All patients were satisfied with good aesthetic results, and no further intervention was needed.
A 64-year-old woman was diagnosed as having invasive basal cell carcinoma of the right lower eyelid. A full-thickness wedge of the lower eyelid tissue, including the lower lacrimal punctum, was excised under local anesthesia. A 20 × 8-mm scapha cartilage graft was harvested from the inner surface of the right ear. The anterior concave surface of the cartilage with small skin was placed facing conjunctiva and was sutured higher than the margin of the palpebral conjunctival and tarsal defects. A propeller flap with its pedicle based in subcutaneous medial canthal region, ie, a nasolabial flap, was raised and was lined by the skin.
One year after operation, neither ectropion nor drooping of the lower eyelid was present (Fig. 4A). Further, slit-lamp examination detected no irritation or injury of the conjunctiva and cornea, and visual acuity was maintained. However, the reconstructed lower eyelid of this case showed trichiasis and tearing, and there was also eye discharge because of dermal hairs and secretion from skin pores of the reconstructed posterior lamella.
Revision surgery with oral mucosa for skin surface of the reconstructed posterior lamella was done 30 months after the initial surgery under local anesthesia (Fig. 4B). The surgery was done precisely because the patient wanted it, and no other complications occurred. A Stahl’s ear-type deformity in the donor helix remained.
A 79-year-old man was diagnosed as having invasive basal cell carcinoma of the right lower eyelid (Fig. 5A). A full-thickness wedge of the lateral two-thirds of the lower eyelid was excised under general anesthesia. A 24 × 6-mm scapha cartilage graft with smaller skin (2 mm wide) was harvested from the inner surface of the right ear (Fig.5 B, C). The cartilage graft was sutured at a level higher than the margin of the defect of the palpebral conjunctiva for reconstruction of the posterior lamella. Further, a perforator-based propeller from the lateral orbital region was lined as the anterior lamella (Fig. 5 D, E). One week after operation, the composite graft appeared viable. Eighteen months after operation, neither ectropion nor drooping of the lower eyelid was present, and the graft appeared to be in good condition (Fig. 5 F, G). Further, the attending ophthalmologist detected no irritation or injury of the conjunctiva and cornea, and visual acuity was maintained. No deformity was present in the donor helix (Fig. 5H), and no other complications occurred.
The cases presented above demonstrate successful uses of skin flaps for reconstruction of a large anterior lamella defect of the lower eyelid. Skin flaps for this type of procedure may be obtained from cheek (cheek rotation flap2 and transposed flap3), temporal forehead (Fricke flap), orbicularis musculocutaneous tissue, or nasolabial tissue. When choosing a flap for the reconstruction of the anterior lamella, the quality, size, and shape of the lining, rather than the type of flap, are critical determinants as far as the aesthetic outcome is considered. The concept of propeller flaps is gaining popularity as a local flap of the extremity.4
The name “propeller flap” was reported first by Hyakusoku5 in a study of the reconstruction of scar contracture after burn injury in 1991. Propeller flaps are classified into 2 types: central axis type and acentric axis type, depending on the location of the pedicle in the flap. In general, an acentric axis type flap is useful for covering a defect. Because this type of flap can be made to rotate 180 degrees. it can cover skin defects at some distance.6 The propeller flap is adoptable for the reconstruction of a lower eyelid to cover a defect left after excision of malignant tumor and trauma. A subcutaneous-pedicled flap or a perforator-pedicled flap is also indicated for repairing an anterior lamella defect of the lower eyelid. According to Hyakusoku et al,6 a propeller-shaped island flap with a narrow subcutaneous pedicle or with a perforator pedicle, despite its location by definition, does not always have its pedicle in the central portion of the flap; the conventional local flap methods, including the advancement flaps and the transposition flaps, may therefore be subsumed under the “propeller flap method.” Our local flap is also called a propeller flap.
