size and comparable functional outcomes of ICD, SD, ILD, and 2PD to normal lip parameters according to different age groups are described in Table 1.
Reconstruction of Total Lower Lip Defects
A female patient, aged 74 years, presented with multiple ulcerative masses of lower lip cancer and underwent a wide excision and reconstruction with the MBNC flap and postoperative radiation therapy. At 31 months after operation, she was very satisfied with her appearance and has good functional lips (Fig. 3). The ICD, ILD, SD, and 2PD were 55, 52, 21, and 2 mm, respectively.
A female patient, aged 74 years, presented with a 4-cm lower lip lesion, and underwent a wide excision and a total lip reconstruction with the MBNC flap. At 14 months after operation, the ICD, ILD, SD, and 2PD were 62, 50, 28, and 2 mm, respectively. The patient had satisfactory appearance (Fig. 4).
Reconstruction of Defects Larger Than a Total Lip Defect
An 83-year-old female patient presented with a lower lip lesion sized 5 cm, involving oral commissure, and underwent a wide excision of lip, commissure, and right cheek and a reconstruction with the MBNC flap. At 39 months after operation, she was very satisfied with her lips (Fig. 5). The ICD, ILD, SD, and 2PD were 63, 42, 24, and 2 mm, respectively.
Reconstruction of Recurrent Cancer of a Lower Lip
A 66-year-old woman presented with recurrent carcinoma involving almost the entire lower lip after the Karapandzic fan flap reconstruction13 5 years ago and underwent resection and total lip reconstruction with the MBNC flap. At 6 months after operation, the ICD, ILD, SD, and 2PD were 47, 35, 16, and 1 mm, respectively. The scar was acceptable with good oral competence (Fig. 6).
The measurement of lip function was also performed in 201 Thai volunteers (101 women and 100 men). The results of this study will be reported in another article.
A previous study reported that carcinoma of the lip in the Thai population predominantly occurred in women because of the habit of chewing betel nut and working outdoors.1
The primary goal of lip reconstruction is a functional lip with good oral competence, which can be achieved if the sphincter is reconstructed and sensation preserved.14 The local tissue provides color and texture match, tissue with similar thickness, and skin and mucosal tissue characteristics.15 Various techniques have been proposed,16,17 but total or near-total defects of the lip pose challenges of a poor aesthetic outcome and compromised oral competence. The Karapandzic flap provides lip competence with a sensate, mobile lip, but its primary drawback is microstomia.14,18 Bernard's19 technique uses transposition of full-thickness flaps and requires the excision of 3 cutaneous triangles. Although microstomia can be avoided, there is no functional orbicularis with a tight adynamic lower lip because of denervation.18 Many reconstructive techniques do not provide mucosal replacement of lip vermilion. The free flap techniques produce less cosmetic and functional results.20
The MBNC provides adequate lip height with muscular part by the rectangular flap added to the base of the triangular flap. The mental crease defines the inferior margin of the flap.15 Injury to the parotid duct ampulla is avoided by preserving it outside or inside the flap. The flap design incorporates the remaining lower lip, the orbicularis oris muscle, which forms a sphincteric ring around the mouth15 and cheek musculature. A full-thickness incision was made at the medial edge of the skin and mucosal flap with preservation of branches of arterial supply to the lower lip and was not made lateral to the facial artery. The lateral incision was deep to subcutaneous and submucosal tissue with blunt dissection of subcutaneous and cheek muscular tissue to preserve neurovascular structure, the major depressor muscles of lip15 and the buccinators21 and to allow better advancement of lower lip flaps. For adequate lip width and preservation of original position of the oral commissure, the modiolus is reconstructed by suturing muscle of the flap to the muscle of the upper lip just lateral to the commissure. The buccal and mandibular branches of the facial nerves leave the parotid near the parotid-masseteric fascia in the same plane as the parotid duct22 to supply the orbicularis oris, buccinators, and lip depressors. Branches of the maxillary and mandibular divisions of the trigeminal nerve for sensation to the lower lip are preserved by careful blunt dissection. The lateral edge of the skin and mucosal flaps are approximated using a V-Y technique.10 The designed mucosa in the mucosal flap above the oral commissure is used to reconstruct the red vermilion.
The facial artery hooks around the lower border of the mandible at the anterior edge of the masseter muscle and passes upward and forward to near the oral commissure.23 The inferior labial artery and horizontal labiomental artery (HLA) are the main arteries of the MBNC flap.24,25 Their location, course, and dimensions of the lower lip are not constant.26 Knowledge about their location is important to avoid complications.27 The HLA branches from the facial artery in the middle of the lower lip and the inferior labial artery branches at the level of the oral commissure. In most cases, the HLA runs under the depressor anguli oris muscle and passes through the depressor labii inferioris and orbicularis oris muscles28,29 and can be preserved in the lower lip inferior to the oral commissure, and inclined gradually toward the lower lip. Careful dissection with precaution of variance in anatomical landmark will assure flap viability and avoid injury to these vessels. A number of facial artery perforators located predominantly at the level of the oral commissure are preserved in the flap and can be used as a pedicle flap.30
The MBNC flap resolves the challenges of aesthetic outcomes and provision of good oral competence with a sensate and mobile lip. The functional outcome was comparable with normal lip parameters described in a study.11 The flap preserved neurovascular tissue similar to the Karapandzic flap,14 but it overcomes microstomia, the limitation of the Karapandzic flap caused by change of position of the oral commissure.14,15,18 The flap overcomes the limitations of Webster-Bernard’s technique,19 which are chronic tension of closure and a tight adynamic lip.15,18 When the lip defect extends to a large portion of cheek or buccal mucosa, there may not be enough local tissues to use the MBNC flap.
