Journal Logo


Autologous Graft Thickness Affects Scar Contraction and Quality in a Porcine Excisional Wound Model

Chan, Rodney K. MD, FACS*†; Rose, Lloyd F. PhD*†; Wu, Jesse C. MS*†; Tucker, David I. DDS*†; Chan, Maren M. MD; Christy, Robert J. PhD*; Hale, Robert G. DDS*†; Leung, Kai P. PhD*†

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open: July 2015 - Volume 3 - Issue 7 - p e468
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000426
  • Open
  • United States


In burn patients, restoration of barrier function is paramount, as skin closure is a main determinant of survival.1 Thus, in clinical care of deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns, early excision is commonly followed by coverage with autologous partial-thickness skin grafts. One determinant of final skin quality is the thickness of autograft applied.2 In functionally important areas of the face, neck, and hands, achievement of high-quality skin that permits joint movement, physiological functions, and cosmesis is an important consideration and a thicker unmeshed graft is typically used.3

Although this practice results in better clinical outcomes, clinicians are hesitant to apply thick grafts because thicker skin requires a more ideal recipient wound bed for revascularization. Thicker grafts are also associated with higher donor-site morbidity and decrease the number of times a donor site can be reharvested. Applying thinner and more easily revascularized grafts increases the likelihood of incorporation but risks a less desirable outcome in terms of scar formation.

The long-term effect of low-quality skin replacement is function-limiting burn scar contracture. Surgical revision generally involves secondary scarred skin replacement using either autologous skin grafts or skin flaps. After initial injury and acute care, burn patients often must commit years to scar contracture revision, significantly delaying return to a normal functional lifestyle.

The ideal skin replacement therapy is one that, with the fewest possible operations, achieves as many functions of normal skin as possible. One of the gaps in achieving satisfactory results lies in our understanding of how graft thickness alters wound healing and resists the forces of contraction.

Therefore, a quantifiable and relevant preclinical model is important to evaluate autologous grafting techniques and to set standards for tissue-engineered skin substitutes. Using a porcine full-thickness wound model, we correlated the thickness of autograft skin with scar quality. Objective and subjective metrics of graft quality were further correlated with morphological, histological, and immunohistochemical measures. Our results present a relevant preclinical model for the assessment of the quality of skin replacement therapy and may guide development and evaluation of future skin substitutes.



The use of 6-month-old crossbred female Yorkshire pigs (Midwest Research Swine, Gibbon, Minn.) was reviewed and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Tex.). All animals received care in strict compliance with the 2011 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Research Council and were maintained in Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International–accredited facilities.

Full-thickness Excision and Grafting

Five 6-cm wounds were marked (4 cm from each other and 2 cm from the spine) on each dorsal side of the animal with edges tattooed. To control for animal growth, 2 additional 6-cm unwounded circles were tattooed. Total wound area was less than 10% total body surface area. After full-thickness excision down to muscle fascia, wounds were grafted using autologous skin from a hind-limb donor site. Autografts were harvested using a Zimmer pneumatic dermatome (Zimmer Surgical, Dover, Ohio) and cut to fit defect. Eleven pigs were used in this study with autograft locations randomized among the following groups with n = 8 wounds: 6/1000th (150 μm), 12/1000th (300 μm), 20/1000th (500 μm), or 30/1000th (760 μm) of an inch grafts, and full-thickness skin graft. Full-thickness autograft skin was harvested from the original full-thickness wound creation and surgically defatted.

Observer Scar Assessment Scale

Using the observer portion of the POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale), scars were examined by 4 unblinded observers. All observers were also involved in the surgery, with no additional personnel available to make blinded assessments. Vascularity (degree of redness), relief (surface irregularity), and mobility (graft adherence to underlying surface) were measured compared to normal skin and a score assigned for each parameter.4 In short, selected variables were assigned a score from 1 to 10, with a score of 1 reflecting close to normal skin and 10 representing the worst possible score. The remaining scar categories were determined to be unreliable measures of scarring in our model or were already being assessed objectively.