Although a nasolabial flap is regarded as the standard flap for reconstruction of nose and upper lip, 1 study has described the use of the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of the lower eyelid.7 This type of flap can rotate 70 to 90 degrees on subcutaneous acentric axis from the nasolabial area to the lower eyelid. The perforator-based lateral orbital flap can rotate 180 degrees on perforator acentric axis from the lateral orbital area to the lower eyelid. One is reminded that it was Bozikov et al8 who first reported on this perforator anatomy of the cheek and lateral orbital area. In passing, we have detected the perforator during surgery while elevating this propeller flap.
The most important advantage of these propeller flaps is that they are easy to manipulate and may be harvested in an appropriate size from less invasive and less viable donor sites on the relaxed skin tension lines. Although rotation flaps based on the orbicularis oculi muscle were thought to be flaps of similar design,9 the concept behind them is different. Despite the conceptual difference between the 2 types of flaps, the rotation flaps seem to give a good and aesthetic outcome and that was just what we saw in the results from our propeller flap method.
Investigators have previously reported on the reconstruction of the posterior lamella with various tissues, including conjunctiva,10 buccal mucosa,11–13 palatal mucosa,14,15 preserved sclera,16,17 chondromucosal grafts from the nasal septum,18,19 conchal cartilage grafts,20 and fascia lata.21 Each tissue type has its advantages and disadvantages.
The scapha cartilage graft with small skin used in anterior half cases in our present study has in fact been used; it was referred to as composite chondrocutaneous graft and used for secondary rhinoplasty of cleft lip-nose22,23 and for the treatment of paralytic ectropion.24 Yanaga and Mori25 recently described the use of the scapha composite graft for the total eyelid and socket reconstruction after an orbital exenteration, but they had less success with an intact eyeball when they used the tissue for the reconstruction of the posterior lamella of the lower eyelid. The scapha cartilage graft with small skin, round and soft with a shape similar to that of the lower lid, affords a good fit to the eye globe. Further, the tissue can be harvested quickly. However, the use of this graft would put the orbit opposite the skin surface rather than opposite the moist mucosal surface, which can, in turn, result in temporary chemosis of the conjunctiva, tearing, and the so-called eye discharge because of dermal hairs and secretion from skin pores of the reconstructed posterior lamella, as was seen in case 6 (Table 2).
In general, the use of a skin flap for the reconstruction of posterior lamella runs contrary to the accepted practice in eyelid reconstruction because it risks irritation and injury to the conjunctiva and cornea. However, we would argue that the use of a skin flap for posterior lamella may be better than no attempts at the reconstruction: both will show conjunctivitis, tearing, and ocular pain,26 but such complications will only be temporary in our method.
We would like to attempt to clarify, with the help of anatomical vertical schemata, how healing progresses in a reconstructed lower anterior lamella, which shows bulky lids and ectropion as complications. Figure 6A shows wound healing and granulation of posterior lamella, Figure 6B shows a later stage at which the skin flap is kept lower compared with the height of posterior lamella, and Figure 6C depicts the final wound healing stage where the defect size becomes smaller and reepithelialization takes place on granulation tissue.
In our present case series, neither ectropion nor drooping of the lower eyelid occurred, and the graft remained in good condition in all cases. Slit-lamp examination failed to detect any irritation or injury of the conjunctiva and cornea, and visual acuity was maintained. However, we do believe that cleaning of the skin surface of the reconstructed posterior lamella is critical for preventing intermittent conjunctivitis from occurring.
To decrease the possibility of conjunctivitis because of the trichiasis from dermal hairs and secretion from small skin pores of the reconstructed posterior lamella, the size of skin with scapha cartilage was cut as small as 2 mm in width for posterior half of the cases (Fig. 7A, B). We imagine that lower eyelid with no reconstructed posterior lamella looks like that shown in Figure 6C.
Further, defects that require harvesting of a smaller, upper portion of the scapha are likely to result in less deformity (case 14). In contrast, with larger lower lid defects requiring a harvest of larger portions of the scapha, deformation resulted in only anterior half cases. A deformity in the donor helix by this technique was also improved by getting a smaller skin harvested from scapha.
The present cases demonstrate that the scapha cartilage graft with smaller skin on a vascularized propeller flap, with which we treated 16 patients, can be applied successfully for total reconstruction of the lower eyelid. Use of the scapha cartilage graft with small skin on a vascularized propeller flap allows for a good fit to the orbit, short operative time under local anesthesia, good graft viability, and good aesthetic results with minimal donor-site morbidity.
The authors thank Dr. Yoshihiko Tanabe for critical review and Dr. Nakabayashi for assistance with slit-lamp examinations.
Patients provided written consent for the use of their images.
1. Lamont M, Jayaramachandran R, Tyers T. Transposed cheek flap in lower lid reconstruction: a retrospective case note review. Orbit. 2011;30:261–264.
2. Mustarde JC. Repair and Reconstruction in the Orbital Region. 1980.Chapt.7, 2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone.
3. McGregor IA. Eyelid reconstruction following subtotal resection of upper or lower lid. Br J Plast Surg. 1973;26:346–354.
4. Teo TC. The propeller flap concept. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;37:615–626, vi.
5. Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M. The propeller flap method. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:53–54.
6. Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R, Oki K, et al. The perforator pedicled propeller (PPP) flap method: report of two cases. J Nippon Med Sch. 2007;74:367–371.
7. Tei TM, Larsen J. Use of the subcutaneously based nasolabial flap in lower eyelid reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:420–423.
8. Bozikov K, Shaw-Dunn J, Soutar DS, et al. Arterial anatomy of the lateral orbital and cheek region and arterial supply to the “peri-zygomatic perforator arteries” flap. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;30:17–22.
9. Miyamoto J, Nakajima T, Nagasao T, et al. Full-thickness reconstruction of the eyelid with rotation flap based on orbicularis oculi muscle and palatal mucosal graft: long-term results in 12 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1389–1394.
10. Manchester WM. A simple method for the repair of full thickness defects of the lower lid with special reference to the treatment of neoplasms. Br J Plast Surg. 1951;3:252–263.
11. Furnas DW, Furnas H. Angular artery flap for total reconstruction of the lower eyelid. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;10:322–325.
12. Goldstein MH. “Orbiting the orbicularis”—restoration of muscle-ring continuity with myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:294–301.
13. Van der Muelen JC. The use of mucosa-lined flaps in eyelid reconstruction: a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70:139–146.
14. Siegel RJ. Palatal grafts for eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:411–414.
15. Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y. One-stage reconstruction of full-thickness lower eyelid defects using a subcutaneous pedicle flap lined by a palatal mucosal graft. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:183–186.
16. Quicksort MH, Dryden RM. Lower eyelid advancement. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1971.
17. Tanabe Y, Hoshino M. Oculo-plastic surgery with preserved human sclera (II) reconstruction of full-thickness eyelid defect. Jpn Clin Ophth. 1979;33:949–954.
18. Millard DR Jr. Eyelid repairs with a chondromucosal graft. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;30:267–272.
19. Mehrotra ON. Repairing defects of the lower eyelid with a free chondromucosal graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:689–693.
20. Matsuo K, Hirose T, Takahashi N, et al. Lower eyelid reconstruction with a conchal cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80:547–552.
21. Matsumoto K, Nakanishi H, Urano Y, et al. Lower eyelid reconstruction with a cheek flap supported by fascia lata. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1650–1654.
22. Converse JM. Deformities of the lining of the nose. In: Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. 1997.2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
23. Kobayashi S, Haramoto U, Ohmori K. Correction of the hypoplastic nasal ala using an auricular composite graft. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;37:490–494.
24. Vasconez LO, Gamboa-Bobadilla M, Core GB. Treatment of paralytic ectropion with composite chondrocutaneous graft. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33:557–560.
25. Yanaga H, Mori S. Eyelids and eye socket reconstruction using the expanded forehead flap and scapha composite grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:8–16.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.
26. Barba-Gómez J, Zuñiga-Mendoza O, Iñiguez-Briseño I, et al. Total lower-eyelid reconstruction: modified Fricke’s cheek flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1430–1435.