Purpose:
The social determinants of health are a well-established health care industry priority. Robust data associated with psychosocial circumstances for populations validate poor health outcomes. However, another domain begs for inclusion and industry attention. A mental health chasm has emerged amid a post-COVID-19 landscape fraught with escalating health disparities, morbidity, and mortality. Themes of trauma, diversity, equity, and inclusion are major organizational imperatives. As a result, an expanded focus on the social determinants of mental health (SDoMH) mandates dedicated perspective. Part 1, of this 2 article series, on the SDoMH will provide distinct understanding of relevant industry terminology, historical drivers, and macro factors that influence mental health, along with health disparities. In addition, this article will set the foundation to advance the industry's quality compass, the Triple/Quadruple Aim.
Learning Outcomes:
After reading this article, learners will be able to:
- define the social determinants of mental health (SDoMH);
- distinguish them from the social determinants of health (SDoH);
- explore foundational concepts related to the SDoMH;
- understand upstream drivers of the SDoMH; and
- present evidence that validates attention to the wholistic health triad.
Finding/Conclusion:
Access to quality wholistic health care encompasses pathophysiology, psychopathology, and psychosocial circumstances, and is a considerable challenge across populations. Mental health, along with health disparities, has been fueled by enduring systematic racism that has facilitated inadequate funding, poor reimbursement, decreased treatment options, and pervasive stigma across diverse patient populations (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, familial status, disability, socioeconomic status). These SDoMH mandate a critical fresh lens by case management to ensure the most proactive and comprehensive approach to care. To achieve the successful outcomes mandated by this approach, the industry's quality compass, the Triple/Quadruple Aim must be expanded to include a Quintile Aim of wholistic health equity.
Implications for Case Management Practice:
Case management's unique transdisciplinary composition has the workforce well positioned to effect grand change in population health perspectives. Wider attention to clinical and fiscal outcomes for health and mental health inequities mandates innovative approaches to patient care, which encompass a wholistic health triad of pathophysiology, psychopathology, and psychosocial circumstances.
