Table 3 lists the epidemiological data assessed.
The following parameters were evaluated:
- Percentage of dermal regeneration template and integration of skin graft (evaluation by digital image software)11;
- Resolution of the wound (complete coverture of bone and tendon);
- Duration of treatment up to final wound closure.
For the treatment, all patients had surgical debridement performed to get wound bed preparation and obtain a clean wound. Only one debridement was performed in 6 patients, 2 debridements in 4 patients, 3 debridements in 5 patients, and more than 3 debridements in 5 patients (a mean of 2.7 debridements per patient).
The average time of the first surgery (since the trauma occurrence up to the debridement) was 6 days (minimum: 1 day/maximum: 19 days). The period needed to prepare the wound bed up to the placement of the dermal regeneration template was 13.2 days on average (minimum: 1 day/maximum: 22 days). The maturation period of the dermal template until performing skin grafting was on average 12.6 days (minimum: 4 days/maximum: 18 days). The average area of wound covered with Integra was 87.2 cm2 (minimum: 6 cm2/maximum: 312 cm2).
The integration of the dermal regeneration template was on average 86.5% of wound area. Complete integration of the skin graft over the dermal matrix was achieved in 14 patients (70%), partial integration in 5 patients (25%), and total loss in just 1 case (5%). The wound has completely closed in 95% of patients. Only one patient had a failure and needed an additional skin graft. When there was partial integration of the graft (loss of up to 20%), the remaining wound was closed through dressing care on an outpatient basis.
The average time of treatment from the first attendance until discharge was 31.8 days. The mean follow-up was 10.6 months (minimum: 6 months/maximum: 24 months).
Reports12–14 of coverage of deep wounds with dermal matrices, especially with exposure of tendon and bone, show that usually these structures require surgical flaps to cover them and that is not appropriate to use skin grafts. In such cases, one might need to use a distant flap, a surgical procedure with longer duration and higher morbidity, requiring specialized equipment and trained microsurgery staff, which are not always available. Thus, dermal templates may be indicated to cover deep wounds in limbs to reduce the surgical morbidity, some especially in debilitated patients with no clinical conditions to undergo a long-duration procedure.
In deep wounds on the dorsum of the hand or on fingers or foot where the flaps have a coarser contour (even cutaneous flaps), the use of a dermal template provides adequate coverage with a more delicate contour and in maintaining the anatomical characteristics of the area15 (Fig. 1).
Another attractive option for dermal template in complex wounds is as a rescue procedure in loss of free flaps, allowing the resolution of the wound by using the matrix associated with skin grafting. In this series, 3 wounds had been covered primarily with free flaps that had a total loss (Fig. 2).
Negative-pressure devices were used over the dermal template to obtain a faster maturation (approximately 1–2 weeks) and a higher quality of integration.8–10,16,17 This association keeps the matrix immobilized, leaves the wound bed moist and free of debris, prevents the accumulation of fluid collections, and reduces bacterial colonization of the wound. All these factors favor a faster maturation of the dermal regeneration template.
The 86.5% area of integration rate of the matrix and the 70% of cases of total integration of skin graft were considered suitable because the treated wounds were complex injuries and only the skin graft alone would not solve the problem. In the presented cases, 95% of wounds resolved with no need for additional procedures (flaps). Helgeson et al,12 in a retrospective study, evaluated the Integra dermal matrix associated with negative-pressure therapy in 16 patients suffering from war trauma with exposed bone or tendon. They reported success in 83% of patients. The success rate presented here was 95%. We had 1 case failure probably due to inadequate skin graft taking (a too thick skin grafting). This case needed a thin skin regrafting over the dermal template for resolution.
Taras et al,18 in a prospective study with application of Integra in 17 digital trauma patients with exposure of deep structures, showed a successful full-thickness skin grafting in 20 digits after 21 days of maturation. They reported partial loss of 15–25% and no total losses. In our study, we used partial skin grafting after an average maturity period of 12.6 days, and we had total integration in 70%, partial integration in 25% (loss of up to 20% of the grafted area), and total loss in 5% of patients. Most authors recommend performing a partial skin graft on the matrix to avoid loss as its vascularization is still incipient by 3 weeks.
