Journal Logo

Ideas and Innovations

A Mathematical Design in Creating the New Nipple-Areolar Complex in Vertical Mammaplasty

Jessica Lai, Hui Min MBBS; Lam, Thomas FRCS (Ed.), FRCS (Glas.), FRACS

Author Information
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open: July 2014 - Volume 2 - Issue 7 - p e177
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000130
  • Open
  • Australia

Abstract

Vertical mammaplasty for mastopexy or breast reduction was first introduced by Dartigues1 in 1925 and subsequently modified by many2–8 in an attempt to improve cosmesis. In the early 1990s, the technique was popularized by Lejour.9 Before this, majority of breast reductions were performed using the Wise pattern.10

In Lejour’s planning for marking the new nipple-areolar complex (NAC), she described a free-hand drawing of a “dome”-shaped periareolar curve measuring 14–16 cm in length to suit the patient’s individual body habitus and desired postoperative result.9 The method of drawing this curve was not specified and suggested to be chosen according to the preferred method of the surgeon.

It has been said that plastic surgeons can be divided into the artistic ones who operate freely and those who are more mathematically minded and operate according to a preplanned drawing. Methods that have been proposed to date include using a malleable dome-shaped areolar marker,11 intraoperative positioning using discs cut from adhesive surgical tape,12 a modified compass with adjustable limbs,13 a flexible ruler,14 and a wire coat hanger.15 These methods are somewhat technically fiddly and require additional equipment. We hereby present our “mathematical” method of designing the areolar marking for the Lejour technique or vertical mastopexy/breast reduction. We have found this method to produce consistent results and is easy for those who are accustomed to the Wise pattern marking10 to adopt.

DESIGN

The location of the new NAC is first marked preoperatively using the surgeon’s preferred method, usually 23–25 cm from the sternal notch in line with the existing nipple at the level of or 1–2 cm above the inframammary fold. Two lines are drawn extending downward on either side of the existing NAC at a 75-degree angle from the breast meridian (Fig. 1). A vertical line is then drawn 2 cm superior to the nipple position to mark the top end of the new areola (point A in Fig. 1). Next, 2 lines measuring 3 cm down the previously drawn 2 limbs are marked (points B and C). These 3 points are then joined with a curved line which forms the outline of the new areola (lines AB and AC). Intraoperatively, one can tag the points BC together with a suture to form the inferior curved border of the new areola and confirm it with a 42 mm diameter nipple marker (Figs. 2, 3).

F1-8
Fig. 1:
Marking of the new nipple-areolar complex.
F2-8
Fig. 2:
Comparing the new nipple-areolar complex size with a 42-mm diameter nipple marker.

Mathematically, this design forms a somewhat asymmetric circle with a diameter of just <5 cm. The circumference of a circle with a diameter of 5 cm would be: Circumference = π × diameter, that is, 3.14 × 5 = 15.7 cm which is within Lejour’s recommended 14–16 cm.8,9 Using this new nipple marking as the top of the new nipple location, and assuming an average nipple of approximately 1-cm round, the resultant areola will be 2 cm all round with this design. A simple diagram summarizing the steps described above is shown in Figure 4.

F3-8
Fig. 3:
Confirming the new nipple-areolar complex size with a 42-mm diameter nipple marker.
F4-8
Fig. 4:
Diagram illustrating marking of the new nipple-areolar complex.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a simple mathematical method of marking a new NAC for Lejour’s technique or vertical mammaplasty which is easily adapted by one who is more accustomed to the Wise pattern marking or who prefers more mathematically or formulated markings.

REFERENCES

1. Dartigues L.. Traitement chirurgical du prolapses mammaire Arch Franco Belg Chir. 1925;28:313
2. Arié G.. A new technique of mammaplasty Rev Latinoam Cir Plast. 1957;3:23
3. Lassus C. A technique for breast reduction. Int Surg. 1970;53:69–72
4. Lassus C.. New refinements in vertical mammaplasty Chir Plast. 1981;6:81
5. Marchac D, de Olarte G. Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:45–55
6. Lassus C. Breast reduction: evolution of a technique–a single vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1987;11:107–112
7. Renó WT. Reduction mammaplasty with a circular folded pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:65–74; discussion 75
8. Lejour M. Vertical Mammaplasty and Liposuction of the Breast. 1994 St. Louis Quality Medical Publishing
9. Lejour M. Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:100–114
10. Wise RJ. A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1956;17:367–375
11. Ackerman BM. Areola marker for vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1833
12. Vogt PM, Mühlberger T, Torres A, et al. Method for intraoperative positioning of the nipple-areola complex in vertical scar reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2096–2099
13. Paloma V, Samper A, Sanz J. A simple device for marking the areola in Lejour’s mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:2134–2135; discussion 2136
14. Borman H. Periareolar marking in Lejour’s mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1582
15. Kavka S. A simple device for marking the areola in vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:2087
© 2014 American Society of Plastic Surgeons