Objective Graft Analyses

Graft dimensions were analyzed by ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Md.) and calculated as a percentage of initial graft size corrected for animal growth. Direct measurement of graft elevation used a handheld laser image capture device (SilhouetteMobile, Aranz Medical, New Zealand) measuring wound area, volume, height, and depth. Hemoglobin and melanin concentration were assessed with the Cortex Technology DSMII Colorimeter (CyberDerm, Broomall, Pa.) normalized to adjacent healthy skin.


On days 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120 postgrafting, 12-mm punch biopsy samples of the graft were taken, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin or Carnoy’s solution (for mast cell staining), dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer-thick sections were deparaffinized and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, Verhoeff’s Elastic Masson’s Trichrome for collagen and elastin, picrosirius red for collagen, or Alcian blue for mast cells. All sections were photographed (Eclipse 55i and DS-Fi1, Nikon, Melville, N.Y.) under white light or plane-polarized light (picrosirius red stain). Histologic measurement of skin graft and scar thickness was performed on day 120. Mast cells were counted in 10 randomly selected high-power fields (×400) in the superficial dermis and results expressed as number of cells per field.


Tissues were cut into 5-μm-thick sections. After deparaffinization and hydration, antigen retrieval was performed and sections blocked with 10% normal goat serum for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were then treated with primary antibodies, rabbit pAb α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (Abcam, Cambridge, Mass.) and CD45 (Novus, Littleton, Colo.), overnight at 4°C. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Primary antibody was detected with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) followed by diaminobenzidine (DAB) development (Vector Lab, Burlingame, Calif.). Slides were observed under Nikon Eclipse 55i light microscope and photographs taken with a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical differences for Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) scoring, colorimetry, and graft contraction were determined by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey-Kramer adjustment, or nonparametric comparison for all pairs using Steel-Dwass method when appropriate, using JMP statistics software (SAS, Cary, N.C.). Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean with P < 0.05 considered significant.

This study has been conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, the Animal Welfare Regulations, and the principles of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.


Graft Thickness Correlates with Subjective Measures of Skin Quality

Subjective assessments of graft healing were performed on day 120 postgrafting for vascularity, thickness, relief, and mobility (OSAS; Fig. 1). Thinner grafts (6 or 12/1000th of an inch, or 150 or 300 μm, respectively) are well vascularized with a significantly redder appearance and more surface irregularities than thicker grafts (20 or 30/1000th of an inch, or 500 or 760 μm, respectively, and FTSG). Although there seems to be no difference between the groups in terms of thickness, thin grafts tend to have higher mobility scores, indicating that the skin graft appears more adherent and immobile relative to the underlying surface. Thin grafts also have significantly higher hemoglobin concentration (higher vascularity) based on the erythema measurement of redness, consistent with subjective measurements of graft vascularity, and have significantly higher melanin concentration (increased pigmentation). Taken together, thicker grafts have lower total OSAS scores compared with thinner grafts.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Summary of graft contraction, graft elevation, erythema, melanin, and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) measurements of various thickness skin grafts on day 120 postgrafting. The 2-letter combinations under “P-value” refer to comparisons between the designated columns. Thus, “AE: <0.0001” indicates that the calculated P value between contraction of a 6/1000th (150 μm) graft (column A) and a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG; column E) is 0.0010.

Graft Thickness Correlates with Objective Measures of Skin Quality

Objective assessments of contraction, graft elevation, and colorimetry measurements were taken over 120 days. Autograft thickness significantly affects wound contraction (Fig. 2). Analysis of the resulting graft size is presented as the % initial graft size (Figs. 1, 3), with thicker grafts contracted significantly less (higher % initial graft size) than thinner grafts. Thicker grafts were also less elevated (Fig. 4), indicating less surface deformation from contraction.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2:
Graft size of various thickness skin grafts monitored over 120 days. Thinner grafts have contracted significantly over time while thicker grafts have closely preserved their original size. FTSG indicates full-thickness skin graft.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3:
Size of various thickness skin grafts on day 120 postgrafting. Thin grafts have contracted significantly as measured by the percentage of their original size compared with thicker grafts. Statistical analysis is shown in Figure 1. FTSG indicates full-thickness skin graft.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4:
A graphical representation of graft elevation measurements by SilhouetteMobile. The thin graft shows more contraction (top picture) and higher elevation (bottom graph) compared with the thick graft.

