A Randomized Study Comparing the Short-Term Neurocognitive Outcome of Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Patients With Depression : Journal of Psychiatric Practice®

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Articles

A Randomized Study Comparing the Short-Term Neurocognitive Outcome of Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Patients With Depression

ABDEL LATIF, AHMED MD; NASRELDIN, MOHAMED MD; ABDEL KADER, ANN MD; FATHY, HEBA MD; MOUSSA, SUAAD MD; BASHEER, MYE MD; ELSHEIKH, ADLY MSc; MADBOULY, NAGWAN MD

Author Information
Journal of Psychiatric Practice 26(1):p 23-36, January 2020. | DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000436

Abstract

Background: 

Studies have compared electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with regard to their clinical efficacy in the treatment of depression, but only a few studies have addressed their differential impact on cognition. The purpose of this study was to compare the neurocognitive side effects of both treatment modalities.

Methods: 

In this comparative study, 40 patients with major depressive disorder referred for ECT were randomly assigned either to a course of 25 sessions of rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or to a course of ECT ranging from 4 to 8 sessions. The primary outcome measures were the results of a cognitive battery that assessed different aspects of cognitive functioning. The cognitive battery comprised the Digit Span Subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, the Stroop Color-Word Test-Victoria version, the Color Trails Test Trials 1 and 2, and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test.

Results: 

At the end of treatment, scores on the Digit Span Subtest, the Stroop Color-Word Test-Victoria version, and the Color Trails Test showed statistically significant better results in the rTMS group compared with the ECT group.

Conclusions: 

rTMS was well tolerated with less negative impact on cognitive functioning than ECT.

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid