Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

New Inferomedial Based Mammaplasty with L-Scar

Gabriel, Stratis M.D.; Mantalos, Panagiotis N. M.D.; Enchef, Angelos M.D.; Gianopoulos, Evangelos M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: March 2009 - Volume 123 - Issue 3 - p 115e-117e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819a34c4
VIEWPOINTS

Psychico General Hospital (Gabriel)

IKA Athens Oncologic Hospital (Mantalos)

Psychico General Hospital Athens, Greece (Enchef, Gianopoulos)

Correspondence to Dr. Mantalos; IKA Athens Ongologic Hospital; 4, Asopiou Street; Athens 11473, Greece; info@mantalos.gr

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

More than ever before, the minimal scarring techniques used in mammaplasty have today become very popular.2–4 An alternative reduction mammaplasty technique is described by the authors that results in an L-shaped scar, with the nipple-areola complex based on an inferomedial pedicle flap.

Sixty-three patients were operated on using this method over the past 30 months. Twenty-three of them underwent reduction mammaplasty and 40 underwent mastopexy. The average patient age was 35.8 years. In the reduction cases, the maximum weight of the removed tissue was 940 g.

The incision lines were marked preoperatively, as usual, with the Wise pattern and the A, B, C, D, and E points. The new point (F) is determined on the bisector of the angle (C-E-D) by pinching the loose skin of the breast, between points B and E (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

After these first markings, the corresponding points are sutured with temporary stay stitches, as follows: point F to B, point C to B1, and point C1 to A1. Then, the new areola margins are rearranged, because point A2 is now inside the new areola circle, and not in the new perimeter.

After the former, the new outer and inner contours of the new pattern are drawn, which comprises an L-curve that starts from point A1 (C1) and continues through points B1 (C) and B (F), and ends at point D of the Wise pattern. Next, the temporary stitches are removed, and the inferomedial pedicle for the nipple-areola complex is marked.

The skin is incised down to the muscle fascia, first in the inner pole and then in the outer one. In the inner pole, the incision is not as inferior toward the inframammary fold as in the outer one. It stops between points C and F. The two adipocutaneous flaps are unified by cutting through the mammary parenchyma just above the nipple, leaving an adequate amount of tissue on the upper pole (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

In cases of reduction mammaplasty, a horseshoe-shaped section of tissue (but with a shorter medial limb) is removed from around the nipple flap.2

The upper pole flap is undermined onto the pectoralis fascia, as far as the second rib, creating space for the top of the nipple flap to come in between. When the nipple-areola complex flap is too heavy, a suspension absorbable pexy stitch is used at this point.3 Wound closure is started, in the opposite way.

There were no major complications. Advantages of the method include the following: standardized easy marking; there is no medial scar; complications are rare and minor; immediate and early postoperative aesthetic results are very satisfactory; better shape and more complete projection of the breast than with inverted-T techniques because of a longer vertical scar; avoidance of the pleating of the vertical scar technique; and it has an easy learning curve for beginners. Disadvantages of the method include the distance from the areola to the submammary fold, which is longer than with other methods (7 to 13 cm).4,5

With this new method, we have not so far experienced the relatively common complications of reduction mammaplasty, related to inadequate blood perfusion of the nipple-areola complex flap. We think that the key reason is the extramedial component of the base of the inferior flap.

Stratis Gabriel, M.D.

Psychico General Hospital

Panagiotis N. Mantalos, M.D.

IKA Athens Oncologic Hospital

Angelos Enchef, M.D.

Evangelos Gianopoulos, M.D.

Psychico General Hospital Athens, Greece

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Robbins T. A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:64–67.
2. Chiari AJ. The L short scar mammaplasty: A new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:233–246.
3. Lassus C. A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:373–380.
4. Meyer R, Kasserling U. Reduction mammaplasty with an L-shaped suture line: Development of different techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55:139–148.
5. Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grunert JG. The limited scar mastopexy: Current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1622–1630.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Section Description

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-avail able basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ en kwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be d isclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to pub lish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect t he policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

©2009American Society of Plastic Surgeons