Thicker Grafts Have Distinct Histological Characteristics

Hematoxylin-eosin staining at day 7 postgrafting showed marked infiltration of inflammatory cells at the graft-host junction (Fig. 5). Qualitatively, this inflammatory infiltration was greater in magnitude and persisted for a longer period of time in thin grafts (data not shown). Furthermore, this granulating layer was replaced with disorganized collagen in thin grafts while thick grafts preserved a native collagen architecture. Collagen staining in thin grafts on day 120 demonstrated persistent inflammation marked by mixed inflammatory infiltrates (lymphocytes, plasmacytes, neutrophils) and thin, dense, immature collagen laden with many fibrocytes. In thick grafts, the collagen was close to normal, consisting of large, loosely packed, evenly spaced bundles. Preservation of skin appendages, absence of inflammation, and normal amounts of fibrocytes were also observed. It is well known that as fiber density increases, picrosirius color changes; and as wound healing progresses, collagen fiber density increases.5 Picrosirius red staining of thin grafts on day 120 showed predominately densely packed thin collagen fibers (red/orange), consistent with scar collagen maturation. By contrast, thick grafts contained loosely spaced, thick bundles of interwoven collagen (orange/yellow) resembling normal skin. Grafts also demonstrated a distinct CD45 immunohistochemical profile on day 7. Throughout thin grafts, leukocyte infiltration was dense and pervasive, whereas in the thick grafts, inflammatory infiltrate was minimal, with few CD45+ cells. α-SMA staining on day 14 in thin grafts showed a thicker layer of myofibroblasts compared with thick grafts. Thin grafts also appeared to be hypervascular compared with thick grafts, as shown by dense pericyte staining around blood vessels on day 120. Mast cell staining revealed that thin grafts also have more mast cells (yellow arrowheads, Figs. 5, 6) than thick grafts on day 120. Objective measurement of graft and scar thickness was performed histologically (Fig. 7), revealing a direct correlation with resulting skin quality and an inverse relationship with scar thickness.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5:
Histological comparison between thin (A) (6/1000th of an inch, 150 μm) and thick (B) (full-thickness skin graft) grafts. H&E: Hematoxylin and eosin stain on day 7 postgrafting. The green line depicts the junction between graft and host tissue (×20). VEMT: Verhoeff’s Elastic Masson’s Trichrome stain for collagen on day 120 (×40). Picrosirius Red: Collagen stain on day 120 (×100). Thick graft consists of large, interwoven, and loosely spaced collagen bundles, whereas thin graft contains densely packed thin collagen fibers. CD45: On day 7, leukocyte infiltration is dense (×400) and pervasive (×20) in the thin graft compared with the thick graft. α-SMA (myofibroblasts): Myofibroblast infiltration in host tissue on day 14 postgrafting (×20). The brown myofibroblast layer is present below the graft-host junction (green line). α-SMA (pericytes): Vascular network is noted primarily at the superficial dermis (day 120, ×40). Alcian Blue: Mast cells stain blue (yellow arrowheads) and are located primarily at the superficial dermis (day 120, ×400).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6:
The number of mast cells was counted for each group on day 120. The thicker graft, especially the full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), has fewer mast cells compared with the thinner graft.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7:
Histological comparison of graft, scar, and total thickness between each autograft group on day 120. A, The graph shows an inverse relationship between graft thickness and scar thickness. B, Histological comparison between a thin (12/1000th of an inch, 300 μm) and a thick (30/1000th of an inch, 760 μm) graft. The blue line marks the original autograft, red line marks the scar, and the green dashed line marks the total dermal thickness. Thinner grafts have a thicker scar compared with thicker grafts. FTSG indicates full-thickness skin graft.