The limitations of this retrospective study are as follows: patient records collected were for a long period of time (over decades), difficulty of the long-term follow-ups, economy, and death of a number of patients or recurrent tumors in many because of the advanced stage.
Good functional and aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction support clinical applications of the MBNC flap. It can be used in extensive lower lip defects, such as defects of more than two-thirds of the lip, defects extending to the cheek, commissural reconstruction, both upper and lower lip reconstruction, and the secondary reconstruction of various difficult lip defects. With the recent modification, the cheek incision will be placed along the natural skin crease and provides a better scar.
The author thanks Dr. Radhakrishnan Muthukumar for assistance with English language presentation, Mr. Songpol Oopachitakul for illustration, Dr. Pattana Ongkasuwan for assistance of clinical data, and support from the Center of Cleft Lip-Palate and Craniofacial Deformities (Tawanchai Center), Khon Kaen University.
The patient in figure 6 provided written consent for the use of her image.
1. Komthong R, Taksaphan P, Chowchuen B, et al. Carcinoma of the lip in Srinagarind Hospital. Thai J Surg. 1989;10:103106.
2. Panje WR. Lip reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1982;15:169178.
3. Mazzola RF, Lupo G. Evolving concepts in lip reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1984;11:583617.
4. Zide BM. McCarthy JG. Deformities of the lips and cheeks. Plastic Surgery. 1990:Vol. 3. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 20092056.
5. McHugh M. Reconstruction of the lower lip using neurovascular island flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1977;30:316318.
6. Vatanasapt V, Chadbunchachai W, Taksaphan P, et al. Bilateral neurovascular cheek flaps for one stage lower lip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:173175.
7. Chowchuen B. Cancer of the lip: surgeons comment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg Thai. 1996;2:5359.
8. Chowchuen B. Modified bilateral neurovascular cheek flaps: a new technique for reconstruction of difficult and extensive lower lip defect. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95(suppl 11):S164S167.
9. Chowchuen B. Modified bilateral neurovascular cheek flaps: functional reconstruction of major upper lip defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg Thai. 1997;3:3347.
10. Chowchuen B, Surakunprapha P. Modified bilateral neurovascular cheek flaps: a new technique for reconstruction of extensive upper lip defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47:6469.
11. Fogel ML, Stranc MF. Lip function: a study of normal lip parameters. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:542549.
12. Stranc MF. Stark RB. Lip reconstruction. Plastic Surgery of the Head and Neck. 1987:Vol. 2. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 12421257.
13. Chowchuen B. Chowchuen B, Jenwitheesuk K, Chuangsuwanich A. Reconstructive surgery following resection of head and neck tumor. The Book of Progress in Surgery. 2011:Bangkok: Bangkok Medical Journal Publisher; 266.
14. Karapandzic M. Reconstruction of lip defects by local arterial flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1974;27:9397.
15. Langstein HN, Robb GL. Lip and perioral reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32:43145, viii.
16. Neligan PC. Strategies in lip reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:477485.
17. Abbe R. A new plastic operation for the relief of deformity due to double harelip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;42:481.
18. Salgarelli AC, Sartorelli F, Cangiano A, et al. Treatment of lower lip cancer: an experience of 48 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:2732.
19. Bernard C. Cancer de la levre inférieure; restauration a l'aide de lambeaux quadrilaterires-lateraux querison. Scalpel, Liège. 5:18511621853165.
20. Neligan PC. Neligan PC. Cheek and lip reconstruction. Plastic Surgery. 2013:Vol. 3. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Saunders; 254277.
21. Matros E, Pribaz JJ. Thorne CH. Reconstruction of acquired lip deformities. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 2014:7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 372383.
22. Wijayaweera CJ, Amaratunga NA, Angunawela P. Arrangement of the orbicularis oris muscle in different types of cleft lips. J Craniofac Surg. 2000;11:232235.
23. Zucker MZ, Gur Eyal, Hussian G, et al. Neligan PC. Plastic Surgery. 2013:Vol. 3. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Saunders; 278306.
24. Pinar YA, Bilge O, Govsa F. Anatomic study of the blood supply of perioral region. Clin Anat. 2005;18:330339.
25. Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 2008:40th edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 490.
26. Whetzel TP, Mathes SJ. Arterial anatomy of the face: an analysis of vascular territories and perforating cutaneous vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:591603; discussion 604.
27. Edizer M, Mağden O, Tayfur V, et al. Arterial anatomy of the lower lip: a cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:21762181.
28. Ahmadi SK, Rahpeyma A, Rezvani HN. Vermilion lower lip cross flap—an anatomic study on 22 fresh cadavers. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012;2:107110.
29. Lee SH, Lee HJ, Kim YS, et al. What is the difference between the inferior labial artery and the horizontal labiomental artery? Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:947953.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.
30. Demirseren ME, Afandiyev K, Ceran C. Reconstruction of the perioral and perinasal defects with facial artery perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:16161620.