Weigert et al19 retrospectively studied 15 patients with severe trauma on their hands and exposure of tendon or bone. The average area of the wound was 62 cm2, the preparation time up to the placement of the dermal template was 26 days, the maturation time of the dermal template was 26 days, and the resolution of the wound was 87%. In our study, the average area of the wound was 87.2 cm2, the average preparation time up to the dermal template was 13.2 days, the maturation time of the template was 12.6 days, and the resolution of the wound was 95% of cases. These favorable results are probably due to the use of negative-pressure therapy.
In short, the use of the Integra dermal template together with the negative-pressure therapy and skin grafting as a subsequent treatment showed adequate rate of resolution of deep wounds with low morbidity.
1. Ferreira MC, Paggiaro AO, Isaac C, et al. [Skin substitutes: current concepts and a new classification system]. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26:696–702
2. Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke J, et al. Artificial dermis for major burns. A multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 1988;208:313–320
3. Stern R, McPherson M, Longaker MT. Histologic study of artificial skin used in the treatment of full-thickness thermal injury. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990;11:7–13
4. Ryan CM, Schoenfeld DA, Malloy M, et al. Use of Integra artificial skin is associated with decreased length of stay for severely injured adult burn survivors. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002;23:311–317
5. Lee LF, Porch JV, Spenler W, et al. Integra in lower extremity reconstruction after burn injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1256–1262
6. Yannas IV, Burke JF. Design of an artificial skin: I. Basic design principles. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14:65–81
7. Moiemen NS, Vlachou E, Staiano JJ, et al. Reconstructive surgery with Integra dermal regeneration template: histologic study, clinical evaluation, and current practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):160S–174S
8. Fraccalvieri M, Pristerà G, Zingarelli E, et al. Treatment of chronic heel osteomyelitis in vasculopathic patients. Can the combined use of Integra®, skin graft and negative pressure wound therapy be considered a valid therapeutic approach after partial tangential calcanectomy? Int Wound J. 2012;9:214–220
9. Molnar JA, DeFranzo AJ, Hadaegh A, et al. Acceleration of Integra incorporation in complex tissue defects with subatmospheric pressure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1339–1346
10. Stiefel D, Schiestl CM, Meuli M. The positive effect of negative pressure: vacuum-assisted fixation of Integra artificial skin for reconstructive surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:575–580
12. Helgeson MD, Potter BK, Evans KN, et al. Bioartificial dermal substitute: a preliminary report on its use for the management of complex combat-related soft tissue wounds. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:394–399
13. Violas P, Abid A, Darodes P, et al. Integra artificial skin in the management of severe tissue defects, including bone exposure, in injured children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:381–384
14. Iorio ML, Shuck J, Attinger CE. Wound healing in the upper and lower extremities: a systematic review on the use of acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):232S–241S
15. Ghazi BH, Williams JK. Use of Integra in complex pediatric wounds. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:493–496
16. Jeschke MG, Rose C, Angele P, et al. Development of new reconstructive techniques: use of Integra in combination with fibrin glue and negative-pressure therapy for reconstruction of acute and chronic wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:525–530
17. Moiemen NS, Yarrow J, Kamel D, et al. Topical negative pressure therapy: does it accelerate neovascularisation within the dermal regeneration template, Integra? A prospective histological in vivo study. Burns. 2010;36:764–768
18. Taras JS, Sapienza A, Roach JB, et al. Acellular dermal regeneration template for soft tissue reconstruction of the digits. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:415–421
© 2014 American Society of Plastic Surgeons
19. Weigert R, Choughri H, Casoli V. Management of severe hand wounds with Integra® dermal regeneration template. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36:185–193