Autologous partial-thickness skin is the standard in skin replacement therapy. Although it has many advantages, we are far from an ideal therapy. When used to resurface an area where mobility or aesthetics is important, coverage with a thin partial-thickness autograft often results in a thick, nonpliable scar. In the quest for better skin replacement, it is important that a quantifiable and relevant preclinical model exists with which to evaluate and guide development of skin substitutes and that the model accurately reflects treatment and healing responses of human wounds. In this study, we describe a porcine model of full-thickness wounds, where a gradation of skin qualities was created experimentally using variable thickness autografts. Multiple methods to quantify skin quality were correlated with morphological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical characteristics.

The significance of this study lies in the characterization of a novel preclinical model that mirrors problematic clinical scenarios: durable coverage of full-thickness skin defects using skin grafts or skin substitutes. This model may be used to determine the value of emerging skin substitutes compared with the current standard of care (Fig. 8). For example, a hypothetical experimental skin substitute covered with a 12/1000th inch split thickness skin graft, yielding a 20% contraction rate, may be compared with the standard-of-care skin graft (40% contraction rate; Fig. 3), allowing an assessment of the experimental skin substitute as “overperforming” (green).

Fig. 8
Fig. 8:
The merit of current and emerging treatments or treatment strategies can be compared with the standards established by this model. The y axis can be any of the measures we have used for determining skin quality (ie, contraction and erythema). For example, if the standard contraction for a 12/1000th inch (300 μm) graft is 40%, then a skin substitute that yields 20% contraction would be an overperformer compared with the standard (green). If the same product has 50% contraction, then the product is an underperformer (red). FTSG indicates full-thickness skin graft.

Equally important, this study establishes correlations between subjective and objective measures of skin quality, using OSAS to subjectively assess the quality of skin. The total OSAS demonstrated differences among the various graft thicknesses. Because the pigs were essentially white, we omitted pigmentation scoring. Although OSAS is cumbersome and requires education and calibration of observers, it facilitates comparison with published reports. However, an equivalent objective scoring system is preferred. Indeed, this model permits objective validation of our subjective assessments. Although critics may argue that quality cannot be quantified, erythema, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and mobility are all quantifiable traits and taken together may represent a better objective scar scale for future preclinical and clinical studies.

  • Using colorimetry,6,7 we have demonstrated significant differences in erythema between thin and thick grafts that correlate with OSAS subjective assessments of vascularity. This is further confirmed by increased vessel density in thin grafts, which is demonstrated by increased pericyte staining. Although blood flow is clearly important for skin graft survival, hypervascularity is associated with lower quality skin and worse scar.8–10
  • Objective measurements of pigmentation also demonstrated significantly more melanin in thinner grafts. Indeed, upregulation of melanocytes is a natural response to injury.11 Therefore, it is not surprising that thin grafts, with less reconstitution of the dermis and worse scarring, have more melanin.
  • Subjective assessment of scar thickness did not correlate well with graft thickness. Staining with Verhoeff’s Elastic Masson’s Trichrome allowed us to distinguish between skin graft height, scar height, and total skin height (Fig. 7). Graft thickness is inversely proportional to the amount of scar formed. The prolific collagen deposition among thin grafts is consistent with our clinical observation that application of a thin skin graft results in low-quality skin that is thick and stiff. Enhanced collagen deposition corresponds with increased inflammatory cellular infiltration, supporting our speculation that thinner grafts induce rampant inflammation that may directly or indirectly contribute to a robust fibrotic response. The amount of fibrosis observed may simply be a host response that takes place at the junction of skin graft and host tissue; however, thicker grafts have a lower inflammatory infiltrate and the scar formed under the graft is minimal. We did not attempt to measure skin or scar thickness noninvasively, but for future studies, ultrasound may be a useful modality.12–14
  • Relief, the degree of surface irregularity relative to surrounding skin measured on day 120, was more pronounced in thinner grafts. A significant difference was observed between 6 and 30/1000th (150 μm and 760 μm) groups but not between other groups. This may result from scarring at the graft edge affecting average graft height or from lack of statistical power. Currently, subjective assessment is more correlative with quality than objective measurements.
  • Objective assessment of stiffness/suppleness using a durometer correlates well with clinical assessment of pliability7 although we found the readouts to be variable. Using OSAS we found thin grafts to be more stiff and immobile, in agreement with previous reports that because humans lack a panniculus carnosus, grafting directly onto fascia results in reduced movement of the graft over underlying tissues.15,16 We have transitioned to using a cutometer to more accurately and objectively measure mobility but do not have enough data to draw conclusions.
  • Contraction is a particularly meaningful measurement for assessment of skin graft and skin substitute quality, as the preservation of adjacent anatomy is so important for face and hands. Indeed, this was a highly significant variable when comparing the various groups. Though not as easily measured in a human clinical trial where permanent tattooing of the wound edges would be less acceptable, a tracing method that relies on adjacent immobile points may be used.17

Few reports have correlated histological and immunohistological characteristics of final skin quality with corresponding subjective and objective characteristics. We found that collagen fiber characteristics and the level of α-SMA expression correlate with graft thickness and skin quality. Others have noted its correlation with scar thickness and contraction.18

Collagen undergoes rapid maturation in fibrosis: fiber birefringence intensity increases, and polarization color changes as fiber density increases.5,19 Our results show increased collagen density and a lack of collagen fiber organization in thin grafts, consistent with scar collagen maturation. By comparison, collagen in thick grafts is more organized and less dense, resembling normal skin, suggesting that thin grafts develop a thick disorganized scar by excessive synthesis of collagen, decreased matrix degradation, or both.

We noted increased numbers of mast cells in thin grafts, correlating with the worst scar. Mast cells stimulate type I collagen synthesis in fibroblasts in vitro,20 and excessive accumulation and deposition of type I collagen is associated with dermal fibrosis.21–24 Hypertrophic scars in both humans and Duroc pigs have been associated with high numbers of mast cells,25 whereas fewer mast cells are observed in fetal or oral mucosal wounds compared with scar-forming adult dermal wounds.26–28

Inflammatory activation after severe burn injury is well documented, and burn is an independent predictor of scarring.29 Several factors increase theisk of skin graft contraction, including extensive body surface involvement, thin grafts, and open wound beds,30 all of which contribute to inflammatory activation. Indeed, we have shown that thin skin grafts, which result in greater contraction, elicit a strong cellular inflammatory infiltration at the graft-host junction. Infiltration of inflammatory cells in the early wound has been strongly linked to fibrogenesis and hypertrophic scarring.31 Delayed eschar excision and delayed wound coverage, both seen among large surface area burns and especially among combat casualties, result in increased inflammation and graft contraction.32 The use of negative pressure wound dressings in burns33 can further elicit inflammation through a foreign body response.34


Using skin grafts of various thicknesses, we have established a model that may serve to evaluate products and methods of skin substitution. We have found objective measurements of erythema, pigmentation, and contraction to be highly quantitative and reliable, although subjective measurements are still necessary at this time for relief and mobility. Persistence and magnitude of inflammatory cellular infiltrate, levels of α-SMA expression, presence of mast cells, and the quality of collagen correlate with skin quality. These findings could facilitate the development of skin substitutes to achieve higher quality skin and wound closure while minimizing donor-site morbidity.


1. Nitzschke SL, et al. Wound healing trajectories in burn patients and their impact on mortality. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35:474–9
2. Padgett EC. Indications for determination of the thickness of split skin grafts. Am J Surg. 1946;72:683–693
3. Engrav LH, Heimbach DM, Walkinshaw MD, et al. Excision of burns of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:744–751
4. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1960–1965; discussion 1966–1967
5. Rich L, Whittaker P. Collagen and Picrosirius Red staining: a polarized light assessment of fibrillar hue and spatial distribution. Braz J Morphol Sci. 2005;22:97–104
6. Takiwaki H, Miyaoka Y, Kohno H, et al. Graphic analysis of the relationship between skin colour change and variations in the amounts of melanin and haemoglobin. Skin Res Technol. 2002;8:78–83
7. Oliveira GV, Chinkes D, Mitchell C, et al. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:48–58
8. van der Veer WM, Niessen FB, Ferreira JA, et al. Time course of the angiogenic response during normotrophic and hypertrophic scar formation in humans. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19:292–301
9. Wang J, Chen H, Shankowsky HA, et al. Improved scar in postburn patients following interferon-alpha2b treatment is associated with decreased angiogenesis mediated by vascular endothelial cell growth factor. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2008;28:423–434
10. Shen R, Li TZ, Qi SH, et al. [A research of endothelial cell-targeted therapy for cure of hypertrophic scar]. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;19:254–257
11. Zhang S, Liu S, Yu N, et al. RNA released from necrotic keratinocytes upregulates intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in melanocytes. Arch Dermatol Res. 2011;303:771–776
12. Hambleton J, Shakespeare PG, Pratt BJ. The progress of hypertrophic scars monitored by ultrasound measurements of thickness. Burns. 1992;18:301–307
13. Lau JC, Li-Tsang CW, Zheng YP. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation. Burns. 2005;31:445–452
14. Li JQ, Li-Tsang CW, Huang YP, et al. Detection of changes of scar thickness under mechanical loading using ultrasonic measurement. Burns. 2013;39:89–97
15. Billingham RE, Medawar PB. Contracture and intussusceptive growth in the healing of extensive wounds in mammalian skin. J Anat. 1955;89:114–123
16. Jones T, McDonald S, Deitch EA. Effect of graft bed on long-term functional results of extremity skin grafts. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1988;9:72–74
17. Bulstrode CJ, Goode AW, Scott PJ. Stereophotogrammetry for measuring rates of cutaneous healing: a comparison with conventional techniques. Clin Sci (Lond). 1986;71:437–443
18. Wang XQ, Kravchuk O, Winterford C, et al. The correlation of in vivo burn scar contraction with the level of α-smooth muscle actin expression. Burns. 2011;37:1367–1377
19. Szendröi M, Vajta G, Kovács L, et al. Polarization colours of collagen fibres: a sign of collagen production activity in fibrotic processes. Acta Morphol Hung. 1984;32:47–55
20. Zhang Q, Kelly AP, Wang L, et al. Green tea extract and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibit mast cell-stimulated type I collagen expression in keloid fibroblasts via blocking PI-3K/AkT signaling pathways. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:2607–2613
21. Fukaya S, Matsui Y, Tomaru U, et al. Overexpression of TNF-α-converting enzyme in fibroblasts augments dermal fibrosis after inflammation. Lab Invest. 2013;93:72–80
22. Duong HS, Zhang QZ, Le AD, et al. Elevated prolidase activity in keloids: correlation with type I collagen turnover. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:820–828
23. Pines M, Snyder D, Yarkoni S, et al. Halofuginone to treat fibrosis in chronic graft-versus-host disease and scleroderma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:417–425
24. Gallant CL, Olson ME, Hart DA. Molecular, histologic, and gross phenotype of skin wound healing in red Duroc pigs reveals an abnormal healing phenotype of hypercontracted, hyperpigmented scarring. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:305–319
25. Harunari N, Zhu KQ, Armendariz RT, et al. Histology of the thick scar on the female, red Duroc pig: final similarities to human hypertrophic scar. Burns. 2006;32:669–677
26. Papineau ME, DiPietro LA. Site-specific alterations in the early inflammatory process of wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;13:A28––A48
27. Wilgus TA. Immune cells in the healing skin wound: influential players at each stage of repair. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58:112–116
28. Wulff BC, Parent AE, Meleski MA, et al. Mast cells contribute to scar formation during fetal wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:458–465
29. Jeschke MG, Boehning DF, Finnerty CC, et al. Effect of insulin on the inflammatory and acute phase response after burn injury. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9 Suppl):S519–S523
30. Harrison CA, MacNeil S. The mechanism of skin graft contraction: an update on current research and potential future therapies. Burns. 2008;34:153–163
31. Wynn TA. Fibrotic disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 paradigm. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:583–594
32. Deitch EA, Wheelahan TM, Rose MP, et al. Hypertrophic burn scars: analysis of variables. J Trauma. 1983;23:895–898
33. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ, Marks MW, et al. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):127S–142S
34. Petkar KS, Dhanraj P, Kingsly PM, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing methods on split-thickness skin grafts in burned patients. Burns. 2011;37:925–929
© 2015 American Society of Plastic Surgeons